• <table id="gigg0"></table>
  • west china medical publishers
    Keyword
    • Title
    • Author
    • Keyword
    • Abstract
    Advance search
    Advance search

    Search

    find Keyword "Systematic Review" 25 results
    • Statins Therapy for C-reactive Protein and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Patients with Cerebral Infarction: A Systematic Review

      Objective To determine the effectiveness of statins in reducing C-reactive protein in patients with cerebral infarction and the potency of C-reactive protein as an indicator for preventing cerebrovascular events. Methods We searched PubMed, EMbase, Central Register of Controlled Trials, CBMdisc and CNKI from the date of establishment through August 2008. Bibliographies of the retrieved articles were also checked. Data was extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently with a designed extraction form. The RevMan 5.0 software was used to carry out meta-analysis. Results Twenty-three randomized trials involving 1946 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed the following: statins reduced C-reactive protein compared to the control group (WMD= –5.79, 95%CI –7.32 to –4.26); statins were associated with a reduction of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) (WMD= –0.21, 95%CI –0.25 to –0.17); atorvastatin greatly reduced C-reactive protein than the simvastatin control group (WMD= –1.78, 95%CI –3.92 to 0.36); statins were associated with a slight improvement in neurological deficit (OR= 2.22, 95%CI 0.94 to 5.21). Conclusion The evidence currently available shows that statins can reduce C-reactive protein and carotid IMT in the patients with cerebral infarction compared to the control group. However, it is not clear whether statins reducing C-reactive protein is correlated to the improvement of neurological deficit and prognosis. Similar trials in future should focus on the relationship between the change of C-reactive protein and clinical outcomes.

      Release date:2016-09-07 02:10 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • Bias Control of Systematic Reviews

      The most important difference between systematic review and traditional narrative review lies in their respective quality, namely the degree of bias control. Generally speaking, the sources of bias include the process of literature searching, study selection, data extraction and original studies. A systematic review may greatly reduce bias, as it takes effective steps such as developing search strategies, undertaking funnel plot analysis, using established criteria for study selection, and assessment of the methodology quality of studies. All these help to control, identify and, describe the possible bias.

      Release date:2016-09-07 02:27 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • Conservative in the Treatment of Protrusion of Cervical Vertebra Intervertebral Disc: A Systematic Review

      Objective To evaluate the effect and safety of the conservative treatment for the protrusion of cervical vertebra intervertebral disc. Methods We searched CBM disk (1978~2007), CNKI (1979~2007), VIP (1989~2007). Telephone interviewed the original authors of claimed randomized controlled trials(RCTs) to identify whether they are truly RCTs. Only true RCTs and quasi-randomized controlled trials were included and the quality of them was critically assessed. Results Five RCTs and eleven quasi-randomized controlled trials were identified and included. It showed that lifting-massage, massage combining with traction or acupuncture, articulus mobilization combining with traction and electrotherapy, traction combining with computer intermediate frequency therapeusis and injectio ad acumen combining with massage have marked improvement. But it could hardly draw a conclusion that all the combining therapies had better curative effect. Conclusions Weak evidence shows that combining conservative treatment can improve the curative effect of the protrusion of cervical vertebra intervertebral disc. The results need to be supported by well designed and high quality trials.

      Release date:2016-09-07 02:09 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • Neonatal Resuscitation Technique in Reducing Neonatal Asphyxia Rate and Mortality Rate in China: A Systematic Review

      ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of promoting neonatal resuscitation technique in treatment of neonatal asphyxia in China. MethodsElectronical databases including WanFang Data, CNKI, VIP, Jiangsu Engineering and Technology Literature Information Center, PubMed and The Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2016) were searched to collect studies of neonatal resuscitation technique in treatment of neonatal asphyxia up to June 1st, 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk bias of included studies, and then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of eighteen observational studies were included, involving 28 144 cases of neonatal asphyxia and 32 636 cases of control, 2 148 death cases of neonatal asphyxia and 1 679 cases of controls. The results of meta-analysis showed that neonatal resuscitation technique could reduce newborn suffocation rate compared with the control group in hospital surveys (RR=0.59, 95%CI 0.55 to 0.63, P<0.000 01) and in regional project surveys (RR=0.72, 95%CI 0.69 to 0.75, P<0.000 01). Neonatal resuscitation could also reduce neonatal asphyxia mortality rate in hospital surveys (RR=0.26, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.42, P<0.000 01) and in regional surveys (RR=0.65, 95%CI 0.55 to 0.77, P<0.000 01). ConclusionThe existing evidence shows that neonatal resuscitation technology could effectively reduce the incidence of neonatal asphyxia and mortality rate in China. Due to the limitations of the quantity and quality of present studies, we need to carry out prospective multicenter cohort studies to verify the current results.

      Release date:2016-12-21 03:39 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • Effectiveness of GnRH Antagonist In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer (IVF-ET) in PCOS Patients: A Systematic Review

      Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of GnRH antagonist in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients.Methods Such databases as PubMed (1997 to 2010), PML (1997 to 2010), FMJS (2000 to 2010), CBMdisc (1979 to 2010), CNKI (1994 to 2010), VIP (1989 to 2010), WanFang (1994 to 2010), and duxiu scholar searcher (www.duxiu.com), and nine relevant Chinese journals were searched for retrieving the randomized controlled trails (RCTs) on the effectiveness of GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist for IVF-ET in PCOS Patients. The studies were screened according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria by two reviewers independently, the data was abstracted and the quality was evaluated. The RevMan 4.2.7 software was used for Meta-analyses. Results Six grade-B studies involving 699 participants were included. The results of Meta-analyses showed that, compared with the GnRH agonist, there was no significant difference in the GnRH antagonist group about the stimulation duration (WMD= –1.23, 95%CI –2.76 to –0.31), dose of gonadotrophins (Gns) (WMD= –4.87, 95%CI –14.20 to 4.46), serum E2 value on the day of HCG administration (WMD= 31.37, 95%CI –263.40 to 326), number of oocytes retrieved (WMD= 1.34, 95%CI –1.02 to 4.70), clinical pregnancy rate (OR= 1.27, 95%CI 0.77 to2.10), and miscarraige rate (Peto OR= 0.67, 95%CI 0.38 to1.18). But the OHSS rate in the GnRH antagonist group was lower with a significant difference (Peto OR= 0.35, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.50). Conclusions Compared with the GnRH agonist protocol, the GnRH antagonist protocol can obviously reduce the incidence of OHSS, but has the same effect in Gn dose, retrieving oocytes and clinical pregnancy rate. Because the GnRH antagonist can decrease the treatment duration and cost, and has better safety, so it may be an ideal choice for PCOS patients to have IVF-ET therapy. For the quality and quantity limitation, and the methodology difference of the included studies, it is suggested that the conclusion from this study should be only served as a reference of clinical analyses, and should be revaluated and updated unceasingly.

      Release date:2016-09-07 11:06 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • Bibliometric Analysis of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Published in the Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

      Objective To conduct bibliometric analysis of systematic review and meta-analysis published in the Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine. Methods Based on the Chinese academic periodical network as a data pool, literature on systematic reviews (involving meta-analysis) and clinical decision-making researches were retrieved in the Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Magazine from 2001 to 2010, screened and categorized by the medical and hygienic standards of Chinese Library Classification (fourth edition), and then were counted and sorted. Results There were 425 articles about systematic reviews (involving meta-analyses) and clinical decision-making studies in the Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Magazine, with an yearly increasing number. Basically, those articles involved all subjects such as clinical medicine, preclinical medicine, hygenics, pharmacy, and traditional Chinese medicine. Conclusion Development levels of evidence-based research in medical subjects are different, each of which has its own feature. Also, some systematic reviews do not strictly follow the Cochrane Handbook. Therefore, high-quality systematic review is still needed in each subject.

      Release date:2016-09-07 10:58 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • Performance of TCu380A Compared with Other Common IUDs: A Systematic Review

      Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of TCu380AIUD comparing with other common IUDs. Methods CBMDISC (1979 to 2005), Wanfang (1994 to 2005), CNKI (1974 to 2005), CMCC (1979 to 2005), CMAC (1994 to 2005), EMbase (1974 to 2004), MEDLINE (1974 to 2005), WHO/RHL (2004 to 2005), The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2004), SCI (1985 to 2005), POPLINE (1966 to 2003) and 9 relevant journals were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TCu380AIUD with other common IUDs. The quality of included trials was critically appraised. RevMan4.2.7 software was used for statistical analysis. Results Fifteen published studies involving 20 417 participants were included. The results of meta-analyses were expressed with OR (cumulative expulsion rate, cumulative pregnancy rate, cumulative rate of removing for medical reasons) and 95% CI. Compared with TCu380A, TCu220C resulted in lower cumulative expulsion rate at 0.5 and 1 year of follow-up [OR 0.36 (0.18 to 0.70); 0.44 (0.31 to 0.62), respectively], higher cumulative pregnancy rate at ten years of follow-up [1.22 (1.04 to 1.43)], lower cumulative rate of removing for medical reasons at 0.5 year of follow-up [0.59 (0.36 to 0.97)]; MLCu375 resulted in higher cumulative expulsion rate at 1 year of follow-up [2.17 (1.29 to 3.67)], higher cumulative pregnancy rate at 1 and 2 years of follow-up [1.72 (1.18 to 2.50); 1.28 (1.02 to 1.60)]; UCD300 resulted in lower cumulative expulsion rate at five years of follow-up [0.38 (0.27 to 0.56)]; Medicated Gamma 380IUD resulted in lower cumulative rate of removing for medical reasons at 1 year of follow-up [0.31 (0.14 to 0.70)]. Conclusions Compared with TCu380A which is considered as a standard of IUDs, the performance of TCu220C is inferior in contraception, but TCu220C is also a good IUD in performance; The overall clinical performance of MLCu375IUD was as good as that of TCu380A; UCD300 is of the characteristic of lower cumulative expulsion rate; Medicated Gamma 380IUD can decrease side effects effectively. However, larger multi-center randomized comparative trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm the conclusion

      Release date:2016-08-25 03:34 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • Clinical Practice Guidelines on Infertility: A Systematic Review

      Objective To systematically review the methodological quality of guidelines concerning infertility, so as to provide references for clinical practice. Methods Guidelines concerning infertility were electronically retrieved (from inception to Feb. 2013) in PubMed, EMbase, CBM, WanFang Data, CNKI, GIN guideline database guideline development websites (including NGC, NICE, SIGN, NZGG, SOGC, etc.), and medical associtation websites (including IFFS, FIGO, ESHRE, NFOG, RCOG, ASRM, ACOG, etc.). We also searched Chinese guideline websites including the website of the National Health and Family Planning Commission of People’s Republic of China, CGC (China Guideline Clearinghouse), and CPGN (Clinical Practice Guideline Net). Two reviews independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and assessed the quality of guideline development and reporting using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II). Results a) A total of 16 guidelines concerning infertility were included, with development time ranging from 1998 to 2012. Among 16 guidelines, 10 guidelines were made by the USA, 3 by Britan, 1 by the Europe, and 1 by America and Europe. b) The scores of guidelines according to the domains of AGREE II decreased from “Clarity of presentations, scope and purpose”, “Participants”, “Applicability”, “Rigour of development”, and “Editorial independence”. 16 guidelines were generally low in quality. The levels of recommendations were Level A (5 guidelines), Level B (8 guidelines), and Level C (3 guidelines). c) Four evidence-based guidelines scored the top three in the domain of “Rigour of development”. d) The recommendations of different guidelines were fairly the same. e) No guidelines on infertility have been developed in China. Conclusion a) The guidelines on infertility should be improved in “Rigour of development” and “Applicability” in future. Conficts of interest should be addressed. b) Guidelines are recommended to be developed on the basis of the methods of evidence-based medicine, and best evidence is recommended. c) National organizations such as ASRM should be established in China, so as to develop biomedicine and TCM guidelines based on evidence and regulate the treatment. d) For the general assessment of guidelines, AGREE II should offer threshold criteria of suggestion.

      Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • Level of Serum Neurone Specific Enolase and Prognosis in Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

      Objective To evaluate the prognostic value of the level of serum neurone specific enolase (NSE) in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMbase, CBMdisc, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1950 to December 2007). Studies meeting the eligibility criteria were retrieved and their bibliographies were checked for other relevant publications. The quality of included studies was evaluated by 2 reviewers independently. Meta-analyses were performed for the results of homogeneous studies using STATA 7.0 software. Results Nine studies involving 2 021 SCLC patients were included. About 66.0% of patients had high serum levels of NSE, according to the cut-off value defined by the authors. The hazard ratio (HR) of high levels of NSE for overall survival (OS) was 1.27 times of that of low levels of NSE for OS in SCLC patients (95% CI 1.19 to 1.35, P=0.281). Conclusion  Patients with high levels of NSE appear to have a poorer OS compared with those with low levels of NSE, thus the level of NSE has a prognostic value in SCLC patients. Due to the potential publication bias, selection bias, and measurement bias among these studies, the conclusion should be interpreted carefully. More high-quality homogeneous studies are required to accurately evaluate the prognostic value of NSE.

      Release date:2016-08-25 03:36 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • Impact of Perioperative Use of Clopidogrel on Coronary Bypass Grafting Patients: A Meta-Analysis

      Objective To systematically evaluate impact of perioperative use of clopidogrel on coronary bypass grafting (CABG) patients for anti-platelet treatment, in order to provide evidence for the rational drug use of such patients in the perioperative period. Methods PubMed, EMbase, HighWire, CENTRAL and its affiliated clinical trial registered data center, CBM and CNKI were electronically searched from 2003 to November, 2012. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized clinical trials on perioperative use of clopidogrel of CABG patients were collected. References of included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened studies according to exclusion and inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results 18 studies (including 10 RCTs and 8 non-randomized clinical trials) involving 14 592 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: a) Among 10 included RCTs, preoperative use of clopidogrel for anti-platelet treatment reduced the incidence of myocardial infarction obviously, compared with the blank control group (RR=0.63, 95%CI 0.48 to 0.83, P=0.000 9), but there is no significant difference between the two groups in blood loss amount within 24 hours after operation (MD=130, 95%CI –6.21 to 266.22, P=0.06), the number of reoperation patients because of bleeding (RR=1.42, 95%CI 0.92 to 2.20, P=0.12), and risk of postoperative short-term death (RR=1.19, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.58, P=0.24); b) Among 8 non-randomized clinical trials, there was no significant difference between the two groups in reducing the incidence of myocardial infarction (RR=0.83, 95%CI 0.30 to 2.26, P=0.71), but preoperative use of clopidogrel for anti-platelet treatment significantly increased blood loss amount within 24 hours after operation (MD=82.42, 95%CI 35.18 to 129.66, P=0.000 6), the number of reoperation patients because of bleeding (RR=1.71, 95%CI 1.07 to 2.75, P=0.03), and risk of postoperative short-term death (RR=1.89, 95%CI 1.15 to 3.12, P=0.01). Conclusion Current evidence shows that, perioperative use of clopidogrel can reduce the incidence of myocardial infarction, but doctors should consider cautiously the increased risk of bleeding, re-operation and postoperative short-term death. There is contradiction between the results of RCTs and those of non-randomized clinical trials, which may result from the argument intensity, quantity and sample size bias of the included studies. The above conclusion should be proved by large-scale high-quality RCT results in future.

      Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
    3 pages Previous 1 2 3 Next

    Format

    Content

  • <table id="gigg0"></table>
  • 松坂南