ObjectiveTo study changes in choroidal thickness(CT) with intravitreal injections of ranibizumab treatment. MethodsThis is a prospective, uncontrolled, open-label study. A total of 31 eyes of 31 patients diagnosed with wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and 33 eyes of 33 patients diagnosed with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to pathological myopia (PM) were included in the study. All affected eyes were treated with intravitreal ranibizumab 0.05 ml (10 mg/ml) and followed up monthly until 6 months. Enhanced depth imaging on Cirrus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography was used to measure the CT. The initial CT was compared with the data at 1, 3 and 6 month after treatment, and the correlation between of the decrease of CT at the 6 month and the number of injection times was analyzed. ResultsIn AMD group, the average CT respectively decreased by (9.68±11.02), (12.58±11.04), (13.84±11.67)μm at 1, 3 and 6 month, and the differences were significant(t=4.89, 6.34, 6.60;P < 0.001). In PM group, the average CT respectively decreased by (2.06±10.92), (3.64±8.78), (3.27±7.20)μm at 1, 3 and 6 month. The difference at 1 month was not significant (t=1.08, P=0.287). While after 3 months and 6 months, the differences were significant(t=2.38, 2.61;P=0.024, 0.014). The injection times were not correlated with the CT decreases at 6 month in both groups(r=0.04, 0.30;P=0.815, 0.099). ConclusionIntravitreal injections of ranibizumab can induce choroidal thickness reduction for wet age-related macular degeneration and choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia.
Objective To observe the clinical effects and safety of Bevacizumab on recurrent idiopathic choroidal neoascularization(CNV). Methods To analyze retrospectively the clinical data of 21 eyes of 20 patients with recurrent idiopathic CNV who had intravitreal injection of Bevacizumab(0.05 ml 1.25 mg) after signing the letter of consent. In these patients, 12 cases (13 eyes) had been cured by photodynamic therapy (PDT), and 8 cases (8 eyes) had been cured by transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT). The follow-up periods were 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after injection. The inspection findings of best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and optical coherence tomogr aphy (OCT) before and after the treatment were observed and analyzed. It could inject once more by the same way if there are recurrences in follow-up period. Results At the end of follow-up period, the BCVA improved obviously (gt;1 lines) in 14 eyes (66.7%)，kept stable (changed within 1 line)in 5 eyes (23.8%) and decreased (gt;1 lines) in 2 eyes(9.5%). The complete closure of CNV in 17 eyes (81.0%) and partial closure in 4 eyes (19.0%) were observed by FFA images. The thickness of retina in macular region decreased 115 micron. 3 eyes (14.3%) has inject again during follow-up period. The intraocular pressure increased in 4 eyes(19.0%) , the average intraocular pressure was 26.7 mm Hg（1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa). They have been returned to normal through the treatment. There was no serious adverse reaction in process of treatment. Conclusion Intravitreal infection of Bevacizumab can reduce the leakage of recurrent CNV and macular edema after PDT or TTT. About 2/ 3 patients can improve their visual acuity obviously. No severe complication or adverse reaction was observed in this study. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis,2008,24:168-171)
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal injection with Bevacizumab for iris neovascularization (INV) which caused by proliferative dia betic retinopathy (PDR) or central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Methods The clinical data of 39 patients (47 eyes) with INV who undergone intravitreal injection with Bevacizumab from 12,2006 to 3,2007 in Department of Ophthalmology, Peopleprime;s Hospital of Peking University were retrospectively analyzed. The patients (22 males and 17 females, 23 left eyes and 24 right eyes) aged from 28 to 82 years with the average of （57.77plusmn;13.0）years. 26 cases (34 eyes) were PDR and 13 cases (13 eyes) were CRVO. All of patients underwent intravitreal injection with 1.25 mg/0.05 ml Bevacizumab. Follow-up time was 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 3 week s and 6 weeks after the treatment. The visual acuity, changes of intraocular pre ssure and changes of INV before and after the treatment were observed and analyzed. Results In patients with PDR, the visual acuity was improved in 19 eyes (55.9%), was stable in 15 eyes (44.1%) and none decreased. In patients with CRVO, the visual acuity was improved in 4 eyes (30.8%), was stable in 9 eyes (69.0%) and none decreased. Among neovascular glaucoma (NVG), decreas e of IOP was noticed in 16 eyes with PDR (80%) and 6 eyes with CRVO (667%). Re gression of INV was noticed in 97.1% PDR patients and 84.6% CRVO patients. Conclusions Intravitreal injection with Bevacizumab is very effective in treating INV. Further researches still needs to explore long term efficacy, safety and complications of this t reatment. （Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis，2008，24：176-179）
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab and (or) triamcinolone combined with laser photocoagulation for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) during one year period. MethodsThe data of 31 eyes from 31 consecutive patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO during one year follow-up visit were retrospectively analyzed. Mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) logMAR was (0.74±0.36) and mean central retinal thickness (CRT) was (484.48±164.81)μm at baseline. All patients received standardized clinical comprehensive examinations including vision, intraocular pressure and optical coherence tomography for diagnosis before treatment. All patients received intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab (0.05 ml) at first visit. The continue PRN treatment were based on the visual acuity changes and the optical coherence tomography findings. Eyes received combined triamcinolone acetonide 0.05 ml (40 mg/ml) and ranibizumab for macular edema recurrence after two injections of ranibizumab and received laser photocoagulation during 10-14 days after third injections of ranibizumab. Mean injection of ranibizumab was 3.52±2.01, 15 eyes with triamcinolone acetonide (0.84±1.21), 21 eyes with laser photocoagulation (0.97±0.95) and 12 eyes with three treatment. Compared the visual acuities and CRTs of the first and the last visits by statistical analysis. ResultsMean visual acuity improved significantly to 0.42±0.33 logMAR (t=6.611, P=0.000). Mean improvement of visual acuity was 2.90±3.07 lines. A gain of three or more logarithmic lines was evaluated in 20/31 eyes (64.52%) at the last visit. Mean CRT was (326.19±117.80)μm (t=4.514, P=0.000).Mean reduction of CRT was (333.58±134.17)μm. A decrease of 100μm of CRT was evaluated in 17/31 eyes (54.84%). No severe ocular and systematic side effect was found. ConclusionThe efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab and (or) triamcinolone combined with laser photocoagulation for macular edema secondary to BRVO were assured.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical effect of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) combined with vitrectomy in treating proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). MethodsThis is a prospective non-randomized controlled clinical study. A total of 62 patients (70 eyes) who underwent vitrectomy for PDR were enrolled and divided into IVR group (30 patients, 34 eyes) and control group (32 patients, 36 eyes).IVR group patients received an intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml ranibizumab solution (10 mg/ml) 3 or 5 days before surgery. The follow-up time was 3 to 18 months with an average of (4.5±1.8) months. The surgical time, intraoperative bleeding, iatrogenic retinal breaks, use of silicone oil, the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the incidence of postoperative complications were comparatively analyzed. ResultsThe difference of mean surgical time (t=6.136) and the number of endodiathermy during vitrectomy (t=6.128) between IVR group and control group was statistically significant (P=0.000, 0.036). The number of iatrogenic retinal break in IVR group is 8.8% and control group is 27.8%, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.154, P=0.032). Use of silicone oil of IVR group is 14.7% and control group is 38.9%, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.171, P=0.023). The incidence of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage in 3 month after surgery was 11.8% and 30.6% respectively in IVR group and control group. The differences were statistically significant (χ2=3.932, P=0.047). The 6 month postoperative mean BCVA of IVR group and control group have all improved than their preoperative BCVA, the difference was statistically significant (t=4.414, 8.234; P=0.000).But there was no difference between the mean postoperative BCVA of two groups (t=0.111, P=0.190). There was no topical and systemic adverse reactions associated with the drug after injection in IVR group. ConclusionsMicroincision vitreoretinal surgery assisted by IVR for PDR shorten surgical time, reduces the intraoperative bleeding and iatrogenic retinal breaks, reduces the use of silicon oil and the postoperative recurrent vitreous hemorrhage. But there was no significant relationship between vision improvement and IVR.
The introduction of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy represents a landmark in the management of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD). However, as a new therapy, several problems such as durability of the therapeutic effects, medication side effects, and medication selection have emerged. We should make appoint of improving the therapeutic effect and safety by realizing the limitation of the therapy, monitoring the clinical potential adverse reactions of anti-VEGF agents, and recommending individualized treatment.
Objective To observe the effects of intravitreal injection of conbercept for aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (AP-ROP). Methods It is a retrospective case study. Twenty-one patients (40 eyes) with AP-ROP were enrolled in this study. There were 9 males (18 eyes) and 12 females (22 eyes), with the mean gestational age of (28.30±1.79) weeks and the mean birth weight of (1 021.40±316.70) g. All the lesions of 40 eyes were located in posterior zone, with 24 eyes in zone I and 16 eyes in zone II. All the eyes were treated with intravitreal injection of conbercept 0.025 ml (0.25 mg). During follow-up, nonresponders or patients with deterioration were retreated with intravitreal injection of conbercept or photocoagulation; patients with progressive deterioration to stage 4 had received vitrectomy. At the 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 weeks after treatments, the disappearance or decrease of retinal vessel tortuosity and neovascularization, and the growth of the normal retinal vessels toward the peripheral retina were evaluated. Results Thirty-six eyes were cured for only one injection, the cured rate was 90.00%. However, 2 eyes (5.00%) had progressed to stage 4 with contractive retinal detachment, which underwent vitrectomy. Two eyes (5.00%) had received twice injections, whose remaining avascular zone area treated by photocoagulation. No major systemic or ocular complications after injection appeared. All lens remained transparent and no iatrogenic retinal hole was occurred during the follow-up. Conclusion Intravitreal injection of conbercept is effective in the treatment of AP-ROP.
Objective To observe the inhibitory effects and characteristics of intravitreal injection with bevacizumab on laser induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV).Methods Twelve male brown norway（BN）rats were divided into the bevacizumab group and control group with six rats in each group. One eye of rats were received a series of 8 diode laser esions around optic disc to induce CNV,then the rats in bevacizumab group and control group underwent intravitreal injection with 2 mu;l bevacizumab and ringer's lactate.On days 7,14,and 21，the morphology and leakage of CNV were observed by fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA).On day 21 after photocoagulation,the photocoagulated eyes were enucleated and processed for histopathologic examination, including hematoxylin and eosin (Hamp;E) staining and immunohistochemistry staining for vascular endothelial growth factor（VEGF）.Results On day 7 after photocoagulation,ICGA showed that CNV developed in the bevacizumab group and the control group. FFA showed that leakage intensity in the bevacizumab group was significantly lower than that in the control group，but the bevacizumab group gradually increased over time. The mean thickness of CNV significantly decreased in the bevacizumab group.The CNV in the bevacizumab group were negative for VEGF according to the result of immmuohistochemistry staining.Conclusions Early intravitreal injection with 2 mu;l bevacizumab can reduce the thickness of CNV and inhibit the leakage of CNV. However, bevacizumab could neither block the formation of CNV, nor suppress the permeability permanently. Combined other therapies with bevacizumab may be more potential to treat CNV effectively.
ObjectiveTo observe the efficacy of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) for retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP). MethodsEleven patients (14 eyes) with RAP were enrolled in this retrospective clinical study. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and maximum retinal thickness (MRT) were detected by examination of visual acuity and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The average BCVA was 0.17±0.21, CRT was (382.71±219.07) μm, MRT was (746.36±268.29) μm. All eyes received 0.5 mg (0.05 ml) ranibizumab injection. Follow-up visits were performed monthly after injection. The mean follow-up time was (15.38±13.64) month. Injections were repeated if the eyes with retinal edema. The mean number of repetitive IVR was (3.7±1.0) times/eye (from 1 to 10 times). Changes in BCVA, CRT, MRT and complications were observed at the last follow up. ResultsAt the last follow-up, the mean BCVA was 0.28±0.26 (from 0.01 to 1.0). Of 14 eyes, visual acuity improved in 11 eyes, not changed in 2 eyes and decreased in 1 eye. The difference of BCVA was significant between before and after the treatment (t=3.167,P=0.007). The mean CRT was (166.14±52.79) μm, which was less than that of pre-treatment values (t=3.737,P=0.002). The mean MRT was (360.43±102.19) μm, which was less than that of pre-treatment values (t=6.106,P=0.000). No ocular or systemic adverse effects occurred. ConclusionIVR is an efficient and safe treatment for RAP, with visual acuity improvement, decrease of CRT and MRT.
ObjectiveTo observe the different effect of 23G vitrectomy surgery assisted with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab and pan-retina photocoagulation in severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) treatment. MethodsA total of 60 patients (78 eyes) with severe PDR diagnosed were enrolled and divided into intravitreal injection of Lucentis group (Group A, 22 patients, 28 eyes), pan-retina photocoagulation group (Group B, 18 patients, 20 eyes) and control group (Group C, 20 patients, 30 eyes), all of them received 23G vitreoretinal surgery. The average operation time, iatrogenic hiatus, the use of filler and electric coagulation, postoperative bleeding and best corrected visual acuity in three months were comparatively analyzed among the three groups. ResultsThe operation time in the three group was (67.429±11.243), (77.762±10.435), (106.839±20.724) min respectively, the differences of A vs C and B vs C were statistically significant(t=8.940, 5.928; P < 0.05). Five eyes needed electric coagulation in Group A, 6 eyes in Group B, and 24 eyes in Group C, the differences of A vs C and B vs C were all statistically significant (χ2=19.955, 10.505;P < 0.05). Four eyes used the filler in Group A, 3 eyes in Group B, and 23 eyes in Group C, the differences of A vs C and B vs C were all statistically significant (χ2=18.099, 14.083;P < 0.05). The difference of iatrogenic hiatus and postoperative bleeding was no significance among the three groups (P > 0.05). The best corrected visual acuity of 3 months after surgery in the three group is (0.383±0.122), (0.251±0.067), (0.104±0.044) respectively, the differences of A vs C and B vs C were all statistically significant(t=11.909, 13.616;P < 0.05). ConclusionThe intravitreaI injection of ranibizumab or pan-retina photocoagulation treatment before the vitrectomy surgery is very effective, both of them can shorten the operation time, reduce electric coagulation and use of filler, and improve patients' eyesight.