In order to solve imperfection of heart rate extraction by method of traditional ballistocardiogram (BCG), this paper proposes an improved method for detecting heart rate by BCG. First, weak cardiac activity signals are acquired in real time by embedded sensors. Local BCG beats are obtained by signal filtering and signal conversion. Second, the heart rate is estimated directly from the BCG beat without the use of a heartbeat template. Compared with other methods, the proposed method has strong advantages in heart rate data accuracy and anti-interference, and it also realizes non-contact online detection. Finally, by analyzing the data of more than 20,000 heart rates of 13 subjects, the average beat error was 0.86% and the coverage was 96.71%. It provides a new way to estimate heart rate for hospital clinical and home care.
目的 探討全人/整體護理對晚期癌癥患者生活質量的影響。 方法 將2007年11月－2008年7月60例確診為晚期癌癥的患者隨機分為試驗組和對照組，均規范接受阿片類藥物鎮痛和針對其他痛苦癥狀的藥物控制治療。在此基礎上，試驗組再增加軀體照護、心理疏導、靈性關懷等全人/整體護理，并就兩組在疼痛緩解、活動能力和生活質量改善等方面的效果進行比較。 結果 觀察期內，試驗組在疼痛緩解、活動能力及生活質量改善方面明顯優于對照組，兩組比較差異均有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。 結論 在藥物治療基礎上，運用全人/整體護理能夠明顯提高晚期癌癥患者及其家屬的生活質量。
ObjectiveTo compare the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of young early breast cancer patients with different human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression levels, and to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of young early breast cancer patients with low HER2 expression. MethodsA total of 1 723 breast cancer patients who were treated in the Department of Breast Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University between June 2016 and June 2018 were collected and divided into three groups: HER2-negative, low-expression, and high-expression. The clinicopathological characteristics of the three groups were compared, and the relationship between HER2 expression and patients’ prognosis was analyzed. ResultsThere were 512 HER2-negative patients, 748 HER2-low expression patients, and 463 HER2-high expression patients. The results of the clinical pathological characteristics analysis of the three groups of patients showed that there were no statistical differences in marital status, menopausal status, family history, single T stage (tumor size), single M stage (distant metastasis), affected side, vascular tumor thrombus, and radiotherapy in the three groups of breast cancer patients with different HER2 expression levels (P>0.05). However, there were statistical differences in age, Ki-67 expression level, N stage, TNM stage, surgical method, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status, histological type, histological grade, whether to receive neoadjuvant therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with different HER2 expression levels (P<0.05). The results of survival analysis showed that the prognosis of early breast cancer patients may not be significantly correlated with the HER2 expression level, and the prognosis of young early breast cancer patients may also not be statistically correlated with the HER2 expression status. ConclusionsBreast cancer patients with different HER2 expression levels differ in multiple clinicopathological characteristics, but these differences do not significantly affect the prognosis of the patients. Especially for early-stage breast cancer, HER2 expression levels do not seem to have a significant impact on prognosis. This suggests that HER2 status may not be a decisive factor in treatment and prognosis assessment, and other pathological characteristics and treatment methods need to be considered comprehensively. The prognosis of young breast cancer patients in early stage may also not be statistically correlated with HER2 expression status.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of terazosin, tamsulosin and finasteride for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods We searched the related original studies all over the world, and only included randomized controlled trials (RCT) and quasi-randomized controlled trials (CCT). MEDLINE (1966 to Dec. 2004), EMBASE (1984 to Dec. 2004), The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2004) and four Chinese databases were electronically searched and 10 related journals were handsearched. The studies included in the references of eligible studies were additionally searched. Two reviewers independently screened the studies for eligibility, evaluated the quality and extracted the data from the eligible studies, with confirmation by cross-checking. Divergences of opinion were consulted by a third party. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 4.2 software. Results Twelve original studies involving 2 471 participants met inclusion criteria. Compared with terazosin, tamsulosin could improve international prostatic symptom score, with WMD 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03 to 1.46, P=0.04. There was no statistical difference between terazosin and tamsulosin in improving the average rate of urine flow (WMD 0.23, 95%CI -0.39 to 0.85, P=0.46), the residual urine volume (WMD 0.82, 95%CI -2.92 to 4.57, P=0.67) and in diminishing the volume of prostate (WMD 2.20, 95%CI -3.99 to 8.39, P=0.49). There was no statistical difference between finasteride and tamsulosin in improving the international prostatic symptom score (WMD 0.65, 95%CI -0.45 to 1.75, P=0.25) or the max rate of urine flow (WMD 0.39, 95%CI -0.72 to 1.51, P=0.49). Only two studies compared finasteride with terazosin and had different conclusions. Only one study compared finasteride or terazosin with a combination of these drugs suggested that the combination had higher effective power than finasteride alone but no difference with terazosin alone. Conclusions Although the effectiveness in some aspects is higher in the tamsulosin group, there is not enough evidence to show which one is the best among these three drugs. The combination of finasteride and terazosin does not show more effectiveness than terazosin alone. This review suggests that tamsulosin alone should be used for the treatment of BPH and the combination needs to be identified by better evidence. It is important to improve the quality of original studies.