Methods Sixty-six postoperative patients with gastric cancer combined diabetes were divided into 3 groups according to the balanced principle. In the frist group (FD group), FD was the nutrition preparation for 21 patients. In the second group (fresubin group), fresubin and the ordinary insulin injection were the nutrition preparation for 21 patients. In the third group (TPN group), the nutrition preparation came from TPN and the ordinary insulin injection for 24 patients. FD, fresubin or TPN were given at 24 h after operation, the levels of blood glucose for empty stomach, after meal (enteral nutrition or TPN) and the common complications compared among 3 groups of postoperative patients. Results ① In FD group, the levels of blood glucose of postoperative empty stomach and after enteral nutrition were stable with little fluctuation and no insulin was needed with 1 case of hyperglycemia (4.8%). In fresubin group and TPN group, the levels of blood glucose of postoperative empty stomach and after enteral nutrition or TPN were unstable with big fluctuation, with 6 cases (28.6%) and 8 cases (33.3%) of hyperglycemia, 5 cases (23.8%) and 6 cases (25.0%) of hypoglycemia in fresubin group and TPN group, respectively. Compared with fresubin group and TPN group, the rate of pathoglycemia was lower in FD group, the difference had statistical significance separately (Plt;0.05); There was no significant difference between fresubin group and TPN group (Pgt;0.05). ② The rates of infection of incisional wound in FD group (4.8%) and fresubin group (23.8%) were lower than that of TPN group (33.3%), there was significant difference among 3 groups (Plt;0.05); The time of passage of gas by anus in FD group and fresubin group were shorter than that in TPN group (Plt;0.05); There was no significant difference between FD group and fresubin group (Pgt;0.05). There were no significant differences of the rates of abdominal distension or diarrhea among 3 groups (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion Regarding postoperative patients with gastric cancer combined diabetes, in the early time field test group of the nutrition preparation, FD is better than fresubin or TPN, which does not increase the risk of the blood glucose change and have few complications.
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between total enteral nutrition and enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods A total of 70 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in our hospital from July 2012 to July 2015 were collected prospectively, and all patients were divided into 2 groups randomly: enteral nutrition group and combined nutrition group. Patients in enteral nutrition group received total enteral nutrition, and patients in combined nutrition group received enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition. Compared the nutritional indicators, other related indexes, and morbidity between the 2 groups. Results ① The nutritional indexes. Compared with before treatment, the body mass index (BMI), white blood cell count, serum albumin level, serum albumin level, and total lymphocyte count at 1 week and 2 weeks after treatment improved (P<0.05). At the same time point (before treatment, 1 week after treatment, and 2 weeks after treatment), there was no significant in the BMI, white blood cell count, serum albumin level, serum albumin level, and total lymphocyte count between the 2 groups (P>0.05). ② Other related indexes. The anal exhaust time, defecation time, and hospital stay of the patients in the combined nutrition group were shorter than those of enteral nutrition group, and the cost of treatment in combined nutrition group was less than that of the enteral nutrition group (P<0.05). ③ Morbidity. There was no significant difference in the total morbidity between the combined nutrition group〔11.4% (4/35)〕 and enteral nutrition group 〔20.0% (7/35)〕,P>0.05. Conclusion Total enteral nutrition and enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition after pancreaticoduodenectomy both can obtain well curative effect, but enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition can make the patients recover faster with lower cost, which is suitable for promotion.
Objective To investigate the influence on the postoperative recovery for giving either total parenteral nutrition （TPN） or early enteral nutrition (EEN) to patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy. Methods Eighty-six patients with gastric cancer undergone total gastrectomy were divided into TPN group (n=31) and EEN group (n=55). Patients in TPN group received TPN support via vena cava (internal jugular vein or subclavian vein), while patients in EEN group received early feeding through the naso-intestinal tube, which was placed during operation, and volume of enteral nutrition (fresubin) was increased daily, full enteral nutrition was expected on day 3-5. Nutrition status after operation, postoperative plasma albumin (Alb), the time of passing gas or stool, the time of oral intake, hospital stay and any postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Results There were no significant differences between two groups (Pgt;0.05) in postoperative plasma Alb level, the time of passing gas or stool, postoperative complications rate or hospital stay. However, in the TPN group, the time of oral intake was shorter than that in EEN group (P=0.004). Conclusions Both TPN and EEN are the suitable nutritional methods for patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy, and with no detectable difference. For patients with high risk, such as severe malnutrition, naso-intestinal tube should be placed for EEN.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of total enteral nutrition (TEN) versus total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Methods The databases such as Pubmed (1996 to June 2011), EMbase (1984 to June 2011), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials of The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2011) and CBM (1978 to June 2011) were electronically searched, and the relevant references of the included papers were also manually searched. Two reviewers independently screened the trials according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the methodology quality. Meta-analyses were performed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.1 software. Results Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 379 patients with SAP were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that compared with TPN, TEN could significantly reduce the risk of mortality (RR=0.33, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.55, Plt;0.000 1), pancreatitis-related infections (RR=0.35, 95%CI 0.25 to 0.50, Plt;0.000 01), required rate of surgical intervention (RR=0.43, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.82, P=0.01), and incidence of multiple organ failure (MOF) (RR=0.28, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.46, Plt;0.000 01). There was no significant difference in the nutrition strategies associated complications between TPN and TEN (RR=1.16, 95%CI 0.42 to 3.22, P=0.78). Conclusion Meta-analyses show that compared with TPN, TEN can reduce the risk of mortality, pancreatitis-related infections, required rate of surgical intervention, and incidence of MOF; and it will not increase the nutrition strategies associated complications. Consequently, TEN should be considered a better choice for SAP patients as early as possible.
In order to investigater the effect of nutritional support on nutrients metabolism after liver resection,we researched into the hepatectomy and total parenteral nutrition model in rats.The features of the model were no fasting before surgery,10% glucose subcutaneous injection prior to operation avoiding of blood loss and shortening of the surgical process.The 7-day mortality was markedly decreased.Anesthetized with phenobarbital(25mg/kg) injection in combination of ether inhalation,the rats recovered quickly from anesthesia and developed almost no infection of the respiratory tract after hepatectomy.The rats were supplied parenterally energy of 573kJ/kg and a marked improvement in survival was achieved after liver resection.By applying dual preventive rotation equipment of protective spring and IN-Stopper,nutrient solution could be safely infused.
Objective To study glutamine (GLN) and cholecystokinin (CCK) effects on prevention of cholestasis in total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Methods White rabbits were choosed as TPN models, which were divided into four groups, group 1, TPN only (n＝10); Group 2, TPN plus GLN administration (n＝10); Group 3, TPN plus CCK (n＝10); Group 4, TPN plus GLN and CCK administration. Bile components were assayed and the structural change in gallbladder and liver were observed under light and election microspes at the forth and eighth week. Results Increasing of bilirubin and cholesterol was observed in the 1st and 2nd groups at the forth week, but increasing in the 3rd group was observed at the eighth week. The 4th group was normal. Changes of gallbladder and liver structure in 1st and 3rd group occured at the forth week. Changes of 2nd group occured at the eighth week. No structural change was found in the 4th group. Conclusion The test prove that cholestasis would occure during TPN and become serious with time prolonging. Integrity and function of gallbladder-wall tissue cell could be defended and sustained by applying GLN, but there is no direct preventing action. There is apparent cholecy stokinetic and cholagogic fundations by applying CCK. But CCK would lose its function if gallbladderwall was damaged. The test prove that TPN+GLN+CCK is the best way to prevent cholestasis during TPN.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of early enteral nutrition (EN) versus total parenteral nutrition (TPN) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Methods Such databases as MEDLINE, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, VIP, CNKI were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about EN versus TPN after PD published from 2000 to March 2010. The quality of the included trials was assessed according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, and the data were extracted and analyzed by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 4 RCTs involving 322 PD patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that the EN (the treatment group) was superior to the TPN (the control group) in the average postoperative hospital stay (MD= –2.34, 95%CI –3.91 to –0.77, Plt;0.05), the total incidence rate of complication (RR=0.75, 95%CI 0.57 to 0.99, P=0.04), the recovery time of enterocinesia (MD= –29.87, 95%CI –33.01 to –26.73, Plt;0.05) and the nutrition costs (MD= –30.51, 95%CI –35.78 to –25.24, Plt;0.05); there were no differences in mortality (RR=0.23, 95%CI 0.03 to 2.03, P=0.19), pancreatic leakage (RR=0.78, 95%CI 0.45 to 1.35, P=0.38), infectious complications (RR=0.71, 95%CI 0.43 to 1.18, P=0.19), non-infectious complications (RR=0.78, 95%CI 0.5 1 to 1.20, P=0.26) and postoperative serum albumin level (MD= –0.79, 95%CI –2.84 to 1.27, P=0.45). Conclusion Compared with total parenteral nutrition, the enteral nutrition used earlier after pancreatoduodenectomy shows significant advantages. But more reasonably-designed and double blind RCTs with large scale are expected to provide high quality proof.
Malnutrition is directly related to the outcomes of critically ill children. Providing ideal nutritional treatment can reduce the high catabolic state caused by the critically ill, reduce oxidative damage and regulate immune response, then improving clinical prognosis. Optimized nutritional supply for critically ill children has been transformed from auxiliary support to one of the important treatment methods. Enteral nutrition is the preferred way to provide nutrition, but parenteral nutrition is the only method of supplement and replacement when the supply of enteral nutrition is insufficient or deficient. This article reviews the timing of parenteral nutrition initiation, protein and amino acids in parenteral nutrition, the mechanism of possible adverse effects in early parenteral nutrition, and issues related to parenteral nutrition in premature infants, in order to help clinicians in pediatric intensive care unit improve the evaluation and management of parenteral nutrition use.
ObjectiveTo study the protective effect of hepatocyte growth factor(HGF) on grafted mucous membrane of transplanted small bowel.MethodsTotal small bowel transplantation was made in inbred Wistar (RT1k) rats heterotopically,either total parenteral nutrition (control group,n=10) or hepatocyte growth factor supplemented TPN (HGF group,n=10) was given to the recipients from the 2nd day to the 10th day postoperatively. Morphological parameters of the transplanted intestinal mucosa, such as mucosal villous height, villous width, crypt depth, mucosal thickness and villous surface area were observed. Variation of ultrastructure of transplanted epithelial cells was observed. Composition of mucosal protein and DNA content were tested. ResultsComparison between HGF group and the control group were as follows. Mucosal villous height (298.79±22.31） μm vs （176.45±14.62） μm, P=0.001, villous width (107.46±12.34） μm vs （74.20±16.85） μm, P=0.004, crypt depth (104.56±11.17） μm vs （74.45±8.34） μm, P=0.000 5, mucosal thickness (409.53±35.83） μm vs （259.38±24.65） μm, P=0.003, and villous surface area (0.101±0.011) mm2 vs (0.041±0.005) mm2, P=0.001 were found significantly increased in HGF group compared with control group, there were no obvious difference decrease as compared to pretransplant parameters.Mucosal protein composition was higher in HGF group than that in control group （89.65±9.28) mg/g wet wt vs (53.73±11.45) mg/g wet wt, P=0.012, baseline (92.64±10.52) mg/g wet wt, nearly equal to baseline; DNA composition was also high in HGF group （0.89±0.09) mg/g wet wt vs (0.51±0.06) mg/g wet wt, P=0.008, baseline (0.91±0.09) mg/g wet wt. Nearly normal ultrastructure of the graft was maintained in HGF group, atrophied microvilli and broken mitochondrial crista were observed in control group.ConclusionHepatocyte growth factor can improve mucosal structure, preserve enterocyte ultrastructure of isograft after small bowel transplantation in rat.
Objective To promote the clinical application of parenteral and enteral nutrition preparations in hospitalized patients. Methods Domestic and foreign articles about parenteral and enteral nutrition support were enrolled to make a review. Results Nowadays, parenteral and enteral nutrition played an important role in the medical treatment of perioperative and critically ill patients. Rational nutrition support could improve the condition of patients with nutritional risk and result in better clinical outcomes. Different enteral nutrition formulations should be used according to the diseases. Supplementally parenteral nutrition may also be useful in combination with enteral nutrition to reach the required intake targets. We should pay attention to the application of glucose, lipid emulsion, amino acids, vitamins, and so on, when performed parenteral nutrition support. Conclusion It is necessary to standardize parenteral and enteral nutrition support in the work of clinical practice, including the application of nutrition support and selection of nutrition preparations.