ObjectiveTo understand the research progress on micronutrient deficiency after gastrectomy for gastric cancer in order to provide a new ideas for its prevention and treatment. MethodThe literature on reseach relevant micronutrient deficiency after gastrectomy for gastric cancer in recent years at home and abroad was searched and reviewed. ResultsThe micronutrient deficiency after partial or total gastrectomy was more common for the patients with gastric cancer, especially some key nutrients such as iron, zinc, copper, fat soluble vitamins (vitamins A, D, E), vitamin B12, folate, and so on. The main reason for the micronutrient deficiency was due to the changes of the anatomical structure or physiological function of the gastrointestinal tract caused by surgery, as most micronutrients were absorbed through the duodenum or jejunum, bypassing the main absorption site of micronutrients after total or partial gastrectomy; In addition, preoperative malnutrition, neoadjuvant therapy, early and late postoperative complications, as well as postoperative adjuvant therapy, and reduced gastric acid secretion, might all lead to the micronutrient absorption disorders. There was also limited literature on the micronutrient supplementation after gastrectomy for gastric cancer, but some researchers still supported providing nutritional support before and after surgery for the gastric cancer patients with severe malnutrition. There was few literature reported on the adverse consequences of nutritional support for the gastric cancer patients underwent gastrectomy. ConclusionsAt present, there is still limited literature on the study of micronutrient deficiency and supplementation after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. With the increasing attention of clinician to the impact of micronutrients on diseases or health, the European Society for Extraintestinal and Enteral Nutrition developed the “ESPEN micronutrition guidelines” in 2022 and “Expert consensus on micronutrients deficiency and supplementation in malignant tumors” was published in China at 2024. In the current situation where relevant research is insufficient, it is recommended that clinicians refer to this guideline or expert consensus and provide personalized intervention for patients with micronutrient deficiencies based on their clinical conditions.
ObjectiveTo analyze short-term outcomes of hand assisted laparoscopic (HAL) D2 radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer and summarize clinical experiences. MethodsThe clinical data of 199 patients with gastric cancer undergoing D2 radical distal gastrectomy from December 2010 to December 2013 in this hospital were analyzed. HAL (HAL group, n=92) and traditonal open (TO group, n=107) D2 radical distal gastrectomy were performed. The operation time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph nodes harvested, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications were compared between these two groups. ResultsThere was no residue of cancer cells at the surgical margin in the HAL group and the TO group. Compared with the TO group, the average incision length was obviously shorter (P < 0.01) and the average intraoperative blood loss was obviously less (P < 0.05) in the HAL group. The average operation time, the average number of lymph nodes harvested, and the average postoperative hospital stay had no significant differences between the HAL group and the TO group (P > 0.05). One case was died of unknown gastrointestinal bleeding in the HAL group and the TO group, respectively. The postoperative complication rate was 9.78% (9/92) in the HAL group and 11.21% (12/107) in the TO group, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). ConclusionsHAL D2 radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer don't increase operation time. It has some advantages of minimal invasion and safety as compared with traditional open surgery.
ObjectiveTo explore feasibility and safety of π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG).MethodThe clinical data of 20 patients who underwent TLTG, admitted in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from January 2018 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsTLTG with π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis was successfully carried out in all 20 patients. The operative time was (236.0±55.5) min, the π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis time was (25.7±4.8) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (192.0±148.9) mL, the operative incision length was (3.7±0.8) cm. The postoperative pain score was 2.4±1.1, the first flatus time was (3.1±0.9) d, the first postoperative ambulation time was (1.8±0.7) d, the removal time of nasoenteral nutrution tube was (7.4±2.4) d, the liquid diet time was (6.2±1.4) d, the removal time of intraoabdominal drainage tube was (7.8±2.8) d, the postoperative hospital stay was (10.8±3.0) d. There was no death related to the anastomosis in all patients. Two patients developed a little pleural effusion and 1 patient developed lymphatic leakage were cured with conservative treatment. One patient with intraabdominal encapsulated effusion was cured by puncture and drainage treating. There was no postive incisal margin. The length of upper segment of resection form gastric cancer was (2.3±1.7) cm, the maximum tumor diameter was (4.9±2.8) cm, the number of dissected lymph nodes was 27.9±5.6. All patients were followed up 3–15 months. Eight patients underwent endoscopic examination had no obvious anastomosis stenosis and esophageal reflux. Two patients died of tumor recurrence and metastasis witnin one year after operation, and the rest had disease-free survival until the end of follow-up.ConclusionFrom preliminary results of limited cases in this study, π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis in TLTG is a technically safe and feasible surgical procedure in treatment of gastric cancer.
Objective To compare short-term effects of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) and laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy (TATG) in treatment of resectable gastric cancer. Methods The EMbase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, and WanFang Data databases were searched by computer. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the literatures, the comparative research literatures were selected. The relevant data were extracted and the literature evaluation was applied. The Revman 5.3 software was applied for the meta-analysis. Results A total of 11 articles (6 Chinese literatures, 5 English literatures) were included, including 1 491 patients clinically diagnosed with the gastric cancer. The results of meta-analysis showed: compared with the LATG group, the TLTG group had the less intraoperative blood loss ［MD=–17.59, 95% CI (–30.81, –4.37), P=0.009］, shorter incision length ［MD=–4.50, 95% CI (–4.92, –4.09), P<0.000 01］, and earlier first anal exhaust time ［MD=–0.16, 95% CI (–0.28, –0.04), P=0.007］in the treatment of gastric cancer; Besides, the first time of postoperative fluid intake of the TLTG group was earlier ［MD=–0.47, 95% CI (–0.86, –0.08), P=0.02］ and the postoperative hospital stay of the TLTG group was shorter ［MD=–0.59, 95% CI (–0.94, –0.24), P=0.000 9］; In the TLTG group, the VAS score was lower on the first postoperative day ［MD=–3.10, 95% CI (–3.48, –2.72), P<0.000 01］ and on the third postoperative day ［MD=–2.30, 95% CI (–2.57, –2.03), P<0.000 01］. There were no significant differences in the operation time, proximal margin distance, distal margin distance, lymph node dissection, and postoperative adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). The subgroup analysis of the postoperative adverse reactions showed that there were no significant differences in the anastomotic stricture, anastomotic leakage, and anastomotic bleeding (P>0.05). Conclusions TLTG has some advantages of less bleeding, shorter incision, earlier ventilation and feeding, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and light postoperative pain in treatment of resectable gastric cancer. However, due to quantitative and qualitative limitations of included studies, above conclusions still need to be carried out more and high quality researches are validated.
ObjectiveTo compare the effect and safety between laparoscopic versus laparotomy D2 radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. MethodsTwo hundred and seventeen patients with advanced gastric cancer who were treated in our hospital from March 2011 to March 2014 were selected as research objects. According to surgical method, they were divided into laparoscopy group (103 patients received laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy) and laparotomy group (114 patients received laparotomy D2 radical gastrectomy). Comparison of the surgical effect-related indicators between 2 groups was performed. ResultsIn the aspect of intra-operative indicators:the operation time, proximal margin length, distal margin length, and the number of removal lymph node between the 2 groups did not significantly differed with each other (P>0.05); while the bleeding volume and the length of incision in laparoscopy group were significantly less (shorter) than those of laparotomy group (P<0.05). In the aspect of post-operative indicators:the time to first flatus, time to resumed oral intake, time to ambulation, post-operative hospital stay, time of analgesics given, and the total incidence of postoperative complication in laparoscopy group were significantly shorter (less or lower) than those of laparotomy group (P<0.05), the operating cost in laparoscopy group was significantly higher than that of the laparotomy group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in total treatment cost, mortality of gastric cancer, and recurrence or metastasis rate between the 2 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionsBoth laparoscopic and laparotomy D2 radical gastrectomy in treatment of advanced gastric cancer can obtain good clinical effect. But compared with laparotomy D2 radical gastrectomy, laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy can reduce operative wound, reduce incidence of complications, improve postoperative recovery, and has higher safety.
Objective To investigate the influence on the postoperative recovery for giving either total parenteral nutrition （TPN） or early enteral nutrition (EEN) to patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy. Methods Eighty-six patients with gastric cancer undergone total gastrectomy were divided into TPN group (n=31) and EEN group (n=55). Patients in TPN group received TPN support via vena cava (internal jugular vein or subclavian vein), while patients in EEN group received early feeding through the naso-intestinal tube, which was placed during operation, and volume of enteral nutrition (fresubin) was increased daily, full enteral nutrition was expected on day 3-5. Nutrition status after operation, postoperative plasma albumin (Alb), the time of passing gas or stool, the time of oral intake, hospital stay and any postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Results There were no significant differences between two groups (Pgt;0.05) in postoperative plasma Alb level, the time of passing gas or stool, postoperative complications rate or hospital stay. However, in the TPN group, the time of oral intake was shorter than that in EEN group (P=0.004). Conclusions Both TPN and EEN are the suitable nutritional methods for patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy, and with no detectable difference. For patients with high risk, such as severe malnutrition, naso-intestinal tube should be placed for EEN.
Objective To evaluate clinical efficacy of mFOLFOX6 combined with aspirin in treatment of advanced gastric cancer following perioperative period of laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy. Methods One hundred and seven patients with advanced gastric cancer were assigned to observation group (57 cases) and control group (50 cases). The patients in the observation group received the mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy and regular intake of aspirin (100 mg/d) and the control group received the mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy alone. The recurrence or metastasis rate, rate of disease progress, toxicity, median survival time, and 3-year survival rate were compared between the observation group and the control group. Results ① There were no significant differences in the gender, age, pathological type, and so on between the observation group and the control group (P>0.05). ② The rates of toxicity such as the white blood cell reduction, granulocyte reduction, thrombocytopenia had no significant differences in these two groups (P>0.05). ③ The follow-up time was 4–45 months with an average 3.5 years, the rate of disease progress was lower (P=0.032), the median survival time was longer (P=0.043), the cumulative 3-year overall survival (P=0.015) and the cumulative 3-year disease-free survival (P=0.037) were better in the observation group as compared with the control group. Conclusion Preliminary results in this study show that mFOLFOX6 regimen combined with low-dose aspirin could significantly improve efficacy of advanced gastric cancer following perioperative period of laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy, reduce rate of disease progress, and improve survival rate without increasing side effects.
With the swift evolution of bariatric and metabolic surgery, additional procedures building upon sleeve gastrectomy have consistently surfaced. Recent studies suggest that sleeve gastrectomy with jejunojejunal bypass (SG-JJB) yields superior short-term weight reduction outcomes compared to sleeve gastrectomy alone, with weight loss and glycemic control effects akin to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and without significant complications. As a result, SG-JJB is regarded as a safe and efficacious bariatric procedure, noted for its technical simplicity and reversibility, presenting substantial clinical utility. Nonetheless, high-quality, multicenter, large-sample, long-term follow-up randomized controlled trials are essential to further ascertain its long-term efficacy and safety, and to facilitate its standardized implementation. This article seeks to review the advancements in SG-JJB research, evaluate its effectiveness and safety in managing obesity and associated comorbidities, and explore its future developmental trajectory.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) based on delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy in the treatment of gastric cancer. MethodsNinety patients with gastric cancer who treated in our hospital from December 2013 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Forty-five patients with gastric cancer received delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy by using laparoscopic linear stapler after they were treated with TLDG and D2 lymphadenectomy (TLDG group), while 45 patients with gastric cancer received laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and D2 lymphadenectomy (LADG group). The operative time, digestive tract reconstruction time, blood loss, number of dissected lymph nodes, length of proximal and distal margin to the cancer, time of the first flatus, recovery time of drinking water, time of resuming semi-fluid diet, postoperative hospital stay, and complications during follow-up period were observed and evaluated. Results① Intraoperative findings. The operative time, digestive tract reconstruction time, and length of distal margin to the cancer of TLDG group were significantly longer than those corresponding index of LADG group (P < 0.050), but the blood loss was significantly less than that of LADG group (P < 0.050). There was no significant difference between two groups in proximal margin to the cancer and number of dissected lymph nodes (P > 0.050). ② Postoperative findings. There was no significant difference between two groups in time of the first flatus, recovery time of drinking water, time of resuming semi-fluid diet, postoperative hospital stay, and incidence of complication (P > 0.050). All patients were followed for 6-16 months (median with 10 months), and there was no one suffered from recurrence, anastomotic stricture, and anastomotic obstruction. ConclusionThe TLDG based on delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy in the treatment of gastric cancer was feasible and safe, and it will be an ideal method for digestive tract reconstruction in patients with gastric cancer, so it is worthy to clinical application.
ObjectiveTo analyze the risk factors affecting delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. MethodsThe gastric cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in the Jiaozuo People’s Hospital from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2022 were retrospectively collected. The occurrence of DGE was recorded. Meanwhile, the multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was performed to screen the risk factors affecting the DGE. ResultsA total of 350 gastric cancer patients underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study were included, 17 (4.9%) of whom developed DGE. The multivariate binary logistic regression analysis results showed that the preoperative gastric outflow tract obstruction (OR=8.582, P=0.009), intraoperative jejunal nutrition tube indwelling (OR=14.317, P=0.010), more peritoneal drainage tube placement (OR=5.455, P=0.006), and intraoperative blood loss ≥140 mL (OR=4.912, P=0.018) increased the risk of DGE. ConclusionAccording to the results of this study, when patients undergoing laparoscopic distal radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer accompanied by preoperative gastric outflow tract obstruction, intraoperative jejunal nutrition tube indwelling, more peritoneal drainage tube placement, and more intraoperative blood loss, it should be paid more attention to prevention DGE, and early detection and treatment, so as to improve the prognosis of patients.