Reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines of China in 2015_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

LING Juan ^1,2,3,4 , WANG Mingxia ^1,2,3,5 , WANG Qi ^1,2,3,4 , WANG Xiaoqin ^1,2,3,4 , YAO Liang ⁶ , LU Cuncun ^1,2,3,4 , TIAN Jinhui ^1,2,3,4 ,  CHEN Yaolong ^1,2,3,4 ,  YANG Kehu ^1,2,3,4

1. Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 73000, P.R.China;
2. Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 73000, P.R.China;
3. The GRADE Center of China, Lanzhou, 73000, P.R.China;
4. WHO Collaboration Center for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, 73000, P.R.China;
5. The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 73000, P.R.China;
6. School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hongkong, 999077, P.R.China;

Corresponding?author：

CHEN Yaolong, Email: chenyaolong21@163.com; YANG Kehu, Email: kehuyangebm2006@126.com

Keywords：

RIGHT; China; Clinical practice guideline; Reporting quality

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.201712036

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

ObjectivesTo evaluate the reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines published in Chinese journals in 2015.MethodsCBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were searched to collect clinical practice guidelines published in Chinese journals from January, 2015 to December, 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and the reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines were evaluated by the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT). Excel software was used for data analysis.ResultsA total of 74 clinical practice guidelines were included. It was found that among the seven domains of RIGHT, the reporting quality of basic information and background domains were acceptable. There were fewer problems in the domain of evidence and recommendation. There were many deficiencies in three domains, such as review and quality assurance, funding and the declaration/management of interests and other information.ConclusionsThe reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines published in Chinese journals in 2015 is low, and the full reporting rate of clinical practice guidelines need to be improved. It is suggested that guideline developers construct strict guidelines for the development and report the guidelines with international standard, thus improving the quality of the clinical practice guidelines.

Citation： LING Juan, WANG Mingxia, WANG Qi, WANG Xiaoqin, YAO Liang, LU Cuncun, TIAN Jinhui, CHEN Yaolong, YANG Kehu. Reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines of China in 2015. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2018, 18(7): 721-728. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.201712036 Copy

1.	Lameire N, Biesen WV. Clinical practice guidelines: an important tool in improving dialysis quality. Contrib Nephrol, 2012, 178(178): 58.
2.	Institute of medicine (US) committee on standards for developing trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US): 2011.
3.	Davis D, Goldman J, Palda VA. Handbook on clinical practice guidelines. Ottawa: Canadian Medical Association, 2007.
4.	AGREE manual. Available at: http://www.agreetrust.org.
5.	Chen Y, Yang K, Maru?ic A, et al. A reporting tool for practice guidelines in health care: the RIGHT Statement. Ann Intern Med, 2017, 166(2): 128.
6.	Institute of medicine (US) committee to advise the public health service on clinical practice guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Ann Oncol, 1990, 60(9): 343-348.
7.	杜開昔, 姜明山. 對期刊文章和開題報告的同行評審. 自然辯證法通訊, 1988, (4): 25-32.
8.	Burnham JC. Research ethics, manuscript review, and journal quality. Madison: ASA-CSSA-SSSA: 55-62.
9.	Collaboration A. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care, 2003, 12(1): 18-23.
10.	Murphy JF. Paternalism or partnership: clinical practice guidelines and patient preferences. Ir Med J, 2008, 101(8): 232.
11.	謝秀麗, 王琪, 陳耀龍, 等. 中醫(中西醫結合)臨床實踐指南制修訂方法—患者偏好與價值觀. 中華中醫藥雜志, 2016, 31(11): 4607-4610.
12.	解染, 陳耀龍, 陳昊, 等. 循證指南制定中患者價值觀和偏好的研究方法. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2015, 15(5): 586-591.
13.	Chen YL, Wang C, Shang HC, et al. Clinical practice guideline in China. BMJ, 2018, 360: j5158.
14.	Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. J Clin Epidemiol, 2010, 3(12): 1308-1311.
15.	劉紅, 胡新和. 學術期刊同行評審的發展、方式及挑戰. 中國科技期刊研究, 2005, 16(5): 605-608.
16.	方卿. 我國學術期刊同行評審現狀分析. 中國編輯, 2006, (6): 57-61.

1. Lameire N, Biesen WV. Clinical practice guidelines: an important tool in improving dialysis quality. Contrib Nephrol, 2012, 178(178): 58.
2. Institute of medicine (US) committee on standards for developing trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US): 2011.
3. Davis D, Goldman J, Palda VA. Handbook on clinical practice guidelines. Ottawa: Canadian Medical Association, 2007.
4. AGREE manual. Available at: http://www.agreetrust.org.
5. Chen Y, Yang K, Maru?ic A, et al. A reporting tool for practice guidelines in health care: the RIGHT Statement. Ann Intern Med, 2017, 166(2): 128.
6. Institute of medicine (US) committee to advise the public health service on clinical practice guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Ann Oncol, 1990, 60(9): 343-348.
7. 杜開昔, 姜明山. 對期刊文章和開題報告的同行評審. 自然辯證法通訊, 1988, (4): 25-32.
8. Burnham JC. Research ethics, manuscript review, and journal quality. Madison: ASA-CSSA-SSSA: 55-62.
9. Collaboration A. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care, 2003, 12(1): 18-23.
10. Murphy JF. Paternalism or partnership: clinical practice guidelines and patient preferences. Ir Med J, 2008, 101(8): 232.
11. 謝秀麗, 王琪, 陳耀龍, 等. 中醫(中西醫結合)臨床實踐指南制修訂方法—患者偏好與價值觀. 中華中醫藥雜志, 2016, 31(11): 4607-4610.
12. 解染, 陳耀龍, 陳昊, 等. 循證指南制定中患者價值觀和偏好的研究方法. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2015, 15(5): 586-591.
13. Chen YL, Wang C, Shang HC, et al. Clinical practice guideline in China. BMJ, 2018, 360: j5158.
14. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. J Clin Epidemiol, 2010, 3(12): 1308-1311.
15. 劉紅, 胡新和. 學術期刊同行評審的發展、方式及挑戰. 中國科技期刊研究, 2005, 16(5): 605-608.
16. 方卿. 我國學術期刊同行評審現狀分析. 中國編輯, 2006, (6): 57-61.

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines of China in 2015

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content