Objective To assess the safety and effectiveness of direct stenting (DS) versus conventional stenting (CS) with predilation in clinical practice. Methods Such databases as PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2011), CBM, VIP and CNKI were searched from the date of their establishment to April 2011, to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on DS vs. CS. The quality of RCTs was critically appraised, and the data were extracted and cross-checked by two reviewers independently. Meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 24 RCTs involving 6 666 patients were included. The results of Meta-analyses showed that DS took shorter operative time compared with CS (MD=–3.36, 95%CI –4.41 to –2.30, Plt;0.000 01) with acute gain (luminal diameter) during operation (MD=–0.01, 95%CI –0.04 to 0.02, P=0.64). But there were no significant differences in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events during six-month follow-up (OR=0.89, 95%CI 0.69 to 1.14, P=0.35) and restenosis (OR=1.02, 95%CI 0.82 to 1.26, P=0.88). Conclusion Current evidence shows that DS is not superior to CS. This conclusion still needs to be further proved by well-designed and large scale RCTs with longer follow-up duration.
摘要:目的:探討基層醫院開展急診經皮冠狀動脈支架植入術(PCI)治療急性心肌梗死(AMI)的可行性、安全性。方法:回顧分析2002年11月~2009年4月我院41例AMI患者的急診PCI資料。結果:41例AMI患者,急診開通梗死相關動脈(IRA)39例(即時成功率95.1%),開通IRA者中術后死亡2例(死亡率4.9%),總成功率90.2％。結論:在有條件的基層醫院開展急診PCI安全有效。Abstract: Objective: To explore the feasibility and safety of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction in elementary hospital. Methods: The clinical data of 41 AMI patients who underwent emergent PCI from November 2002 to April 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Among the 41 AMI patients referred to PCI, infarctrelated arteries were recanalized in 39 cases. The immediate success rate was 95.1%. 2 cases of them died. The total success rate was 90.2%.Conclusion: Emergent PCI is safe and effective in the hospitals which could carry out PCI.