ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of transcranial combined with peripheral repetitive magnetic stimulation on motor dysfunction after stroke.MethodsA total of 40 patients after stroke who were hospitalized in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University between January and December 2019 were selected. The patients were divided into the trial group and the control group by random number table method, with 20 cases in each group. Both groups received conventional rehabilitation and medicine treatment, on that basis, the trial group received repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS), while the control group received rTMS combined with fake rPMS, both lasted for 2 weeks. Before treatment and 2, 4, 12 weeks after the initiation of treatment, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) [including FMA-Upper Limb (FMA-UL), FMA-Lower Limb (FMA-LL)], National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) were used to evaluate the efficacy of rTMS combined with rPMS.ResultsFive patients fell off, and 35 patients were finally included, including 18 in the trial group and 17 in the control group. No adverse reaction occurred during the study. Before treatment, there was no significant difference in FMA, FMA-UL, FMA-LL, NIHSS or MBI scores between the two groups (P>0.05). After treatment, the FMA score of the trial group changed from 36.44±28.59 to 75.56±19.94, and that of the control group changed from 39.05±29.85 to 54.64±23.25; the between-group difference was statistically significant at the end of the 4th and 12th weeks (P<0.05). The FMA-UL score of the trial group changed from 21.39±22.14 to 46.94±15.84, and that of the control group changed from 20.82±20.47 to 31.29±16.98; the between-group difference was statistically significant at the end of the 4th and 12th weeks (P<0.05). The FMA-LL score of the trial group changed from 15.06±9.10 to 28.61±5.69, and that of the control group changed from 18.23±10.33 to 23.35±8.20; the between-group difference was statistically significant at the end of the 12th week (P>0.05). The NIHSS score of the trial group changed from 6.83±4.54 to 2.78±2.05, and that of the control group changed from 6.35±3.67 to 3.94±2.56; the MBI score of the trial group changed from 53.33±17.90 to 83.06±12.50, and that of the control group changed from 60.88±25.45 to 78.82±15.67; there was no statistically significant difference in NIHSS or MBI between the two groups at any timepoint (P>0.05). Except for the FMA-LL of the control group, the other outcome indicators in each group were significantly different after treatment compared with those before treatment (P<0.05).ConclusionsBoth rTMS and rTMS combined with rPMS can improve the limb motor function and activities of daily living of stroke patients. The treatment mode of rTMS combined with rPMS has better effect on motor dysfunction after stroke, which is of great significance for improving the overall rehabilitation effect.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can influence the stimulated brain regions and other distal brain regions connecting to them. The purpose of the study is to investigate the effects of low-frequency rTMS over primary motor cortex on brain by analyzing the brain functional connectivity and coordination between brain regions. 10 healthy subjects were recruited. 1 Hz rTMS was used to stimulate primary motor cortex for 20 min. 1 min resting state electroencephalography (EEG) was collected before and after the stimulation respectively. By performing phase synchronization analysis between the EEG electrodes, the brain functional network and its properties were calculated. Signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis. The result demonstrated that the global phase synchronization in alpha frequency band was decreased significantly after low-frequency rTMS (P<0.05). The phase synchronization was down-regulated between motor cortex and ipsilateral frontal/parietal cortex, and also between contralateral parietal cortex and bilateral frontal cortex. The mean degree and global efficiency of brain functional networks in alpha frequency band were significantly decreased (P<0.05), and the mean shortest path length were significantly increased (P<0.05), which suggested the information transmission of the brain networks and its efficiency was reduced after low-frequency rTMS. This study verified the inhibition function of the low-frequency rTMS to brain activities, and demonstrated that low-frequency rTMS stimulation could affect both stimulating brain regions and distal brain regions connected to them. The findings in this study could be of guidance to clinical application of low-frequency rTMS.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treating stroke patients with motor dysfunction. Methods The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMbase, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data were searched from inception to January 2012, and the references of the included studies were also retrieved to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on rTMS in treating stroke patients with motor dysfunction. Two reviewers independently screened articles according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and evaluated the quality of the included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0.2 software, and evidence quality and recommendation level were assessed using the GRADE system. Results A total of 11 RCTs involving 376 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis (including 3 RCTs, low quality) showed that, compared with the routine rehabilitation treatment, 2 to 4 weeks of rTMS was much beneficial to stroke patients with motor dysfunction, with significant differences (WMD=11.02, 95%CI 2.56 to 19.47). The other 8 studies only adopted descriptive analysis accordingly. Conclusion It is still uncertain of the effectiveness of rTMS in improving motor dysfunction of stroke patients, so rTMS should be applied with caution in clinic.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) compared with sham therapy for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Methods The Cochrane Library, Medline, EMbase, CBMdisk, CNKI and VIP were searched through computer from 1985 to 2011. The review included RCTs comparing the treatment efficacy of low-frequency rTMS located on right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with sham stimulation in the patients suffering major depressive disorder. The quality of the included RCTs was strictly evaluated and the data were extracted by two reviewers independently. The extracted data were analyzed by RevMan 4.2. Results Among seven double-blinded RCTs involving 234 patients included, 1 was A level in quality, 5 were B level, and 1 was C level according to the outcomes of quality evaluation. The results of Meta-analysis indicated that low frequency rTMS was superior to sham stimulation in remission rates after two weeks’ treatment (RR=3.11, 95%CI 1.56 to 6.19). Additionally, low frequency rTMS was lower than the sham stimulation in the scores of HDRS and MADRS (WMD= –6.41, 95%CI –9.32 to –3.50, and WMD= –5.27, 95%CI –9.08 to –1.46, respectively). But no significant difference in response rates between the low prequency rTMS group and the sham group was found (RR=1.72, 95%CI 0.74 to 4.01). There were no severe and intolerable side effects reported in these seven studies. Conclusion The low frequency rTMS as a non-invasive and safe technique may appear to be effective for the treatment of major depressive disorder according to the positive results but the conclusion is not definite because of negative results. This review suggests that parameters could be sited as frequency: 1 Hz, intensity: 90%-110% motor threshold (MT), location: right DLPFC and duration: 2 weeks. Nevertheless, further multicenter and high quality studies are needed before it is used as a first-line treatment for major depressive disorder.
The aim of this study is to explore the effects of continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTBS) on functional brain network in emotion processing. Before and after the intervention of cTBS over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) of ten participants who were asked to perform the emotion gender recognition task, we recorded their scalp electroencephalograms (EEG). Then we used the phase synchronization of EEG to measure the connectivity between two nodes. We then calculated the network efficiency to describe the efficiency of information transmission in brain regions. Our research showed that after the intervention of cTBS and the stimulation of the emotion face picture, there was an obvious enhancement in the event-related spectral perturbation after stimuli onset in beta band in 100–300 ms. Under the stimulation of different emotion picture, the values of global phase synchronization for negative and neutral stimuli were enhanced compared to positive ones. And the increased small-worldness was found in emotional processing. In summary, based on the effect of activity change in the left DLPFC on emotion processing brain network, the emotional processing mechanism of brain networks were preliminary explored and it provided the reference for the research of emotion processing brain network in the future.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). MethodsWe searched databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2015), EMbase, PsycINF, EBSCO, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP from inception to October 2015 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about rTMS for patients with MCI. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 5 RCTs involving 180 MCI patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the control group, rTMS treatment could significantly improve the overall cognitive abilities of MCI patients (SMD=2.53, 95% CI 0.91 to 4.16, P=0.002), as well as the single-domain cognitive performances, including tests for episodic memory (MD=0.98, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.72, P=0.01) and verbal fluency (MD=2.08, 95% CI 0.46 to 3.69, P=0.01). rTMS was a well-tolerated therapy, with slightly more adverse events observed than the control group (RD=0.09, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.18, P=0.04), but cases were mainly transient headache, dizziness and scalp pain. ConclusionrTMS may benefit the cognitive abilities of MCI patients. Nevertheless, due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, large-scale, multicenter, and high quality RCTs are required to verify the conclusion.
ObjectiveTo observe the efficacy of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied at contralesional hemisphere Broca’s homologue on patients with global aphasia after left massive cerebral infarction. Methods Patients with global aphasia after left massive cerebral infarction in the Department of Neurorehabilitation of China Rehabilitation Research Center between August 2021 and December 2023 were selected. According to the random number table method, patients were randomly divided into a low-frequency rTMS group and a high-frequency rTMS group. rTMS targeted the mirror area within the right hemispheric Broca’s area. Patients’ language ability was assessed pre- and post-treatment by the Chinese version of the western aphasia battery (WAB). Results A total of 27 patients were included, with 14 in the low-frequency rTMS group and 13 in the high-frequency rTMS group. Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in the WAB test indicators between the two groups of patients (P>0.05). After treatment, WAB scores (spontaneous speech, auditory comprehension, naming, repetition, aphasia quotients) in both groups were significantly improved (P<0.05); compared to the low-frequency rTMS group, the high-frequency rTMS group exhibited significant improvement in spontaneous speech, auditory comprehension, repetition, naming and aphasia quotients (P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of high-frequency rTMS excitation to contralesional hemisphere is better than that of conventional low-frequency rTMS inhibition to contralesional hemisphere in improving the speech function of patients with global aphasia after left massive cerebral infarction.
Parkinson’s disease is a neurodegenerative disease that mostly occurs in middle-aged and elderly people. It is characterized by progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra and aggregation of Lewy bodies, resulting in a series of motor symptoms and non-motor symptoms. Depression is the most important manifestation of non-motor symptoms, which seriously affects the quality of life of patients. Clinicians often use antidepressant drugs to improve the depressive symptoms of patients with Parkinson 's disease, but it is still urgent to solve the problems of drug side effects and drug resistance caused by such methods. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is a safe and non-invasive neuromodulation technique that can change the excitability of the corticospinal tract, induce the release of dopamine and other neurotransmitters, and further improve the depressive symptoms of patients with Parkinson 's disease. Based on this, this paper discusses and summarizes the research progress on the efficacy and potential mechanism of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving depression in Parkinson 's disease at home and abroad, in order to provide reference for related clinical application research.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on stroke patients with aphasia. MethodsDatabases such as PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2014), CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data were searched up to June 2014, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about rTMS for stroke patients with aphasia. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the exclusion and inclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 9 RCTs involving 130 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with the control group, rTMS improved stoke patients' speech function after treatment (WMD=14.36, 95%CI 6.93 to 21.79, P=0.000 2). The results of descriptive analysis showed that, rTMS at Broadmann area 45 (1 Hz, 90% RMT, once 20 or 30 minutes, 2 or 3 weeks as a course with 2-day intervals) possibly had a positive long-term effect on post-stroke patients' speech function. ConclusionrTMS may positively improve stroke patients' speech function. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more large-scale, multicenter, high quality RCTs are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a noninvasive neuromodulation technique can improve the impairment of learning and memory caused by diseases, and the regulation of learning and memory depends on synaptic plasticity. TMS can affect plasticity of brain synaptic. This paper reviews the effects of TMS on synaptic plasticity from two aspects of structural and functional plasticity, and further reveals the mechanism of TMS from synaptic vesicles, neurotransmitters, synaptic associated proteins, brain derived neurotrophic factor and related pathways. Finally, it is found that TMS could affect neuronal morphology, glutamate receptor and neurotransmitter, and regulate the expression of synaptic associated proteins through the expression of brain derived neurotrophic factor, thus affecting the learning and memory function. This paper reviews the effects of TMS on learning, memory and plasticity of brain synaptic, which provides a reference for the study of the mechanism of TMS.