目的 評價卡培他濱+伊立替康與氟尿嘧啶/醛氫葉酸（5-FU/LV）+伊立替康治療轉移性結直腸癌的有效性和安全性。 方法 計算機檢索PubMed、CENTRAL、Embase、中國生物醫學數據庫、中國期刊全文數據庫、維普數據庫和萬方數據庫，檢索時間均從建庫至2011年9月。對符合納入標準的隨機對照試驗進行質量評價和Meta分析。 結果 納入3個隨機對照試驗，共計419例患者，卡培他濱+伊立替康在中位生存期、完全緩解率[RR=1.58，95%CI（0.27，9.11），P=0.61]、部分緩解率[RR=0.86，95%CI（0.68，1.09），P=0.20]、總有效率[RR=0.88，95%CI（0.71，1.09），P=0.26]上表現出與5-FU/LV+伊立替康相似的效果，安全性方面卡培他濱+伊立替康有較高的Ⅲ/Ⅳ級惡心[RR=1.92，95%CI（1.05，3.54），P=0.04]、腹瀉[RR=3.23，95%CI（2.14，4.89），P＜0.000 01]發生風險和較低的Ⅲ/Ⅳ級中性粒細胞減少[RR=0.72，95%CI（0.53，0.98），P=0.04]發生風險。 結論 根據當前現有證據，5-FU/LV+伊立替康可能較卡培他濱+伊立替康更為有利于轉移性結直腸癌患者的治療，但仍需結合臨床實際情況進行化療方案的優選。
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ramelteon for chronic insomnia in adults. Methods The following databases as CENTRAL, PubMed, EMbase, ISI, CNKI, CBMdisc, VIP and WanFang Data were searched from the date of their establishment to November 2010. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting the inclusion criteria were included. The data extraction and quality assessment were conducted according to the methods of Cochrane Reviewers’ Handbook recommend by The Cochrane Collaboration, and meta-analysis was performed with RevMan5.0 software. Results A total of 5 RCTs involving 1 772 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that: a) Effectiveness: In the effectiveness, ramelteon was superior to placebo in latency to persistent sleep (MD=18.36, 95%CI 11.55 to 25.18, Plt;0.000 01), total sleep time (MD= –15.47, 95%CI –22.50 to –8.43, Plt;0.000 1), sleep efficiency (MD= –3.39, 95%CI –5.32 to –1.46, P=0.000 6), sleep quality (MD=0.14, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.25, P=0.01) after one week treatment and latency to persistent sleep (MD=13.02, 95%CI 6.01 to 20.03, P=0.000 3) except for wake after sleep onset (MD= –8.79, 95%CI –17.24 to –0.35, P=0.04) after one month treatment. b) Safety: significant differences were only found in the female prolactin (MD=5.50, 95%CI 2.02 to 8.98, P=0.002) and male free testosterone (MD=15.30, 95%CI 0.62 to 29.98, P=0.04) between the two groups, rather than in all the other hormones concentration, rebound insomnia, withdrawal syndrome, next-day residual effects and incidence rate of adverse reactions. Conclusion Ramelteon has marked effects on adults’ chronic insomnia after 1-week treatment, but its effect is not obvious after 1-month treatment. The adverse reactions are mostly the somnolence, rising of male free testosterone and female prolactin concentration.
【摘要】 目的 系統評價司帕沙星對比氧氟沙星治療耐多藥肺結核的有效性和安全性。 方法 計算機檢索Cochrane圖書館臨床對照試驗資料庫（2010年第2期）和PubMed（1978年-2010年10月）、EMBASE（1974年-2010年10月）、中國學術期刊網絡出版總庫（1978年-2010年10月）、維普（1989年-2010年10月）、中國生物醫學文獻數據庫（1978年-2010年10月）；手工檢索其他相關雜志。檢索語種為中文和英文。納入司帕沙星對比氧氟沙星治療耐多藥肺結核的隨機對照試驗。按Cochrane系統評價的方法評價納入研究質量，用RevMan 5.0軟件對數據進行Meta分析。 結果 共納入8篇研究，Meta分析結果顯示司帕沙星組與氧氟沙星組相比，痰菌轉陰率、病灶顯著吸收率、空洞閉合率均高于對照組，差異具有統計學意義（Plt;0.05）。 結論 現有的證據表明，司帕沙星與其他抗結核藥物聯用治療難治、耐多藥肺結核的療效優于氧氟沙星的聯用方案，但由于納入的文獻數量有限，質量參差不齊，存在潛在的發表偏倚。【Abstract】 Objective To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of sparfloxacin versus ofloxacin in treatment of multi-drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Methods Literatures were retrieved from PubMed (1978-October, 2010), EMBASE (1974-October 2010), Cochrane library (2nd volume, 2010), China Academic Journal Network Publishing Database (1978-October, 2010), VIP (1989-October, 2010) and CBM (1978 to October, 2010) by computer, and searched some other relevant journals manually. Chinese and English were both used in the search. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on sparfloxacin versus ofloxacin in treating pulmonary tuberculosis were included in this study. Meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.0 software. Results The meta-analysis of 8 included RCTs showed that the sputum negative conversion rate, focus absorption rate, cavity closure rate in the sparfloxacin group were significantly higher than the ofloxacin group (P＜0.05). Conclusions The analysis indicates that combined treatment with sparfloxacin has a better effect in treating MDR-TB than with ofloxacin. However, the reliability of this review may be affected by the number and quality of studies included. Large-scale randomized controlled trials of high quality are needed to confirm the conclusions above.