Objective To investigate the etiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment of acute obstructive suppurative pancreatic ductitis (AOSPD). Method The literature reports on AOSPD at home and abroad were reviewed and analyzed comprehensively based on clinical experience. Results AOSPD was a rare clinically infectious disease of purulent pancreatic duct. Chronic pancreatitis and ampullary operations were the main pathogenesis factors. The clinical symptoms were non-specific, and the imaging manifestations were pancreatic duct dilatation and pancreatic duct calculi. The clinical diagnosis was mainly determined by epigastrium CT or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, which was easy to be misdiagnosed and missed. Conclusion The clinical diagnosis of AOSPD is difficult, early pancreatic duct drainage is the key to the treatment, and attention should be paid to its diagnosis and treatment.
Objective To summarize current research advances of mechanism and treatment of pancreatic endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in chronic pancreatitis. Method The related literatures about the research progress of the pancreatic endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in the chronic pancreatitis in recent years were retrieved and reviewed. Results In recent years, it had many new studies and discoveries on the pancreatic endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in the chronic pancreatitis. The mechanism of the pancreatic exocrine dysfunction was mainly due to the decrease of the pancreatin secretion in the patients with chronic pancreatitis. The mechanism of the pancreatic endocrine insufficiency was mainly due to the damage of the pancreatic exocrine gland and islet tissue in the chronic pancreas, which leaded to the destruction of the pancreatic endocrine cells, the other endocrine cells, and the disturbance of the intestine-islet axis, followed by the disorder of the various hormones (insulin, glucagon, pancreatic polypeptide, etc.), and eventually manifested the glucose tolerance or dominant diabetes. Conclusions At present, although there is a certain degree understanding for pancreatic endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in chronic pancreatitis, there are no breakthroughs in its mechanism and treatment, and effect is lack of large sample and multicenter clinical control study. Exploring more optimized detection methods and establishing a perfect treatment system is goal of future development and research.
ObjectiveTo analyze risk factors of intraoperative massive hemorrhage in patients with pancreatitis-induced sinistral portal hypertension (SPH) and to explore its strategies of treatment.MethodsThe clinical data of patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH admitted to the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2015 to March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The intraoperative massive hemorrhage was defined as the blood loss exceeding 30% blood volume. The factors closely associated with the intraoperative massive hemorrhage were analyzed by the forward logistic regression model.ResultsA total of 128 patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH were enrolled in this study, including 104 males and 24 females, with an average age of 47 years old and a median intraoperative bleeding volume of 482 mL. Among them, 93 patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH caused by the pancreatic pseudocyst after acute pancreatitis and 35 caused by the chronic pancreatitis. There were 36 patients with history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 46 patients with hypersplenism. Thirty-six patients suffered from the massive hemorrhage. Among them, 30 patients underwent the distal pancreatectomy concomitant with splenectomy, 1 patient underwent the duodenum- preserving resection of pancreatic head, and 5 patients underwent the pseudocyst drainage. The univariate analysis showed that the occurrence of intraoperative massive hemorrhage in the patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH was not associated with the gender, age, body mass index, albumin level, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, hypersplenism, type of pancreatitis, course of pancreatitis, number of attacks of pancreatitis, size of spleen, maximum diameter of lesions in the splenic vein obstruction site, or number of operation (P>0.05), which was associated with the diameter of varicose vein more than 5.0 mm (χ2=19.83, P<0.01), the intraperitoneal varices regions (χ2=13.67, P<0.01), the location of splenic vein obstruction (χ2=5.17, P=0.03), the operation time (t=–3.10, P<0.01), or the splenectomy (χ2=17.46, P<0.01). Further the logistic regression analysis showed that the varicose vein diameter more than 5.0 mm (OR=6.356, P=0.002) and splenectomy (OR=4.297, P=0.005) were the independent risk factors for the intraoperative massive hemorrhage in the patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH.ConclusionsSplenectomy and having a collateral vein more than 5.0 mm in diameter are independent risk factors for intraoperative massive blood loss in surgeries taken on patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH. Attention should be paid to dilation of gastric varices and choice of splenectomy.
Objective To study effects of Helicobacter pylori on oncogenesis and progression of pancreatic cancer. Method The current literatures on the relationship between the Helicobacter pylori and the pancreatic cancer were collected and reviewed. Results The Helicobacter pylori infection might play a role in the development of the pancreatic cancer. The infection rate of the Helicobacter pylori in the patients with pancreatic cancer is higher than that of the healthy controls; furthermore, in the patients with Helicobacter pylori antibody positive, the infection rate of the Helicobacter pylori in the cytotoxin-associated gene A-negative strains of Helicobacter pylori is significantly higher than that of the healthy controls. Conclusions Helicobacter pylori infection is related to occurrence and development of pancreatic cancer. Specific mechanism is still not clarified and further research is need to study.
ObjectiveTo summarize and analyze the long-term clinical effect of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy.MethodsThe clinical data of 102 patients who underwent DPPHR (n=35) or pancreaticoduodenectomy (n=67) from January 2014 to December 2019 in The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsThe operations of patients in the DPPHR group and the PD group were successfully complete, no one died during operation or perioperative period. The weight gain in one year after operation and incidences of exocrine dysfunction in the DPPHR group were all better than those of the PD group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference on the other complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The pain score, diarrhea score, and the overall health status score in one year after operation significantly improved in the DPPHR group than those in the PD group (P<0.05).ConclusionDPPHR is more beneficial to improve the quality of life after operation, and is a better surgical procedure for benign and low-grade malignant diseases of pancreatic head.
Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) is a surgical approach indicated for benign or low-grade malignant tumors of the pancreatic head, pancreatic duct stones in the pancreatic head, chronic pancreatitis, and related pathologies. Compared to traditional pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), its core principle lies in preserving the integrity of the stomach, duodenum, and biliary tract, thereby reducing postoperative digestive dysfunction and metabolic complications to improve patients’ quality of life. With the continuous advancement of laparoscopic techniques, laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (LDPPHR) has emerged as a significant refinement of conventional PD, achieving an optimal integration of minimally invasive laparoscopy and organ function preservation. This article synthesizes recent Chinese and English literature to provide a systematic review of surgical indications, technical nuances, complication management, and clinical outcomes of LDPPHR.
Objective To explore the feasibility and safety of Frey operation under laparoscopy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Methods The clinical data of chronic pancreatitis patients who underwent laparoscopic Frey procedure in Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University from 2021-2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Results Eleven patients with chronic pancreatitis complicated with pancreatic duct stones were included in the study, 7 of whom had a history of diabetes and (or ) impaired glucose tolerance, suggesting that pancreatic endocrine function was impaired. The median diameter of the main pancreatic duct measured by imaging method was 8 mm (4–20mm). The median operative time was 188 min (120–368 minutes), and the total intraoperative bleeding volume was 50 mL (20–100 mL). Postoperative pancreatic fistula did not occur, one case of postoperative abdominal fluid accumulation and hypoproteinemia improved after symptomatic supportive treatment such as anti infection, acid and enzyme inhibition, and nutritional rehydration. Postoperative bleeding occurred in 3 cases, including 1 case of intestinal anastomotic bleeding, which was sutured again under emergency laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis to stop bleeding. The other two cases improved after conservative management such as blood transfusion, plasma, vitamin K, acid inhibition, enzyme inhibition and hemostatic drugs. The median postoperative hospitalization time was 7 days (4–18 days), and no patient mortality happened within 90 days after surgery. Conclusion Laparoscopic Frey operation is feasible and a relatively safe and effective method for the treatment of chronic pancreatitis.
ObjectiveTo explore the advantages and disadvantages of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) in the clinical application of pancreatic surgical diseases, and to summarize the progress of minimally invasive application of DPPHR combined with the current application of laparoscopy and robot surgery in pancreatic surgery. MethodThe related research literatures about DPPHR at home and abroad in recent years were searched and reviewed. ResultsThe effect of DPPHR compared with traditional pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for treatment of benign pancreatic diseases was still controversial, and the postoperative remission effect, perioperative period, occurrence of long-term complications and improvement of quality of life were not very advantageous compared with PD, and the prognosis of minimally invasive surgery was poor. ConclusionDPPHR remains highly controversial for surgical intervention in benign pancreatic disease and has enormous scope for advances in minimally invasive surgical applications in pancreatic surgery, but more clinical studies are needed to verify its clinical efficacy.
ObjectiveTo summarize of clinical application and progress of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR).MethodThe relevant literatures published recently at domestic and abroad about the clinical application and progress of DPPHR were collected and reviewed.ResultsFor the benign lesions, low-grade malignancies and borderline tumors of the head of pancreas, the DPPHR could achieve the same expected therapeutic effect as the classical pancreatoduodenectomy. The DPPHR could reserve the continuity of stomach and duodenum while resecting lesions and improve the symptoms of patients, reduce the reconstruction of digestive tract and the resection of pancreas and surrounding tissues as much as possible, and retain the pancreas-intestinal axis, which was more in line with the physiology of human beings.ConclusionsAt present, DPPHR is worthy of further development and promotion in department of pancreas surgery, but current studies only focus on occurrence of short-term complications after operation. Because patients with benign diseases of pancreatic head have better prognosis and longer survival time after operation, we should pay attention to the long-term complications such as diarrhea, anemia and reflux cholangitis. More clinical studies need in future to be demonstrated superiority of DPPHR in clinical efficacy and to evaluate occurrence of long-term complications and their impact on quality of life of patients with DPPHR by comprehensive analysis of multiple evaluation indicators.
Objective To explore changes and challenges on management of chronic pancreatitis. Methods The updated clinical guidelines and the latest research findings were collected and reviewed. Results The proposition of a new mechanistic definition and identification of an early stage give us a novel insight into chronic pancreatitis. The intraductal pancreatic calcifications has been regarded as the most reliable ultrasonography and CT features of chronic pancreatitis. In addition, the endoscopic ultrasonography is also of great value. The present surgical strategies are established on the concepts of step-up approach and damage control. The surgery perform better than the endoscopic treatment in the long-term outcome, but the timing course of surgery need to be further investigated. Conclusions Early diagnosis and treatment plays a critical role in cases of chronic pancreatitis. More patients of chronic pancreatitis should be treated in a multidisciplinary team as future perspectives.