Radiofrequency ablation for hepatic hemangioma is safe and effective, and can obtain the same curative effect as traditional surgical resection. For hepatic hemangiomas with large volume, abundant arterial blood supply and long ablation time, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) often occurs after radiofrequency ablation, which can lead to injury or dysfunction of important organs. This paper systematically summarizes the mechanism, prevention and treatment of SIRS after radiofrequency ablation of hepatic hemangioma, so as to provide reference for improving the safety of radiofrequency ablation of hepatic hemangioma.
ObjectiveTo analyze the long-term efficacy and its influencing factors in the treatment of the permanent atrial fibrillation(AF) using monopolar radiofrequency ablation during concomitant cardiac valve replacement surgery with rheumatic heart disease. MethodsClinical data of the 116 patients with rheumatic heart disease and permanent AF who underwent modified maze procedure using monopolar radiofrequency ablation and concomitant cardiac valve replacement in the affiliated hospital of Qingdao university from October 2004 to December 2010 were collected and retrospectively analyzed, including 43 males and 73 females with their age of 50.5±7.5 years. Electrocardiogram (ECG) with 12-lead and echocardiography data, as well as the related complications, cardiac function and life quality were collected at the time of the immediately after the operation, discharge from hospital, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year postoperatively and every year after the operation. Patients were divided into eliminating group of AF (including sinus rhythm and nodal rhythm) and AF group according to the results of the ECG at the time of the ending follow-up. In the eliminating group of AF, there were 52 patients (16 males, 36 females) with their age of 48.4±7.3 years, and in the AF group, there were 50 patients (22 males, 28 females) with their age of 51.9±7.1 years. Analyzed the difference of the related factors between the two groups using statistical methods and tried to find the factors affecting the long-term clinical efficacy of the operation. ResultsThree patients died in hospital (one died of the hemolysis, acute renal insufficiency and hyperkalemia. One died of the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome caused by the acute renal insufficiency. And the other one died of the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome caused by the repetitive ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation on the day of the automatic discharge). Three patients died during the follow-up (one died after the reoperation because of the perivalvular leakage in other hospital, and the causes of death in the two others could not be catched). One patient occurred cerebral embolism, and the other one occurred cerebral hemorrhage in the af group during the follow-up. There was statistical significance between two group at the aspects of age, preoperative AF duration, preoperative left atrium diameter, time of the cardiopulmonary bypass and time of the cross-clamp ascending aorta. In multivariate analysis, age and preoperative left atrium diameter are risk factors affecting the long-term efficacy. ConclusionThe treatment of the permanent atrial fibrillation using monopolar radiofrequency ablation concomitant cardiac valve replacement with rheumatic heart disease is effective and has good long-term efficacy. The factors of affecting the long-term clinical efficacy are the patient's age and the diameter of left atrium.
Objective To overview the systematic reviews/meta-analyses of radiofrequency ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for primary liver cancer. Methods We searched China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, Chongqing VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases using computers, with a search deadline of December 31, 2022 for systematic reviews/meta-analyses of radiofrequency ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for primary liver cancer. The AMSTAR 2 scale, PRISMA statement, and GRADE grading system were used to evaluate the reporting quality, methodological quality, and evidence level. Results A total of 13 systematic reviews/meta-analyses were included, published from 2011 to 2022. The evaluation results of the AMSTAR 2 scale showed that 4 systematic reviews/meta-analyses were of low quality, while the rest were of extremely low quality, without medium to high quality systematic reviews/meta-analyses. The evaluation results of PRISMA statement showed that the scores of 9 systematic reviews/meta-analyses were 15-21, with certain reporting defects, and only 4 were relatively complete. The GRADE system evaluation of 75 evidence bodies for 9 clinical outcome indicators showed that there was no high quality of evidence, with medium quality accounting for 29%, low quality accounting for 32%, and extremely low quality accounting for 39%. Conclusions Radiofrequency ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization can improve the 1-year and 3-year overall survival rates of patients with primary liver cancer with medium quality of evidence. However, its impact on 5-year overall survival rate, recurrence-free survival rate, complications, and whether it is more effective for hepatocellular carcinoma with a diameter of 3-5 cm still require more high-quality clinical research and systematic evaluation to verify.
Based on the experience of more than 10 000 times of radiofrequency ablation treatment and the clinical and basic research results of radiofrequency ablation treatment of liver cancer obtained during the period, the author shares the experience of radiofrequency ablation indication selection, preoperative preparation, concept of radiofrequency ablation and postoperative follow-up of liver cancer. The purpose is to explore how to improve the curative effect of RFA treatment for small liver cancer, and reduce local residue, recurrence, as well as relevant complications.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and external beam radiation (XRT) in the treatment of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MethodsThe early HCC patients were collected in the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database, from 2010 to 2015, according to the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients were assigned into an XRT group and a RFA group according to according treatment plans. The propensity score matching (PSM) was performed at a ratio of 1∶4 based on age, gender, race, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), cirrhosis, and tumor diameter. The overall survival of the patients of the two groups was compared, and the risk factors affecting the long-term prognosis for the early HCC patients were analyzed. ResultsA total of 2 861 early HCC patients were collected, including 2 513 in the RFA group and 348 in the XRT group. After PSM, a total of 1 582 patients were enrolled, including 343 in the XRT group and 1 239 in the RFA group. After PSM, the proportion of tumor with larger diameter (>5 cm) in the XRT group was still higher than that in the RFA group (P<0.001), but there were no statistically significant differences in the other clinical pathological characteristics between them (P>0.05). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves of the RFA group was better than that of the XRT group (HR=1.65, P<0.001); The stratified analysis based on the tumor diameter revealed that the survival curves of the RFA group were superior to those of the XRT group in the HCC patients with tumor diameters <3 cm, 3–5 cm, and >5 cm (<3 cm: HR=1.79, P<0.001; 3–5 cm: HR=1.50, P<0.001; >5 cm: HR=1.67, P=0.003). The results of the multivariate Cox regression model analysis showed that the older age (≥65 years), higher AFP level (≥400 μg/L), larger tumor diameter (≥3 cm), and later AJCC stage (stage Ⅱ) were the risk factors for overall survival in the early HCC patients (HR>1, P<0.05), while the XRT treatment was a risk factor for shortening overall survival in the HCC patients [HR(95%CI)=1.62(1.41, 1.86), P<0.001]. ConclusionThe data analysis results from the SEER database suggest that the long-term overall survival of RFA treatment is superior to XRT treatment for patients with AJCC stage Ⅰ or Ⅱ.
Objective To explore therapeutic effect of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) guided by contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patient with advanced primary liver cancer following transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Methods The patients with advanced primary liver cancer treated with the TACE firstly from January to December 2014 in this hospital were prospectively collected, then were randomly divided into a conventional ultrasound guided RFA group (control group) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound guided RFA group (study group). The complete ablation rate, liver function, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were observed in the two groups. Results A total of 42 patients with advanced primary liver cancer treated with the TACE were enrolled in this study, there were 21 patients in each group. ① There were no significant differences in the baseline data such as the gender, age, BCLC stage, AFP level, and Child grade of liver function between the two groups (P>0.05). ② All the treatments were completed according to the plan, no serious complications or treatment-related death happened. The complete ablation rate of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group (χ2=5.717, P=0.017), and the AFP level was significantly lower than that of the control group (t=2.618, P=0.012). There was no significant difference in the Child grade of liver function between the 2 groups (P>0.05). ③ The rate of repeat RFA in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (χ2=4.434, P=0.035), and there was no significant difference in the TACE treatment rate between the two groups (χ2=1.659, P=0.197). ④ The survival rate of the study group was significantly better than that of the control group by comparing the survival curves (χ2=3.999, P=0.046). Conclusion Contrast-enhanced ultrasound guided RFA is superior to conventional ultrasound guided RFA in treatment of advanced primary liver cancer following TACE.
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of different surgical methods in the treatment of early-stage gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). Methods The clinical data of 43 patients with early-stage GBC who received treatment in Peking University People’s Hospital from Jan. 2010 to Dec. 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical methods, the patients were divided into laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)+lymph node dissection (LND)+radiofrequency ablation (RA) group, open cholecystectomy (OC)+LND+RA group, and OC+LND+liver resection (LA) group. Operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, surgical complications, and long-term survival were compared among the 3 groups. Results All the 43 patients performed successful surgery without perioperative death. ① Operation duration and postoperative hospital stay. The differences of operation duration and postoperative hospital stay among the 3 groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). Compared with the LC+LND+RA group, operation duration and postoperative hospital stay of the OC+LND+RA group and the OC+LND+LR group were longer (P<0.017), but there was no statistically significant difference between the OC+LND+RA group and the OC+LND+LR group (P>0.017). ② Intraoperative blood loss. The difference of intraoperative blood loss among the 3 groups was statistically significant (P<0.001). Compared with the OC+LND+LR group, the intraoperative blood loss was lower in the LC+LND+RA group and the OC+LND+RA group (P<0.017), but there was no significant difference between the LC+LND+RA group and the OC+LND+RA group (P=0.172). ③ Postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications among the 3 groups (P=0.326). ④ Long-term survival. There was no significant difference in survival curves among the 3 groups (P=0.057). Conclusions The method of cholecystectomy combined with LND and RA of gallbladder bed can achieve the radical effect on early-stage GBC (Tis–T2). Laparoscopic surgery, in particular, has shorter operation duration and faster recovery.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with transilluminated powered phlebectomy (TIPP) vs. high ligation and stripping (HLS) combined with TIPP in patients with varicose veins of lower limbs.MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 190 patients (206 limbs) of varicose veins of lower limbs who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital from December 2017 to July 2018, of them 88 patients (96 limbs) in RFA combined with TIPP group and other 102 patients (110 limbs) in HLS combined with TIPP group. The treatment effectiveness and quality of life was assessed with venous clinical severity score (VCSS) and chronic venous insufficiency questionnaire (CIVIQ-14) in three months and one year after surgery. Doppler ultrasound was used to evaluate the closure of great saphenous vein.ResultsBaseline characteristics were similar between the two groups (P>0.05). The RFA combined with TIPP group was better than the HLS combined with TIPP group in operation time, intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay time, postoperative bed time, resumption time of activities, as well as incidences of skin induration and limb numb (P<0.05). Occlusion rates of great saphenous vein in 3 months was 93.8% (90/96) in the RFA combined with TIPP group and 97.3% (107/110) in the HLS combined with TIPP group, and in one year was 91.7% (88/96) and 97.3% (107/110) respectively, there was no significant difference between the two groups at the same time point (P>0.05). The VCSS scores and CIVIQ-14 scores also improved significantly in two groups in 3 months and 1 year follow up (P<0.05), but there was no significant differences between the two groups at the same time point (P>0.05).ConclusionsRFA combined with TIPP is an effective method for the treatment of varicose veins of lower limbs. Compared with HLS, RFA has the same good effectiveness and quality of life, but it has the advantages of short operation time, rapid postoperative recovery, and less postoperative complications.
Objective To compare the effect of monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and concomitant rheumatic heart disease. Methods The clinical data of 261 patients who underwent valve replacement and radiofrequency Maze Ⅲ procedure in Shanghai First People's Hospital from 2010 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the radiofrequency ablation system, patients were assigned to a monopolar radiofrequency ablation group (n=209, 129 males, 80 females, aged 59.6±9.7 years) and a bipolar radiofrequency ablation group (n=52, 36 males, 16 females, aged 58.6±11.2 years). After procedures, clinical factors such as patients' basic information, perioperative complication and mortality, the elimination rate of atrial fibrillation were measured. Results There was no statistic difference in perioperative morbidity and mortality between two groups. The ablation time of the monopolar radiofrequency ablation group was longer than that of the bipolar group (29.7±3.3 minvs. 22.3±7.8 min,P=0.035). Postoperative diameter of left atrium was reduced in both groups. Compared with the monopolar radiofrequency ablation group, bipolar group had a better elimination rate of atrial fibrillation at three months and one year follow-up (82.0%vs. 66.3%,P=0.037; 80.0%vs. 59.6%,P=0.008). Conclusion Valve replacement combined with radiofrequency Maze Ⅲ procedure is safe and efficient. Compared with monopolar radiofrequency ablation, bipolar radiofrequency ablation has advantage on elimination rate of atrial fibrillation, ablation time and cardiopulmonary bypass time.
ObjectiveTo explore the outcome of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of overweight and obesity patients, and develop a more reasonable day-to-day surgical procedure.MethodsA retrospective analysis of the patients undergoing day surgery of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein under fine management from July 1st, 2017 to June 30th, 2019 was performed. According to the body mass index (BMI), the patients were divided into normal group (18.5 kg/m2≤BMI<24 kg/m2), overweight group (24 kg/m2≤BMI<28 kg/m2), and obese group (BMI≥28 kg/m2). The observation items during and after surgery of each group were compared and analyzed. The quantitative data were presented as median (lower quartile, upper quartile), and the qualitative data were presented as frequency and/or percentage.ResultsA total of 189 patients were included, including 65 in the normal group [BMI: 22.6 (21.3, 23.4) kg/m2], 77 in the overweight group [BMI: 26.1 (25.3, 27.0) kg/m2], and 47 in the obese group [BMI: 29.7 (28.4, 31.2) kg/m2]. Radiofrequency ablation time in the obese group [195 (185, 215) s] was significantly longer than that in the normal group [185 (175, 195) s] and the overweight group [185 (177.5, 198) s] (P<0.05). The numerical rating scale score of postoperative 24-hour pain in the radiofrequency ablation area in the obese group [1 (1, 2)] was significantly higher than that in the normal group [1 (1, 1)] and the overweight group [1 (1, 1)] (P<0.05). The postoperative 1-month residual vein length in the normal group [1.0 (0.8, 1.3) cm] was significantly shorter than that in the overweight group [1.2 (0.9, 1.8) cm] and the obese group [1.3 (0.9, 1.8) cm] (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative 1-month radiofrequency ablation area induration in the obese group (66.0%) was significantly higher than that in the normal group (10.8%) and the overweight group (20.8%) (P<0.05). The postoperative 3-month residual vein length in the obese group [1.2 (1.1, 1.4) cm] was significantly longer than that in the normal group [1.0 (0.9, 1.2) cm] and the overweight group [1.1 (1.0, 1.2) cm] (P<0.05).ConclusionPatients with BMI≥24 kg/m2 undergoing day surgery of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein require longer radiofrequency ablation time, as well as more postoperative pain assessment and outpatient follow-up.