ObjectiveTo investigate the factors that affect the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP).MethodsThe clinical data of 114 patients underwent DP who were performed in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from Jan. 2014 to Jun. 2019, were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsIn this group of 114 patients, 43 cases (37.7%) of POPF occurred after DP, including 19 cases of grade A (biochemical fistula), 21 cases of grade B, and 3 cases of grade C. The univariate analysis results showed that: BMI value, drinking history, preoperative plasma albumin level, postoperative plasma albumin level, postoperative neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), preoperative and postoperative prognostic nutrition index (PNI) levels were significant different between the POPF group and non-POPF group (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis results showed that: preoperative plasma albumin>35 g/L [OR=0.115, 95%CI was (0.038, 0.348)], postoperative plasma albumin>35 g/L [OR=0.126, 95%CI was (0.031, 0.516)], and postoperative NLR value≤6.65 [OR=0.149, 95%CI was (0.048, 0.461)] were the influencing factors of POPF after DP. The area under curve of postoperative NLR was 0.731 [95%CI was (0.639, 0.824)]. ConclusionPreoperative and postoperative plasma albumin>35 g/L, as well as postoperative NLR ≤6.65 are protective factors for POPF after DP, and postoperative NLR can be used as a predictor of POPF.
The detection rate of benign and borderline/low-grade malignant tumors of pancreas has increased year by year. Most of the patients are middle-aged and young people, who have thirst for high quality of life in long-term. Pancreatic-duct-preserving partial pancreatectomy can meet the needs of reducing surgical trauma, preserving normal pancreatic function and improving patients’ quality of life. However, pancreatic-duct-preserving partial pancreatectomy often needs to face the problem of pancreatic duct defect. Repair of pancreatic duct needs to be applied ? according to different types of pancreatic duct defect. At the same time, the prevention and treatment of pancreatic fistula also require more patience, courage and creativity of pancreatic surgeons. Pancreatic-duct-preserving partial pancreatectomy can solve the current clinical problems. It is safe and feasible with carefully evaluate indications, characters of patients and the personal ability of surgeons.
Four techniques in Whipple operation improved by the anthor in this article are as follow: ①the jejunum was pulled up to the area above transverse colon through the duodenal canal behide intestinal mesenteric radix. ②As Hofmeister’s method, the duodenojejunostomy or gastrojejunostomy was made through mesentery of transverse colon. ③The internal drainage tube inserted into the pancreatic duct was extended to about 25 to 30 cm. ④A silicon tube for feeding about 3 mm diameter was placed into distal jejudum through anterior wall of gastric antrum, pylorus and duodenojejunal anastomosis. The techniques and their advantages are elaborated in this paper.
ObjectiveTo explore the security and advantages of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) for occupancy lesions in pancreatic body and tail. MethodsA total of 97 patients with occupancy lesions in pancreatic body and tail who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in our hospital from June 2010 to August 2014 were collected retrospectively, and were divided into LSPDP group (n=60) and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (LDPS) group (n=37) according to the surgery, clinical effect was compared between the 2 groups. ResultsThe operations got well in all patients, no one died during perioperative period. The operation time was shorter in LSPDP group than that of LDPS group[(190.83±66.39) min vs. (224.46±83.23) min, P=0.030], but there was no significant difference between LSPDP group and LDPS group in the blood loss[45.35 mL vs. 54.92 mL], hospital stay[(8.38±4.06) d vs. (9.76±4.54) d], incidence of total postoperative complication[23.33% (14/60) vs. 13.51% (5/37)], and degree of postoperative complication (P>0.050). There were 86 patients were followed up for 3-54 months, with the median time of 18 months. For patients with tumor, no one suffered from recurrence, metastasis, and death during the follow-up period, and other patients with benign diseases had an excellent prognosis. ConclusionFor occupancy lesions in pancreatic body and tail, LSPDP is feasible and safe.
Objective To study the clinical significance of central pancreatectomy in treatment of benign tumor of neck and body of pancreas. Methods The clinical data of 29 patients with benign tumor of pancreas were reviewed retrospectively in our hospital during the past 5 years. Results There was no perioperative death. Mean of operative time was （165±45） min （125-270min）， mean of blood loss was （173±88） mL （50-450mL）. The pathological diagnosis of all the patients were benign. Pancreatic fistula occurred in 10 patients. One patient with bleeding after operation was treated with another two operations. Twenty-one patients were followed-up with the time ranged from 3 months to 4 years （average 16 months）. There were no complications related to diabetes. Conclusion Central pancreatectomy is reasonable for patients with benign tumor of pancreas， it could well preserve the endocrine and exocrine function of pancreas， and improve the quality of life of patients.
Objective To summarize the experiences of middle pancreatectomy. Methods Eleven female and 4 male with a mean age of 49.4 years (23.8-73.1 years) who underwent middle pancreatectomy from January 2001 to October 2005 were collected. Eight patients with neuroendocrine tumor (non-function of 5 cases), 5 with serous cystadenomas and 2 with mucinous cystadenomas were included. The proximal apical end of pancreas was sutured, while distal end of pancreas was anastomosed to a Roux-en-Y jejunal loop. Results Mean operative time was 275 min (179-370 min), mean length of resected pancreas was 45 mm (30-60 mm) and max diameter of tumor was 23 mm (15-40 mm). Complication after operation was pancreatic fistula 〔4 cases (26.7%)〕, in which 3 cases (20.0%) had intraabdominal blood. The mean time of follow-up was 23 months (3 months-5 years). one patient was died of multiple organs failure for pulmonary infections in month 3 after operation, and the others were alive without novo-diabetes. Conclusion Middle pancreatectomy is an effective operation for benign and borderline tumors of neck and body of pancreas without a significant increase of postoperative morbidity.
ObjectiveTo summarize the key technical points, applicability, feasibility, and safety of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP).MethodA retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 22 patients who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from September 2016 to November 2019, all patients planned to receive LSPDP.ResultsTwenty of the 22 patients successfully completed LSPDP, and 2 patients converted to laparotomy. One patient was transferred to laparotomy to suture the damaged splenic artery. The spleen was observed to have no ischemia and the spleen preservation operation was continued. One patient was converted to laparotomy due to the difficulty of dissecting the tail of the pancreas which caused by severe abdominal adhesion. The operation time of LSPDP patients was (191±86) minutes (170–480 min), intraoperative blood loss was (365±50) mL (200–1 000 mL), and postoperative hospital stay was (9.9±2.6) days (7–16 d). Six patients of pancreatic fistula occurred after operation, including 3 cases of biochemical fistula, which were cured and discharged after symptomatic treatment, 3 cases of grade B pancreatic fistula, who all improved after anti-inflammatory, acid suppression, enzyme suppression, and double catheter drainage. Twenty patients were interviewed after the operation, and the follow-up time was 3–24 months (median of 15 months). During the follow-up period, no patient had recurrence or metastasis.ConclusionsUnder the conditions of strict screening of suitable cases, adequate preoperative imaging evaluation, intraoperative fine manipulation, and the application of appropriate operating instruments and cutting closure devices, LSPDP is safe and feasible to treat benign tumors of the pancreatic body and tail and some borderline tumors. During the operation, attention should be paid to the reasonable treatment and protection of splenic arteries and veins.
ObjectiveTo investigate the role of local pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors.MethodThe clinical data of 45 patients with benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors who underwent local pancreatectomy from January 2014 to June 2019 in Union Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology were analyzed.ResultsForty-five patients underwent the local enucleation or resection with negative margin. The pathological results showed that there were 17 cases of solid pseudopapilloma, 5 cases of mucinous cystadenoma, 4 cases of serous cystadenoma, 10 cases of islet cell tumor, 5 cases of nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumor, 4 cases of congenital cyst. There were 6 cases of head of pancreas, 26 cases of body of pancreas, 8 cases of tail of pancreas, 5 cases of uncinate process. The tumor was 1.2 to 9.0 cm in diameter with an average of 3.2 cm. Among them, the diameter was more than 5.0 cm in 9 cases. The incidence of pancreatic fistula after operation was 57.8%, 65.4% was grade A fistula, 34.6% was grade B fistula, and no grade C fistula occurred. The incidence of abdominal infection was 13.3%, incidence of abdominal hemorrhage was 6.7%. There was no secondary diabetes mellitus and pancreatic endo- and exocrine dysfunction, and no death case.ConclusionsPancreatic enucleation for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors after strict preoperative evaluation can effectively preserve the pancreatic endocrine function of patients. Although the incidence of pancreatic fistula is high, it is mostly biochemical fistula, and the incidence of serious complications is low.
ObjectiveTo explore the safety and feasibility of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy for children with distal pancreatic injures.MethodsClinical data of 10 patients with severe distal pancreatic injures in The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University from January 2012 to July 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The intraoperative and postoperative situation including operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood platelet count, and perioperative complications were observed.ResultsAll the 10 patients underwent spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy successfully. The median operation time was 3 h (2–6 h), the median intraoperative blood loss was100 mL (50–300 mL), the postoperative blood platelet count ranged from 75×109/L to 260×109/L with the median postoperative blood platelet count was 175×109/L. Two patients suffered from pancreatic leakage, one patient suffered from subphrenic infection, and one patient suffered from pulmonary infection. All patients suffered from complication recovered after symptomatic treatments. All patients were followed up in the outpatient department, the follow-up time was 4–60 months with a median of 30 months. Reexamination of abdominal ultrasound and blood routine (every 3 months after surgery) showed that, no abnormalities in blood supply, morphology, and structure of spleen, and platelet counts fluctuated within the normal range. During the follow-up period, none of the children suffered from severe infection due to hyposplenic function.ConclusionSpleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy is a safe and effective method for children with distal pancreatic injures.
Objective To analyze the risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) and to explore the effective index of predicting POPF after DP. Methods The clinical data of 120 patients with pancreatic disease who were treated with DP in the Department of Tumor Surgery of Xuzhou Medical University from January 2010 to November 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. The influencing factors of POPF after DP were analyzed by non-conditional logistic regression. Results Of the 120 patients, 15 patients (12.5%) had clinically significant POPF, including 13 cases of grade B pancreatic fistula and 2 cases of grade C pancreatic fistula. The results of non-conditional logistic regression showed that, the soft pancreas and preoperative pancreatic CT value of the pancreas less than 40 Hu were the independent risk factors of POPF after DP (P<0.05). Conclusions Pancreatic texture and preoperative CT value are important factors influencing the occurrence of POPF after DP. Evaluating the preoperative CT value and intraoperative pancreatic texture can effectively predict the risk of POPF after DP.