Quality assessment of systematic reviews on community interventions in China_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

WANG Xiaoyan ¹ , LIU Ying ² ,  NING Yanhua ¹

1. Department of Community Nursing, the Nursing School of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, P.R.China;
2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Public Health School of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, P.R.China;

Corresponding?author：

NING Yanhua, Email: nyhl_ning@126.com

Keywords：

Community intervention; China; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Methodological quality; Reporting quality; AMSTAR; PRISMA

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.201710096

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

ObjectivesTo assess the characteristics, methodological and reporting qualities of systematic reviews on community interventions in China.MethodsThe Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data and CBM databases were searched for studies of community interventions from inception to August 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the methodological and reporting quality by AMSTAR tool and PRISMA checklist. Data analysis was performed by SPSS 20.0 software.ResultsA total of 18 systematic reviews of community interventions were included. The average AMSTAR score was 4.67±1.68, and all studies did not provide the list of included and excluded studies or a statement on conflict of interests. The average PRISMA score was 16.42±3.65, and over 50.0% of the included systematic reviews did not perform protocol and registration, search, additional analyses, risk of bias of included studies and funding.ConclusionsThe evidence shows that the reporting and methodological quality of meta-analyses of community interventions in China is insufficient. The combination of results, quality of individual research and the evaluation of publication bias should be paid more attention to improve methodological quality. The reporting of meta-analyses of community interventions in China should follow the PRISMA checklist.

Citation： WANG Xiaoyan, LIU Ying, NING Yanhua. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on community interventions in China. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2018, 18(7): 729-734. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.201710096 Copy

1.	World Health Organization. Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013-2020. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/94384/9789241506236_eng.pdf;jsessionid=B3A4C6D037E493D42552121DEEBE5B98?sequence=1.
2.	World Health Organization. Action plan for prevention and control of non-communicable diseases, 2015. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241597418_eng.pdf.
3.	齊力, 姜瑩瑩, 毛凡, 等. 社區慢性病防治工作現狀及居民對慢性病防治的認識和需求. 中國慢性病預防與控制, 2016, 24(4): 279-282.
4.	Carter MJ. Evidence-based medicine: an overview of key concepts. Ostomy Wound Manage, 2010, 56(4): 68.
5.	Nordmann AJ, Kasenda B, Briel M. Meta-analyses: what they can and cannot do. Swiss Med Wkly, 2012, 142(142): w13518.
6.	Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol, 2009, 62(10): 1013-1020.
7.	Knobloch K, Yoon U, Vogt PM, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2011, 39(2): 91-92.
8.	張建軍, 雷婷, 周慧. 社區干預對我國 2 型糖尿病療效影響的 Meta 分析. 華南預防醫學, 2017, 43(2): 122-125.
9.	張艾川, 牟善芳. 國內社區護理干預對老年性骨質疏松癥臨床結局影響的 Meta 分析. 湖南中醫雜志, 2016, 32(9): 153-156.
10.	楊維維, 劉沛, 巢健茜, 等. 社區干預對高血壓患者血壓影響 Meta 分析. 中國公共衛生, 2016, 32(5): 712-715.
11.	宋玉波, 孫佩佩, 高珊, 等. 中國老年高血壓患者社區管理效果的 Meta 分析. 社區醫學雜志, 2016, 14(16): 17-21.
12.	李越, 丁李路, 邊學峰, 等. 社區綜合干預對重性精神病患者復發率影響. 中國公共衛生, 2016, 32(3): 398-401.
13.	樂春燕. 社區護理干預對老年高血壓療效影響的 Meta 分析. 大家健康旬刊, 2016, 10(1): 193-193.
14.	丁桂花. 我國社區健康干預措施對兒童保健效果影響的系統評價. 中國婦幼衛生雜志, 2016, 7(2): 1-5.
15.	張炎, 孫秋英, 張敏, 等. 糖尿病醫院社區一體化管理模式效果的系統評價. 中華現代護理雜志, 2015, 21(26): 3132-3135.
16.	許意清, 李越, 姜寶法. 重性精神病患者肇事肇禍社區綜合管理干預效果 meta 分析. 中國公共衛生, 2015, 31(8): 1091-1094.
17.	饒琦. 全程護理干預療法對中國人群老年性癡呆效果的系統評價和 Meta 分析. 當代醫學, 2015, 21(18): 3-5.
18.	曾子, 田旭, 帥婷, 等. 國內社區護理干預對老年骨質疏松癥病人臨床結局影響的系統評價. 循證護理, 2015, 1(1): 12-20.
19.	薛秦香, 蘇敏. 對我國社區糖尿病治療效果的 Meta 分析. 中國衛生事業管理, 2014, 31(9): 654-658.
20.	吳暉, 劉波, 項兆均, 等. 我國社區干預糖代謝異常人群對心腦血管事件影響的薈萃分析. 上海醫藥, 2014, 35(12): 43-46.
21.	雷良蓉. 社區護理干預對老年糖尿病患者治療效果影響的 Meta 分析. 中國現代醫藥雜志, 2012, 14(4): 57-59.
22.	程桂香, 朱正盛. 高血壓患者遵醫行為社區護理干預 Meta 分析. 中國醫藥科學, 2011, 1(19): 41-42.
23.	孔令娜, 劉可儀, 周穎清. 社區護理干預對老年高血壓療效影響的 Meta 分析. 中國全科醫學, 2010, 13(13): 1462-1464.
24.	陳懷玉, 胡麗君. 社區干預對糖尿病患者遵醫行為影響的 Meta 分析. 中國全科醫學, 2010, 13(25): 2834-2836.
25.	郭彧, 李立明. 高血壓社區綜合防治效果的薈萃分析. 中華流行病學雜志, 2000, 21(3): 171-176.
26.	Chen Z. Launch of the health-care reform plan in China. Lancet, 2009, 373(9672): 1322.
27.	Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Jones A, et al. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals. JAMA, 1998, 280(3): 278-280.
28.	Zhang J, Wang J, Han L, et al. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals. Nurs Outlook, 2015, 63(4): 446.
29.	Ma B, Qi GQ, Lin XT, et al. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of acupuncture interventions published in Chinese journals. J Altern Complem Med, 2012, 18(9): 813.

1. World Health Organization. Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013-2020. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/94384/9789241506236_eng.pdf;jsessionid=B3A4C6D037E493D42552121DEEBE5B98?sequence=1.
2. World Health Organization. Action plan for prevention and control of non-communicable diseases, 2015. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241597418_eng.pdf.
3. 齊力, 姜瑩瑩, 毛凡, 等. 社區慢性病防治工作現狀及居民對慢性病防治的認識和需求. 中國慢性病預防與控制, 2016, 24(4): 279-282.
4. Carter MJ. Evidence-based medicine: an overview of key concepts. Ostomy Wound Manage, 2010, 56(4): 68.
5. Nordmann AJ, Kasenda B, Briel M. Meta-analyses: what they can and cannot do. Swiss Med Wkly, 2012, 142(142): w13518.
6. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol, 2009, 62(10): 1013-1020.
7. Knobloch K, Yoon U, Vogt PM, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2011, 39(2): 91-92.
8. 張建軍, 雷婷, 周慧. 社區干預對我國 2 型糖尿病療效影響的 Meta 分析. 華南預防醫學, 2017, 43(2): 122-125.
9. 張艾川, 牟善芳. 國內社區護理干預對老年性骨質疏松癥臨床結局影響的 Meta 分析. 湖南中醫雜志, 2016, 32(9): 153-156.
10. 楊維維, 劉沛, 巢健茜, 等. 社區干預對高血壓患者血壓影響 Meta 分析. 中國公共衛生, 2016, 32(5): 712-715.
11. 宋玉波, 孫佩佩, 高珊, 等. 中國老年高血壓患者社區管理效果的 Meta 分析. 社區醫學雜志, 2016, 14(16): 17-21.
12. 李越, 丁李路, 邊學峰, 等. 社區綜合干預對重性精神病患者復發率影響. 中國公共衛生, 2016, 32(3): 398-401.
13. 樂春燕. 社區護理干預對老年高血壓療效影響的 Meta 分析. 大家健康旬刊, 2016, 10(1): 193-193.
14. 丁桂花. 我國社區健康干預措施對兒童保健效果影響的系統評價. 中國婦幼衛生雜志, 2016, 7(2): 1-5.
15. 張炎, 孫秋英, 張敏, 等. 糖尿病醫院社區一體化管理模式效果的系統評價. 中華現代護理雜志, 2015, 21(26): 3132-3135.
16. 許意清, 李越, 姜寶法. 重性精神病患者肇事肇禍社區綜合管理干預效果 meta 分析. 中國公共衛生, 2015, 31(8): 1091-1094.
17. 饒琦. 全程護理干預療法對中國人群老年性癡呆效果的系統評價和 Meta 分析. 當代醫學, 2015, 21(18): 3-5.
18. 曾子, 田旭, 帥婷, 等. 國內社區護理干預對老年骨質疏松癥病人臨床結局影響的系統評價. 循證護理, 2015, 1(1): 12-20.
19. 薛秦香, 蘇敏. 對我國社區糖尿病治療效果的 Meta 分析. 中國衛生事業管理, 2014, 31(9): 654-658.
20. 吳暉, 劉波, 項兆均, 等. 我國社區干預糖代謝異常人群對心腦血管事件影響的薈萃分析. 上海醫藥, 2014, 35(12): 43-46.
21. 雷良蓉. 社區護理干預對老年糖尿病患者治療效果影響的 Meta 分析. 中國現代醫藥雜志, 2012, 14(4): 57-59.
22. 程桂香, 朱正盛. 高血壓患者遵醫行為社區護理干預 Meta 分析. 中國醫藥科學, 2011, 1(19): 41-42.
23. 孔令娜, 劉可儀, 周穎清. 社區護理干預對老年高血壓療效影響的 Meta 分析. 中國全科醫學, 2010, 13(13): 1462-1464.
24. 陳懷玉, 胡麗君. 社區干預對糖尿病患者遵醫行為影響的 Meta 分析. 中國全科醫學, 2010, 13(25): 2834-2836.
25. 郭彧, 李立明. 高血壓社區綜合防治效果的薈萃分析. 中華流行病學雜志, 2000, 21(3): 171-176.
26. Chen Z. Launch of the health-care reform plan in China. Lancet, 2009, 373(9672): 1322.
27. Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Jones A, et al. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals. JAMA, 1998, 280(3): 278-280.
28. Zhang J, Wang J, Han L, et al. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals. Nurs Outlook, 2015, 63(4): 446.
29. Ma B, Qi GQ, Lin XT, et al. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of acupuncture interventions published in Chinese journals. J Altern Complem Med, 2012, 18(9): 813.

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Quality assessment of systematic reviews on community interventions in China

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content