Objective To analyse short-term cl inical effect of total elbow arthroplasty in treatment of distal comminuted humeral fracture with serious osteoporosis in geratic patients. Methods From April 2006 to October 2007, five cases of distal comminuted humeral fractures were treated by total elbow arthroplasty with bone cement. Of them, there were 2 males and 3 females, aging 50-76 years old (mean 67.6 years old), including 4 cases of closed fracture and 1 case of open fracture (II type Gustilo-Anderson). All fractures were caused by tumbl ing. According to classification of AO, there were 2 cases of type C1, 2 cases of type C2 and 1 case of type C3. The Barnett index of osteoporosis was 0.40-0.45. The time from injury to operation was 4 to 18 days (mean 7.2 days). The rehabil itation exercise of function was done after 2 days of operation. Results The operative time was from 120 to 180 minutes (mean 150 minutes), the bleeding amount was from 150 to 250 mL (mean 200 mL). All incision achieved primary heal ing. No compl ication occurred. Five cases were followed up for 19 to 36 months (mean 24.5 months). The mean motion range of elbow joint include 141.6° for flection, 6.5° for extention, 10.2° for the degree of ectropion, 81.7° for revolve forward, and 73.8° for revolve behind respectively after 4 months of operation. The length discrepancy of upper l imb was less than 1.5 cm, the muscle force for flexion and extention of finger and wrist was normal. The X-ray films showed that the position of artificial joint was satisfactory without prosthesis dislocation or loosening. According to Mayo elbow performance score, the excellent and good rate was 80% (excellent in 1 case, good in 3 cases, and fair in 1 case). Conclusion Total elbow arthroplasty with bone cement is an effective method in treatment of distal comminuted humeral fracture with serious osteoporosis obviously in the geratic patients, but indication and technique of operation should be mastered strictly.
Objective To observe the effectiveness of reduction and fixation by the improved elbow anteromedial approach in treatment of ulna coronoid process fracture. Methods Between January 2010 and December 2014, 13 patients with the ulna coronoid process fracture were treated with reduction and fixation by the improved elbow anteromedial approach. There were 10 males and 3 females with an average age of 37.2 years (range, 18-57 years). Five cases were caused by traffic accident, 7 cases by falling injury from height, and 1 case by object impact injury. Seven cases were the terrible triad of the elbow, 4 cases were the ulna coronoid process and radial head fractures, 1 case was the proximal radius and ulna fractures, and 1 case was the ulna coronoid process and distal radius fractures. According to Regan-Morrey classification criteria, the ulna coronoid process fracture was rated as type Ⅱ in 2 cases and as type Ⅲ in 11 cases. According to O’Driscoll classification criteria, 10 of the 13 cases were anterior coronoid fracture (8 cases of type Ⅱb, 2 of type Ⅱc), and 3 of basal fracture. The operation time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications, range of motion (ROM) of the elbow joint, Mayo elbow function index (MEPI) score and fracture healing time were recorded. Results The average operation time was 38.7 minutes (range, 30-55 minutes), and the average amount of intraoperative bleeding was 109.3 mL (range, 90-160 mL). All incisions healed at stage Ⅰ. There was no iatrogenic vascular or nerve injury. All patients were followed up 13-24 months (mean, 16.9 months). All fractures achieved clinical healing. The average healing time was 11.2 weeks (range, 8-16 weeks). There were 2 cases of heterotopic ossification. At last follow-up, the ROM of elbow flexion was 119-145° (mean, 132.4°); the ROM of elbow extension was –8-15° (mean, 7°). The ROM of forearm pronation was 68-90° (mean, 78.6°), and the ROM of forearm supination was 76-90° (mean, 84.3°). At last follow-up, the MEPI score was 70-100; and 9 cases were excellent, 3 cases were good, and 1 case was fair. The excellent and good rate was 92.3%. Conclusion Improved elbow anteromedial approach for the ulna coronoid process fracture can not only avoid the injuries of surrounding blood vessels and nerves, but also perform fracture reduction and fixation under direct vision. It is a safe, simple, and effective treatment method for the ulna coronoid process fracture.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical significance of anterior median approach combined with lateral approach to the elbow joint in the treatment of terrible triad of the elbow.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the data of 63 cases who used the anterior median approach of the elbow joint combined with the lateral approach (group A, n=36) or the medial and lateral approach of the elbow (group B, n=27) in the treatment of terrible triad of the elbow between March 2014 and July 2019. The operation time, postoperative complications, and postoperative Mayo score of the elbow were compared between the two surgical approaches.ResultsThe operation time of group A and group B was (93.78±7.78) and (106.93±10.35) min, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The patients in both groups completed operations successfully, without vascular or nerve injury. All the wounds healed by first intention. No redislocation or reoperation occurred. Ten months after operation, there was no significant difference in the excellence rate of Mayo score of the elbow (83.3% vs. 85.2%) or postoperative complication rate (16.7% vs. 14.8%) between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionThe anterior median approach of the elbow joint combined with the lateral approach and the medial and lateral elbow approach for the treatment of terrible triad of the elbow are equivalent to the postoperative elbow function recovery. The operation time of the former is shorter than that of the latter, and the anterior approach reveals the coronal process intuitively and sufficiently. In the case that there is no medial ligament injury, the anterior median approach of the elbow joint combined with the lateral approach can be preferred.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on tennis elbow.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, VIP, CNKI and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on NSAIDs for tennis elbow from inception to May 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 8 RCTs involving 595 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences in the therapeutic effect between NSAIDs and the placebo group (RR=1.10, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.35, P=0.39) or non-placebo control group (RR=0.88, 95%CI 0.77 to 1.00, P=0.06). Compared with non-placebo control group, NSAIDs group had lower VAS score difference (MD=?1.41, 95%CI ?2.28 to ?0.53, P=0.002).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the effect of NSAIDs on tennis elbow is still uncertain. The improvement of symptoms with NSAIDs may be superior to placebo, but inferior to other treatment methods. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, the above conclusions are required to be verified by more high-quality studies.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the importance of the posterior and lateral arterial network of elbow in the application of the super-regional and mutual-pedicled axial flap. METHODS: Twenty-seven upper extremities of adult cadavers were prepared as casts of Acrylomintril Batradiene Styrene(ABS) resin and corroded in a b solution of NaOH according to natural layers of human tissue. The source, site and structure of the posterior and lateral arterial network of elbow were observed, the number and total sectional area of anastomosing branches crossing the line between two humeral epicondyles were measured and compared with the medial and anterior region. RESULTS: There are 8.64 +/- 2.74(36.42%) and 8.30 +/- 1.19(35.0%) anastomosing branches crossing the posterior and lateral regions, and total section areas are (0.48 +/- 0.11) mm2 and (0.37 +/- 0.03) mm2 respectively. So there is very rich arterial network around the elbow. CONCLUSION: The enough number of anastomosing branches and their section areas of the posterior and lateral region of the elbow make it possible to connect super-regional and mutual-pedicled axial flaps crossing the elbow.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) via olecranon osteotomy approach. Methods Between January 2011 and December 2021, 22 patients (25 sides) with elbow joint disease were treated with TEA via olecranon osteotomy approach. There were 9 males and 13 females with an average age of 52.0 years (range, 32-80 years). The disease involved unilateral elbow joint in 19 cases, including 12 cases on the left side and 7 cases on the right side, and 3 cases with bilateral elbow joints. There were 3 cases (3 sides) of osteoarthritis, 7 cases (9 sides) of rheumatoid arthritis, 6 cases (7 sides) of traumatic arthritis, 4 cases (4 sides) of distal humeral fracture, and 2 cases (2 sides) of elbow tuberculosis. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were recorded. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and range of motion (ROM) were used to evaluate the elbow joint function, and imaging was used to review the position of the prosthesis and the healing of the osteotomy. ResultsThe operation time ranged from 53 to 120 minutes (mean, 90.6 minutes); intraoperative blood loss ranged from 10 to 200 mL (mean, 68.4 mL). All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 3.9-126.7 months, with a median time of 47.6 months. At last follow-up, the MEPS scores of 22 patients ranged from 72 to 100 (mean, 91.6); the elbow joint function was rated as excellent in 17 sides, good in 7 sides, and fair in 1 side, with an excellent and good rate of 96%. Elbow joint ROM was 98°-140° in flexion (mean, 119.7°), 5°-23° in extension (mean, 13.9°), 70°-90° in anterior rotation (mean, 83.3°), and 63°-90° in posterior rotation (mean, 79.4°). The follow-up time of 17 patients (20 sides) without fracture and joint stiffness before operation was 3.9-126.7 months, with a median time of 53.9 months; at last follow-up, the MEPS score and the elbow joint ROM were significantly better than those before operation (P<0.05). The follow-up time of 5 patients (5 sides) with fracture and joint stiffness before operation was 12.0-124.2 months, with a median time of 40.1 months. At last follow-up, MEPS scores ranged from 89 to 100 (mean, 91.2), and elbow joint ROM restored. Two cases (2 sides) developed ulnar nerve symptoms after operation, and 1 case (1 side) suffered from periprosthetic fracture and periprosthetic infection after revision, and the elbow prosthesis was removed. The prosthesis survival rate was 96%. During follow-up, no prosthesis loosening occurred. ConclusionThe intraoperative visual field exposure of TEA via the olecranon osteotomy approach is sufficient, which can reduce the incidence of complications such as triceps weakness and ulnar nerve injury, effectively improve the function of the elbow joint, and obtain satisfactory effectiveness.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of limited internal fixation combined with a hinged external fixator in the treatment of peri-elbow bone infection. Methods The clinical data of 19 patients with peri-elbow bone infection treated with limited internal fixation combined with a hinged external fixator between May 2018 and May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 15 males and 4 females with an average age of 44.6 years (range, 28-61 years). There were 13 cases of distal humerus fractures and 6 cases of proximal ulna fractures. All the 19 cases were infected after internal fixation of fracture, and 2 cases were complicated with radial nerve injury. According to Cierny-Mader anatomical classification, 11 cases were type Ⅱ, 6 cases were type Ⅲ, and 2 cases were type Ⅳ. The duration of bone infection was 1-3 years. After primary debridement, the bone defect was (3.04±0.28) cm, and the antibiotic bone cement was implanted into the defect area, and the external fixator was installed; 3 cases were repaired with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap, and 2 cases were repaired with lateral brachial fascial flap. Bone defects repair and reconstruction were performed after 6-8 weeks of infection control. The wound healing was observed, and white blood cell (WBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reaction protein (CRP) were reexamined regularly after operation to evaluate the infection control. X-ray films of the affected limb were taken regularly after operation to observe the bone healing in the defect area. At last follow-up, the flexion and extension range of motion and the total range of motion of the elbow joint were observed and recorded, and compared with those before operation, and the function of the elbow joint was evaluated by Mayo score. Results All patients were followed up 12-34 months (mean, 26.2 months). The wounds healed in 5 cases after skin flap repair. Two cases of recurrent infection were effectively controlled by debridement again and replacement of antibiotic bone cement. The infection control rate was 89.47% (17/19) in the first stage. Two patients with radial nerve injury had poor muscle strength of the affected limb, and the muscle strength of the affected limb recovered from grade Ⅲ to about grade Ⅳ after rehabilitation exercise. During the follow-up period, there was no complication such as incision ulceration, exudation, bone nonunion, infection recurrence, or infection in the bone harvesting area. Bone healing time ranged from 16 to 37 weeks, with an average of 24.2 weeks. WBC, ESR, CRP, PCT, and elbow flexion, extension, and total range of motions significantly improved at last follow-up (P<0.05). According to Mayo elbow scoring system, the results were excellent in 14 cases, good in 3 cases, and fair in 2 cases, and the excellent and good rate was 89.47%. ConclusionLimited internal fixation combined with a hinged external fixator in the treatment of the peri-elbow bone infection can effectively control infection and restore the function of the elbow joint.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of internal fixation with headless compression hollow embedding screws in the treatment of intraarticular fracture of elbow.MethodsBetween March 2012 and September 2018, 12 patients with intraarticular fracture of elbow were treated with internal fixation with headless compression hollow embedding screws. There were 7 males and 5 females with an average age of 50.3 years (range, 22-65 years). Cause of injury included falling in 7 cases, falling from high places in 4 cases, and traffic accident in 1 case. Ten patients were distal humerus fractures which were classified as type 13-B3 in 8 cases and type 13-C3 in 2 cases according to the International Association of Internal Fixation Research (AO/ASIF). Two patients were radial head fractures which were classified as type Ⅲ according to the modified Mason classifications. The preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 8.25±0.83. The time from injury to operation was 3-5 days (mean, 3.7 days).ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention. All 12 patients were followed up 6-15 months, with an average of 8.4 months. The results of X-ray films and CT examination showed that the fracture ends were anatomic reduction, and the fractures healed at 6-11 months after operation, with an average of 7.8 months. One patient had heterotopic ossification at 4 months after operation. The VAS scores were 5.17±0.79 at 2 weeks after operation and 0.50±0.50 at last follow-up. There were significant differences between the time points (P<0.05). At last follow-up, the Mayo elbow function score was 68-95, with an average of 83.9. The activity of elbow joint recovered.ConclusionThe intraarticular fracture of elbow can be firmly fixed by the headless compression hollow embedding screw, which can allow the early functional training of the elbow joint, reduce the incidence of heterotopic ossification, and obtain good effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo investigate the short-term effectiveness of free radial head reconstruction of coronoid process, artificial radial head replacement, and ulna olecranon internal fixation in the treatment of the complex terrible triad of the elbow.MethodsRetrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 12 patients with complex terrible triad of the elbow treated with free radial head reconstruction of coronoid process, artificial radial head replacement, and ulna olecranon internal fixation between April 2011 and April 2018. There were 8 males and 4 females with an average age of 44.5 years (range, 26-62 years). The causes of injury included 5 cases of traffic accident, 7 cases of falling from hight. The Regan-Morrey classification of ulnar coronoid process fractures was type Ⅲ; Mason classification of radial head fractures was type Ⅲ in 7 cases and type Ⅳ in 5 cases. The time from injury to operation was 5-14 days, with an average of 6.0 days. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and complications were recorded. After operation, X-ray film of elbow joint was reexamined, fracture healing condition was observed, and fracture healing time was recorded. The flexion, extension, and rotation of the elbow joints on the healthy and affected sides were recorded and measured. The elbow function was evaluated according to Mayo elbow function score.ResultsThe operation time was 90-140 minutes (mean, 110 minutes); the intraoperative blood loss was 100-300 mL (mean, 150 mL). None of the patients had vascular injury during the operation. One patient developed numbness in the ulnar nerve innervation area and recovered completely after symptomatic treatment for 1 week. All the 12 patients were followed up 12-22 months, with an average of 16 months. At last follow-up, the fracture healed completely, 1 patient developed ectopic ossification of elbow joint, and 2 patients developed traumatic arthritis of elbow joint. No internal fixation-related complications occurred. There was no significant difference in the range of motion of elbow flexion, extension, pronation, and supination between the affected and healthy sides (P>0.05). The median Mayo elbow function score was 96, and the interquartile range was (94, 97), and the excellent and good rate was 91.7%.ConclusionFor patients with complex terrible triad of the elbow with ulna coronoid process fractures of Regan-Morrey type Ⅲ and radial head fractures of Mason type Ⅲ, Ⅳ combined with ulna olecranon fractures, the free radial head reconstruction, artificial radial head replacement, and ulna olecranon internal fixation, through active rehabilitation function exercise after operation, can achieve more satisfactory short-term effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) with preservation of triceps brachii insertion approach.MethodsBetween January 2012 and September 2017, 17 patients with elbow disease were treated with TEA with preservation of triceps brachii insertion approach. There were 3 males and 14 females, with an average age of 65.2 years (range, 48-85 years). The injuries located on left elbow in 5 cases and on right elbow in 12 cases. There were 11 cases of distal humerus fracture (AO type C1 in 2 cases and type C3 in 9 cases); the interval between fracture and operation was 3-10 days (mean, 4.1 days). There were 3 cases of osteoarthritis and 3 cases of rheumatoid arthritis, with the disease duration of 2-26 years (mean, 8.7 years). The postoperative elbow function and pain was assessed by Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) score, respectively. The prosthesis position, heterotopic ossification, and periprosthetic fracture were observed by X-ray films.ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention. Sixteen patients were followed up 18-69 months (mean, 40.6 months). Intraoperative ulnar nerve injury occurred in 2 cases, and healed after symptomatic treatment. At last follow-up, the MEPS score was 55-100 (mean, 90.3). The results were excellent in 11 cases, good in 2 cases, fair in 2 cases, and poor in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 81.3%. The VAS score was 0-2 (mean, 0.4). X-ray reexamination showed that no polyethylene wear, prosthesis loosening and fracture, abnormal prosthesis position, periprosthetic fracture occurred during the follow-up period, and the prosthesis survival rate was 100%. Heterotopic ossification occurred in 2 and 3 months after operation in 2 cases, respectively.ConclusionThe triceps on approach for TEA are satisfactory for distal humerus fracture, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis.