Objective To review the eradication rate for Helicobacter Pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy with Ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC). Methods A systematic review of all the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed according to International Cochrane Collaboration. Data Source RCTs were identified from specialized trials register of Cochrane U GDP Group, the Cochrane library, additional electronic search (including MEDLINE and CBM), handsearching, and personal contact with pharmaceutical companies. Data Selection Randomized clinical trials comparing RBC or RBC in combination with other antibiotics such as proton pump inhibitor, H2-receptor antagonist, other bismuth or placebo were included. No language and blinding limitations were applied. Inclusion criteria Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. The methodological quality of trials was assessed by the Jadad-scale plus allocation concealment. Statistics analysis was managed by using RevMan 4. 1. Results Fifteen randomized clinical trials including 3 638 patients were included, with eight trials of high methodological quality. Meta-analysis indicated that odds ratio was 3.06 (95%CI 2.62 to 3. 58, P lt; 0. 000 01) comparing RBC to controls. But the heterogeneity was significant (P lt; 0. 000 01), so we choose random effects model. Then the odds ratio was 2.05 (95%CI 1. 29 to 3. 25, P=0.002). No serious adverse effects were found. Sensitivity analysis showed that the specimens and the quality of RCT haven’t affected researching result. Conclusion RBC is more effective in Helicobacter Pylori eradication therapy than others.
Objective To evaluate the current situation of randomized controlled trials/ clinical controlled trials (RCT/CCT) on chronic gastritis and whether it could offer reliable evidence for clinical practice in China. Method RCT/CCT on chronic gastritis from eight Chinese clinical journals were searched manually and assessed according to international standard. Results 823 issues containing 213 therapeutic articles were searched and 81 RCT/CCT were identified and assessed. Conclusions The quantity and quality of RCT/CCT on Chronic gastritis in China could not meet the need of clinical practice. RCT/CCT of western medical therapy are much better than those of traditional Chinese therapy and integrated traditional Chinese and western medical therapy ones.
Objective To evaluate the reporting quality and influencing factors of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of lung cancer. Methods RCTs of lung cancer with PRO as either primary or secondary endpoints were searched from PubMed, EMbase, Medline, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and VIP databases between January 1, 2010 and April 20, 2024. Reporting quality of included RCTs were assessed based on the CONSORT-PRO extension. Descriptive statistics and bivariate regression analysis were used to describe the reporting quality and analyze the factors influencing the reporting quality. Results A total of 740 articles were retrieved. After screening, 53 eligible RCTs of lung cancer with 22 780 patients were included. The patients were mainly with non-small cell lung cancer (84.91%), with the median sample size of the included studies was 364.0 (160.5, 599.5) patients. The primary PRO tool used was the EORTC QLQ-C30 (60.38%). There were 52 (98.11%) studies whose PRO measured the domain of "symptom management of cough, dyspnea, fatigue, pain, etc.", and 45 (84.91%) studies measured "health-related quality of life". Multicenter studies accounted for 84.91%, and randomized non-blind trials accounted for 62.26%. PRO was used as the primary endpoint in 33.96% of the studies and as secondary endpoints in 66.04%. The reliability and validity of the PRO tools were explicitly mentioned in 11.32% and 7.55% of the studies, respectively. The average completeness of reporting according to the CONSORT-PRO guidelines was 60.00%, ranging from 25.00% to 93.00%. The main factors affecting the completeness of CONSORT-PRO reporting included sample size and publication year. For every increment in sample size, the completeness of reporting increased by 27.5% (SE=0.00, t=2.040, P=0.046). Additionally, studies published after 2018 had a 67.2% higher completeness of reporting compared to those published in or before 2018 (SE=17.8, t=–3.273, P=0.006). Conclusion The study reveals that the overall reporting quality of PRO in lung cancer RCTs is poor. Particularly, the reporting of PRO measures reliability and validity, PRO assumptions, applicability, and handling of missing data need further improvement. Future research should emphasize comprehensive adherence to the CONSORT-PRO guidelines.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of fibfinogen-depleting agents (snake venom extracts) in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Method A systematic review of all the relevant randomized controlled trails (RCTs) was performed. RCTs were identified from the Cochrane Stroke Group’s Specialized Trials Register, additional electronic and handsearching, and personal contract with pharmaceutical companies. We included all completed and unconfounded truly or quasi-randomized trials in patients with ischemic stroke comparing fibrinogen depleting agents for analysis. Results Ten completed and one ongoing RCTs have been identified so far. Up to 1998, only three trials using ancrod (182 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Ancrod was associated with a significant reduction in early deaths (5.6% vs. 16%; odds ratio [OR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13 to 0.85; 2P=0.02) suggesting that treatment of 100 patients would avoid about 10 early deaths. The frequency of asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage shown by computed tomography was similar between ancrod-treated and control groups (7.6% vs. 9.6%; OR 0.78; 95%CI 0.26 to 2.33; 2P=0.65). No major intracranial or extracranial hemorrhages or recurrent ischemic strokes occurred in the ancord-allocated patients. There were nonsignificant trends in favor of ancrod in death from any cause (OR 0.57; 95%CI 0.27 to 1.23; 2P=0.15) and death or disability (OR 0.52; 95%CI 0.26 to 1.03; 2P=0.06) at the end of trial follow-up. Up to 2000, other two trials published results. This review will be updated with new trial results soon, which will provide more data. Conclusions There were too few patients and outcome events to draw reliable conclusions from the present data. Although ancrod-like agents appeared promising, their routine use cannot be recommended at the moment. Future trials should test simpler fixed-dose regimens to allow better generalizability.
Objective To seek the statistical solution in the comparison of different effects from multi-center randomized controlled trials （RCTs）. Methods The data collected from a multi-center RCT were used as the examples and processed by CMH test and meta-analysis. Results The result of CMH test indicated that the significant difference of the effect values existed among centers （P 〈0. 05 ）. While meta-analysis showed no significant difference （P 〉0.05 ） by heterogeneity test. However, when using fixed effect model, inter-group significant difference of merged effect values was observed （P 〈0.05 ）. Conclusions In the clinical research based on the method of multi-center RCT, met.a-analysis can be applied if the difference of inclination of the inter-group therapeutic effect is found among different centers. The proper mathematical model should be selected based on the result of heterogeneity test to merge and compare the effect values. The conclusions should be drawn from the results of both meta-analysis and CMH test.
In order to improve the understanding of pragmatic randomized controlled trial (pRCT), to promote high-quality implementation of such trials, and to provide technical guidance for researchers to conduct such trials scientifically, the working group of China REal world data and studies ALliance (ChinaREAL) hereby develop a technical guidance. The guidance provides technical specifications of pRCT in terms of the concept and scope of application, planning and study design, conduct, data management and quality control, statistical analysis, and ethical issues. It emphasizes that the trial sites and settings, patient population, interventions, controls, outcomes, follow-ups and other factors should be considered when planning and designing. Meanwhile, the guidance recommends that estimation of sample sizes for different types of trial designs should be based on individual pRCTs, and it also provides suggestions for data management, quality control, principles of statistical analysis, analysis requirements for each type of trial designs, and ethical considerations.
Objective To investigate the current situation of randomized controlled trials or clinical controlled trial (RCT/CCT) on chronic hepatitis B and whether to offer reliable evidence for clinical practice in China. Methods RCT/CCT identified from six Chinese clinical journals were searched manually and assessed according to international standard of evidence-based medicine. Results 308 issues containing 212 therapeutic articles and 88 RCT/CCT on chronic hepatitis B were identified and analyzed. Conclusion the quantity and quality of RCT/CCT of chronic hepatitis B did not meet the need of clinical practice.
Traditional randomized controlled trial and real-world study have different advantages in internal validity and external extensibility, respectively. With the development of evidence-based health decisions, randomized controlled trial was no longer the only golden standard of interventional study, the research evidence of the real world was gradually involved in health decisions. This study mainly analyzed the requirements of evidence and actual application of evidence in the evaluation of the effectiveness of NICE in the UK. It was found that NICE still used the results of randomized controlled trials as a primary basis. Although real-world research has developed rapidly in recent years, it was limited used in health decision because of its bias by design and other factors. However, in recent years, real-world evidence has played a significant role in the field of innovative drugs or diseases that lack therapeutic drugs. With the improvement of real-world research in experimental design and data analysis, it is expected that it will play a more important role in health decision-making.
Objective To review systematically whether there is enough existing evidence that methylcobalamin is effective and safe in the treatment of the patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.Methods A Cochrane systematic review of all relevant randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of methycobalamin for diabetic peripheral neuropathy was performed. Clinical trials were searched from Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 4, 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to January 2004), EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2004), the Chinese Biological Medicine Database (1978 to January 2004), the Chinese Science and Technology Journal Full-text Database (1989 to January 2004) and references of all included trials. The selection of studies, data extraction and assessment of methodological quality were performed independently by two reviewers. The following outcomes were assessed: effectiveness of clinical signs and symptoms, sensory nerve and motor nerve conduction velocities and serious adverse events of methylcobalamin. Results Thirty randomized clinical trials including 1 949 patients met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the most included trials was of low level. The "funnel plot" of the comparison of thirteen studies of methylcobalamin with other B Vitamins studies showed symmetry, which indicated less possible publication bias and the result was partly reliable, but it could not indicate the whole publication biases. The results of meta-analysis indicated that methylcobalamin showed significantly positive effects on the improvement of the signs and symptoms of peripheral neuropathy, and the effects were better than the other vitamin B agents. The increase of some nerves conduction velocities by methylcobalamin was better than by the other vitamin B. No serious adverse events were observed during the treatment period.Conclusions Methylcobalamin appears to be a safe and effective treatment on diabetic peripheral neuropathy. However, the evidence is not b because of the low quality of most trials. Rigorously designed, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials of methylcobalamin for diabetic peripheral neuropathy are needed to further assess the effect.
Objective To assess the effect of different thrombolytic agents, and different regimens in acute ischaemic stroke. Methods A systematic review of all the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed. RCTs were identified from the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register, Embase (1980 to 1997), handsearching Japanese and Chinese journals, and personal contact with pharmaceutical companies. We included randomised and quasi-randomised trials in patients with confirmed acute ischaemic stroke comparing different doses of a thrombolytic agent, or different thrombolytic agent, or the same agent given by different routes. Results Eight trials involving 1 334 patients were included. Concealment of allocation was generally adequate. All the trials were conducted in Japan. Different doses (of tissue plasminogen activator or urokinase) were compared in six trials. Different agents (tissue plasminogen activator versus urokinase,or tissue-cultured urokinase versus conventional urokinase) were compared in three trials. Few data were available for functional outcomes. A higher dose of thrombolytic therapy was associated with a five-fold increase in fatal intracranial haernorrhages (odds ratio 5.02, 95% confidence interval 1.56 to 16.18). There was a non-significant trend towards more early deaths or clinically significant intracranial haemorrhages in higher dose group. No difference in late deaths or extra-cranial haemorrhages was shown between low and higher doses. However, very few of these events occurred. No difference was shown between the different thrombolytic agents tested. Conclusions There is not enough evidence to conclude whether lower doses of thrombolytic agents might be safer or more effective than higher doses in acute ischaemic stroke. It is not possible to conclude whether one agent might be better than another, or which route of administration might be best.