Objective To comment the diagnosis and treatment the bile leakage from the injuried abnormal minute biliary in our laparosicopic cholecystectomy (LC) practice. Methods Fourteen cases of minute biliary duct injury in 2 050 cases of LC were studied retrospectively. Among them, 6 cases had been found the points of leakage during operation, and the points were treated by titanium nips. In 4 cases even though the bile leakage could be seen, but the points of leakage could not found, and were treated by drainage. Four cases with peritonitis, 1 needed to be explored, and treated with suture ligature, 1 was explored by laparoscopy again, another two cases were treated with multiple hole catheters to drainage of the abdominal cavities through stab wounds. Results All 14 cases recovered. Conclusion Small bile leakage in LC is almost inevitable. It is the best that the bile leakage can be discovered during operation and to be treated. If it is discovered after operation, an open or laparoscopic exploratory laparotomy and adequate drainage would be needed. In the case of small amount of leakage, catheter drainage through stab wound is feasible.
Objective To explore the operative managements of ectopic gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).Methods Twenty one cases of ectopic gallbladder undergone LC in this hospital were analyzed regarding the perioperative management, principle, and technique of operation.Results There were 2 cases of situs transversus, 1 case with gallbladder under right posterior lobe of liver, 2 under left lateral lobe of liver and 16 in the liver. All 21 cases of ectopic gallbladder had undergone LC successfully, and no complications were found during and after operation. Conclusion Anatomic ectopia of gallbladder tosses a challenging problem to laparoscopic surgeon. It is safe for surgeons to recognise actual anatomical anomaly and to manage them appropriately.
ObjectiveTo compare the effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis in elderly patients and non-elderly patients. MethodsThe clinical data of 185 cases of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis who treated in our hospital from September 2010 to November 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. Then the 185 cases of holecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis were divided into elderly patients group (n=74) and the non-elderly patients group (n=111). The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative activity time, abdominal drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay, hospitalization cost, incidence of complications, unplanned analgesia, stone-free rate, rate of conversion to laparotomy, recurrence of stone, and mortality were compared between the two groups. Results① Intraoperative and postoperative indexes. No significant difference was noted in operative time and intraoperative blood loss (P > 0.050), but the postoperative exhaust time, postoperative activity time, abdominal drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay, hospitalization cost, and ratio of indwelling T tube of elderly patients group were all higher or longer than corresponding index of non-elderly patients group (P < 0.050). ② Postoperative complications and unplanned analgesia. There was no striking discrepancy in incidence of complications (including biliary leakage, peritonitis, haemorrhage, vomit, ectoralgia, and fever), and Clavien-Dindo grade (P > 0.050), except unplanned analgesia (P=0.007), the rate of unplanned analgesia in elderly patients group was higher than that of non-elderly patients group. ③Surgical effect. There was no significant difference in the stone-free rate, rate of conversion to laparotomy, and rate of recurrence of stone between the 2 groups (P > 0.050). ConclusionLC+LCBDE is also safe and effective in treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis in elderly patients, it's worthy to be expanded and be used broadly.
ObjectiveTo compare the advantages and disadvantages of transumbilical single port (TUSP) and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). MethodsThe clinical data of 45 patients underwent elective LC were analyzed, 20 patients with TUSP LC (TUSP-LC group), 25 patients with conventional LC (conventional LC group). The operation time, Child-Pugh score and painkiller application frequency within three days after operation, the first time of out of bed and hospital stay after operation, intraoperative blood loss, chronic pain within one month after surgery were compared between two groups. ResultsAll cases were operated successfully except one patient in the conventional LC group. The frequency of painkiller application within three days after operation and postoperative hospital stay in the TUSP-LC group were better than those in the conventional LC group (Plt;0.05). There were no significant differences on postoperative chronic pain of surgical area within 1 month and Child-Pugh score between two groups (Pgt;0.05). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the conventional LC group were less than those in the TUSP-LC group (Plt;0.05, Plt;0.01). ConclusionTUSP LC has the advantages of small wound, slight pain, and fast recovery.
摘要:目的:探討腹腔鏡膽囊大部分切除在復雜膽囊結石手術中應用的可行性及安全性。方法:回顧性分析2003年1月至2008年10月間41例行腹腔鏡膽囊部分切除術的復雜膽囊結石病人。行腹腔鏡膽囊切除術指征為:膽囊管不能明確辨認時,諸如:膽囊積膿、Mirris綜合征、Calot三角致密粘連呈“冰凍樣”、萎縮性膽囊等。手術方法為:切除膽囊前壁,取凈結石,腹腔置管引流。結果:41例復雜膽囊結石病人中1例中轉開腹手術外,其余全部在腹腔鏡下完成,手術時間為45～145分鐘,平均(57.42±19.41)分鐘,1例術后出現膽漏,其余術后住院時間為2～7天。 結論:在膽囊三角不能安全辨認前提下,對于復雜膽囊結石行腹腔鏡膽囊部分切除術是一種安全的手術方式,不但能簡化手術、降低手術風險,而且能避免行開腹手術治療。Abstract: Objective: To study the possibility and safty of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in complicated cholecystectomy. Methods: Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy was performed when the cystic duct cannot be identified safely, such as empyema cholecystitis, Mirris syndrome, frozen Calot’triangle, shrunken gallbladder. The operation consists of resecting the anterior wall of the gallbladder, removing all stones, and placing a large drain. 41 patients who underwent a laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy between 1 January 2003 and 31 October 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Fortyone cases of complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy were performed. 1 cases in which were changed to open cholecystectomy. Operating time was 45145 min, average (57.42±19.41) min. 1 cases were reoperated because of the bile leak. Hospital stays were 27 days. Conclusion: Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy is a viable procedure during cholecystectomy in which Calot’s triangle cannot be safely dissected. It may simplify the operation and decrease the risk in complicated cholecystectomy and averts the need for a laparotomy.
To analyse the causes of biliary injuries and summuarize the experience of prevention of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Twenty-three patients with biliary duct injury were diagnosed and treated at our center between September 1992 and August 1998. The main causes were either misidentification of the bile duct or aberrant right duct as the cystic or injudicious use of thermal energy (cautery) to dissect, control bleeding, or divide tissue. Conclusion: The causes of biliary duct injury are complex. Training and experience of sugeon, the meticulous dissection of the calot′s triangle and preoperative or operative cholangiography are three key factors in prevention of biliary duct injury during LC.
Objective To review the complex situation，surgical experience，and surgical technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy （LC）．Methods The clinical data of 86 patients who underwent LC in our hospital and the consulting hospitals from February 2005 to April 2011 were retrospectively analyzed．According to the complicated conditions，the different surgical techniques were applied during LC such as lamellar dissection，aspirater stripping method，laparoscopic suture，and intraoperative cholangiography．Results The operation time was （68±23）min （25－210 min），blood loss was （55±13）ml （15－200 ml）．LC was successfully performed in 84 of 86 cases．Only two patients received transferring laparotomy because of scar tissue in Calot triangle that was hard to dissect．No severe complications occurred，such as biliary leakage，bleeding after operation，stricture of bile duct，retained calculus，and so on．All the patients were cured before discharge．Conclusion Lamellar dissection，aspirater stripping method，and laparoscopic suture combined with the view of laparotomy can be used to deal with complicated LC successfully．
ObjectiveTo explore the role of fast-track surgery (FTS) in day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) pain management. MethodsWe used bidirectional cohort study to investigate the patients undergoing day surgery of laparoscopic cholecystectomy admitted into our department. A total of 143 patients between April and September 2014 receiving routine pain management were chosen to be the control group, and 78 patients between October 2014 and January 2015 receiving FTS pain management were regarded as the FTS group. Postoperative pain, early ambulation, influence of pain on the sleep, patients' satisfaction and prolonged hospital stay rate were compared between the two groups. ResultsPain scores of patients in the FTS group 0-0.5, 0.5-6, 6-12, and 12-24 hours after surgery were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The proportion of patients with early postoperative ambulation and patients' satisfaction rate in the FTS group were significantly higher than the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionThe FTS pain management model can effectively reduce patients' pain after DLC, accelerate patients' postoperative rehabilitation and increase patients' satisfaction.
Objective To investigate the feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy through the transumbilical approach. MethodsThe clinical data of 18 patients underwent endoscopic cholecystectomy through only one transumbilical incision at West China Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Results All of the operations were successfully completed without conversion to routine laparoscopic surgery or open surgery. The operation time was 40-130 （58±10） min. There was no intraoperative complication. The patients did well postoperatively and were discharged 1 day after operation. There was no postoperative complications and without visible abdominal scar on 1 month follow-up. Conclusions Laparoscopic cholecystectomy through the transumbilical approach is technically feasible and safe. But this technique is difficult, the patients should be selected carefully.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) on prevention of the complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). MethodsThe clinical data of 1 079 patients underwent LC from January 2006 to June 2010 in this hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to the use of MRCP or not in the different period, the patients were divided into nonMRCP group (n=523) and MRCP group (n=556). The occurrence of bile duct injuries (BDI) and retained common duct stone (RCDS) were compared between two groups. ResultsConversion to open surgery was performed in 35 cases in nonMRCP group and in 41 cases in MRCP group. The intraoperative and postoperative BDI were found in five patients and RCDS were found in 27 patients in nonMRCP group, and those were not found in patients in MRCP group. The differences of BDI and RCDS of patients were significant between two groups (P=0.026 and P=0.000). In nonMRCP group, 23 of 55 patients were found common bile duct stones by intraoperative cholangiography. Common bile duct stones were found by intraoperative cholangiography other than preoperative MRCP in three patients in MRCP group, while another three patients did not find common bile duct stones by intraoperative cholangiography although preoperative MRCP suggested. By MRCP, double gallbladders were found in one patient, Mirizzi syndrome in eight patients, variant cystic duct in 34 patients, accessory hepatic duct in 28 patients, and complicating common bile duct stones in 27 patients in MRCP group, the diagnostic accuracy of those were 100%, 87.5%, 94.1%, 89.3% and 88.9%, respectively. ConclusionPreoperative MRCP is helpful to prevent BDI and RCDS for the patients with LC.