Objective To investigate factors for surgical difficulty and complications following closure of temporary ileostomy for rectal cancer. Methods The clinical data of 103 patients with low rectal cancer treated with closure of temporary ileostomy from January 2014 to July 2017 in the Northern Theater Command General Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The associated factors of surgical difficulty and postoperative complications were identified by the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results In this study, there were 11 (10.7%) patients with surgical difficulty (operation time >100 min) in the 103 patients. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the history of previous abdominal surgery ［OR=5.272, 95% CI (1.325, 20.977), P=0.018］ and minimally invasive surgery ［OR=0.166, 95% CI (0.037, 0.758), P=0.020］ were the independent influencing factors of the difficulty of surgery. The complications following closure of temporary ileostomy included 16 (15.5%) patients with the incision infection, 5 (4.9%) patients with the intestinal obstruction, and 3 patients with the pulmonary infection (2.9%). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the diabetes ［OR=4.855, 95% CI (1.133, 20.804), P=0.033］, operation time >100 min ［OR=11.914, 95% CI (2.247, 63.171), P=0.004］, and peristomal dermatitis ［OR=18.814, 95% CI (3.978, 88.988), P<0.001］ were the independent influencing factors for the incision infection. Conclusions History of previous abdominal surgery is main cause for difficulty of surgery and minimally invasive surgery can reduce difficulty of surgery. Diabetes mellitus, longer operation time, and peristomal dermatitis are main causes of postoperative incision infection.
Objective To classify the postoperative complications (POCs) in patients receiving esophagectomy and find risk factors of different grades of complications. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 298 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy from January 2012 to August 2015 in our hospital. According to the postoperative complications, they were divided into two groups: the complication group (n=113) and the non-complication group (n=185). In the complications group, there were 86 males and 27 females with an average age of 61.42±7.81 years. There were 150 males and 35 females with an average age of 60.39±7.76 years in the non-complication group. The POCs were classified by Clavien-Dindo system. All possible factors influencing the occurrence of grade Ⅱ-Ⅴ POCs were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used for seeking independent risk factors of POCs. Results The incidence of grade Ⅱ POCs was 29.87% (89/298), 5.37% (16/298) for grade Ⅲ and 2.68% (8/298) for grade Ⅳ and Ⅴ. The most common POC was lung infection with the incidence of 13.76%. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed the operation duration and the number of lymph node dissection were the independent risk factors of grade Ⅱ-Ⅴ POCs. Conclusion Postoperative lung infection is the major complication in patients receiving esophagectomy. The operation duration and the number of lymph node dissection are the independent risk factors of grade Ⅱ-Ⅴ POCs.
Objective To investigate the impact of the surgeon’s dominant hand-side on the operational efficiency and safety of primary lumbar discectomy under unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE). Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted in 60 patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation who underwent UBE lumbar discectomy between August 2024 and August 2025 by the same right-handed surgeon, including 30 patients with non-dominant (right approach) (non-matched group) and 30 patients with dominant (left approach) (matched group). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in baseline data including gender, age, body mass index, herniated segment distribution, disease duration, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI) (P>0.05). The total operation time, core endoscopic operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and related complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. A self-developed surgeon’s operational fluency assessment score was used for auxiliary subjective evaluation. VAS score and ODI were used to assess pain and functional improvement preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. The modified MacNab criteria was used to evaluate overall surgical outcomes at 3 months postoperatively. Results There was no significant difference in the total operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). The core endoscopic operation time of the matched group was significantly shorter than that of the non-matched group, and the operational fluency assessment score of the matched group was significantly higher than that of the non-matched group (P<0.05). All patients were followed up 3-6 months, with an average of 4.2 months. Complications occurred in 2 cases (6.7%) in the matched group, including 1 case of dural tear and 1 case of postoperative transient nerve root palsy, and 1 case (3.3%) in the non-matched group, which was postoperative epidural hematoma. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The VAS scores and ODI of the two groups decreased at 1 and 3 months after operation, and improved further at 3 months after operation compared with 1 month after operation, and the differences were significant (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups after operation (P>0.05). Modified MacNab standard was used to evaluate the curative effect at 3 months after operation, and there was no significant difference in the evaluation grade and excellent and good rate between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Consistency between the surgeon’s dominant hand side and the surgical approach side significantly improves core endoscopic operational efficiency and surgical fluency in UBE lumbar discectomy, without compromising clinical efficacy or safety. It is suggested that this matching factor should be prioritized in surgical scheduling and beginner training to optimize the operative experience and shorten the learning curve.