Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) using evidence-based methods based on the burden of disease. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) Nine guidelines were included (eight foreign guidelines, one domestic guideline; seven based on evidence, two based on expert consensus). (2) A result of one domestic RCT (n=72, high quality) indicated that tiotropium could significantly improve pulmonary function of severe COPD patient complicated with respiratory failure and increase their quality of life (SGRQ score: MD=–10.8%, 95%CI –12.2% to –9.4%). A result of one RCT (n=156, moderate quality) with 3-month follow-up indicated that tiotropium could significantly improve the proportion of measured value to expected value of FEV1 in patients with mild and moderate COPD in stationary phase (MD=10.3%, 95%CI 8.1% to 12.5%). A result of two RCTs (n=160, low quality) indicated that compound ipratropium bromide had efficiencies of 84.2% to 87.5% for moderate and severe COPD. A result of one RCT (n=60, moderate quality) indicated that salmeterol/fluticasone (inhalation) was superior to placebo for improving mild and moderate COPD in stationary phase. A result of one RCT (n=725, moderate quality) indicated that tiotropium combined with salmeterol/fluticasone for COPD in stationary phase was superior to tiotropium alone. A result of one RCT (n=110, low quality) indicated that nebulized budesonide inhalation had an efficiency of 86.8% for acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) and an incidence of 7.9% as to adverse reaction that mainly included laryngo-pharyngeal irritation. (3) Imipenem, meropenem, cefoperazone/ sulbactam and ceftazidime were effective for COPD with low drug resistance rates in treating COPD caused by non-ICU pathogens (less than 8%). Conclusion (1) We offer a b recommendation for tiotropium, ipratropium, salbutamol, formoterol, salmeterol and theophylline used in the treatment of COPD in stationary and exacerbation phases, a b recommendation for streptococcus pneumoniae and influenza vaccines in preventing the deterioration of COPD, a b recommendation for inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) used in the treatment of COPD in stationary phase and a b recommendation for corticosteroids (for oral use) for AECOPD. (2) We offer a b recommendation for cefoperazone/sulbactam, imipenem and meropenem used in the treatment of moderate and severe AECOPD. (3) We offer a weak recommendation for ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, lavofloxacin, moxifloxacin, amoxicillin amp; clavulanate potassium, amoxicillin, azithromycin, clarithromycin and doxycycline as first-line and second-line antibiotics for mild and moderate AECOPD, and a weak recommendation for compound sulfamethoxazole, cefatriaxone, cefotaxime and cefuroxime used in the treatment of severe and extremely severe COPD, mucolytic agents used in the treatment of stable COPD with difficult expectoration. (4) We make a recommendation against antibiotics, expectorants and corticosteroids (for oral use) as routine use in stationary phase of COPD.
Objective To provide baseline data for further evidence-based evaluation and selection of essential medicine by analyzing the inpatient disease constitution in 8 pilot township health centers located in eastern, central and western China in 2010. Methods The analysis was performed to compare the similarities and differences of both systematic diseases and top 15 single diseases of inpatients in 8 pilot township health centers located in eastern, central and western China in 2010. The Microsoft Excel 2003 and SPSS 13.0 softwares were used for data classification and analysis, and the frequency and composition were used as describing statistical indicators. Results a) The top 5 systematic diseases were respiratory, digestive, circulatory, urinary tract and urogenital systems, as well as the trauma and toxicosis, with accumulative constituent ratio accounting for 71.0%-81.6%; b) The inpatients suffering from top 15 systematic diseases were 10 630, accounting for 61.10%. Each of the respiratory and digestive system contained 6 single diseases including 4 acute and 2 chronic ones, with inpatients accounting for 99.2% and 93.8%, respectively; the circulatory system contained 3 single diseases which were all chronic with inpatient ratio of 84.6%; and c) The chronic diseases were in majority within the top 15 single diseases, which were most commonly seen rather than acute diseases in the pilot township health centers in eastern and central China. The inpatients’ acute diseases were more often seen than chronic diseases in well-off and fundamental township health centers. Conclusion a) The top 5-6 systematic diseases are stable in the pilot township health centers in eastern, central and western China in 2010. The common single inpatient diseases are centralized, which benefits the selection and adjustment of essential medicine for the pilot township health centers in China; b) The capacity building of the western, fundamental and well-off township health centers to diagnose and treat inpatients suffering acute diseases should be promoted; c) The capacity building of the central and general township health centers to diagnose and manage inpatients suffering chronic diseases should be promoted; d) The capacity building of the eastern and well-off township health centers to provide outpatient service should be promoted. The function of the eastern township health centers needs further clarification and improvement; and e) More attention should be paid to diseases prevention, control and treatment for women, children, the elderly and the population with high burden of diseases.
Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for acute bronchitis using evidence-based methods based on the burden of disease. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) Eight guidelines were included (seven foreign guidelines, one domestic guideline; five based on evidence, three based on expert consensus). (2) A result of six RCTs (n=816, low quality) indicated that pentoxyverine had efficiencies of 53% to 82% for cough relief. Among the six RCTs, a result of three RCTs (n=283) indicated that pentoxyverine was slightly less efficient than procaterol (RR=0.86, 95%CI 0.78 to 0.94, P=0.001); a result of two RCTs (n=233) indicated that pentoxyverine was slightly less efficient than Chinese medicinals decoction (RR=0.82, 95%CI 0.74 to 0.91, Plt;0.001). Adverse reaction of pentoxyverine (incidence: 0% to 2.4%) mainly covered nausea, palpitation, etc. Pentoxyverine cost 0.20 yuan (for adult) or 0.08 yuan (for child) daily, which was orally taken and applicable to the target population. (3) A result of six RCTs (n=403, low quality) indicated that the efficiencies of dextromethorphan for cough relief was 47.0% to 95.3%. Among the six RCTs, a result of one RCT (n=283) indicated that dextromethorphan hydrobromide (nasal drop) was more efficient than blank intervention (RR=3.71, 95%CI 1.91 to 7.21); a result of one RCT (n=43) indicated that dextromethorphan (for oral use) was more efficient than placebo (RR=1.74, 95%CI 1.13 to 2.66); a result of one RCT (n=300, moderate quality) indicated that dextromethorphan was more efficient than pentoxyverine (RR=1.16, 95%CI 1.07 to 1.26); a result of one observational study (n=121, low quality) indicated that dextromethorphan given for 5 days had an efficiency of 66.5%. Adverse reaction of dextromethorphan (incidence: 2% to 30%) mainly covered mouth dryness, dizziness, nausea, etc. Conclusion (1) We offer a b recommendation for dextromethorphan used in relieving dry cough due to acute bronchitis. (2) We offer a weak recommendation for pentoxyverine as symptomatic treatment for cough relief. (3) We make a recommendation against antibiotics, β2-agonist bronchodilators and mucolytic agents as routine use. (4) More large-scale, multi-center, double-blinded RCTs are needed in clinical and pharmacoeconomic studies of acute bronchitis in hopes of producing high-quality local evidence.
Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) using evidence-based methods based on the burden of disease. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) Eleven guidelines were included (nine foreign guidelines, two domestic guidelines; nine based on evidence, two based on expert consensus). For CAP, amoxicillin amp; clavulanate potassium had efficiencies of 77.1% and an incidence of 18.8% as to adverse reaction that mainly included gastrointestinal reaction, skin rashes, etc. Piperacillin/tazobactam had an efficiency of 92.1% and a bacterial clearance rate of 88.9%. Cefuroxime had an efficiency of 89% and a bacterial clearance rate of 85.5%. There was no statistical significance between azithromycin and cefuroxime for CAP (RR=0.98, 95%CI 0.9 to 1.06); however, azithromycin was superior to cefuroxime in shortening fever-relief time (MD=–0.98, 95%CI –1.24 to –0.55) and cough-relief time (MD=–1.36, 95%CI –1.94 to –0.78). Efficiencies of ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, moxifloxacin and lavofloxacin were all more than 80% and among the three, moxifloxacin was the most efficient (RR=1.08, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.13, P=0.004). Meropenem had an efficiency of 90%, a bacterial clearance rate of 83.3% and an incidence of 3.33% as to adverse reaction that mainly included diarrhea. Conclusion (1) We offer a b recommendation for antibiotics such as amoxicillin, amoxicillin amp; clavulanate potassium, ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, doxycycline, azithromycin, clarithromycin, cefuroxim, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, lavofloxacin, moxifloxacin, ertapenem, meropenem, imipenem and vancocin. (2) We offer a weak recommendation for penicillin G, ciprofloxacin and erythromycin. (3) We propose that doctor should choose optimal antibiotics based on commonly-seen pathogenic bacteria that cause CAP, local criteria of antibiotic susceptibility, severity of CAP, and risk factors of patients.
Objective To Investigate the disease constitution and hospitalization expense in Luxi township health center (LxC) in Yongxi county of Jiangxi Province in 2010, to make clear about the local burden of diseases and to provide the baseline data for further study. Methods The inpatient records of LxC in 2010 were collected. Based on the primary diagnosis on hospital discharge record, the diseases were standardized and classified according to the International Classification of Disease, 10th Edition (ICD-10). Data including general information of the inpatients, discharge diagnosis, hospitalization expense and usage of essential medicine etc, were reorganized and analyzed by using Microsoft Excel 2003 and SPSS 13.0 software. Results a) The total number of inpatients were 925 in 2010, with male/female ratio of 0.8; b) The disease spectrum included 17 categories, accounting for 81% of the ICD-10; c) The top 5 diseases were in respiratory, digestive, injury, poisoning amp; external causes, circulatory and genitourinary system, totally accounting for 82.27%; d) The top 15 single diseases were upper respiratory infection, fracture, chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD), chronic gastroenteritis, cerebrovascular disease (CVD), calculi in urinary system, rheumatoid arthritis, intervertebral discs diseases, cholecyslithiasis accompanied with cholecystitis, cardiac disease, reproductive organ diseases, injury amp; poisoning, pneumonia, hypertension and peptic ulcer; e) The patients with upper respiratory infection and pneumonia were mostly older than 65 or younger than 5 years old. With the exception of calculi in urinary system and peptic ulcer, all the other 8 chronic diseases were mainly seen in patients over 65 years old; f) Among the 15 single diseases as listed above, the chronic diseases were associated with shorter average hospital stay and low average expense compared with the acute diseases (4.8 d vs. 11.6 d; ?439.1 vs. ?666.9); and g) The hospitalization expense of LxC, although increasing year by year, was still far below that of the national township health centers (?542.3 vs. ?1 004.6). Conclusion a) The top 3 in inpatients systematic diseases of LxC are respiratory system, digestive system, and injury and poisoning; the former 2 diseases attack more often in females, and the acute diseases are mainly infection and fracture; b) Except for rheumatoid arthritis, cholecyslithiasis accompanied cholecystitis, cardiac diseases, reproductive organ diseases and peptic ulcer, all the other 10 of the top 15 single diseases are similar to Yong’an township health center (YaC) in Sichuan Province in 2010; c) The acute diseases mainly focus on respiratory system, and injury and poisoning, and the chronic diseases mainly focus on digestive system, circulatory system, genitourinary system, the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue system; d) The number of patients who suffer from chronic diseases increases significantly when over of 35 years old, especially, often seen in female rather than male. The acute burden diseases is serious in patients less than 15 or more than 45 years old; e) The upper respiratory infection and pneumonia mainly affect the old and children; f) Compared with Xintian township health center (XtC) in Gansu Province, the average hospital stay of fracture patients is longer (43.7 d vs. 9.0 d), the hospitalization expense is higher (?1 948.0 vs. ?1 648.3), and the diseases is burden heavier (8.1% vs. 4.9%); and g) The average hospital stay of patients with acute diseases is longer than YaC and XtC (11.6 d vs. 3.7 d, 6.2 d), but the hospitalization expense is lower than both of them (?666.9 vs. ?850.4, ?906.9).
Objective To provide baseline datum for further evidence-based selecting essential health technology or essential medicine by comparing the top 15 inpatient diseases in the three pilot township clinics in western China from 2008 to 2010. Methods With the key words as disease spectrum, constitution of disease, inpatient disease category, inpatient diseases and so on, such databases as CBM, CNKI, VIP, WanFang and official websites of Ministry of Health were searched on computer, and the manual search was also conducted in combination to extract the related datum of provinces where the pilot township health centers were situated. The Excel software was used for data classification and analyses. Results (1) Among the 16 included literatures including 15 journal papers and 1 master thesis, 4 scored from zero to 3.5, 9 scored from 3.5 to 6.75, and the left 3 scored 7 or more than 7; (2) The common inpatient diseases in the township health centers in eastern, central and western regions in China were different. The upper respiratory tract infection, acute/chronic bronchitis, acute/chronic gastritis and appendicitis were the common inpatient diseases in the township health centers throughout China. The pneumonia, emphysema, cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, and acute/chronic gastroenteritis were the common inpatient diseases in the township health centers in southwest and northwest regions. The top 15 inpatient diseases in the three pilot township clinics in this study covered all the common inpatient diseases in the township health centers in southwest and northwest regions in China; (3) The total number of the top 15 inpatient diseases of the three pilot township health centers in western China between 2008 and 2010 was 35, including 20 chronic and 15 acute diseases. The chronic diseases were chronic bronchitis, chronic gastritis, hypertension, lumbar/cervical disease, cholelithiasis or cholecystitis, coronary heart disease, chronic pulmonary heart disease, urinary calculi, pelvic inflammation, vertebrobasilar insufficiency, arthritis, acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, Meniere’s disease, chronic obstructive emphysema, myocardial ischemia, prostatitis, etc.. The acute diseases were upper respiratory tract infection, pulmonary infection, fracture, superficial injury, acute appendicitis, acute bronchitis, urinary tract infection, acute gastritis, acute gastroenteritis, delivery amp; cesarean section, soft tissue injury, acute urticaria, etc.; and (4) While the common inpatient disease categories were relatively centralized and stable, but some of them were different in regions, inpatients’ age and sex structure. Conclusion (1) There are some differences in the common inpatient diseases in the township health centers among eastern, central and western regions in China, thus it is necessary to select essential health technology and essential medicine according to local conditions; (2) As a good representation, the common inpatients diseases in the three pilot township health centers in western China can provide the baseline evidence for selecting essential health technology and essential medicine for the township health centers in western China; (3) There are lack of national/regional statistics, survey data and evidence-based research on disease spectrum of the township health centers currently. While the investigation methods or statistics measurements/quality of these included studies are variable without standard regulation; and (4) It suggests that the state and every provinces should implement and improve the statistic analysis of disease spectrum of the township health centers, train staffs and fulfill the construction of information system.
Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for the treatment of coronary heart disease by means of evidence-based approaches based on the burden of disease for township health centers located in eastern, central and western regions of China. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) 11 clinical guidelines on coronary heart disease were included, three of which are evidence-based guidelines. (2) Totally, those guidelines contained 61 medicines (of 13 classes). (3) According to WHOEML (2011), NEML (2009), CNF (2010), other guidelines and the quantity and quality of evidence, we made a b recommendation for nitroglycerin, isosorbide dinitrate, metoprolol, nifedipine, verapamil, enalapril and aspirin as essential medicine for coronary heart disease. We made a weak recommendation for amlodipine, clopidogrel, heparin, propranolol, simvastatin and streptokinase. (4) 13 recommended medicines have been marketed in China and their prices were affordable. (5) Results of domestic low-quality studies indicated that nitroglycerin, isosorbide dinitrate, metoprolol, aspirin and heparin were effective for coronary heart disease. We didn’t find systematic reviews or pharmacoeconomic studies on the recommended medicines in Chinese literature databases. Conclusion For coronary heart disease: (1) We offer a b recommendation for nitroglycerin, isosorbide dinitrate, metoprolol, nifedipine, verapamil, enalapril and aspirin and a weak recommendation for propranolol, amlodipine, clopidogrel, heparin, simvastatin and streptokinase. (2) There is lack of high-quality evidence from relevant domestic studies, especially on pharmacoeconomic evaluation. (3) We propose that more studies should be carried out on clinical guideline of coronary heart disease and pharmacoeconomic comparison should be also made between recommended medicine and medicine of the same class.
Objective To investigate the disease constitution and hospitalization cost in Yong’an Central Township Health Center (YaC) in Shuangliu County of Sichuan Province from 2008 to 2010, so as to provide baseline data for further research. Methods Questionnaire and focus interview were carried out; case records and cost information of YaC inpatients in 2008, 2009 and 2010 were collected. The diseases were classified according to ICD-10 based on the first diagnose and the cost was analyzed. Data including general information of the inpatients, discharge diagnosis, hospitalization expenses, and drug cost etc. were rearranged and analyzed by Excel software. Results a) The total number of inpatients were 4 236, 4 335 and 4 844 in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Females were more than males (56.99% vs. 42.96%, 55.59% vs. 44.1%, 54.36% vs. 45.62%), and their disease spectrum included 20 categories, which accounted for 95% of disease classes of ICD-10; b) The inpatients suffering from top three systematic diseases accounted for 62.74% to 72.31%, which included the respiratory, digestive, urinary tract and urogenital systematic disease; c) The top 15 single diseases were upper respiratory infection, acute bronchitis, pulmonary infection, acute gastroenteritis, fracture, acute appendicitis, chronic bronchitis, calculi in urinary system, cerebral vascular insufficiency, lumbar vertebra disease, acute gastritis, superficial injury, chronic gastritis, hypertension, and cholecytolithiasis or cholecystitis; d) The number of inpatients in the group of over 15-24 ages with chronic diseases increased with age and females were more than males. The acute disease burden of inpatients in 0-4 age group was the heaviest, who only suffered from acute diseases and males were more than females. The inpatients in 25-54 age group suffered from more acute diseases than chronic diseases and females were more than males; and e) The inpatients’ average costs of chronic diseases were higher than those of acute diseases in 2010 (1 564.45 yuan vs. 1 104.11 yuan) and those of either Xintian Central Township Health Center (1 311.81 yuan) or Gaozha Central Township Health Center (1 002.99 yuan). Conclusion a) In recent three years, the main systematic diseases that inpatients suffer are digestive, respiratory, and urinary tract and urogenital system diseases; the acute diseases are more than the chronic; the acute diseases mainly include infection and injury; b) During the past three years, the top 15 diseases have been stable and the same diseases include upper respiratory infection, pulmonary infection, acute bronchitis, acute appendicitis, acute gastritis, acute gastroenteritis, fracture, chronic gastritis, chronic bronchitis, and calculi in urinary system; c) It should be paid attention to the inpatients with chronic diseases in over 15-24 age group and the inpatients with acute diseases in 0-4 age group; and d) The inpatients’ average costs of top 15 diseases in 2010 were higher than those of either XtC or GzC, and consideration on rationality of the hospitalization cost should be paid attention to.
Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for acute gastroenteritis using evidence-based approaches based on the burden of disease for township health centers located in eastern, central and western regions of China. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) Five guidelines were included, two of which were evidence-based. (2) Recommended medicines included eight antidiarrheals (of four classes) and three antemetics. (3) According to WHOEML (2011), NEML (2009), CNF (2010), other guidelines and the quantity and quality of evidence, we offered a weak recommendation for ondansetron, metoclopramide, smectite, racecadotril and loperamide applied in the treatment of acute gastroenteritis. We made a recommendation against antibiotics, dexamethasone, kaolin-pectin, activated charcoal, attapulgite and bismuth subsalicylate. (4) Evidence from domestic studies: a result of 14 CCTs (n=1 635, low quality) indicated that in the significant efficiency and total efficiency, smectite (smecta) was superior to routine liquid infusion, norfloxacin, gentamicin or furaxone. Among these 14 CCTs, two CCTs reported smectite (smecta) caused nausea and vomiting (three cases); one CCT reported pain and distention in the abdomen (one case) and general discomfort (one case); and the rest reported no adverse reaction. A result of 10 CCTs (n=1 017, low quality) indicated that for acute diarrhea, racecadotril was superior to routine treatment in the significant efficiency (OR=2.55, 95%CI 1.64 to 3.94, Plt;0.01) and total efficiency (OR=4.32, 95%CI 2.96 to 6.30, Plt;0.01). A result of two CCTs (n=344, low quality) indicated that racecadotril was superior to smectite in the total efficiency in treating acute diarrhea. A result of two CCTs (n=1 056, low quality) indicated that racecadotril was superior to routine treatment in the total efficiency in treating acute adult diarrhea (OR=5.19, 95%CI 3.54 to 7.63, Plt;0.01). A result of two CCTs (n=182, low quality) reported children presented with nausea (two cases). A result of one CCT (n=947, low quality) reported adults presented with constipation (fifteen cases), anorexia (four cases), headache (nine cases) and abdominal pain (one case). Conclusion For acute gastroentitis, we offer a weak recommendation for smectite (powder, for oral use) used in adults (once 3 g, tid., mixed with warm water before intake), child under one year of age (3 g daily, bid.), and child above one year of age (once 3 g, qd. or bid.). Retention enema could be appiled to children with acute gastroenteritis. We also offer a weak recommendation for racecadotril (capsule) used in adults (one capsule, tid., taken continuously less than seven days). Due to the lack of evidence from clinical trials, we make a recommendation against racecadotril applied to women with pregnancy and lactation or children. In order to produce high-quality local evidence, we propose that (1) Further clinical studies should be standardized in diagnosis and criteria. (2) The design and implementation quality of clinical studies should be improved. (3) Original studies on pharmacoeconomic studies and drug applicability are needed.
Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for urolithiasis using evidence-based methods based on the burden of disease. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) Three evidence-based guidelines were included. Based on WHOEML (2011), NEML (2009), CNF (2010) and the quantity and quality of evidence, we made a recommendation for diclofenac sodium, nifedipine, allopurinol and ibuprofen used in symptomatic treatment of urolithiasis. (3) Results of domestic studies (including four RCTs, n=566; two observational studies, n=96) indicated that calculus-removed rates of diclofenac sodium, nifedipine and allopurinol were 91.5%, 86.4%~93.3% and 86.4% respectively with significant differences. Diclofenac sodium daily cost 7.00 to 8.57 yuan, nifedipine 1.48 to 4.44 yuan, and allopurinol 0.24 to 0.82 yuan. Ibuprofen had a total efficiency of 94.5% with a significant difference for alleviating renal colic, which cost 0.11 yuan daily. Four recommended medicines with safety, clinical efficacy, high economical efficiency and applicability had been marketed with specifications and dosage forms corresponding to guidelines in China. Conclusion For urolithiasis: (1) We offer a b recommendation for diclofenac sodium (capsule/tablet, 50 mg×24, or 25 mg×24) which is contradicted in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding and in pregnant women or women with planned pregnancy. (2) We offer a weak recommendation for nifedipine (tablet/capsule, 10 mg×100 or 10 mg×60) which is contraindicated in dialysis-receiving patients with malignant hypertension and should be cautiously used in patients with irreversible renal failure. (3) We offer a weak recommend allopurinol (tablet, 100 mg×100) which is contraindicated in patients with allergic reaction, severe insufficiency of the liver or kidney, or significant lack of blood cells. (4) We offer a b recommendation for ibuprofen (tablet, 20 mg×20) which is contraindicated in patients with allergic reaction to aspirin.