ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of arthroscopic suture and absorbable screw double fixation for both anterior and posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures of tibial insertions. MethodsBetween June 2006 and September 2013, 8 patients with anterior and posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures of the tibial eminence underwent arthroscopic treatment with suture and absorbable screw double fixation. There were 5 males and 3 females, with a mean age of 28.9 years (range, 18-43 years). The causes of injury included traffic accident in 5 cases and falling from height in 3 cases. The time from injury to operation was 3-10 days (mean, 6.2 days). The Lysholm knee score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and Tegner rating scales were used to evaluated the knee function. ResultsPrimary healing of incision was obtained, without infection or deep vein thrombosis. The mean follow-up period was 42.4 months (range, 24 to 65 months). At 3 months after operation, X-ray films showed good reduction and healing of fracture. The anterior and posterior drawer tests were negative. The knee range of motion was normal (0-125°), and it recovered to preoperative level in 7 cases. The IKDC score, Tegner score, and Lysholm score were significantly improved to 90.4±5.2, 7.5±1.6, and 89.2±3.5 from preoperative 52.1±3.3, 3.3±1.0, and 51.9±3.5 respectively (t=-38.680, P=0.000; t=-39.520, P=0.000; t=-41.150, P=0.000). ConclusionA combined injury of anterior and posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures of tibial insertions is rare. Arthroscopic treatment with suture and absorbable screw double fixation is a useful technique to restore tibial avulsion injuries with well-documented radiographic healing, good clinical outcomes, and low complication rates.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of open reduction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fracture at tibial insertion of knee joint with absorbable screws fixation and absorbable screw combined with suture anchor fixation. Methods The clinical data of 26 patients with PCL avulsion fracture at tibial insertion who met the selection criteria between March 2015 and October 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 14 patients were fixed with simple absorbable screw (group A), and 12 patients were fixed with absorbable screw combined with suture anchors (group B). All patients were confirmed by X-ray film, CT, or MRI preoperatively, and got positive results in preoperative posterior drawer tests. There was no significant difference in gender, age, side of affected limb, time from injury to operation, comorbidities, and preoperative Meyers & McKeever classification, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. At last follow-up, Lysholm score and IKDC score were used to evaluate the improvement of knee function. ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (P>0.05). All incisions healed by first intention, and no complication such as vascular and nerve injury or venous thrombosis occurred. All 26 patients were followed up 9-89 months, with an average of 55.3 months. The follow-up time of group A and group B was (55.7±23.2) and (56.8±29.3) months, respectively, with no significant difference (t=?0.106, P=0.916). Radiographs showed bone healing in both groups at 3 months after operation, and no complication such as infection and traumatic arthritis occurred. At last follow-up, the posterior drawer test was negative in both groups, and the Lysholm score and IKDC score significantly improved when compared with the pre-operative values (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the improvement value between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionFor PCL avulsion fracture at tibial insertion of the knee joint, the open reduction and absorbable screw combined with suture anchor fixation can achieve reliable fracture reduction and fixation, which is conducive to the early rehabilitation and functional exercise, and the postoperative functional recovery of the knee joint is satisfactory.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of arthroscopic suspension fixation with Endobutton in the treatment of tibial insertion avulsion fractures of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 52 patients (52 knees) with tibial insertion avulsion fractures of PCL, who were treated by arthroscopic suspension fixation with Endobutton between June 2017 and October 2022. There were 29 males and 23 females, with an average age of 40.6 years (range, 19-66 years). There were 24 cases of traffic accident injuries, 17 cases of sports injuries, and 11 cases of fall injuries. The time from injury to operation ranged from 6 to 19 days (mean, 13.3 days). According to the Meyers-McKeever classification, there were 30 cases of type Ⅱ and 22 cases of type Ⅲ fractures. All patients exhibited positive posterior drawer test results. Preoperative knee joint function was assessed with Lysholm score (21.3±6.7), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (20.7±5.8), and visual analogue scale (VAS) score (5.3±0.7); and knee joint range of motion was (41.73±3.17)°. Based on preoperative CT three-dimensional reconstruction measurements, the longitudinal diameter of the avulsed bone fragment ranged from 13 to 25 mm (mean, 18.1 mm). Operation time and occurrence of complications were recorded, and postoperative imaging was used to assess fracture healing. Knee joint function and pain severity were evaluated using knee joint range of motion, Lysholm score, IKDC score, and VAS score. Results The operation time ranged from 46 to 81 minutes (mean, 56.2 minutes). All patients were followed up 12-28 months (mean, 20.1 months). The iatrogenic fractures of bone fragments occurred during operation in 4 cases; and knee effusion occurred in 2 cases and anterior knee pain in 1 case after operation. All incisions healed by first intention. Imaging evaluations at 3 months after operation showed the fracture healing and no internal fixation failure. All patients demonstrated good knee function and had returned to normal activities at 12 months after operation. At last follow-up, the knee joint range of motion was (133.44±4.17)°, Lysholm score 93.6±3.1, IKDC score 93.4±2.5, and VAS score 1.0±0.6, with significant differences compared to preoperative scores (P<0.05). Conclusion Arthroscopic suspension fixation with Endobutton in the treatment of tibial insertion avulsion fractures of PCL is simple to operate, and the knee joint function recovers well.
Objective To compare the effectiveness between lower tibial tunnel placement combined with internal tension relieving suture and simple lower tibial tunnel placement for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. MethodsThe clinical data of 83 patients with simple PCL injury who met the selection criteria between January 2014 and February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 44 patients underwent PCL reconstruction through lower tibial tunnel placement combined with internal tension relieving suture (tension relieving suture group), and 39 patients underwent PCL reconstruction through simple lower tibial tunnel placement (control group). Baseline characteristics, including gender, age, body mass index, side of injury, cause of injury, preoperative side-to-side difference (SSD) in posterior tibial translation, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, knee range of motion (ROM), Tegner score, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores (including symptom, daily activities, and knee function scores) were compared between the two groups, showing no significant difference (P>0.05). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were recorded and compared between the two groups. The effectiveness was evaluated by Lysholm score, IKDC scores, Tegner score, VAS score, knee ROM, SSD in posterior tibial translation before operation and at last follow-up, the patient satisfaction at last follow-up, and the postoperative graft recovery was evaluated by MRI. ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-60 months, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Postoperative MRI showed that the graft was in good condition, and the reconstructed PCL graft had good signal, continuity, and tension. During the follow-up, there was no complication such as re-rupture or donor site discomfort in both groups. At last follow-up, the Lysholm score, IKDC scores, Tegner score, VAS score, knee ROM, and SSD in posterior tibial translation significantly improved in both groups when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). The changes of Lysholm score, Tegner score, IKDC knee symptom score, and SSD in posterior tibial translation between pre- and post-operation were significantly superior in the tension relieving suture group compared to the control group (P<0.05). However, no significant difference was found between the two groups in the changes of VAS score, knee ROM, IKDC daily activities score or knee function score between pre- and post-operation, and the satisfaction score (P>0.05). ConclusionLower tibial tunnel placement combined with internal tension relieving suture PCL reconstruction represents a more effective surgical approach for improving postoperative laxity of PCL and knee function recovery comparing to simple lower tibial tunnel placement PCL reconstruction.
Objective To summarize the research progress on knee laxity of biomechanics and prevention and treatment after posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. MethodsThe domestic and international literature on the prevention and treatment of knee laxity after PCL reconstruction in recent years was extensively reviewed and analyzed. Results Different degrees of knee laxity often occur after PCL reconstruction, which can lead to poor prognosis in patients. The causes are associated with a variety of factors, including abnormal graft remodeling (such as differences in healing time and biomechanics among different types of grafts), tunnel position deviation (such as graft wear caused by the “killer turn” effect), and mechanical factors in postoperative rehabilitation (such as improper early weight-bearing and range of motion). These factors may promote graft elongation, increase early posterior tibial translation, and thereby induce knee laxity. ConclusionWhile PCL reconstruction improves knee stability, it is crucial to focus on and prevent postoperative knee laxity. However, current surgical methods are limited by factors such as graft characteristics, surgical technique flaws, and rehabilitation protocols, and thus can not fully correct the issue of abnormal postoperative laxity. Surgical techniques and treatment strategies still need further improvement and optimization to enhance patients’ postoperative outcomes and quality of life.
OBJECTIVE To measure the isometric point of the attachment site in femur during the reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). METHODS Seven fresh knee specimens from cadavers were adopted in this experiment. The anterior, posterior, proximal, distal and central points of the PCL’s femoral attachment site were respectively anchored to the middle of the PCL’s tibial attachment site by the trial isometer wires. The length changes of the intra-articular part of the wires were recorded while the knee was flexed from 0 degree to 120 degrees by a continuous passive motion(CPM) machine. RESULTS The maximal length changes in every points were compared. It showed that the length change in anterior point was the biggest, the distal point was less than that of anterior point, and the proximal point was the least. There was significant difference between proximal and posterior points, but no significant difference between proximal and central points, neither between central and posterior points. All of the maximal length changes of proximal, central and posterior points were not greater than 2 mm. CONCLUSION The femoral tunnel for the PCL reconstruction should be located at the proximal point, which is the middle point of upper edge of femoral attachment site. The selected point for femoral tunnel also may be moved slightly in the direction to central or posterior points according to the needs of operation.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness of double-bundle versus single-bundle for arthroscopic transtibial reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). MethodsWe searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, VIP and WanFang Data to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PCL reconstruction treated with double-bundle versus single-bundle arthroscopic transtibial technique. Two reviewers screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies, and then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 4 RCTs involving 186 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that double-bundle was superior to single-bundle in Lysholm score (MD=2.17, 95%CI 0.29 to 4.05, P=0.02), Tegner score (MD=0.62, 95%CI 0.09 to 1.16, P=0.02), IKDC objective score (A:RR=1.57, 95%CI 1.09 to 2.26, P=0.02; A+B:RR=1.15, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.32, P=0.04). However, there was no significant difference in the KT-1000 posterior between both groups (MD=-0.65, 95%CI -3.29 to 1.99, P=0.63). ConclusionThe current evidence shows that the double bundle arthroscopic transtibial is superior to the single bundle PCL reconstruction. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies with large sample-size are needed to validate the conclusion.
Objective To study the method and cl inical results of arthroscopic double-bundle posterior cruciate l igament (PCL) reconstruction using achilles tendon allograft. Methods From September 2005 to September 2006, 17 patients with PCL injuries of grade III received arthroscopic double-bundle PCL reconstruction using achilles tendon allograft. There were 12 males and 5 females with an average age of 31.7 years (range, 19-48 years), including 10 cases of left PCL injuries and 7 cases of right PCL injuries. Injury was caused by sports in 6 cases and traffic accident in 11 cases. The average time from injury to surgery was 16 days (range, 7-30 days). The preoperative knee flexion was (121.8 ± 4.1)°. The posterior drawer test was positive and the varus angulation test was negative in all 17 patients. Lysholm score was 50.8 ± 6.1 and Tegner score was 1.3 ± 0.7. The side-to-side difference was (10.5 ± 1.6) mm by KT-1000 arthrometer. Results The hospital ization were (13.6 ± 2.4) days. The operation time was (67.8 ± 9.4) minutes. The time was (5.4 ± 1.2) days when the body temperature was higher than 37.4 ℃ after operation. All incisions healed by first intention. No compl ication occurred. All 17 patients were followed up 25 months on average (range, 18-30 months). The knee flexion was (116.9 ± 3.1)° at the final follow-up, showing no significant difference when compared with that of preoperation (P gt; 0.05). The posterior drawer test and the varus angulation test were negative in all 17 patients. Lysholm score and Tegner score were 91.6 ± 3.2 and 6.0 ± 0.7, respectively, and the side-to-side difference was (2.7 ± 1.7) mm, showing significant differences when compared with those of preoperation (P lt; 0.05).Conclusion Achilles tendon allograft is fit for PCL reconstruction. Arthroscopic double-bundle posterior cruciate l igament reconstruction using achilles tendon allograft can reconstruct both anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of the PCL. The knee joint function can be restored effectively. The short-term outcome has been proved, but the long-term outcome needs more observations
Objective To analyse the results of posterior cruciate l igament-retained mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to solve the problems often encountered during surgery. Methods From February 1999 to August 2005, the cl inical data from 73 patients with RA undergoing TKA were analysed retrospectively. In 73 patients, 38 patients were treated with posterior cruciate l igament-retained mobile-bearing prosthesis (group A), while 35 patients were treated with posterior stabil ized fixed-bearing prosthesis (group B). Another 70 patients with osteoarthritis (OA) treated with an posterior cruciate l igament-retained mobile-bearing prosthesis served as controls (group C). In group A, there were 8 males and 30 females with an average age of 56.5 years and an average diseasecourse of 16.8 years. In group B, there were 6 males and 29 females with an average age of 57.3 years and an average disease course of 17.1 years. In group C, there were 37 males and 33 females with an average age of 65.4 years and an average disease course of 10.8 years. There was no significant difference (P gt; 0.05) in general data between groups A and B, but there were significant differences (P lt; 0.05) when compared with group C. Results In groups A and B, 2 cases (5.3%) and 1 case (2.9%) had poor heal ing of incision, respectively; in group C, all cases had good heal ing of incision. There were significant differences in heal ing rate of incision between groups A, B and group C (P lt; 0.05). All patients were followed up 7.6 years on average (range, 3.5-10.5 years). Deep infection occurred in 1 case respectively in 3 groups, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05). Posterior instabil ity occurred in 1 case (2.6%) 5 years after operation in group A and 2 cases (2.9%) 9 years after operation in group C, and no posterior instabil ity occurred in group B; showing significant differences between groups A, C and group B (P lt; 0.05). There were significant differences (P lt; 0.05) in knee score, Feller patellar score, and anterior knee pain score between pre- and postoperative values among groups A, B, and C. There were significant differences (P lt; 0.05) in the function scores between pre- and post-operative values in 3 groups, between groups A, B and group C pre- and post-operatively. Conclusion Posterior cruciate l igament-retained mobile-bearing TKA can yield satisfactory cl inical results in treatment of RA at intermediate-term followup. This mobile-bearing prosthesis has a low prevalence of posterior instabil ity and a good outcome for anterior knee function without patellar resurfacing.
Objective To explore the best flexion angle of the transplantation tendon for fixing joint in simultaneously reconstructing of the anterior cruciate l igament (ACL) and posterior cruciate l igament (PCL) using semitendinosus tendon as autologous graft. Methods Twenty-four clean level New Zealand White rabbits [(aged 6-8 months, male or female, and weighing (2.5 ± 0.2) kg] were selected and divided randomly into 3 groups (n=8) according to fixation angle of the reconstructed l igaments. The bilateral semitendinosus tendons of hind legs were used to reconstruct the PCL and ACL of right hind leg, and the reconstructed l igaments were fixed at knee flexion angles of 90° (group A), 60° (group B), and 30° (group A). The rabbit general situation was observed after operation, and the specimens of the knee joints (including 10 cmdistal end and 10 cm proximal end) were harvested for testing extension and flexion, displacement, and internal and external rotation at 3 months after operation. Results All the rabbits survived to the end of experiment. There was no significant difference in maximal displacements of ACL and PCL among 3 groups (P gt; 0.05). The anterior and posterior displacements of shift in 3 groups were less than 1 mm, suggesting good stabil ity. The anterior displacement and the posterior displacement at 30° flexion and 90° flexion in group A were significantly larger than those in group C (P lt; 0.05). There were significant differences in internal rotation angle and external rotation angle between group A and group C (P lt; 0.05), and there was no significant difference among other groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion When simultaneously reconstructing ACL and PCL, the knee flexion angle of 60° for fixing the reconstructed l igaments can achieve the best effect.