Objective To study the relationships between expressions of somatostatin receptor subtypes（SSTR1-SSTR5） and angiogenesis in colorectal cancer. Methods The expressions of SSTR1-SSTR5, VEGF, and CD34 in the paraffin sections of colorectal cancer tissues from 127 cases were detected by the standard streptavidin-peroxidase (SP) technique. CD34 was used as a marker to account microvessel density (MVD) in colorectal cancer tissues. The relationships between the expressions of SSTR1-SSTR5 and VEGF expression, or MVD were analyzed. Results The positive expression rate of SSTR1, SSTR2, SSTR3, SSTR4, and SSTR5 was 64.6% （82/127）, 36.2% （46/127）, 18.9% （24/127）, 18.9% （24/127）, and 38.6% （49/127） in colorectal cancer tissues, meanwhile, the positive expression rate of VEGF was 63.8% （81/127） and MVD was (34.67±16.62)/HP in colorectal cancer tissues. The positive expression rate of VEGF (47.8%， 22/46) and MVD 〔(29.00±15.32)/HP〕 in colorectal cancer tissues with SSTR2 positive expression were significantly lower than those in colorectal cancer tissues with SSTR2 negative expression 〔72.8%， 59/81； (37.90±16.56)/HP〕, Plt;0.05. There were no relationships between SSTR1, SSTR3, SSTR4, and SSTR5 expression and VEGF expression or MVD （Pgt;0.05）. Conclusion The positive expression of SSTR2 is related with angiogenesis in colorectal cancer tissues.
The somatostatin levels in serum, cancer tissue and its adjacent mucosas were measured in 43 patients with large intestine carcinoma(LIC). The results showed that the somatostatin level in serum of patients with LIC before operation was obviously lower than that in the control group (Plt;0.001)and after radical operation, it was markedly higher than the preoperative levels(Plt;0.01), but still lower than the control value(Plt;0.001). The somatostatin level in cancer tissue was evidently lower than that in its adjacent mucosas(Plt;0.001)and in normal mucosa(Plt;0.001). There was no significant correlation between the somatostatin level in serum or carcinoma tissue and Duke’s stage or pathological types of the carcinoma tissue. The results indicate that the somatostatin has a negative modulating effect on the growth of large intestine carcinomas, thus provides an experimental basis for the treatment of large treatment of large intestine carcinomas with drugs such as somatostatin.
ObjectiveTo investigate the role of somatostatin in gastrointestinal function after operation for treatment of abdominal injury patients. MethodsSixty patients with abdominal trauma were divided into somatostatin in treatment group (n=30) and the conventional treatment control group (n=30). The amount of gastrointestinal decompression drainage, bowel sounds recovery time, exhaust time, defecation time, and the levels of serum C reactive protein, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 after operation in two groups were observed. ResultsSomatostatin treatment group recovery time of bowel sounds, exhaust time, and defecation time were earlier than the control group, hospitalization time shortened, and the amount of gastrointestinal decompression drainage reduced (P < 0.05), The levels of serum C reactive protein, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8 of somatostatin treatment group were lower than those in control group (P < 0.05), and the magnitude of decline above index in the somatostatin treatment group were greater than that in the control group (P < 0.05). ConclusionSomatostatin can promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function in patients after operation in abdominal injury.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of somatostatin8 (SS8) on the apoptosis and the expression of cmyc protein of hepatocellular carcinoma cell SMMC7721. MethodsCultured in vitro, hepatocellular carcinoma cells SMMC7721 were incubated with SS8 (10 μg/ml). The apoptosis rate and expression of cmyc protein were detected by flow cytometry (FCM). ResultsSS8 can cause the spanonumber in S and G2/M phase and the auxonumber in G0/G1 phase of SMMC7721 cells . The apoptosis rate was 14.2% in the study group and 6.1% in the control group, and there was significant difference (P＜0.05); The level of expressions of cmyc protein was 0.833±0.035 after action by SS8 for 24 h. Compared with control group, there was no significant difference in the study group（P＞0.10）.But after the cells were incubated with SS8 for 48，72，96，120，144 h, the level of expressions of cmyc protein was 0.818±0.04，0.721±0.029，0.669±0.026，0.648±0.045，0.642±0.028 respectively in the study group, and there was significant difference as compared with the control group (P＜0.05). Conclusion The SS8 can induce the apoptosis and lower expression of cmyc protein of hepatocellular carcinoma cell SMMC7721.
Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of somatostatin analogs versus placebo for Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO). Methods Such databases as PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, CNKI, VIP and CBM were searched to collect the randomized controlled trails (RCTs) about somatostatin analogs for Graves’ Ophthalmopathy (GO) pulished by March 2012, while the bibliographies of the included literatue were also retrieved. According to the inclusion criteria, two reviewers screened literature, extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 5 RCTs involving 210 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that somatostatin analogs could reduce the clinical activity score (CAS) of GO patients (MD=0.58, 95%CI 0.02 to1.13, P=0.04), but the effects in reducing the degree of proptosis (mm) was still unverifiable (MD=0.21, 95%CI –0.14 to 0.56, P=0.24). It did not show obvious effects for diplopia, orbital volume, intraocular pressure, visual acuity or the restriction of eye movements. The existing evidence could not confirm that somatostatin analogs were effective for GO (OR=1.32, 95%CI 0.45 to 3.9, P=0.61). Conclusion Somatostatin analogs can reduce the CAS of GO patients, but without significantly clinical significance. Moreover, the effect of reducing proptosis is sitll unverifiable. So the existing evidence cannot confirm that somatostatin analogs are effective for GO. For the quality and quantity limitation of the included studies, this conclusion needs to be proved by performing more high quality RCTs.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo investigate the inhibitory effects of somatostatin analogue (SSTA) on the colonic carcinoma cell growth in vitro and in vivo and its possible mechanism. MethodsThe somatostatin receptor type Ⅱ (SSTR2) mRNA of colonic carcinoma cell line HCT116 was detected by using RTPCR and hybridization in situ. The effects of octreotide (Oct) or NC-8-12 (specific agonist of SSTR2 ) on the proliferation of HCT116 was measured with MTT after HCT116 stimulated by insulin or epidermal growth factor (EGF) and incubated with Oct or NC-8-12 simultaneously for 24 hours. The expression of cyclin D1 was detected with flow cytometry. The HCT116 were implanted in nude mice subcutaneously and treated with Oct or NC-8-12. The tumor volume and tumor weight were measured according to schedule. Results①SSTR2 mRNA was detected in HCT116 and the tumor implanted in nude mice; ②Insulin and EGF increased the proliferation of HCT116 significantly, and this proliferation could be inhibited by Oct and NC-8-12 partially; ③Insulin increased the Cyclin D1 expression of HCT116, its level decreased slightly when treated with Oct or NC-8-12 but not significantly (Pgt;0.05); ④The weight and volume of implanted tumor in nude mice treated with Oct or NC-8-12 showed no significant difference compared with the control group (Pgt;0.05). ConclusionBoth Oct and NC-8-12 could inhibit the proliferation of colonic carcinoma cell line HCT116 in vitro, which indicated that SSTR2 may mediated the inhibition. Oct and NC-8-12 have no effect on the growth of implanted HCT116 in nude mice in this experiment.
The model of transplanted colonic SW480 cell line carcinoma in gymnomouse body was set up to observe the effect of octapeptide somatostatin (SMS 201-995,SMS) on the transplanted carcinoma and elucidate its mechanism. Results: the volume, weight, DNA and protein content in carcinoma cell, cell amount and proliferation index of S and G2M phase in SMS group and SMS+PG (pentagastrin) group were markedly lower than those in PG group and control group, those of PG group were markedly higher than those in control group.The cell amount of G0/G1 phase in SMS group and SMS+PG group was markedly higher than that in PG group and control group, and that of PG group was markedly lower than that in control group.All these suggested that somatostatin could not only inhibit the growth of transplanted human colonic SW480 cell line carcinoma directly but also inhibit the growthpromoting effect of gastrin on the transplanted carcinoma.The mechanism might be that somatostatin inhibit the synthesis of cAMP, DNA and protein in carcinoma cells, then inhibit the cell growing from G0/G1 phase to S and G2M phases.Our study might provide experimental basis for the homonotherapy with analogue of somatostatin in patients with large intestine carcinoma.
Human SW480 colonic cancer cell line was evaluated for its growth response to Octa peptide somatostatin (SMS 201·995, SMS) in vitro by MTT assay and flow cytometry. The results showed that SMS possessed an inhibitive effect on SW480 cell at dose 1.563－200ng/ml, the maximal effective dose was 50ng/ml. Inhibitive effect of SMS did not steadily increase at a dose ＞50ng/ml. It suggests that effect of SMS is achieved via somatotatin receptor. SMS obviously inhibited the synthesis of DNA and protein, and prohibited the SW480 cell shifting from phase G0/G1 in phase S, G2M, which suggests that somatostatin (SS) possessed an inhibitive effect on large intestinal at cancer cell, it is achieved at receptor by inhibiting the synthesis of DNA and protein and prohibiting cell cycle of cancer.
Objective To evaluate the value of 99Tcm-Octreotide somatostatin receptor and 99Tcm-MIBI imaging in the detection of breast cancer. Methods 99Tcm-Octreotide and 99Tcm-MIBI imaging were performed in 26 patients with breast masses before operation. The scintigraphy results were analysed compared with pathologic study. Results The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 99Tcm-Octreotide scintigraphy for breast cancer were 94.4%, 87.5% and 92.3% respectively and those of 99Tcm-MIBI were 88.9%, 75.0% and 84.6% respectively. Significant difference was found between 99Tcm-Octreotide and 99Tcm-MIBI in both of specificity and accuracy (P＜0.05 and P＜0.01). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 99Tcm-Octreotide scintigraphy in the detection of axillary lymph node involvement were 66.7%, 92.9% and 80.8% respectively. Those of 99Tcm-MIBI were 58.3%, 85.7% and 73.1% respectively. The specificity showed significant difference between 99Tcm-Octreotide and 99Tcm-MIBI (P＜0.01). Conclusion 99Tcm-Octreotide somatostatin receptor imaging may be superior to 99Tcm-MIBI in the detection of primary breast cancer and axillary lymph node involvement, and 99Tcm-Octreotide scintigraphy before operation is helpful in working out operative modality for patients.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo investigate the inhibitory effects and the mechanisms of octreotide (OCT) on the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MethodsBel7402 HCC cells were studied for proliferative ability by MTT assay, morphology by light microscopy, adhesive and invasive ability by cell adhesion and “wound strack” experiments. Immunofluorescence flow cytometry was used for study of cMet expression and cell cycle as well. Furthermore, the effects of OCT on tumor growth metastasis were investigated in nude mice with implanted HCC. The expression of cMet in implanted tumor cells was studied by immunohistochemistry. ResultsWith OCT treatment, the proliferative ability of Bel7402 cells and cell morphology didn’t change. The adhesive and invasive ability decreased compared with no OCT treatment cells (P＜0.05). The ratio of G0/G1 cells increased markedly (P＜0.05). The proportion of Bel7402 cells expressing cMet was reduced significantly (P＜0.05). The growth of implanted tumor was inhibited with OCT treatment (P＜0.05). The intensity of cMet expression in OCT group was remarkably weaker than that in control group. In addition, no recurrence and metastasis was found in OCT group 7 weeks after curative resection of xenografts, while 3 cases in controd group were observed to have the recurrence and metastasis. The intensity of cMet immunolabeling in the metastatic tumors was higher than that in xenografts of control group, but the difference was not significant. ConclusionOCT inhibits the growth of HCC by downregulation of cMet.