Objective To explore the diagnostic and treating scheme of primary sclerotic cholangitis. Methods 24 cases of primary sclerotic cholangitis identified by radiological and pathological examinations from 1972 to 1998 were analysed retrospectively. According to Thompson, 1 case was classified as type Ⅰ, 5 cases were type Ⅱ, 10 cases were type Ⅲ and 8 cases were type Ⅳ. The operation were as follows,resection of gallbladder plus T tube drainage in 8 cases, plus Roux-en-Y anastomosis of bile duct and jejunum in 12 cases, plus U tube stent and drainage in 4 cases. Results The total mortality rate was 25% (6/24) in 2～18 years follow-up after operation. Conclusion Early diagnosis and operation may resolve the drainage of bile into the jejunum. When serious lesions and worse liver functions exist, liver transplantation should be considered.
ObjectiveTo investigate the application of imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy in pure laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodsEighty-five cases of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in our hospital from May 2014 to December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. According with inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, 78 cases were investigated. They were divided into pancreatic duct-to-jejunum mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy group as controlled group (n=42) and imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy (technique of duct-to-mucosa PJ with transpancreatic interlocking mattress sutures) group as modified group (n=36). The rates of pancreatic fistula, abdominal infection/abscess, bile leakage, delayed gastric emptying, gastrointestinal/intraabdominal hemorrhage, pulmonary infection, and incision infection were investigated as well as hospital stays and pancreaticojejunostomy time in two groups were compared. ResultsThe rate of pancreatic fistula especially B to C grade pancreatic fistula in the modified group was obviously lower compared with which in the controlled group (8.3% vs. 31.0%, P < 0.05), pancreaticojejunostomy time ofmodified group was significantly shortened [(35.6±12.4) min vs. (52.8±24.6) min, P < 0.05] and total operative time also shortened [(322.4±23.6) min vs. (384.2±30.2) min, P < 0.05). There were no significant difference of the rates of abdominal infection/abscess, bile leakage, delayed gastric emptying, gastrointestinal/intraabdominal hemorrhage, pulmonary infection, ?incision infection, and hospital stays (P > 0.05)]. Conciusions The type of pancreaticojejunostomy has a significant impact on the rate of pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy can decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after operation, and shorten the pancreaticojejunostomy time and total operative time.
Objective To explore the feasibility of arch-preserved jejunum in total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction （AEG） and upper-middle gastric cancer. Methods Clinical data of 13 patients who underwent total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy with usage of arch-preserved jejunum to resolve the anastomosis tension problem in our hospital from Dec. 2012 to Apr. 2013 were analyzedretrospectively， and surgical experience was summarized. Results The maximal and actual extended lengths were （7.75±1.75） cm （4-10 cm） and （5.95±1.82） cm （3-9 cm） respectively， with the utilization percentage of （77.91±16.60）% （50.0%-100.0%）. These patients hadn’t suffered postoperative mortality and severe complications， such as anastomosis leakage， stenosis， hemorrhage， and so on. Besides， there were 1 case complicated with postoperative acute urinary retention and another 1 case complicated with infra-hepatic space abscess and peritoneal infection. Conclusion Arch-preserved jejunum is a practical surgical technique to handle with the anastomosis tension of esophagojejunostomy in total gastrectomy for AEG and upper-middle gastric cancer.
Objective To explore surgery strategy of reoperation for type Ⅳa congenital choledochal cyst. Methods The patient was a 20-year-old female with repeated right upper abdominal pain and fever for more than 1 year and aggravation for more than 1 month, and the choledochal cyst excison was performed 15 years ago. The MRI revealed that a huge cyst located in the left lobe of liver, with multiple intrahepatic calculus. The patient was diagnosed with a type Ⅳa congenital choledochal cyst and choledochojejunostomy later and the intrahepatic dilated bile duct was untreated. Results The cystic dilatation of the intrahepatic bile duct was confirmed during the reoperation, and the multiple stones with pus formation were seen, the color of the right liver was normal and the anatomical left hemihepatectomy was performed. The original anastomosis had no stenosis then was preserved. An about 1.5 cm length of extrahepatic bile duct was dissociated from the upper of anastomosis, and the extrahepatic bile duct was cut open and explored with a choledochoscope. The T-tube drainage was performed following removing the stone. The patient recovered well and was discharged smoothly following the surgery. The cholangiography 6 weeks later revealed that the biliary tract was patency and there was no residual stone. There was no jaundice or fever afterwards. Conclusion Complete excision of choledochal cyst and hepaticoduodenostomy is widely accepted as a standard surgery for type Ⅳa congenital choledochal cyst.
The secondary anastomotic stenosis is often occured from the repair and reconstructive operation of the injured bile duct. It is difficult to treat and the outcome is serious. In order to prevent this complication, the fibrin glue instead of traditional suturing technique combined with inner support was used. Fifty-four hybrid dogs were divided into 3 groups. Group A received Roux-en-y choledochojejunostomy with fibrin glue; group B received Roux-en-y choledochojejunostomy, with a fibrin glue combined support left permanently in the bile duct and group C received Roux-en-y choledocholejejunostomy with fibrin glue combined a support left temporarily in the bile duct. The amount of collagen in the scar was measured at 3/4, 3, 6, 9, 12 months respectively after operation. The results showed: 1. the mature period of scar was shortened from 12 months to 9 months when fibrin glue instead of suture was used in choledochojejunostomy; 2. the mature period of scar was further shortened from 9 months to 6 months when fibrin glue combined with inner support instead of fibrin glue was used in choledochojejunostomy. The conclusions were as follows: 1. fibrin glue could facilitate the healing of wound by inhibiting the formation of scar and accelerrate the maturation of scar; 2. when the inner support was used with fibrin glue in the operation, the mature period of scar could be further shortened; 3. the mechanism of action of the fibrin glue included minimizing the injury, avoiding foreign-body reaction, modifying organization of hematoma, preventing formation of biliary fistular and enhancing intergration and cross-linkage of collagen.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic magnetic compression cholangiojejunostomy (LMCCJ) with laparoscopic hand-sutured cholangiojejunostomy (LHSCJ). MethodsA retrospective case-control study was performed. From January 2019 to May 2022, 37 patients, who underwent laparoscopic treatment in this hospital, were enrolled in this study. There were 16 cases in the LMCCJ group and 21 cases in the LHSCJ group. The demographic information, procedure time to complete bilioenteric reconstruction, postoperative hospital stay, operative complications, magnets expulsion time, and follow-up results were collected and analyzed. ResultsThere were no statistical differences in the baseline data such as the gender, age, composition of primary diseases, preoperative total bilirubin, and preoperative common bile duct diameter between the two groups (P＞0.05). The outer diameter of the magnets was (10.50±0.97) mm, the expulsion time of the magnets was (49.69±37.58) d, and the expulsion rate of the magnets was 100% (16/16). There was no intestinal obstruction or gastrointestinal perforation caused by the retention of the magnets. The procedure time to complete bilioenteric reconstruction in the LMCCJ group was statistically shorter than that in the LHSCJ group [(11.31±3.40) min vs. (24.81±3.40) min, t=11.96, P＜0.01]. There was no statistical difference in the total bilirubin level at the first week after surgery between the two groups (U=142.0, P=0.80). The postoperative hospital stay in the LMCCJ group was longer than that in the LHSCJ group [(28.31±14.11) d vs. (16.19±7.56) d, t=3.36, P＜0.01]. During the perioperative period, there was no bleeding or biliary infection in the two groups, but one case of biliary leak in the LHSCJ group. In all 37 patients were followed-up for (548.8±259.2) d. During the follow-up period, the incidence rates of biliary intestinal anastomosis stenosis, tumor recurrence, and mortality had no statistical differences between the two groups (P＞0.05). ConclusionFrom the results of comparative analysis in this study, it can be concluded that LMCCJ is not only safe equally, but also easier and less time-consuming as compared with LHSCJ.
Objective To evaluate the operative indication and results of pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods A retrospective study was carried out on the cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy following pancreaticogastrostomy from Aug. 2005 to Feb. 2008 in Shanghai Tongji Hospital. Results During this period, 38 cases had undergone pancreaticogastrostomy with pancreaticoduodenectomy. The median operative time was (352.1±78.3) min. The median intraoperative blood transfusion was (911.3±601.4) ml. The median postoperative length of stay was (26.2±12.1) d. Postoperative morbidity was 21.1% (8/38) with no operative death. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage occurred in 1 patient. Delayed gastric emptying occurred in 2 patients. Incision infection occurred in 2 patients. Abdominal fluid collection occurred in 1 patient and pulmonary infection occurred in 2 patients. All of the complications were treated conservatively. Conclusion Pancreaticogastrostomy is a safer drainage procedure for the pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
ObjectiveTo explore the application value of “enfolded pancreatic duct”pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). MethodsThe clinicopathologic data of patients underwent LPD and “enfolded pancreatic duct” PJ from May 2020 to March 2022 were collected retrospectively. The time of PJ was recorded. And the pancreatic leakage, biliary leakage, chyle leakage, bleeding and infection, and death within 30 d after the operation were observed. ResultsA total of 132 patients were collected, including 60 males and 72 females. The age of patients was (58.6±10.9) years old. There were 38 cases of pancreatic head cancer, 17 cases of duodenum carcinoma, 17 cases of inferior segment cholangiocarcinoma, and 23 cases of duodenal papilla carcinoma, 7 cases of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, 11 cases of pancreatic intraductal papilloma, 5 cases of duodenal stromal tumor, 5 cases of duodenal papillary adenoma, 6 cases of pancreatic cyst adenoma, and 3 cases of pancreatic head stone. None of the patients was converted to open surgery. The diameter of pancreatic duct before operation was (3.43±2.11) mm, which were <3 mm in 31 cases. The time of PJ was (20.61±3.16) min. The pancreatic leakage occurred in 17 cases, including 11 cases of grade A leakage, 6 cases of grade B leakage, and none of grade C leakage. There was 1 case of bile leakage, 6 cases of chyle leakage, 5 cases of postoperative bleeding (2 cases of intraabdominal bleeding and 3 cases of gastrointestinal anastomotic bleeding), 3 cases of intraabdominal infection, and no death. None of the patients was readmission due to complications after 90 d of follow-up. ConclusionsFrom summary results of this group of cases, compared with the traditional PJ method, “enfolded pancreatic duct” PJ is less difficult and simpler to operate, which can obviously shorten the PJ time during LPD and reduce the incidence of pancreatic leakage. It is especially suitable for laparoscopic application.
Objective To investigate the effect of the position of pancreatic duct in pancreatic section on postoperative pancreatic fistula. Methods The clinical data of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy admitted to the pancreatic surgery department of our hospital from September 2018 to August 2020 were retrospectively collected. The consistency between intraoperative pancreatic section data and preoperative CT cross-sectional images of pancreatic duct was compared, and the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula was analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression model analysis, to determine whether the position of pancreatic duct on pancreatic section during pancreaticojejunostomy had an impact on the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Results A total of 373 patients were included in this study. In 44 cases, the ratio of the thickness of the short distance from the center of the pancreatic duct to the edge of the pancreas at the pancreatic section was 0.41±0.09, and the imaging measurement value was 0.40±0.10. The interclass correlation coefficient detection value of the two measurement methods was 0.916 (>0.75), P<0.001, this had high consistency. Patients had a high BMI [OR=1.276, 95%CI (1.154, 1.411), P<0.000 1] and soft pancreatic texture [OR=2.771, 95%CI (1.558, 4.927), P=0.001] were independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula, while the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula decreased with the increased proportion of pancreatic duct thickness from center to edge [OR=0.875, 95%CI (0.840, 0.911), P<0.000 1]. Conclusions Patients with high BMI and soft pancreas are independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula, and the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula is reduced when the center of pancreatic duct is far from the edge of pancreas. The ratio of short distance from the center of pancreatic duct to the edge of pancreas to the total thickness of pancreas measured by preoperative imaging can be used to evaluate the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety in the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction between gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement.MethodsThe relevant literatures of efficacy and safety of GJ and SEMS placement in the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction were searched in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical Trial, VIP, CNKI, Wanfang Data databases. The data were extracted and evaluated by the RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 12 articles with 1 505 patients were included, of which 620 underwent the GJ (GJ group) and 885 underwent the SEMS placement (SEMS group); 3 RCTs, 9 non-RCTs. The meta-analysis results showed: the length of hospital stay [MD=5.83, 95%CI (4.24, 7.42), P<0.000 01] and time of postoperative recovery diet [MD=3.41, 95%CI (1.79, 5.03), P<0.000 1] of the SEMS group were significantly shorter than those of the GJ group; Although the incidence of complications of the GJ group was significantly higher than that of the SEMS group [OR=1.85, 95%CI (1.27, 2.70), P=0.001], the technical success rate [OR=2.72, 95%CI (1.13, 6.53), P=0.03] and clinical success rate [OR=1.86, 95%CI (1.35, 2.57), P=0.000 2] were higher and the survival time was longer [MD=38.31, 95%CI (28.98, 47.64), P<0.000 01] of the GJ group as compared with the SEMS group.ConclusionsSEMS placement is more effective in recovering dietary capacity, length of hospital stay, and incidence of complications, while GJ is more effective in survival time, technical success rate, and clinical success rate. In clinical practice, we could choose different surgical method according to patient situation.