Objective To evaluate the cl inical significance of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) appl ied in Neer II, III parts fractures of proximal humeraus. Methods The cl inical data were retrospectively analyzed, from 30 patients with Neer II, III parts fractures of proximal humeraus in accordance with selection criteria, who were treated with manual reduction and plaster external fixation (11 cases, non-operative group) or with MIPPO (19 cases, operative group) between January 2008 and May 2010. In non-operative group, there were 6 males and 5 females with an average age of 60 years (range, 56-80 years) and with an average time of 10 hours (range, 3-24 hours) between injury and reduction, including 8 cases of Neer II and 3 cases of Neer III. In operative group, there were 13 males and 6 females with anaverage age of 65 years (range, 45-78 years) and with an average time of 3 days (range, 1-5 days) between injury and operation, including 9 cases of Neer II and 10 cases of Neer III. There was no significant difference in gender, age, fracture type, and time from injury to operation (P gt; 0.05). The shoulder joint function before and after treatments was evaluated according to Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons’ Form (ASES) scoring systems. Results Thirty patients were followed up. In operative group, the follow-up time ranged from 11 to 18 months (mean, 12 months); all incisions healed by first intention with no compl ication of internal fixation failure, infection, or nerve injury. In non-operative group, the follow-up time ranged from 9 to 15 months (mean, 11 months). The X-ray films showed that fractures healed without humeral head necrosis in 2 groups. The bone heal ing time in operative group and non-operative group was (11.47 ± 2.48) weeks and (11.82 ± 2.44) weeks, respectively, showing no significant difference (t=0.369, P=0.889). The CMS score and ASES score at each time point after treatment were significantly better than those before treatment (P lt; 0.05); the CMS scores in operative group were better than those in non-operative group at 3 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after treatment (P lt; 0.05); and the ASES score in operative group was better than that in non-operative group at 3 weeks and 3 months after treatment (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was found at 1 year after treatment (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion MIPPO fixation using the locking compression plate is an effective option for Neer II, III parts fractures of proximal humeraus. It can provide good functional recovery of the shoulder joint so that patients can get back to their normal l ife as soon as possible.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of titanium elastic nails for severe displaced proximal humeral fractures in older children. MethodsBetween April 2009 and July 2012, 31 cases of severe displaced proximal humeral fractures were treated with closed or open reduction and fixation with 2 titanium elastic nails, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. There were 23 boys and 8 girls, aged from 10 to 15 years (mean, 12.8 years). The causes of injury were sports injury (16 cases), traffic accident (11 cases), and falling from height (4 cases). The interval from injury to operation was 6 hours to 7 days (mean, 72 hours). According to Neer-Horwitz classification, 17 cases were rated as type III fracture and 14 cases as type IV fracture. There were 21 cases of metaphyseal fractures and 10 cases of epiphyseal fractures. ResultsSatisfactory reduction of fracture and stable fixation were obtained in all patients (closed reduction in 23 cases and open reduction in 8 cases). Primary healing was achieved in all incisions; no infection and neurovascular injury occurred. All patients were followed up 12-36 months with an average of 20 months. X-ray films showed that all fractures healed at 7-10 weeks (mean, 8 weeks). During follow-up, no disturbance of development or angulation deformity caused by premature physeal closure or bone bridge formation was observed. At last follow-up, the average Neer score of the shoulder was 95.7 (range, 83-100). The appearance and motion of the shoulder were normal. There was no significant difference in the upper extremity length between affected side and contralateral side[(67.68±2.56) cm vs. (67.61±2.54) cm; t=-1.867,P=0.072]. ConclusionTitanium elastic nails for severe displaced humeral fractures in older children is a safe and effective method with a low complication incidence.
ObjectiveTo observe the influence of different humeral neck-shaft angle on the efficacy in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with locking plate. MethodsA total of 106 patients with proximal humeral fractures were treated by locking plate between March 2009 and March 2013, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Of 106 cases, 58 were male and 48 were female, aged from 26 to 71 years (mean, 52.3 years). The causes were traffic accident injury in 54 cases, falling injury from height in 23 cases, falling injury in 21 cases, and others in 8 cases. According to the Neer classification, there were 32 cases of two-part fractures, 65 cases of three-part fractures, and 9 cases of four-part fractures. The time from injury to operation was 1-7 days (mean, 2.7 days). According to neck-shaft angle by X-ray measurements at 1-3 days after operation, the patients were divided into 3 groups:valgus group (>145°), normal group (126-145°), and varus group (<126°) to observe the influence of neck-shaft angle on efficacy. ResultsAccording to postoperative humeral neck-shaft angle, there were 10 cases in valgus group, 75 cases in normal group, and 21 cases in varus group. There was no significant difference in general clinical data among 3 groups (P>0.05). The patients were followed up 6-12 months. The X-ray results showed fracture healing, and no significant difference was found in fracture healing time among 3 groups (P>0.05). After 6 months, the varus angle of femoral head and visual analogue scale (VAS) score of normal group were significantly lower than those of valgus group and varus group (P<0.05). The excellent and good rate of Constant-Murley score was 78.67% (59/75) in normal group, and it was significantly higher than that in valgus group (60.00%, 6/10) and varus group (42.86%, 9/21) (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between valgus group and varus group (P>0.05). The complication rate was 28.57% (6/21) in varus group, was 10.67% (8/75) in normal group, and was 20.00% (2/10) in valgus group, showing no significant difference among 3 groups (χ2=4.31, P=0.12). ConclusionReconstruction of normal neck-shaft angle is the key to good shoulder function and clinical efficacy in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture.
Objective?To compare the effectiveness between operative and non-operative treatment for 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.?Methods?Between January 2009 and January 2011, 35 patients with 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures were treated with open reduction and locking plate internal fixation (n=20, operative group) and with closed reduction and splint or cast fixation (n=15, non-operative group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, etiology, fracture type, and disease duration between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The postoperative rehabilitation protocol was performed in 2 groups.?Results?All patients of the operative group achieved healing of incision by first intention. All patients were followed up 16 months on average (range, 12-20 months). The X-ray films showed that the other fractures healed except 1 case (5.0%) nonunion in operative group. Varus malunion was found in 1 case (6.7%) of non-operative group and 2 cases (10.0%) of operative group. Humeral head necrosis was found in 1 case respectively in 2 groups (5.0% and 6.7%). There was no significant difference in complication incidence between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The Constant-Murley scores of non-operative group and operative group were 64.7 ± 9.9 and 66.8 ± 11.8 at last follow-up respectively, showing no significant difference (t=0.59, P=0.47).?Conclusion?Operative treatment has similar effectiveness to non-operative treatment for 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures. In elderly patients, non-operative treatment should be chosen.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical results of locking-plate with an intramedullary fibular allograft for type C2 proximal humeral fracture fixation. MethodsBetween January 2011 and August 2012, 16 patients with proximal humeral fractures (AO type C2) were treated by locking-plate with an intramedullary fibular allograft. The clinical data were retrospectively analysed. There were 5 males and 11 females with an average age of 64 years (range, 55-70 years). The injury causes were falling injury in 12 cases, traffic accident injury in 3 cases, and sports injury in 1 case. The duration between injury and operation ranged from 2 to 6 days (mean, 4.5 days). The imaging data were used to judge the fracture healing, and to measure the neck-shaft angle and the height of humeral head; the disability of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36), and Neer score were used to evaluate the function of the shoulder after surgery. ResultsPrimary healing of incision was obtained in all patients; no complication of vascular and nerve injury occurred. Sixteen cases were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 18 months). All fractures healed at 18-24 weeks (mean, 20 weeks). No complication occurred as follows:re-displacement, necrosis, rejection reaction, and loosening or extraction of screws. At last follow-up, the neck-shaft angle was 126.6-136.9° (mean, 132.5°), showing a little lost when compared with intraoperative angle (130.5-138.0°, 134.0° on average). At 12 months after surgery, the height loss of humeral head was 1.8-4.6 mm (mean, 2.0 mm); the passive anteflexion of the shoulder was 130-160° (mean, 148°); the active anteflexion was 120-145° (mean, 136°); the external rotation was 30-65° (mean, 56°); the internal rotation was 15-25° (mean, 19°). And the DASH score was 2-53 (mean, 12); the SF-36 score was 50-95 (mean, 89). According to Neer score for shoulder function, the results were excellent in 10 cases, good in 4 cases, fair in 1 case, and poor in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 87.5%. ConclusionLocking-plate with an intramedullary fibular allograft for type C2 proximal humeral fracture fixation has satisfactory clinical results because of stable fixation, high clinical outcome scores, and low internal fixation failure.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of suspensory external fixation technique in treatment of proximal humeral fractures.MethodsBetween August 2013 and October 2018, 14 patients with proximal humeral fractures were treated with suspensory external fixation technique. There were 10 males and 4 females with an average age of 55.9 years (range, 43-76 years). There were 10 cases of falling injury and 4 cases of traffic accident injury. Among them, there were 9 cases of Neer type Ⅲ and 5 cases of Neer type Ⅳ. The time from injury to operation was 3-7 days (mean, 4.6 days). Nine cases were complicated with osteoporosis. The preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 6.1±1.2. The effectiveness was comprehensively evaluated by hospital stay, fracture healing time, removal time of external fixator, postoperative complications, VAS score, and Neer score of shoulder joint function.ResultsAll operations were successfully completed, and the hospital stay was 6-14 days, with an average of 9.4 days. All the incisions healed by first intention, and no infection or other complications occurred. All patients were followed up 16-60 months (mean, 35.4 months). X-ray films examination showed that all fractures healed, the healing time was 4-7 months (mean, 4.9 months). The removal time of external fixator was 5-8 months (mean, 6.3 months). VAS scores were 1.5±0.8 at 1 month after operation and 1.0±0.9 at last follow-up, both of which were significantly improved when compared with preoperative score, the differences were significant between different time points (P<0.05). Neer score of shoulder joint function was 75-100 (mean, 91.1); 9 cases were excellent, 4 cases were good, and 1 case was fair. The excellent and good rate was 92.9%. During follow-up, there was no adverse events such as acromion impingement, nonunion, or pseudoarthrosis.ConclusionFor proximal humeral fractures, the suspensory external fixation technique is a simple and reliable treatment method that can significantly improve joint function.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of limited open reduction via “door-shaft method” and internal fixation with locking plate for two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus.MethodsThe clinical data of 64 patients with proximal humeral fractures who were admitted between January 2013 and December 2016 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. There were 23 males and 41 females, with an average age of 68.0 years (range, 50-89 years). The injuries were caused by falling in 57 cases, traffic accident in 5 cases, and falling from height in 2 cases. The interval between injury and operation was 1-7 days (mean, 2.1 days). According to Neer classification, there were 28 cases of two-part fractures and 36 cases of three-part fractures. According to the angulation direction of the proximal humeral neck shaft angle, there were 21 cases of adduction fractures and 43 cases of abduction fractures. The fractures were treated with limited open reduction via “door-shaft method” and proximal humerus internal locking systems for internal fixation. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of fluoroscopy, hospital stay, and complications were recorded. The fracture healing was reviewed by X-ray film and the healing time was recorded. The shoulder joint function was evaluated by Neer score standard.ResultsThe operation time was 45-127 minutes, with an average of 82.3 minutes. The intraoperative blood loss was 30-125 mL, with an average of 62.7 mL. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was performed 30-69 times, with an average of 37.0 times. The hospital stay was 6-23 days, with an average of 10.3 days. All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12-37 months, with an average of 18.3 months. X-ray film re-examination showed that all fractures healed, the healing time was 12-21 weeks, with an average of 14.3 weeks. After operation, 3 cases had shoulder stiffness and 1 case had fracture malunion. At last follow-up, the Neer score of shoulder joint function was 49-97, with an average of 83.1. Among them, 38 cases were excellent, 13 cases were good, 10 cases were fair, and 3 cases were poor. The excellent and good rate was 79.7%. The excellent and good rate of patients with two-part fractures was 82.1% (23/28), and the excellent and good rate of patients with three-part fractures was 77.8% (28/36).ConclusionThe “door-shaft method” not only reduces the difficulty of the Joystick technique in the reduction of proximal humerus fractures, but also provides auxiliary stability. It is used for limited open reduction and internal fixation with locking plate to treat the two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus, which can achieve good effectiveness.
Objective To compare the effectiveness and shoulder function of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of Neer three/four-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. Methods Randomized controlled analysis was conducted on 68 patients over 70 years old with Neer three/four-part proximal humeral fractures treated with RTSA or ORIF between January 2020 and June 2022. The patients were randomly divided into RTSA group (n=32) and ORIF group (n=36). There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in the baseline data such as age, gender, body mass index, injured side, Neer classification, and preoperative Charlson comorbidity index, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Constant shoulder score, Oxford shoulder score (OSS), and hemoglobin (Hb). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, reduction of Hb on the 3rd day after operation, hospital stay, total cost of hospitalization, complication incidence, range of motion of shoulder joint at 2 years after operation, VAS score before operation and at 5 days and 1 month after operation, Constant shoulder score and OSS score before operation and at 2 years after operation, and imaging results during follow-up were recorded and compared between the two groups.ResultsCompared with the ORIF group, the RTSA group had longer operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and higher total cost of hospitalization (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Hb reduction on the 3rd day after operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The VAS scores significantly improved in both groups at 5 days and 1 month after operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 26-35 months, with an average of 31.2 months. In the RTSA group, there were 2 cases of poor healing of superficial incision and 1 case of transient nerve injury. There was no complication such as bone resorption around the prosthesis, lucent band, prosthesis loosening, or periprosthetic fracture in all patients. In the ORIF group, there was 1 case of poor healing of superficial incision, 3 cases of nonunion of fracture, 1 case of arthritis secondary to humeral head necrosis, and 1 case of bone absorption of large tuberosity, and no displacement or fracture failure of internal fixation was found in all patients. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications [9.4% (3/32) vs 16.7% (6/36)] between the two groups [OR (95%CI): 0.828 (0.171, 4.014), P=0.814]. In the RTSA group, 28 cases were graded 0 and 4 cases were graded 1 at 2 years after operation. Constant and OSS scores of RTSA group were significantly better than those of ORIF group (P<0.05). The Constant score was significantly better than ORIF group in activity and strength, range of motion, lifting, abduction, and external rotation (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in pain, daily function, and internal rotation between the two groups (P>0.05). The RTSA group had a significantly greater range of motion in lifting, abduction, and external rotation than ORIF group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in internal rotation between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionApplication of RTSA as the initial treatment of Neer three/four-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly can achieve better rehabilitation of joint activity and lower risk of early reoperation, and improve the quality of life of elderly fracture patients. However, the difficulty of revision and the high cost of treatment require the surgeon to pay full attention and strictly grasp the indications.
ObjectiveTo assess the effect of surgical treatment or conservative treatment on the clinical outcomes for displaced 3-part or 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. MethodsWe searched CNKI (between January 1979 and April 2014), Wanfang Data (between January 1982 and April 2014), Medline (between January 1946 and April 2014), PubMed (between January 1966 and April 2014), Embase (between January 1974 and April 2014) and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (between January 2005 and April 2014) for randomized controlled trials comparing surgical treatment and conservative treatment for displaced 3-part or 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. The data were extracted and a Meta-analysis was made using RevMan 5.2. ResultsFive randomized controlled trials with a total of 226 patients were accepted in this Meta-analysis. The differences of Constant scores[WMD=0.48, 95%CI (-4.39, 5.35), P=0.85], incidences of avascular necrosisr of the humeral head[RR=0.66, 95%CI (0.37, 1.16), P=0.15], incidences of nonunion[RR=0.56, 95%CI (0.20, 1.58), P=0.27], incidences of osteoarthritis[RR=0.35, 95%CI (0.10, 1.22), P=0.10] between the two groups were not statistically different. The difference of incidences of additional surgery after primary treatment was statistically significant[RR=3.52, 95%CI (1.18, 10.45), P=0.02]. ConclusionThe results does not support the surgical treatment to improve the shoulder function when compared with conservative treatment for treating elderly patients with displaced 3-part or 4-part proximal humeral fractures. But surgical treatment increases the incidence of additional surgery after primary treatment. Considering surgery can increase the trauma and economic burden of patients, so the conservative treatment is suggested.
ObjectiveTo review the research progress on intra-articular screw penetration in proximal humeral fracture treated with locking plate. MethodsThe domestic and foreign literature about the proximal humeral fracture treated with locking plate was extensively reviewed. The incidence of screw penetration and risk factors were summarized from both primary and secondary screw penetrations, and the reasons of the intra-articular screw penetration and the technical solutions to avoid the penetration were analyzed. ResultsThe incidence of intra-articular screw penetration is about 11%-30%, which includes primary and secondary screw penetrations. The primary screw penetration is related to improper operation, inaccurate measurement, and “Steinmetz solid” effect, which results in inadequate fluoroscopy and blind zone. The secondary screw penetration is related to the loss of reduction and varus, collapse, and necrosis of the humeral head. The risk factors for intra-articular screw penetration include the bone mass density, the fracture type, the quality of fracture reduction, the applied location, number, and length of the plate and screws, and whether medial column buttress is restored. Improved fracture reduction, understanding the geometric distribution of screws, good intraoperative fluoroscopy, and reconstruction of medial column buttress stability are the key points for success. ConclusionThe risk of the intra-articular screw penetration in the proximal humeral fractures treated with locking plates is still high. Follow-up studies need to further clarify the cause and mechanism of screw penetration, and the risk factors that lead to screw penetration, in order to effectively prevent the occurrence of this complication.