The incidence of complications after radical resection of esophageal carcinoma is high up to about 20%-50%. The incidence of pneumonia, pleural effusion, tracheal intubation, anastomotic fistula and cardiac events is relatively high. Among them, pulmonary complications are the most common complications after esophageal cancer operation and cause the most perioperative deaths. Among the factors that influence the occurrence of postoperative complications of esophageal cancer, the amount of fluid infusion during and after the operation is closely related to the occurrence of postoperative complications. Moreover, in the environment of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), it is more important to optimize the postoperative fluid management of esophageal cancer. Restricted fluid therapy plays a more and more important role in patients undergoing esophagectomy. This review integrated the relevant research results and discussed the advantages of the restricted fluid therapy compared with other fluid therapy, how to control the restricted infusion volume and infusion speed and how to monitor and evaluate the infusion process and the selection of infusion types, so as to provide reference for clinical practice test.
In tracheal resection and reconstruction, a technically demanding, complex, and high-risk procedure, management of the anastomotic site significantly impacts postoperative outcomes and long-term quality of life. However, comprehensive studies detailing perioperative anastomotic management strategies in tracheal reconstruction remain scarce. This review summarizes perioperative management strategies for tracheal reconstruction, covering preoperative assessment, surgical techniques, and other key aspects. It also highlights future research directions and challenges, aiming to provide clinicians with a systematic guide to perioperative management in tracheal reconstruction.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of multidisciplinary doctor-nurse collaboration team on the perioperation management of geriatric patients with hip fractures.MethodsThe clinical data of 489 geriatric patients with hip fractures (femoral neck fracture and intertrochanteric fracture) between January 1st 2016 and January 1st 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 279 patients were treated with the multidisciplinary doctor-nurse collaboration care (observation group) and 210 patients were treated with the conventional therapeutics and nursing care (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, type and classification of fracture, the interval between injury and admission, and Charlson index between the two groups (P>0.05). The surgery rates, time from hospitalization to operation, length of stay, and the incidences of perioperative complications were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe surgery rate was 90.32% (252/279) in observation group and 80.48% (169/210) in control group, showing significant difference between the two groups (χ2=9.703, P=0.002). The time from hospitalization to operation and length of stay in observation group [(5.39±2.47), (10.56±3.76) days] were significant shorter than those in control group [(6.13±2.79), (12.27±3.11) days] (t=?3.075, P=0.002; t=?5.330, P=0.000). The incidence of respiratory complications was 46.15% in control group and 30.56% in observation group; the incidence of cardiovascular system complications was 69.23% in control group and 51.19% in observation group; the incidence of cerebrovascular system complications was 20.12% in control group and 11.11% in observation group; the incidence of deep venous thrombosis was 40.24% in control group and 25.40% in observation group. The incidences of perioperative complications were significantly lower in observation group than in control group (P<0.05).ConclusionMultidisciplinary doctor-nurse collaboration team is conducive not only to improve the surgery rates, but also to reduce perioperative complications as well as shorten the length of stay and preoperative waiting time.
With the advancement and development of computer technology, the medical decision-making system based on artificial intelligence (AI) has been widely applied in clinical practice. In the perioperative period of cardiovascular surgery, AI can be applied to preoperative diagnosis, intraoperative, and postoperative risk management. This article introduces the application and development of AI during the perioperative period of cardiovascular surgery, including preoperative auxiliary diagnosis, intraoperative risk management, postoperative management, and full process auxiliary decision-making management. At the same time, it explores the challenges and limitations of the application of AI and looks forward to the future development direction.
ObjectiveTo analyze the perioperative safety and the short-term prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with preoperative arrhythmia. MethodsThe clinical data of NSCLC patients treated in the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from August 2020 to March 2021 were collected and observed. The patients were divided into an arrhythmia group and a control group according to whether there was arrhythmia in the 24 h ambulatory electrocardiogram examination report before operation. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative cardiovascular events and short-term prognosis were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 466 patients were included in this study, including 338 patients in the arrhythmia group, 176 males and 162 females, with a median age of 68.0 (63.0, 72.0) years, and 128 patients in the control group, 59 males and 69 females, with a median age of 66.5 (60.0, 72.0) years. A total of 26 patients (7.7%) in the arrhythmia group were placed with temporary pacemakers before operation. There was no significant difference in the incidence of cardiovascular related events between the two groups [100 (29.6%) vs. 28 (21.9%), P=0.096]. The incidence of postoperative arrhythmia events in the arrhythmia group was higher than that in the control group [112 (33.1%) vs. 11 (8.6%), P<0.001]. The average postoperative ICU stay in the arrhythmia group was longer than that in the control group (1.1±0.7 d vs. 1.0±0.6 d, P=0.039). ConclusionPreoperative arrhythmia does not increase the risk of intraoperative cardiovascular events in NSCLC patients, but increases the incidence of postoperative arrhythmia events and prolongs ICU stay.
ObjectiveTo explore the efficacy and safety of intravenous injection of tranexamic acid (TXA) combined with local use of TXA cocktail in intertrochanteric fracture fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA).MethodsPatients with intertrochanteric fractures who underwent close reduction and internal fixation with PFNA between February 2018 and March 2019 were enrolled in the study. Among them, 45 patients who met the selection criteria were included in the study and randomly allocated into 3 groups (n=15). The patients in group A were not received TXA during perioperative period. The patients were intravenously injected of 1.0 g TXA before operation in group B and combined with local use of TXA cocktail during operation in group C. There was no significant difference in the age, gender, body mass index, fracture classification, disease duration, and complications between groups (P>0.05). The perioperative blood loss and blood transfusion rate, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score before operation and at 12, 24, and 48 hours after operation, the levels of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and bradykinin (BK) before operation and at 1 and 3 days after operation, postoperative complications, and the maximum amplitude (MA) of thromboelastogram were recorded and compared between groups.ResultsThe total blood loss, hidden blood loss, and visible blood loss were significantly lower in groups B and C than those in group A (P<0.05), and the total blood loss and hidden blood loss were significantly lower in group C than those in group B (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the blood transfusion rate, preoperative VAS scores and the levels of PGE2 and BK between groups (P>0.05). The postoperative VAS scores and the levels of PGE2 and BK were significantly lower in group C than in groups A and B (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in pre- and post-operative MA of thromboelastogram between groups (P>0.05). The incidences of postoperative complications were 33.33% (5/15), 20.00% (3/15), and 13.33% (2/15) in groups A, B, and C, respectively, with no significant difference between groups (χ2=1.721, P=0.550).ConclusionFor intertrochanteric fractures, application of intravenous injection of TXA combined with local use of TXA cocktail in PFNA fixation can reduce perioperative blood loss, relieve pain after operation, and do not increase the risk of complications.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the risk factors for perioperative blood transfusion in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang and VIP Database were electronically searched to collect case-control and cohort studies about the risk factors for perioperative blood transfusion in patients undergoing CABG from inception to February 2020. Two reviewers screened and evaluated the literatures according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 26 articles were collected, involving 84 661 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that age (OR=1.06, 95%CI 1.03 to 1.08, P<0.001), age≥70 years (OR=2.14, 95%CI 1.77 to 2.59, P<0.001), female (OR=1.85, 95%CI 1.55 to 2.22, P<0.001), body mass index (OR=0.94, 95%CI 0.90 to 0.98, P=0.003), weight (OR=0.95, 95%CI 0.93 to 0.96, P<0.001), body surface area (OR=0.19, 95%CI 0.10 to 0.39, P<0.001), smoking (OR=0.80, 95%CI 0.69 to 0.93, P=0.003), diabetes (OR=1.15, 95%CI 1.09 to 1.20, P<0.000 01), chronic heart failure (OR=1.59, 95%CI 1.26 to 1.99, P<0.001), number of diseased coronary arteries (OR=1.17, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.35, P=0.030), reoperation (OR=2.12, 95%CI 1.79 to 2.51, P<0.001), preoperative hemoglobin level (OR=0.60, 95%CI 0.43 to 0.84, P=0.003), preoperative ejection fraction <35% (OR=2.57, 95%CI 1.24 to 5.34, P=0.010), emergency surgery (OR=4.09, 95%CI 2.52 to 6.63, P<0.001), urgent operation (OR=2.28, 95%CI 1.25 to 4.17, P=0.007), intra-aortic balloon pump (OR=3.86, 95%CI 3.35 to 4.44, P<0.001), cardiopulmonary bypass (OR=4.24, 95%CI 2.95 to 6.10, P<0.001), cardiopulmonary bypass time (OR=1.01, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.01, P<0.000 01) and minimum hemoglobin during cardiopulmonary bypass (OR=0.42, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.77, P=0.005) were the risk factors for perioperative blood transfusion in patients undergoing CABG.ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that age, age≥70 years, female, body mass index, weight, body surface area, smoking, diabetes, chronic heart failure, number of diseased coronary arteries, reoperation, preoperative hemoglobin level, preoperative ejection fraction<35%, emergency surgery, urgent operation, intra-aortic balloon pump, cardiopulmonary bypass, cardiopulmonary bypass time and minimum hemoglobin during cardiopulmonary bypass are risk factors for perioperative blood transfusion in patients who undergo CABG. Medical staff should formulate and improve the relevant perioperative blood management measures according to the above risk factors, in order to reduce the perioperative blood utilization rate and improve the clinical prognosis of patients.
ObjectiveTo summarize the methods to prevent pulmonary complications in patients underwent abdominal surgery during perioperative period and provide reference for the prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications.MethodLiteratures on the prevention of pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery were searched and reviewed.ResultsThe prevention of pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery included preoperative measures, intraoperative measures, and postoperative measures. Preoperative measures included preoperative education, patient risk assessment, smoking cessation, and so on. Intraoperative measures included anesthetic measures and surgical measures. Postoperative measures included atomization treatment, elimination of bad feelings, early postoperative activities, and so on. In view of the different basic conditions of patients underwent abdominal surgery, the selection and emphasis of preventive measures were also different.ConclusionThe prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications after general abdominal surgery should not only take preventive measures in perioperative period, but also should carry out individual management according to the patient’s condition and general conditions.
Objective To provide experience for clinical diagnosis and treatment through exploring the perioperative characteristics and short-term treatment outcomes of adult cardiac surgery in patients with prior coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or valve surgery in the Department of Cardiac Surgery of Beijing Anzhen Hospital from December 26, 2022 to December 31, 2022, and previously diagnosed with COVID-19 before surgery. ResultsFinally 108 patients were collected, including 81 males and 27 females, with an average age of 60.73±8.66 years. Two (1.9%) patients received emergency surgery, and the others received elective surgery. The 86.1% of patients had been vaccinated, and the duration of COVID-19 was 5.0 (4.0, 7.0) days. The time from COVID-19 to operation was 15.0 (12.0, 17.8) days. Eighty-nine patients received CABG, of which off-pump CABG was dominant (92.1%). Nineteen patients received valve surgery. The rate of delayed extubation of ventilator was 17.6%. The ICU stay was 21.0 (17.3, 24.0) hours, and the postoperative hospital stay was 7.0 (6.0, 8.0) days. Three (2.8%) patients were treated with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), one (0.9%) patient was treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), one (0.9%) patient was treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) due to acute renal insufficiency, three (2.8%) patients were treated with temporary pacemaker, and one (0.9%) patient underwent rethoracotomy. In terms of postoperative complications, the incidence of cerebrovascular accident, acute renal insufficiency, gastrointestinal bleeding and septicemia was 0.9%, respectively, and the incidence of acute heart failure, lung infection, and liver insufficiency was 1.9%, respectively. All patients recovered and were discharged from hospital, and no in-hospital death occurred. Conclusion The utilization rate of postoperative IABP, ECMO, CRRT, temporary pacemaker and the incidence of serious complications in patients with prior COVID-19 are not higher than those of normal patients, and the short-term treatment outcome is good.
ObjectiveTo summarize the progress of perioperative pain management in patients with lower limb vascular diseases. MethodRetrieved the literature about pain management in patients with lower limb vascular diseases both at home and abroad in recent years and reviewed the literature. ResultsLower limb vascular diseases were very common in elderly patients. Whether it was limb ischemic pain or surgery-related pain, it often increased the stress response and activation of the autonomic system, which was not conducive to the recovery of the disease. Good analgesic management was important for these patients. Perioperative pain management could be performed by intravenous analgesics, oral analgesics, local anesthesia, neuraxial anesthesia and peripheral nerve block. Acute and chronic pain should be actively managed during perioperative period. Pre-emptive analgesic strategies could be implemented in patients with severe peripheral vascular disease. ConclusionsGood perioperative analgesia management is necessary. Pain management which employes one or more analgesic methods is important in maximizing pain relief, function, and quality of life for this patient group.