ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of proximal tibial hemiprosthesis replacement in the first stage and prosthesis revision in the second stage in reducing the risk of length discrepancy of limbs in children with proximal tibial osteosarcoma.MethodsBetween 2009 and 2013, 3 children with conventional osteosarcoma at the proximal tibia (stage ⅡB) were treated. There were 2 boys and 1 girl. They were 12, 13, and 13 years old, respectively. After 4 courses of preoperative chemotherapy, the proximal tumor segmental resection and proximal tibial hemiprosthesis replacement were performed. Then the patients underwent prosthetic revision in the second stage when they were 20, 17, and 17 years old, respectively.ResultsAll patients successfully completed two stages of operations. The length discrepancy of lower limb after the second stage operation were 19, 7, and 21 mm, respectively. Three patients were followed up 13, 3, and 27 months after the second stage operation, and the lower extremities functions were satisfactory. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 26, 27, and 25, respectively.ConclusionThe proximal tibial hemiprosthesis replacement in the first stage combined with prosthesis revision in the second stage for treating the proximal tibia osteosarcoma in children can keep the distal femur growth ability, reduce the length discreapancy of lower limb, and obtain satisfactory stability and good function.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of acetabulum reinforcement ring (Cage) with allograft bone for reconstructing acetabular defects in hip revision. Methods Between February 2006 and August 2010, 14 patients (14 hips) with serious acetabular bone defects after total hip arthroplasty underwent acetabular reconstruction by using Cage with allograft bone. There were 6 males and 8 females with a mean age of 59.2 years (range, 45-76 years). The mean time between first replacement and revision was 7.2 years (range, 5-12 years). The revision causes included infection in 8 cases, osteolysis and aseptic loosening in 6 cases. The hip function Harris score was 37.7 ± 5.3. According to America Association of Orthopedic Surgeon (AAOS) standard, the acetabular defect was classified as type III in 8 cases and as type IV in 6 cases. Results All incisions healed by first intention, and no complication occurred. The patients were followed up 14-62 months (mean, 44 months). The pain was relieved or disappeared. At last follow-up, the Harris score was 89.7 ± 3.2, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative score (t= — 44.40, P=0.04). No loosening of the acetabular component or osteolysis was found in 14 hips. No absorption or collapse of the allograft was observed in all patients. Conclusion Cage with allograft bone is a useful method of reconstructing acetabular bone defects in hip revision. Further follow-up is needed to assess the long-term effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical outcomes of acetabular revision using a metal reconstruction cage. MethodsBetween October 2006 and October 2013, 16 patients (16 hips) underwent acetabular revision with a metal reconstruction cage. There were 4 males and 12 females, with the mean age of 62.7 years (range, 49-78 years). The time from total hip arthroplasty to revision was 3-15 years (mean, 8.2 years). The causes for revision were aseptic acetabular loosening in 15 cases, and femoral periprosthetic fracture (Vancouver type B3) in 1 case. According to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) classification, there were 12 cases of type III and 4 cases of type IV; according to the Paprosky classification, there were 12 cases of type IIIA and 4 cases of type IIIB. Harris score was used for hip function evaluation, and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain in the thigh. X-ray films were taken for imaging evaluation. ResultsHealing of incision by first intention was obtained in all patients. Deep venous thrombosis occurred in 1 patient, and was cured after anticoagulation therapy. No complications of infection, neurovascular injury, and prosthetic dislocation were found. Sixteen patients were followed up 6.8 years on average (range, 2-9 years). The Harris score was significantly increased from preoperative 42.44±4.66 to 91.88±3.28 at last follow-up (t=–106.30, P=0.00). Two patients had mild pain in the thigh, but pain disappeared at 1 year after operation. At immediate after operation, the abduction angle was 37-54° (mean, 42.9°). The distance between acetabular rotation centre and teardrop line was (33.67±12.19) mm for preoperative value and was (20.67±9.63) mm for postoperative value, showing significant difference (t=–9.60, P=0.00). The distance between acetabular rotation centre and lateral teardrop was (34.98±12.30) mm for preoperative value and was (40.04±6.61) mm for postoperative value, showing significant difference (t=–3.15, P=0.00). X-ray film results showed bony fusion at the osteotomy sites at 4 to 12 months after operation. No continuous radiolucent line, prosthetic dislocation, or osteolysis was found, and bony ingrowth was observed in all patients. No patient received re-revision due to prosthetic loosening. ConclusionThe metal reconstruction cage for acetabular revision can achieve good effectiveness for patients with serious bone defect.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of slope-reducing tibial osteotomy and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision in the treatment of patients with primary ACL reconstruction failure and abnormally increased posterior tibial slope (PTS). Methods The clinical data of 9 patients with primary ACL reconstruction failure and abnormally increased PTS (≥17°) who met the selection criteria between January 2018 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 8 males and 1 female; the age ranged from 21 to 42 years, with a median age of 30 years. Lachman test was positive in 9 patients. Pivot-shift test was negative in 6 cases, degree Ⅰ positive in 2 cases, and degree Ⅱ positive in 1 case. The PTS was (17.78±1.09)° and the anterior tibial translation (ATT) was (11.58±1.47) mm. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was 51.0±3.8, Lysholm score was 49.7±4.6, and Tegner score was 3.7±0.7. The time from primary reconstruction to revision was 12-33 months, with an average of 19.6 months. Slope-reducing tibial osteotomy and ACL revision were performed. The improvement of knee function was evaluated by IKDC score, Lysholm score, and Tegner score; Lachman test and Pivot-shift test were used to evaluate the stability of knee joint. PTS and ATT were measured to observe the morphological changes of knee joint. Results All the incisions healed by first intention, and there was no complication such as incision infection, fat liquefaction, necrosis, deep vein thrombosis of lower extremities, and neurovascular injury. All 9 patients were followed up 12-36 months, with an average of 25.8 months. At last follow-up, Lachman test and pivot-shift test were negative. IKDC score was 85.0±4.0, Lysholm score was 87.7±2.8, Tegner score was 6.8±0.7, PTS reduced to (9.89±0.60)°, and ATT shortened to (0.91±0.29) mm, which were significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). ConclusionSlope-reducing tibial osteotomy and ACL revision in the treatment of patients with primary ACL reconstruction failure and abnormally increased PTS has a satisfactory short-term effectiveness. It can improve the stability of knee joint and maintain the normal shape of knee joint.
ObjectiveTo investigate the short-term effectiveness of three-dimensional (3D) printed trabecular metal pads for Paprosky type Ⅲ acetabular defect in hip revision.MethodsBetween August 2014 and December 2015, the 3D printed trabecular metal pads were used to repair Paprosky type Ⅲ acetabular defects and reconstruct the annular structure of the acetabulums in 5 cases of primary hip revision. There were 3 males and 2 females, aged from 50 to 72 years, with an average age of 66 years. The time from initial replacement to revision was 10 to 18 years, with an average of 14.4 years. The types of prostheses in primary replacement were non-cemented in 3 cases and cemented in 2 cases. The types of acetabular bone defects were Paprosky type ⅢA in 3 cases and Paprosky type ⅢB in 2 cases. The preoperative Harris score was 34.23±11.67. The height of rotation center of affected hip was (38.17±8.87) mm and the horizontal position was (35.62±9.12) mm.ResultsThe operation time was 120-180 minutes, with an average of 142 minutes. The intraoperative bleeding volume was 800-1 700 mL, with an average of 1 100 mL. Five patients were followed up 18-24 months (mean, 21 months). At last follow-up, the Harris score was 79.82±8.70, which was significantly higher than that before operation (t=16.991, P=0.000). At 1 week after operation, the abduction angle of acetabular cup was 38-42° (mean, 39.4 °) and the anteversion angle was 13-18 ° (mean, 14.6°). The height and horizontal position of rotation center of affected hip were (22.08±8.33) mm and (29.03±6.28) mm, respectively, showing significant differences when compared with those before operation (P<0.05); there was no significant difference when compared with those of healthy hip [(28.62±7.73), (27.29±4.22) mm] (P>0.05). During the follow-up, there was no complication such as prosthesis loosening, dislocation, or periprosthetic fracture.ConclusionIn hip revision, 3D printed trabecular metal pads can repair Paprosky type Ⅲ acetabular defect, reconstruct the structure of acetabulum, provide a stable supporting structure for the acetabular cup, reconstruct the relatively normal rotation center of the hip joint, avoid iatrogenic bone loss, and achieve satisfactory functional recovery of the hip. The long-term effectiveness needs further follow-up.
Objective To review progress of clinical application ofmorselized bone and to investigate relative exploration on it.Methods The recent articles on morselized bone in the field of clinicand experimental research were extensively reviewed, and relative examination of morselized bone referring to method and mechanism were investigated carefully.Results Morselized bone worked well clinically, especially inrevision ofartificial total hip joint, and it was proved effective with lots of advantages.Conclusion Morselized bone functions well clinically. Although its mechanism requires a further research, it still has a promising value in clinical application.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after hip and knee arthroplasties.MethodsThe related literature on two-stage revision for PJI was summarized, and the new progress in the choice of spacers, systemic antibiotic therapy, and risk factors were analyzed.ResultsTwo-stage revision is a common way to treat infection after hip and knee arthroplasties. The types of spacers used in the one-stage operation are diverse and each has its own advantages and disadvantages. Non-articular spacers are mainly used for the patients with poor soft tissue conditions around the joints and severe bone defects. But the joint mobility is not good after the placement of the spacer. Articular spacers can restore the affected joint movement after operation, which is beneficial to the joint mobility after two-stage operation. The use of antibiotics is an indispensable part of the treatment process, and the effectiveness of short-term antibiotic treatment is similar to long-term treatment. Identifying the relevant risk factors that influence the prognosis of the two-stage revision can help preoperative management and reduce the recurrence rate of infection.ConclusionThere are still controversies about the choice of spacers and systemic antibiotic therapy during the two-stage revision and treatment of PJI. The factors affecting the prognosis of the two-stage revision need to be explored and the further high-quality research is needed.
ObjectiveTo summarize the design and the biomechanical characteristics of Sivash-range of motion femoral modular stem (S-ROM) prosthesis and mainly to introduce its clinical use in developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) and hip revision. MethodsLiterature concerning S-ROM prosthesis was extensively reviewed and analyzed. ResultsThe S-ROM prosthesis based on the modularity feature can reach press-fit in metaphysis and diaphysis of femur concurrently. Additionaly, S-ROM prosthesis can fit for anatomic differences of the DDH femur and is capable of use in correction osteotomy and hip revision. ConclusionModular junctions of S-ROM prosthesis increase the potentials of implant fracture and metallic debris production, so further follow-up study is needed to verify the long-term effectiveness.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of two-stage revision of infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using an antibiotic-impregnated articulating cement spacer. Methods The clinical data were analyzed from 23 patients (23 knees) undergoing two-stage revision for late infection after primary TKA between January 2007 and December 2009. There were 15 males and 8 females, aged from 43 to 75 years (mean, 65.2 years). Infection occurred at 13-52 months (mean, 17.3 months) after TKA. The time interval between infection and admission ranged from 15 days to 7 months (mean, 2.1 months). One-stage operation included surgical debridement and removal of all knee prosthesis and cement, then an antibiotic-impregnated articulating cement spacer was implanted. The re-implantation of prosthesis was performed after 8-10 weeks when infections were controlled. The American Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score and Knee Society Score (KSS) were used to compare the function of the knee between pre- and post-revision. The rate of infection control and complication were analyzed. Results All incisions healed primarily. Re-infection occurred in 2 cases after two-stage revision, and infection was controlled in the other 21 cases, with an infection control rate of 91.3%. The patients were followed up 2-5 years (mean, 3.6 years). The HSS score was increased from 60.6 ± 9.8 at pre-revision to 82.3 ± 7.4 at last follow-up, the KSS score was increased from 110.7 ± 9.6 at pre-revision to 134.0 ± 10.5 at last follow-up, all showing significant differences (P lt; 0.01). Radiographs showed that prosthesis had good position with no loosening, fracture, or periprosthetic radiolucent. Conclusion Two-stage revision using an antibiotic-impregnated articulating cement spacer is an effective method to control infected TKA and to restore the function of affected knee.
Objective To conclude the failure factors of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and summarize the research progress of revision surgery. MethodsThe literature on UKA at home and abroad in recent years was reviewed to summarize its risk factors, treatment methods, including the evaluation of bone loss, prosthesis selection, and surgical techniques. ResultsThe factors inducing UKA failure mainly include improper indications, technical errors, and others. The application of digital orthopedic technology can reduce failures caused by surgical technical errors and shorten the learning curve. There are a variety of options for revision surgery after UKA failure, including polyethylene liner replacement, revision with UKA or total knee arthroplasty, with adequate preoperative evaluation prior to implementation. The biggest challenge in revision surgery is the management and reconstruction of bone defects. ConclusionThere is a risk of failure in UKA, which needs to be treated with caution and should be determined according to the type of failure.