ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive value of pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness measured using preoperative CT imaging on pancreatic fistula(PF)following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). MethodsOne hundred and fifty-one patients who underwent PD consecutively from January 2013 to April 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. Associations between the gender, age and the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness from preoperative CT imaging and PF were analyzed. The diagnostic values of the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness in patients with PF were evaluate by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The reliability analysis was done for the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Spearman rank correlation analysis was done between the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness. Results①PF occurred in 46 cases (30.1%).②The gender and age were not associated with PF (Gender: χ2=1.698, P=0.193; Age: χ2=0.016, P=0.900). The pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness were associated with PF (Pancreatic duct diameter: OR=0.275, 95% CI 0.164-0.461, P=0.000; Pancreatic gland thickness: OR=1.319, 95% CI 1.163-1.496, P=0.000).③There was no correlation between the pancreatic duct diameter and the pancreatic gland thickness (rs=-0.120, P=0.145).④The area under curve of ROC was 0.814 (95% CI 0.745-0.883, P < 0.001) for the pancreatic duct diameter in predicting the PF, the sensitivity and specificity was 68.6% and 78.3% respectively when the best critical value was 3.5 mm. The area under curve of ROC was 0.762 (95% CI 0.674-0.849, P < 0.001) for the pancreatic gland thickness in predicting PF, the sensitivity and specificity was 63.0% and 85.7% respectively when the best critical value was 31 mm.⑤The ICC of the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness was 0.984 and 0.992 respectively by two medical diagnostic measurement. ConclusionPancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness measured using preoperative CT imaging might be useful in predicting PF following PD.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive value of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) for postoperative overall and severe complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in the elderly patients with pancreatic cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of the elderly (65 years old or more) patients with pancreatic cancer underwent PD were retrospectively collected, who were admitted to the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2017 to October 2021. The incidences of postoperative overall and severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅲ–Ⅴ was defined as severe complications) were summarized. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze whether GNRI was a risk factor for overall and severe complications after PD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the ability of GNRI to distinguish whether overall or severe complications occurred after PD and to confirm the optimal threshold. Then the patients were assigned into a high nutritional risk group (greater than the optimal threshold) and low nutritional risk group (the optimal threshold or less) based on this. Simultaneously, the clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared. ResultsIn this study, 190 elderly patients with pancreatic cancer were enrolled, 95(50.0%) of whom developed complications, including 28(29.5%) cases of serious complications. The results of multivariate logistic regression model analysis showed that the decreased GNRI was a risk factor for the occurrence of overall and severe complications after PD for the elderly patients [OR(95%CI)=0.361(0.154, 0.848), P=0.019; OR(95%CI)=0.906(0.834, 0.983), P=0.018]. The AUC of GNRI for assessing the occurrence of overall and severe complications was 0.765 and 0.715, respectively, with the optimal critical values of 98 and 96, respectively. Compared with the low nutritional risk group, the high nutritional risk group had higher postoperative total hospitalization costs (Z=–2.37, P=0.019), higher occurrences of overall complications (χ2=44.61, P<0.001) and severe complications (χ2=29.39, P＜0.001). ConclusionsIn elderly patients with pancreatic cancer underwent PD, incidence of serious complications is not lower. GNRI has a good discriminative value in terms of postoperative overall and severe complications. When preoperative GNRI is 98 or less and GNRI is 96 or less, patients should be given early preoperative nutritional support treatment in time.
ObjectiveTo compare the short- and long-term efficacy of artery-first approach pancreatico-duodenectomy (AF-PD) and standard approach pancreaticoduodenectomy (S-PD).MethodsThe PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, WanFang, and CNKI databases were searched, relevant literatures were included, and relevant data were extracted for meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 30 articles were included, including 2 750 cases underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. The results of meta-analysis showed that in terms of short-term efficacy when compared with S-PD group, the AF-PD group had less intraoperative blood loss (WMD=–175.87, P<0.001), lower intraoperative blood transfusion rate (OR=0.36, P=0.002), higher R0 resection rate (OR=1.83, P<0.001), lower postoperative pancreatic leakage rate (OR=0.71, P=0.005), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (WMD=–2.69, P=0.007). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the operation time and overall postoperative complication rate between the two groups (P>0.05). In terms of long-term efficacy when compared with S-PD group, the AF-PD group had lower tumor local recurrence rate (OR=0.43, P=0.004) and tumor liver metastasis rate (OR=0.60, P=0.010), but had higher 1-year (OR=1.95, P=0.007), 2-year (OR=2.04, P<0.001), 3-year (OR=2.09, P=0.001), and 5-year (OR=2.06, P=0.003) overall survival rates, and there were no significant differences in the rates of lung metastasis and peritoneal metastasis between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsAF-PD is better than S-PD in some short-term and long-term outcome indicators such as R0 resection rate, pancreatic leakage rate, overall survival rate, and so on. However, due to the limited quality of the included literatures, more high-quality studies are still needed to verify in the future.
Objective To analyze the difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic leakage and anasto-motic bleeding complications in various methods of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy （PD）. Methods The clinical data of 526 patients underwent pancreaticojejunostomy from January 2008 to September 2012 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. End-to-side “pancreatic duct to jejunum mucosa-to-mucosa” anastomosis （abbreviation：mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis） was performed in 359 patients， which contained 149 patients with internal drainage， 130 patients with external drainage， and 80 patients with no drainage. End-to-side invaginated anastomosis was performedin 165 patients without drainage. In addition， side-to-side anastomosis was performed in 2 patients without drainage.Results There were 34 cases （6.46%） of pancreatic leakage， 8 cases （1.52%） of anastomotic bleeding in pancreaticoje-junostomy， and 32 cases of death （6.08%）. ① The pancreatic leakage rate of mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis was signi-ficantly lower than that of end-to-side invaginated anastomosis 〔4.18% （15/359） versus 11.52% （19/165）， χ2=10.029， P=0.002〕. There was no significant difference of the anastomotic bleeding incidence between mucosa-to-mucosa anasto-mosis and end-to-side invaginated anastomosis 〔1.67% （6/359） versus 1.21% （2/165）， χ2=0.159， P=0.691〕. ② In the mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis group， the pancreatic leakage rates in the ones with internal drainage and external drainage were lower than those in the ones without drainage， respectively （2.68% （4/149） versus 11.25% （9/80）， χ2=7.132， P=0.008；1.54% （2/130） versus 11.25% （9/80）， χ2=9.410， P=0.002）；which was no significant difference between the ones with internal drainage and external drainage 〔2.68% （4/149） versus 1.54% （2/130）， χ2=0.433， P=0.510〕. But there were no significant differences for both the pancreatic leakage 〔2.68% （4/149） versus 1.54% （2/130）， χ2=0.433， P=0.510〕and anastomotic bleeding incidence 〔2.68% （4/149） versus 1.54% （2/130）， χ2=0.433， P=0.510〕 between the ones with internal drainage and external drainage. Conclusions Mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis has a lower pancreatic leakage incidence as compared with end-to-side invaginated anastomosis. However， there is no significant difference of the anast-omotic bleeding incidence. Internal or external drainage could reduce the incidence of pancreatic leakage， but have no obvious effect to the anastomotic bleeding incidence.
Objective To investigate the risk factors and preventions of functional delayed gastric emptying (FDGE) after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD). Methods The clinical data of 41 patients after undergoing PPPD between 2003 and 2009 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively.Results In all 41 cases, postoperative complications developed in 13 patients (31.7%), in which 7 patients developed FDGE (17.1%). The complications excluding FDGE (P=0.010) and diabetes (P=0.024) had remarkable relations with the FDGE in the univariate analysis; Compared with the non-FDGE patients, the albumin was declined obviously (P=0.020) while the serum direct bilirubin increased significantly (P=0.036) in the FDGE patients, while the development of FDGE had relation only with the albumin (P=0.039) and the complication of diabete (P=0.047) by the binary logistic regression analysis. Conclusion In the patients undergoing PPPD, preoperative control of the blood glucose, preoperative correction of hypoproteinemia and hyperbilirubinemia, and centralizing PPPD in high-volume have possibly positive significance for the prevention of FDGE.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of drained versus nondrained pancreaticojejunostomy on prevention of the pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodsSeventysix patients underwent the standard pancreaticoduodenectomy including resection of the distal stomach,common bile duct, the head of pancreas and the duodenum.Pancreaticenteric reconstruction was accomplished via either pancreaticojejunostomy by endtoside anastomsis or pancreaticojejunostomy by ducttomucosa anastomsis.The stented external drainage of pancreatic duct was used in 45 of 76 patients. ResultsPancreatic leakage was identified in 1 patient in the drained group consisting of 45 patients,in 7 patients in the nondrained group consisting of 31 patients, the incidence of pancreatic leakage in the drained group (2.2%) was significantly less than in the nondrained group (22.6%,P＜0.05).ConclusionComparing the incidences of pancreatic leakage from both groups,the authors believe that the stented external drainage of pancreatic duct can significantly reduce the incidence of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy between laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) in treatment of carcinoma of head of pancreas. MethodsClinical data of 60 patients with locally advanced carcinoma of head of pancreas who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in our hospital from October 2004 to October 2009 were collected, of which 26 patients were in LPD group and 34 patients were in OPD group. ResultsOperative time and hospitalization expense of patients in LPD group were both longer or more than those of OPD group (P<0.05), but blood loss, time of starting activity, time of aeration, time of pulling out the drainage tube, time of pulling out the stomach tube, time of absolute resting on bed, and hospitalization time in LPD group were all shorter or lower than those of OPD group (P<0.05). There were 25 patients suffered with postoperative complications, including 10 patients in LPD group and 15 patients in OPD group, and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in total incidence of postoperative complication (P>0.05). But in the specific postoperative complication, the incidences of pancreatic fistula and biliary fistula of LPD group were higher than those of OPD group (P<0.05), but incidences of incision infection, pulmonary infection, and systemic infection were all lower than those of OPD group (P<0.05). All patients were followed up for 1-60 months with the median time of 21.5 months. During the follow-up period, in LPD group, 24 patients suffered with recurrence, 20 patients suffered with tumor metastasis, and 24 patients died; in LPD group, 31 patients suffered with recurrence, 25 patients suffered with tumor metastasis, and 31 patients died. There were no significant difference between the 2 groups in the recurrence rate, metastasis rate, mortality, and survival situation (P>0.05). ConclusionsFor carcinoma of head of pancreas, postoperative recovery and infection complications of LPD are significantly superior than those of OPD. But compared with the OPD, it has no obvious advantage in reducing the pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, delayed gastric emptying, and other complications, and it also has no obvious advantage in improving the long-term survival situation too.
ObjectiveTo summarize the application status and prospect of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).MethodThe relevant literatures about studies of LPD at home and abroad were reviewed.ResultsLPD was a difficult operation, mainly suitable for pancreatic head and periampullary benign and malignant tumors. With the development of laparoscopic techniques in recent years, LPD combined the superior mesenteric vein and portal vein resection and reconstruction, or combined multi-visceral resection was feasible, but the survival benefit of LPD with arterial resection and reconstruction and extended lymph node dissection remained to be discussed. At present, there was no clear requirement on the way to reconstruct the pancreatic fluid outflow tract, but the pancreaticojejunostomy for digestive tract reconstruction was chose by the most surgeons. The most studies had confirmed that LPD was minimally invasive and had a short-term prognosis that was not inferior to that of open pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, the results of large sample analysis about long-term survival rate and oncology results were lacking, so it was difficult to judge the advantages and disadvantages of long-term prognosis of the two methods.ConclusionsLPD is a safe, feasible, reasonable, and effective surgical method. With improvement of laparoscopic technology, LPD is expected to become a standard operation method for treatment of pancreatic head cancer and periampullary carcinoma, and oncology benefits of LPD will be further confirmed in future by large-sample clinical randomized control trials and studies of long-term prognosis follow-up.
Objective To explore the feasibility of clinical application of hepatic artery （HA） or proper hepatic artery （PHA） anastomosing with superior mesenteric artery （SMA） and internal iliac vein （IIV） anastomosing with superior mesenteric vein （SMV） or portal vein （PV） in the extended pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with vascular resection．Methods The HA，PHA，SMA， SMV， PV， and IIV were dissected on 20 adult corpses， and the length， thickness，and lumen diameter of blood vessels were measured and compared with the results of multislice spiral CT scan，magnetic resonance angiography，or color Doppler in 25 patients with pancreatic head carcinoma．The extended pancreaticoduodenectomy was carried out on 5 patients of pancreatic head carcinoma with vascular invasion according to the mathcing results，and the reconstructions of HA or PHA with SMA and IIV with SMV or PV were performed．Results According to autopsy，HA-PHA was （5.50±1.50） cm in length，（0.20±0.01） mm in thickness，（5.02±1.32） mm in lumen diameter；and SMA was （4.00±1.00） cm in length，（0.21±0.01） mm in thickness，（6.05±1.06） mm in lumen diameter．The lumen diameter of left IIV，right IIV，and PV or SMV was （11.06±0.16） mm，（11.10±0.13） mm，and （11.56±0.20） mm，respectively．The thickness of left IIV，right IIV，and PV or SMV was （0.10±0.01） mm，（0.10±0.02） mm，and （0.10±0.02） mm，respectively．The multislice spiral CT scan，magnetic resonance angiography，color Doppler，and selective arteriography in vivo showed that the thickness and lumen diameter of HA-PHA and SMA were wider （0.1 mm and 0.3 mm） than those of the autopsy results，and there were no statistic significances （P＞0.05），but the length of HA-PHA was longer （1－2 cm） than that of SMA，and there was statistic significance （P＜0.05）. The survival of 5 patients with extended pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with PHA or SMA and IIV-PV/SMV resection and reconstruction was longer than that of palliative surgery patients or giving-up patients at the same period，and no long-term complications occurred．Conclusions The vascular invasion of pancreatic head carcinoma is not an absolute contraindication of radical pancreaticoduodenectomy．The survival of 5 patients with vascular invasion of pancreatic head carcinoma in this group is prolonged by extended pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with vascular resection and reconstruction as compared with palliative surgery group at the same period．HA，PHA，and IIV are the best autologous vascular alternative materials without more complications． Being familiar with regional anatomy will guide the surgeons in extended pancreaticoduodenectomy.
ObjectiveTo analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodThe clinical data of 150 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in this hospital from January 2011 to January 2014 were reviewed, and the potential factors for pancreatic fistular were evaluated by both univariate and multivariate analysis. ResultsThe incidence of pancreatic fistula was 12.7% (19/150). Univariate analysis results showed that the age, preoperative high bilirubin level, texture of the remnant pancreas, diameter of wirsung, operative time were associated with pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis results revealed that the texture of the remnant pancreas, diameter of wirsung, and operative time were the inde-pendent risk factors (P < 0.05) for pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. ConclusionsTexture of the remnant pancreas, diameter of wirsung, operative time are independent risk factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Rich experience and skilled surgical procedures could effectively reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula.