The treatment of aortic dissection has already shifted to endovascular strategies. However, with the evolution of this disease and a deeper understanding of it, experts from various countries have developed a series of innovative endovascular techniques and devices in areas such as lumen reconstruction, false lumen embolization, entry sealing, and branch arteries reconstruction, targeting the long-term complication of chronic post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The past few decades have seen that Chinese vascular surgeons have gradually emerged on the world stage and contributed multiple “Chinese solutions” for post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The author in this review intends to provide an overview of these techniques and devices mentioned above.
This study aims to investigate whether displacement force on stents can accurately represents the displacement of the stent after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) by comparing the measured stent displacement with the displacement forces calculated by computational fluid dynamics (CFD). And the effect of cross-limb and parallel-limb EVAR on stent displacements is further studied. Based on our objective, in this study, ten cross-limb EVAR patients and ten parallel-limb EVAR patients in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were enrolled. Patient-specific models were first reconstructed based on the computed tomography angiography images, then the stent displacements were measured, and the displacement forces acting on the stents were calculated by CFD. Finally, the \begin{document}$ \mathrm{cos}\;\alpha $\end{document} value of the angle between the displacement force and the displacement vector was used to analyze the matching degree between the displacement and the displacement force. The results showed that the displacement forces on cross-limb stents and parallel-limb stents were (2.67 ± 2.14) N and (1.36 ± 0.48) N, respectively. Displacements of stent gravity center, stent displacements relative to vessel, and vessel displacements of cross-limb and parallel-limb stents were (4.43 ± 2.81) mm and (6.39 ± 2.62) mm, (0.88 ± 0.67) mm and (1.11 ± 0.71) mm, (3.55 ± 2.88) mm and (5.28 ± 2.52) mm, respectively. The mean \begin{document}$ \mathrm{cos}\;\alpha $\end{document} for cross-limb and parallel-limb stents were 0.02 ± 0.66 and ? 0.10 ± 0.73, respectively. This study indicates that the displacement force on the stent can’t accurately represent the displacement of the stent after EVAR. In addition, the cross-limb EVAR is probably safer and more stable than the parallel-limb EVAR.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the mid-term clinical outcomes of covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB) for the treatment of complex aortoiliac occlusive disease and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this technique. MethodsA total of 12 patients with complex aortoiliac occlusive lesions [Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) Ⅱ C and D] who underwent CERAB reconstruction at West China Hospital of Sichuan University, from December 2020 to December 2024 were prospectively enrolled and analyzed. Baseline and procedural data and follow-up data at 1, 6, 12, and 24 month(s) were collected. Technical success and 30-day complications as well as overall survival were evaluated. Patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization rates were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curve. ResultsAll patients were male, with an age of (66.1±8.3) years; 10 cases were TASC Ⅱ C and 2 were TASC Ⅱ D. Technical success was achieved in all procedures. There were 2 cases of the procedure-related complications: one patient developed acute ischemia of the left lower limb postoperatively and recovered after emergency thrombectomy and endarterectomy; another patient died of a cerebrovascular event on day 3 after surgery. No bleeding, renal failure, pseudoaneurysm, or dissection occurred. The cumulative overall survival rates at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method were all 91.7%, with the cumulative primary patency rates being 86.7%, 73.4%, and 73.4% respectively, and the cumulative secondary patency rates being 100%, 100%, and 92.9% respectively. No amputations occurred during follow-up. ConclusionsThe results of this cohort suggest that CERAB induces favorable mid-term efficacy and safety in the treatment of complex aortoiliac occlusive lesions (TASC Ⅱ C and D). However, the further research is required to explore its suitability for the juxtarenal lesions of TASC Ⅱ D.
Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization combined with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Stanford type B aortic dissection with insufficient proximal landing zone. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection and insufficient proximal landing zone who underwent TEVAR combined with LSA revascularization or TEVAR alone at the Central Hospital of Wuhan from 2017 to 2021. Patients were divided into a revascularization group and a simple stent group based on the surgical approach. Perioperative data of the two groups were compared. ResultsA total of 144 patients were included. In the simple stent group, there were 113 patients, including 85 males and 28 females, with a median age of 56.0 (48.0, 68.0) years. In the revascularization group, there were 31 patients, including 23 males and 8 females, with a median age of 54.0 (48.2, 59.7) years. There were statistical differences in operation time, hospital stay, preoperative lesion diameter, and preoperative and postoperative right vertebral artery diameter between the two groups (P<0.05). The simple stent group had 12 (10.6%) patients of complications, which was lower than the revascularization group (9 patients, 29.0%) postoperatively. At three months postoperatively, the most common complication in the simple stent group was endoleak (5 patients), while in the revascularization group it was hoarseness (2 patients). There was no death in the two groups within 1 year postoperatively. Conclusion Both different surgical approaches have good effects on the treatment of type B aortic dissection with insufficient proximal landing zone, but further validation is needed through multicenter, large-sample, and long-term follow-up studies.
ObjectiveTo analyze the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided endovascular treatment for femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis obliteran (ASO). MethodsThe clinical data of patients with femoropopliteal ASO were collected and analyzed. The patients were treated by ultrasound-guided endovascular intervention in the Xijing Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University, from March 2015 to June 2021. The endovascular intervention methods included the arterial balloon dilation (ABD) alone, stent implantation (SI), Rotarex mechanical thrombus removal (Abbreviationas: Rotarex), and thrombolytic catheter implantation (CDT), etc. ResultsAll 112 patients (121 affected extremities) who met the research criteria were collected. Among them, there were 13, 68, and 40 affected extremities by the Rutherford classification of 2, 3, and 4, respectively, while 41, 39, and 41 affected extremities by the Trans-Atlantic Inter-SocietyConsensus Ⅱ classification of A, B, and C, respectively. Among 121 affected extremities, 61 underwent the ABD alone, 27 underwent ABD plus Rotarex, 12 underwent ABD plus SI, 6 underwent ABD plus SI plus Rotarex, 3 underwent ABD plus SI plus CDT, 7 underwent ABD plus CDT plus Rotarex, and 5 underwent ABD plus CDT. The ultrasound-guided endovascular treatments were completed successfully in 118 affected extremities (the success rate was 97.5%), and 3 affected extremities were not completely completed by ultrasound guidance. After operation, 5 affected extremities had pseudoaneurysm and 7 affected extremities had hematoma at the puncture site, which were cured after conservative management. The ankle-brachial index (ABI) of the affected extremities immediately after surgery was statistically higher than that before surgery [0.89±0.13 vs. 0.53±0.09, mean difference (95% confidence interval)=0.36 (0.34, 0.38), paired t-test (t=–25.17), P<0.001]. After a follow-up of 12 months, one patient had a metatarsal amputation and one patient died (acute myocardial infarction). The restenosis rate and reintervention rate of the target lesions were 25.0% (30/120) and 15.0% (18/120) at 12 months postoperatively, and the late loss of diameter was (0.88±0.25) mm. The ABI was still higher than before surgery [0.78±0.13 vs. 0.53±0.09, mean difference (95% confidence interval)=0.25 (0.22, 0.27), paired t-test, t=–17.61, P<0.001]. ConclusionFrom analysis results of this data, it can be seen that, ultrasound-guided endovascular intervention is a safe and effective treatment for selective femoropopliteal ASO.
Objective To summarize the advantages and key points of external fenestration in the treatment of aortic dissection involved visceral branch arteries after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), and to explore the application effect of external fenestration in aortic dissection involved visceral branch arteries. Methods A patient with abdominal aortic aneurysm resulting in abdominal aortic dissection and involving multiple visceral arteries after EVAR was treated in Center of Vascular and Interventional Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu. The surgical procedure of this patient was summarized, and the current status of total lumen technique in the treatment of such diseases was discussed and analyzed. Results The operation was successful, and it took only five hours, the intraoperative blood loss was about 100 mL, the patient was kept in ICU for one day and discharged one week after surgery and no serious postoperative complications occurred (such as spinal cord ischemia, liver and kidney insufficiency, infection, lower limb ischemia, puncture pseudoaneurysm, etc.). Aortic CT angiography was reexamined in three months after surgery, and the three-dimensional reconstruction showed that the aortic stent was stable, the blood flow of visceral branch arteries was smooth, and the aortic dissection was well isolated. Conclusion Endovascular repair of aortic dissection involving branch arteries of important organs can be achieved by external fenestration technique, it is a new treatment for aortic lesions involved visceral branch arteries.
ObjectiveTo evaluate clinical outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR)for the treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissection (AD)and descending aortic aneurysm. MethodsClinical data of 20 patients with Stanford type B AD or descending aortic aneurysm who underwent TEVAR in West China Hospital from March to June 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 19 male and 1 female patients with their age of 41-76 (58.3±10.2)years. Clinical outcomes were analyzed. ResultsAmong the 20 patients, 18 patients were successfully discharged, 1 patient refused further postoperative treatment and was discharged, and 1 patient died postoperatively. Sixteen patients (88.9%)were followed up for over 3 months. In all the patients during follow-up, true lumen diameter recovered within the scope of intravascular stents, and there was thrombosis in false lumen or aneurysm lumen. ConclusionTEVAR provides a new choice with significant advantages for the treatment of Stanford type B AD, especially for the elderly and patients with concomitant serious diseases, so it is worthy of clinical application.
ObjectiveTo retrospective summarize the experience of endovascular repair and open surgery in the treatment of renal aneurysms in our single center.MethodsClinical data of 24 patients with renal aneurysm treated in our hospital from August 2012 to May 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Nine patients undergoing surgical intervention were categorized as the open operation group, and ten patients who received endovascular repair were classified as the endovascular repair group. To compare and analyze the results of the two groups. Five patients who had refused surgery therapy will be analyzed separately.ResultsTwenty-four patients with seventeen females (70.8%) and seven males (29.2%) were enrolled in this study and nineteen patients with twenty-three aneurysms got repaired successfully. The endovascular repair group had shorter hospital stay compared with the open operation group [median: 10.5 (P25 6.3, P75 15.0) d vs. 21.0 (P25 17.0, P75 27.5) d］. One patient in the open operation group developed renal artery stenosis at 11 months after surgery and underwent reoperation by repair by successful stent placement. There were no other significant postoperative complications occurred in the two groups. No abnormal enlargement or rupture of the aneurysms were observed during the follow-up period in 5 unoperated patients.ConclusionsBoth open surgery and endovascular repair are effective means of treating renal artery aneurysms. Once the renal aneurysm ruptures, serious consequences will occur. Once a renal aneurysm is diagnosed, regardless of the size of the aneurysm, active surgical treatment is recommend.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of vascular interventional technique in arterial injuries of damage control surgery.MethodsA retrospective review was made on clinical data of 31 arterial injuries cases who received damage control surgery from March 2011 to June 2018. All cases underwent endovascular therapy for arterial injuries in No. 960 Hospital of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, and then the definitive operation was operated as soon as the vital signs became stable.ResultsThe surgery was successful in all patients, and the operation time was 43–100 min (average of 57 min), the intraoperative blood loss was 50–200 mL (average of 80 mL). Bleeding was successful controlled in 11 cases with covered stents, 9 cases with multiple overlapping bare stents, and 11 cases with spring coil, all cases with shock were improved immediately. There were no perioperative mortality or procedure-related complication occurred. All cases were discharged from hospital smoothly after two-phase surgery. All the patients were followed up for 6 to 24 months [(17±5) months]. Two patients with covered stent lumen stenosis less than 50% as showed by angiography, and no secondary treatment was required. In addition, blood flow patency was kept in the rest of artery, no bleeding occurred in injured artery. During the follow-up period, the collateral vessels of 9 patients treated with multi-layerbare stent overlapping technique were unobstructed. Stent migration, fracture or leakage was not found during the follow-up period. Patients recovered well after definitive surgery, they had good fracture healing with a disability rate of 0.ConclusionRational application of vascular interventional technique in damage control surgery is a safe and effective treatment method for arterial injuries combined with other traumas.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for chronic thoracoabdominal aortic dissection. MethodsThe patients with chronic thoracoabdominal aortic dissection who underwent total endovascular treatment at Shanghai City First People’s Hospital between December 2021 and March 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into single-trunk group and double-trunk group according to the treatment methods. Clinical data including demographic characteristics, preoperative risk factors, surgical details, postoperative complications and long-term follow-up data were collected. Outcome measures mainly included surgical success rate, in-hospital mortality, endoleak rate and incidence of branch restenosis. ResultsThirty-four patients with thoracoabdominal aortic dissection were treat with total endovascular treatment. That success rate of operation was 100%. The in-hospital mortality was 2.94%. the incidence of paraplegia was 0.00%. the incidence of cerebral infarction was 2.94%. The incidence of type Ⅲ endoleak was 5.88%. The incidence of branch artery stenosis was 8.82%. The incidence of dissection progression was 8.82%. The reintervention rate was 14.71%. In the aspect of reconstruction of splanchnic artery branches, fenestration stent was the main method in the single-trunk group, and branch stent was the main method in the double-trunk group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in perioperative and mid-term follow-up results between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionTotal endovascular treatment is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with thoracoabdominal aortic dissection.