ObjectiveTo compare clinical effect of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and open repeated hepatectomy (ORH) in treatment of liver cancer with late recurrence (recurrence time >12 months) and single tumor diameter ≤5 cm.MethodsThe patients with advanced intrahepatic recurrence after first operation for liver cancer in this hospital from January 2013 to December 2019 were retrospectively collected, who were treated with ORH (ORH group) or percutaneous RFA (RFA group) and met the inclusion criteria. The overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate of the two groups were compared after 1∶1 matching by propensity score matching (PSM), while the factors affecting survival were stratified.ResultsA total of 244 patients with recurrent liver cancer were collected, including 134 patients in the ORH group, 110 patients in the RFA group. The patients in the two groups were matched with 1∶1 by PSM, 90 patients in each group. The median overall survival time of the ORH group and the RFA group was 54 months and 45 months, respectively. There were no significant differences in the curves of cumulative overall survival and cumulative disease-free survival between the two groups (P=0.221, P=0.199). The incidence of severe complications in the ORH group was higher than that in the RFA group (10.00% versus 2.22%, P=0.029). A further subgroup analysis showed that the overall survival time of the ORH group was longer than that of the RFA group when the diameter of recurrent liver cancer was 3 to 5 cm (P=0.035), which had no significant differences for the patients with AFP (>400 μg/L or ≤400 μg/L), tumors number (single or multiple), and tumor diameter ≤3 cm between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsPercutaneous RFA is effective and safe in treatment of advanced recurrent liver cancer, its overall survival and disease-free survival are similar to ORH treatment. However, when diameter of recurrent tumor is3–5 cm, ORH treatment has a advantage in prolonging survival time of patients.
ObjectiveTo explore the curative effect of precise hepatectomy techniques in hepatolithus. MethodsTotally 132 patients underwent precise hepatectomy and 52 patients underwent irregular hepatectomy were retrospectively analyzed, and the intraoperative and postoperative indexes such as operation time, blood loss, postoperative complications, hospitalization time, clearance rate of calculus, and cost of hospitalization were analyzed. ResultsCompared with the patients in irregular hepatectomy group, although the operative time was longer in precise hepatectomy group 〔(364.6±57.8) min vs. (292.9±44.7) min, Plt;0.001〕, but the patients in precise hepatectomy group had less blood loss 〔(558.3±90.6) ml vs. (726.7±88.7) ml, Plt;0.001〕, less postoperative complications (11.4% vs. 23.1%，P=0.004 3), and higher clearance rate of calculus (89.4% vs. 73.1%, P=0.005 5). Thus, the patients in precise hepatectomy group had shorter hospital stay 〔(22.9±4.4) d vs. (28.8±3.5) d, Plt;0.001〕 and less cost of hospitalization 〔(1.8±0.7)×104 yuan vs. (2.1±0.9)×104 yuan, P=0.016 5〕. Conclusion Precise hepatectomy is better than irregular hepatectomy in treatment for hepatolithus.
ObjectiveTo improve the calculation method of the sum of residual hepatic lobe volume and total liver volume after partial hepatectomy in rats.MethodsOne hundred and thirty-five SD rats of different body sizes were divided into five groups by completely random design. The body length, tail length, chest circumference, body weight and length of hepatic triangle lobe of the rats were measured before surgery. Then, according to the classic Higgins and Anderson methods, different lobectomies of liver were performed for each group: middle lobe + left inner lobe, left outer lobe, bilateral papillary lobe, triangular lobe, and right lateral lobe were removed; the proportion of theoretical liver resection in each group was 38.1%, 30.1%, 7.9%, 7.8% and 15.3%, respectively. The actual liver resection volume and residual liver volume were measured after surgery. we finally analyzed statistical differences of liver volume calculated by different indirect methods. In addition, the correlation analysis and regression analysis were conducted between the preoperative measured rat body surface parameters and the measured whole liver volume, so as to explore a more simple and accurate volume measurement method.ResultsThe actual proportion of liver resection in each group was 35.0%, 29.2%, 7.1%, 4.9% and 12.0%, respectively. Compared with the residual liver lobe volume actually measured, that calculated by using the indirect method of substitution of the theoretical liver resection proportion was statistically different in all the other four groups except the left outer lobe group. However, there was no statistical difference between the residual liver lobe volume actually measured and that calculated by the actual liver resection proportion in the 5 groups. In addition, in the preoperative measurement of 5 kinds of basic parameters of rats, the body length has the best correlation with whole liver volume, and the regression equation is \begin{document}$\hat Y = - 27.667 + 0.899X$\end{document}.ConclusionsThe liver volume calculated by indirect method using the actual liver resection proportion, compared with the theoretical liver resection proportion, is more accurate. Compared with the body weight, the body length has the better correlation with whole liver volume.
Objective To evaluate application of anterior approach combined with selective hepatic vein(s) occlusion in associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) for giant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in right lobe. Method The clinical data of 9 patients underwent the ALPPS in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from January 2017 to September 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Results Six cases underwent the complete ALPPS, 3 cases lost because it couldn’t match the standard for the second step. After the first step, The average increased volume of the future liver remnant (FLR) was 139.1 cm3 (46.4–291.6 cm3), and the average increased volume rate of FLR was 37.8% (15.1%–76.2%). The average blood loss was 356 mL (200–600 mL). In the second step, 4 cases underwent the right hemihepatectomy and 2 cases underwent the extend right hemihepatectomy, the average blood loss was 617 mL (300–1 400 mL). There was no bile fistula, liver failure, and death. Conclusions Preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that application of anterior approach combined with selective hepatic vein(s) occlusion is a safe and feasible strategy in ALPPS for giant HCC in right lobe. This strategy is conformity with the " no touch” principle of oncology surgery, and reduces blood loss and decreases complications. Long-term oncological result of ALPPS in HCC patients with cirrhosis is unknown.
ObjectiveTo investigate feasibility and safety of laparoscopic liver resection with vascular variation.MethodsThe clinical data of one patient with preoperative diagnosis of primary liver cancer, who was admitted into the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Military University in October 2017, were analyzed retrospectively. The three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction was completed basing on the preoperative CT data, then the liver volume was calculated and the preoperative planning was made, finally the subsequent surgery was performed.ResultsThe results of the 3D reconstruction suggested that the tumor was situated in the central of the right liver, including the segment Ⅴ, Ⅵ, Ⅶ, and Ⅷ. There was a type Ⅱ portal vein variation, the right anterior branch of the portal vein divided a branch into the left medial lobe. The right hepatic vein was divided into the ventral and dorsal branches. There was a thick right posterior inferior vein in this case. The preoperative planning was that the right posterior lobectomy or right anterior lobectomy could not completely remove the tumor. According to the standard right hemihepatectomy, the remaining liver volume accounted for 27% of the standard liver volume. If preserving the right anterior branch of the portal vein for the right hemihepatectomy, the remaining liver volume accounted for 41% of the standard liver volume. According to the concept of precise hepatectomy, the laparoscopic partial right hepatectomy with preservation of the main branch of the right anterior portal vein was performed smoothly. The liver function recovered well after the surgery. The right pleural effusion appeared after the surgery, then was relieved by the thoracentesis.ConclusionFor primary liver cancer patient with vascular variation, laparoscopic liver resection is feasible and safe basing on guide of 3D reconstruction technology.
ObjectiveTo summarize the definitions, risk factors, and preoperative evaluation methods of posthe-patectomy liver failure. MethodsDomestic and international publications involving posthepatectomy liver failure were retrieved and reviewed. ResultsThere was no uniform definition of posthepatectomy liver failure, however, the most approbatory definitions were "50-50 criteria" and "International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) criteria". Risk factors of posthepatectomy liver failure included patient-related factors, liver-related factors, and surgery-related factors, and preoperative evaluation was mainly based on liver function and liver volume. ConclusionPosthepatectomy liver failure is the main cause of postoperative death, sufficient preoperative evaluation and effective measures to decrease intraoperative blood loss and shorten surgery duration are helpful to prevent and (or) reduce posthepatectomy liver failure.
ObjectiveTo summarize experiences of diagnosis and treatment of intraperitoneal mass after associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodThe clinicopathologic data of a 40 years old case of HCC with intraperitoneal mass after ALPPS in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsThe patient was admitted to this hospital because of abdominal pain and abdominal distension for 5 d. The intraperitoneal mass was found and its nature was not clear on year 1 after ALPPS on admission. After discussion of multidisciplinary team (MDT), the exploratory laparotomy and abdominal tumor resection were planned to perform. The intraperitoneal mass and appendix were removed, the resected tissues were diagnosed as chronic inflammation and retroperitoneal abscess caused by perforation of suppurative appendicitis, respectively. The anti-infection and symptomatic support treatment were strengthened to perform after operation, the patient discharged after recovery. The patient was followed up so far, the general condition was good, and there was no clinical recurrence.ConclusionsFor patient underwent ALPPS, regular follow-up should be paid attention to. If intraperitoneal mass is found and nature is not clear, MDT discussion should be performed so as to make a more reasonable treatment plan. After exclusion of contraindications, surgical treatment should be carried out to furthest benefit patients.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical value and experience of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) of “LEER” model with “less pain” “early move” “early eat” and “reassuring” as its ultimate goal in perioperative period of laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy of patients with primary liver cancer.MethodsThe basic clinical data of 98 patients treated in our department from May 2017 to March 2020 who were diagnosed as primary liver cancer and underwent laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence of postoperative complications, postoperative recovery and patients’ satisfaction were compared between 40 patients managed with traditional model (traditional group) and 58 patients managed with measures of ERAS of “LEER” model (“LEER”-ERAS group).ResultsCompared with the traditional group, the “LEER”-ERAS group had lower postoperative pain scores (t=2.925, P=0.004), earlier postoperative anal exhaustion, bowel movement and normal diet (t=3.071, t=3.770, t=3.232, all P<0.005) , shorter time to postoperative off-bed activity (t=5.025, P<0.001) and earlier postoperative removal time of drainage tube (t=3.232, P=0.001). Postoperative hospital stay was shorter (t=4.831, P<0.001), the cost of hospitalization was lower (t=3.062, P=0.003), and the patient’s satisfaction with medical treatment was higher (χ2=9.267, P=0.002). There were no statistical difference in the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, rate of conversion to laparotomy, blocking time of porta hepatis, postoperative complications and postoperative adverse events between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsCompared with the traditional model, the measures of ERAS of “LEER” model that applied to laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy of patients with primary liver cancer, is safe and effective, and can relieve postoperative pain, accelerate postoperative rehabilitation, improve satisfaction of patients, shorten hospital stay, and reduce medical costs. It has further promotion and research value.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block as part of multimodal analgesia in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for patients with hepatic hydatidosis. MethodsThis study was a randomized controlled trial (The registration number was ChiCTR2100053689). According to the established inclusion and exclusion criteria, the patients diagnosed with hepatic hydatidosis treated in the People’s Hospital of Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture from October 2019 to August 2021 were prospectively included. The odd and even by obverse and reverse of coin was adopted to assign into the study group and the control group, respectively. The patients in the study group were treated with ERAS + TAP block + patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) + tramadol and the patients in the control group were treated with ERAS + PCIA + tramadol. The intraoperative and postoperative statuses of the two groups were compared. ResultsA total of 64 patients were enrolled in this study, including 32 patients in the study group and 32 patients in the control group. There were no statistical differences in the baseline data such as the age, gender, preoperative complications, preoperative liver function, and liver hydatid type between the two groups (P>0.05). The operations of 64 patients were performed successfully, and there was no perioperative death. There were no statistical differences in the operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and operation mode between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the points of visual analogue scale of postoperative pain on day 1 and 2 were lower (P<0.05), the dosage of tramadol within 2 d after operation and hospitalization expenses were less (P<0.05), and the getting out of bed time, eating liquid diet time, postoperative exhaust time, and total hospital stay were shorter (P<0.05) in the study group. The total complication rate of the study group was lower than that of the control group [28.1% (9/32) vs. 78.1% (25/32), χ2=16.063, P<0.001]. The comprehensive complication index was positively correlated with the total hospital stay (r=0.941, P<0.001) and hospitalization expenses (r=0.958, P<0.001). ConclusionPreliminary results of this study suggest that multimodal analgesia included TAP block is effective in ERAS, and could shorten hospital stay and reduce hospitalization expenses.
Objective To compare therapeutic effects of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) on patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods Thirty-five patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma admitted in the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery of Shiyan Taihe Hospital Affiliated to Hubei University of Medicine from August 1, 2014 to August 1, 2015 were randomly divided into ALPPS group and TACE group, in which 17 cases treated by the ALPPS and 18 cases treated by the TACE. The survival, changes of liver function and life quality, postoperative complications and mortality were compared in these two groups. The follow-up was performed by the telephone and the outpatient. Results ① The baselines such as the age, gender, diameter of tumor, complications had no significant differences in these two groups (P>0.05). ② The changes of liver function and life quality after operation in the ALPPS group were significantly better than those in the TACE group (P<0.05). ③ The complications after operation were observed in 5 cases (there were 2 cases of bile leakage, 1 case of intraabdominal bleeding, 1 case of peritoneal effusion, and 1 case of pulmonary infection) in the ALPPS group, which in 13 cases (there were 6 cases of nausea and vomiting, 4 cases of liver function damage, 2 cases of granulocytopenia, 1 case of fever) in the TACE group. The rate of the overall complications in the ALPPS group was significantly lower than that in the TACE group (5/17versus 13/18, P=0.018). ④ The overall survival in the the ALPPS group was significantly better than that in the TACE group (P=0.024). During follow-up period, the deaths happened in 3 cases duo to hepatocellular carcinoma and 1 case duo to traffic accident, 1 case was lost on month 8, 12 cases were still alive in the ALPPS group; the deaths happened in 10 cases duo to hepatocellular carcinoma, 1 case duo to coronary disease, and 1 case duo to cerebral infarction, 6 cases were still alive in the TACE group. Conclusion Preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that ALPPS has a better effect than TACE on patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.