ObjectiveTo summarize the related researches of pancreatic portal hypertension (PPH) in recent years in order to diagnose and treat the disease more timely and effectively. MethodThe literatures relevant to etiology, mechanism, clinical features, diagnostic criteria, and treatment of PPH were searched and reviewed. ResultsThe occurrence of PPH was related to its anatomical structure. Its clinical manifestations were not characteristic, but it was not difficult to diagnose by the assistance of auxiliary examinations. The treatment of PPH was mainly targeted at pancreatic diseases and portal hypertension, and the treatment targeted at portal hypertension was performed according to the situation with or without gastrointestinal bleeding. So, in clinical practice, different treatment measures should be taken according to different situations. ConclusionAt present, the clinical diagnosis and treatment of PPH is relatively mature, but its preventive treatment is still controversial, which will be the focus of future research.
【摘要】 目的 比較脛骨平臺骨折術后輔助與不輔助持續被動運動（continuous passive motion，CPM）的臨床療效。 方法 對2008年6月-2009年6月86例行手術治療的閉合性、無合并損傷的脛骨平臺骨折患者進行回顧性分析。根據是否輔助CPM分為CPM組27例和非CPM組（對照組）59例。對兩組患者的傷口愈合情況，膝關節屈曲、伸直角度，以及膝關節功能恢復情況進行比較。 結果 兩組傷口甲級愈合率差異無統計學意義（P=0.566）。在術后2周和6周，CPM組患者的膝關節屈曲角度明顯大于對照組（Plt;0.001），但在術后3個月和12個月，兩組的差異無統計學意義（P=0.219，P=0.512）。在術后2、6周，3、12個月，CPM組和對照組患者的膝關節伸直角度差異無統計學意義。在術后12個月的Rasmussen膝關節功能評分方面，CPM組和對照組的差異無統計學意義。 結論 脛骨平臺骨折術后輔助CPM能早期提升膝關節屈曲角度，但并不能提高遠期的膝關節活動度和最終的膝關節功能。【Abstract】 Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of continuous passive motion (CPM) treatment after tibial plateau fractures operation. Methods From June 2008 to June 2009, 86 patients were treated due to closed tibial plateau fractures without combined injuries. The patients were treated with (27 patients, CPM group) and without (59 patients, control group) CPM. The wound healing rates, range of motion and the knee function were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in wound healing rates (P=0.566). Two and six weeks after the operation, there were significant differences between the two groups in flexion degree (Plt;0.001); three and 12 months after the operation, there were no significant differences between the two groups (P=0.219, P=0.512). At the 2nd and 6th week, 3rd and 12th month postoperatively, there were no significant differences between the groups in extension degree. Twelve months after the operation, there were no significant differences between the groups in functional recovery of the knee. Conclusion CPM in the post-operative treatment of tibial plateau fractures is effective increasing knee flexion in the early stage, but is not effective increasing range of motion or knee function in a long term.