Objective To perform a systematic review on the safety (i.g. cardiovascular, mortality and gastrointestinal bleeding) of clopidogrel versus clopidogrel combined with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the patients with coronary heart disease. Methods Such databases as The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, SSCI, VIP, CNKI, and CBM were searched from the date of their establishment to September 2010. The bibliographies of the retrieved articles were also checked. The data was extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently. The RevMan 5.0 software was used for meta-analyses. Results A total of 29 studies were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that the use of clopidogrel combined with PPIs was associated with increasing the risk of cardiovascular events (RR=1.27, 95%CI 1.09 to 1.47), as well as myocardial infarction (RR=1.45, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.76), total mortality (RR=1.23, 95%CI 1.06 to 1.43), and rethrombosis (RR=1.37, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.86). However, there was no enough evidence to reach the conclusion that the combination use could benefit the situation of gastrointestinal bleeding (RR=0.84, 95%CI 0.47 to 1.50). Conclusion?Compared with clopidogrel, the combination use of clopidogrel and PPIs increases cardiovascular events, mortality, and the risks of myocardial infarction and rethrombosis. However, more clinical studies are required to assess the effect of reducing gastrointestinal bleeding.
目的:觀察用白眉蛇毒血凝酶(邦亭)治療上消化道出血的療效。方法 上消化道出血患者90例,隨機分為治療組和對照組,所有病例均給予擴容及調整水電解質紊亂,靜滴奧美拉唑42.6mg,每日1次;靜滴卡絡磺鈉60mg,每日1次,重度貧血者予輸血。治療組再應用邦亭4 KU加生理鹽水20mL口服,每日2次,對照組用去甲腎上腺素8mg加生理鹽水90mL,每日分3次口服。結果 治療組總有效率93.75%,對照組總有效率8095%,兩組臨床療效差異有統計學意義(Plt;0.05)結論:白眉蛇毒血凝酶是一種有效的、安全的治療上消化道出血的藥物,在臨床止血治療中值得推廣應用。
Objective To explore the feasibility and safety of liver transplantation （LT） in treatment of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in patients with portal hypertension， and to compare the therapeutic effects with conventional operation （CO）. Methods The clinical data of 303 patients with bleeding portal hypertension from Feb. 2009 to Feb. 2012 in the department of hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery of First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University were retrospectively analyzed. One hundred and one patients received LT procedure （LT group）， whereas the other 202 patients received CO procedure （CO group）. Postoperative follow-up period was 8-44 months （average 26 months）. Results Liver function before operation in CO group was significantly better than that in LT group（P＜0.01）. The mortality of CO group and LT group were 7.4%（14/189） and 3.0%（3/101， P=1.00）， respectively. The rebleeding rate of patients underwent LT was 2.0%（2/101）， significantly lower than that of CO group 〔9.5%（18/189）， P＜0.05〕. The vanish rate of esophagogastric varice in patients underwent LT was 86.1%（87/101）， significantly lower than that of CO group 〔54.5%（86/189）， P＜0.01〕. Conclusions LT treatment for bleeding portal hypertension is feasible and safe. Patients with good liver function despite hemorrhage history may be managed satisfactorily with conventional surgery. LT is the only curative treatment for patients with portal hypertension in end-stage liver disease.
Coronary heart disease with gastrointestinal bleeding is common in clinical practice. The disease is dangerous and has a high mortality rate. This article will review the risk factors for coronary heart disease with gastrointestinal bleeding (including Helicobacter pylori infection, long-term use of antiplatelet drugs and combined anticoagulation drugs), blood transfusion strategies (including hemoglobin transfusion thresholds and platelet transfusion strategies), and the management of antithrombotic drugs after bleeding (including the management of antiplatelet drugs and the management of anticoagulation combined with antiplatelet drugs). The purpose is to provide a theoretical basis for the diagnosis and treatment of coronary heart disease with gastrointestinal bleeding.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of esomeprazole versus omeprazole in the treatment of acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB).MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of esomeprazole versus omeprazole in the treatment of ANVUGIB from inception to January, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 17 RCTs involving 2 086 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, the total effective rate of esomeprazole group was higher than omeprazole group (RR=1.09, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.14, P=0.000 6), the incidence of adverse reactions was lower than omeprazole group (OR=0.27, 95%CI 0.18 to 0.40, P<0.000 01), the average hemostasis time was shorter than omeprazole group (MD=?0.64, 95%CI ?0.94 to ?0.34, P<0.0001), and the difference were statistically significant.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that in the treatment of ANVUGIB, esomeprazole has rapid hemostasis, significant effect and fewer adverse reactions, which is worthy of wide application and promotion. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.