Abstract：?Objective?To analyze surgical procedures and clinical outcomes for patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy （HOCM） complicated by infective endocarditis.?Methods?We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 7 patients with HOCM complicated by infective endocarditis who underwent modified Morrow procedure，removal of intracardiac vegetation，and valve replacement in Fu Wai Hospital from Sep. 2006 to Feb. 2012. There were 5 male patients and 2 female patients with their mean age of 39.80±13.60 years（ranging 21-55）. Postoperative clinical outcomes were observed. Preoperative and postoperative left ventricular outflow tract （LVOT） gradients， left atrium （LA） diameter，left ventricular ejection fraction （LVEF） and heart function were compared.?Results?There was no in-hospital death and perioperative survival rate was 100% in this group. Bacteria vegetations were multiply detected on the mitral valve leaflet （7 cases）， aortic valve leaflet （4 cases） and ventricular septum （1 case） with their diameter of 2-19 mm. Blood culture showed Staphylococcus aureus （3 cases），Squirrel aureus （1 case） . Postoperatively， first-degree atrioventricular block occurred in 2 patients， complete left bundle branch block in 1 patient， left anterior division block in 2 patients， and all these complications were not treated. Postoperative LVOT gradient and LA diameter were significantly lower than preoperative values （P＜0.05）， and cardiac function was significantly improved in these patients. All the patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography at a mean follow-up of 13.00±17.19 （1-49） months in outpatient service. The clinical symptoms of all these patients were diminished or significantly ameliorated and their quality of life was considerably improved. All the patients had NYHA classⅠorⅡ without any reintervention or death during follow-up.?Conclusion?Modified Morrow procedure and valve replacement is a good surgical strategy for patients with HOCM complicated by infective endocarditis with satisfactory early and mid-term clinical outcomes.
ObjectiveTo compare the safety and efficacy of simple mitral valve replacement with the third intercostal incision on the right side and the conventional midsternum incision.MethodsFrom February 2017 to February 2019, heart surgery in the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical College completed the first simple mitral valve replacement (MVR) operation in 103 patients, of whom 39 patients were received minimally invasive right third intercostal small incision (a minimally invasive surgery group). There were 10 males, 29 females at average age of 59.51 years. There were 64 patients with MVR via the middle section of the common sternum (a conventional surgery group), 22 males and 42 females, with an average age of 60.22 years. Types of lesions: 65 patients were with mitral stenosis, 22 patients with incomplete closure, 16 patients with incomplete closure.ResultsThere was no significant difference in preoperative clinical data between the two groups (P>0.05). The entire group of patients successfully completed the operation. Surgical replacement of mitral valve mechanical valve in 74 patients and biological valve in 29 patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the extracardiopulmonary cycle time, aortic blockade time and total hospitalization time. In the early stage of operation, 3 patients were examined for secondary hemostasis, 1 patient was minimally invasive surgery, and the remaining 2 patients were with routine surgery. The infection of incision occurred in 3 patients, all of them were in the routine operation group. All three patients died early after operation in the routine operation group: two were postoperative low cardiac volumetric syndrome leading to multiple organ failure, and the other was sternum infection accompanied by artificial valve endocarditis.ConclusionThere is no significant difference between MVR through the third rib of the right chest and traditional MVR in the safety. However, it has the advantages of small trauma, beauty, low incidence of incision infection and reduced postoperative pain.
Reoperation due to degenerated bioprostheses is an important factor of high-risk thoracic surgeries. In 2020 ACC/AHA guideline, Valve in Valve (ViV) was recommended for high-risk patient instead of surgical mitral valve replacement. This report described a 77-year-old male patient with a failed mitral bioprosthetic valve, evaluated at high risk of surgery, received a transvenous, transseptal transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). Tracheal intubation was removed at CCU 3 h after surgery without discomfort such as polypnea. The patient was transferred out of the CCU and discharged on the 3rd day. Compared with transapical access, transvenous transseptal access was less invasive, with shorter duration in CCU and hospitalization.
ObjectiveTo summarize clinical advantages and outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve replacement (MVR) combined with atrial fibrillation (AF) radiofrequency ablation via right minithoracotomy. MethodsEight patients with mitral valve disease and AF who received surgical therapy in the First Hospital of China Medical University between October 2009 and October 2012 were included in the study. There were 4 males and 4 females with their age of 34-67 (52.4±17.5) years. All the patients underwent minimally invasive MVR combined with AF radiofrequency ablation via right minithoracotomy. Clinical outcomes were summarized. ResultsThere was no in-hospital death or conversion to conventional sternotomy in this group. Two patients received biological valve replacement and 6 patients received mechanical prosthesis. Operation time was 207.9±18.1 minutes, cardiopulmonary bypass time was 81.7±23.9 minutes, and chest drainage amount was 126.7±34.5 ml. AF recurred in 1 patient on the 3rd postoperative day. All the patients were in sinus rhythm at discharge. These patients were followed up for 18.3±7.4 months. During follow-up, 1 patient had AF recurrence. Seven patients were in NYHA class Ⅰ, and 1 patients was in NYHA class Ⅱ. ConclusionMinimally invasive MVR combined with AF radiofrequency ablation via right minithoracotomy can achieve satisfactory clinical results and esthetic appearance, and is a good choice for patients with mitral valve disease and AF.
Objective To compare the clinical outcomes and safety of minimally invasive and routine mitral valve repair or replacement for patients with single mitral valve disease. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 67 patients with single mitral valve disease （without aortic valve and tricuspid valve lesion or other heart diseases including atrial septal defect） who underwent mitral valve repair or replacement in the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University between January and July 2011. The patients were divided into two groups according to different surgical approaches：the minimally invasive surgery group （n=29，8 males and 21 females，age 51.4±9.4 years） underwent minimally invasive mitral valve repair or replacement via right mini-thoractomy；and the routine surgery group （n=38，11 males and 27 females，age 53.6±11.9 years） underwent mitral valve repair or replacement via middle sternotomy. In the minimally invasive surgery group，9 patients underwent mitral valve repair while the other 20 patients underwent mitral valve replacement. And no patient underwent transition to routine operation. In the routine surgery group，15 patients underwent mitral valve repair and 23 patients underwent mitral valve replacement. Clinical outcomes and safety of the operations were compared between the two groups. Results There was no statistical difference in operation time between the two groups （207.9±18.1 min versus 198.4±27.5 min，P=0.076）. The amount of postoperative drainage （126.7±34.5 ml versus 435.6±87.2 ml，P=0.000） and blood transfusion （red blood cell 1.4±0.8 U versus 2.3±1.1 U，P=0.000；blood plasma 164.3±50.4 ml versus 405.6±68.9 ml，P=0.000） of the minimally invasive surgery group were significantly lower than those of the routine surgery group. The cardiopulmonary bypass time （81.7±23.9 min versus 58.7±13.6 min，P=0.000） and aortic-clamping time （51.6±12.7 min versus 38.4±11.7 min，P=0.000） of the minimally invasive surgery group were significantly longer than those of the routine surgery group. The length of ICU stay （22.5±3.6 h versus 31.7±8.5 h，P=0.000），mechanical ventilation （7.4±3.2 h versus 11.2±5.1 h，P=0.000） and postoperative hospitalization （7.1±1.6 d versus 13.5±2.4 d，P=0.000） of the minimally invasive surgery group were significantly shorter than those of the routine surgery group. There was no statistical difference in postoperative complications between the two groups. Minimally invasive surgery group patients were followed up for 5.3±2.4 months with a follow-up rate of 72.4%（21/29）. Routine surgery group patients were followed up for 5.5±3.8 months with a follow-up rate of 71.0%（27/38）. There was no significant complication during follow-up in both two groups. Conclusion Minimally invasive mitral valve operation via right mini-thoracotomy is effective and safe with a good cosmetic result. Compared with routine operation，patients undergoing minimally invasive operation recover better and faster.
ObjectiveTo investigate effect of cardiac function and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) degree of concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty for patients with tricuspid valve annulus dilation and mild TR underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR), and provide an objective basis for clinical decision about concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty for patients with tricuspid valve annulus dilation and mild TR underwent MVR. MethodsA total of 36 patients who underwent MVR from April to October 2013 in Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University were enrolled in this study. Preoperative echocardiography showed mild TR and tricuspid valve annular end-diastolic dimension (TVAEDD)/body surface area (BSA)>21 mm/m2. All the 36 patients were randomly divided into a tricuspid annuloplasty group (TAPG group, n=18, including 7 males and 11 females) and a no tricuspid annuloplasty group (NTAPG group, n=18, including 6 males and 12 females). One week and 6 months postoperative echocardiography were recorded. ResultsThere were no statistical differences in age, gender, heart rate, body surface area, preoperative cardiac function (NYHA), left atrium dimension (LAD), left ventricular dimension (LVD), maximal long-axis of RA (RAmla), mid-RA minor distance (RAmmd), right ventricle dimension (RVD2), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS) between the two groups (P>0.05). Six-months postoperative left atrial-ventricular diameter significantly reduced than that before surgery in the two groups (P<0.05). In the TAPG group, six-months postoperative right ventricle dimension (RVD1), right ventricular wall thickness (RVWT), tricuspid valve annular end-diastolic dimension (TVAEDD), tricuspid valve annular end-systolic dimension (TVAESD) significantly decreased, while percent shorting of tricuspid valve annulus (PSTVA) did not change significantly (P>0.05), TR degree improved significantly (P<0.05), right ventricular fractional area change (RVFAC) and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) significantly increased (P<0.05). In the NTAPG group, compared with preoperative data, six-months postoperative RVD1, RVWT significantly increased, TVAEDD, TVAESD, PSTVA did not change significantly (P>0.05), RVEF reduced significantly (P<0.05), RVFAC increased significantly but less than that in the TAPG group at the same period, constituent ratio of TR changed significantly (P<0.05), but postoperative moderate or more TR were recorded in 6 patients. ConclusionConcomitant tricuspid annuloplasty for patients with tricuspid valve annulus dilation and mild TR underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) can help to decrease RVD1, RVWT, TVAEDD and TVAESD, improve the constituent ratio of TR, and increase RVFAC and RVEF.
ObjectiveTo analyze clinical experience and outcomes of bileaflet preservation in mitral valve replace-ment (MVR) for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 17 patients with severe MR who underwent MVR with bileaflet preservation in the Department of Cardiovascular surgery of Guangdong General Hospital from June 2011 to January 2013. There were 14 males and 3 females with mean age of 63.41±11.82 years (range, 38 to 82 years). There were 13 patients with atrial fibrillation. Preoperatively, 5 patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class Ⅲ, and 12 patients were in NYHA class Ⅳ. There were 7 patients with ischemic MR, 9 patients with degenerative MR, and 1 patient with rheumatic MR. ResultsMVR with bileaflet preservation was performed for all the patients. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed for 4 patients. Eleven patients received bioprosthetic MVR, and 6 patients received mechanical MVR. There was no in-hospital death, postoperative low cardiac output syndrome or left ventricular rupture. All the 17 patients were followed up for a mean duration of 16.44±5.02 months (range, 2 to 25 months). During follow-up, 1 patient died of severe paravalvular leak 2 months after surgery. All the other patients had good mitral valve function. None of the patients had anticoagulation or prosthetic valve related complication. Patient's heart function was significantly improved. Eleven patients were in NYHA functional class Ⅰ, 4 patients were in NYHA class Ⅱ, and 1 patient was in NYHA class Ⅲ. Cardiothoracic ratio, left atrial dimension, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and left ventricular end-systole dimension postoperatively and during follow-up were significantly smaller than preoperative values. Postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly lower than preoperative LVEF(50.94%±8.78% vs. 55.31%±10.44%, P=0.04), but LVEF during follow-up was not statistically different from preoperative LVEF(55.31%±10.44% vs. 56.13%±9.67%, P=0.73), and LVEF during follow-up was significantly higher than postoperative LVEF(56.13%±9.67% vs. 50.94%±8.78%, P=0.02). There was no statistical difference between postoperative mitral pressure half-time (PHT)and PHT during follow-up (95.06±19.00 ms vs. 94.56±19.19 ms, P=0.91). ConclusionMVR with bileaflet preservation is a safe and effective surgical technique for patients with severe MR, and can significantly improve postoperative left ventricular remodeling and function.
Objective To investigate long-term echocardiography characteristics and their clinical significance of patients after mitral valve replacement （MVR）. Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 204 patients who underwent prosthetic MVR and finished echocardiography examination at least 5 years after surgery in West China Hospital of Sichuan University. There were 44 male patients and 160 female patients with their age of 23 to 73 （50.9±10.6）years. Postoperatively， all the patients were followed up for 5-15 （7.9±2.3）years and regularly received echocardiography examination at the outpatient department. Analysis variables included left atrium （LA） dimension， left ventricle （LV） dimension，right atrium （RA） dimension， right ventricle （RV） dimension， left ventricular ejection fraction （LVEF） and effective orificearea （EOA） of the mitral valve. Results Long-term echocardiography showed that LA and LV dimensions were signifi-cantly smaller than preoperative dimensions （P＜0.05）， while RA and RV dimensions were not statistically different from preoperative dimensions （P＞0.05）. Long-term LVEF was significantly higher than preoperative value （P＜0.05）. Long-term EOA was 1.1-4.8 （2.3±0.5）cm2， including EOA of 1.1-1.4 cm2 in 7 patients （3.4%，7/204），and 1.6-1.9 cm2in 42 patients （20.6%，42/204）. During long-term follow-up， 7 patients underwent their second heart surgery， including2 patients with prosthetic valve dysfunction， 1 patient with prosthetic perivalvular leak and severe hemolytic anemia，3 patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation which were not improved after medication treatment， and 1 patient with moderateaortic valve stenosis and regurgitation. Two patients had left atrial thrombosis during follow-up， including 1 patient who died of endocarditis 7 years after surgery， and another patient who was still receiving conservative therapy and further follow-up. Conclusion Concomitant tricuspid or aortic valve disease should be actively treated during MVR， and postoperative patients need better follow-up. Many patients after MVR need long-term cardiovascular medication treatment during follow-up in order to improve their heart function and long-term survival rate.
Abstract: Objective To summarize the experiences of radiofrequency modified maze procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with mitral valve diseases. Methods From May 2003 to December 2008, 122 patients, including 31 males and 91 females, with permanent AF underwent radiofrequency modified maze procedure as a combined operation with mitral valve replacement. Their age ranged from 23 to 65 years old (47±10 years). The duration of AF varied from 0.5 to 32.0 years (6.5±5.7 years). There were 57 cases of stenosis, 7 cases of regurgitation and 58 cases of both stenosis and regurgitation. Ablation lines were made with Cardioblate (Medtronic, monopolar, 25.30 W, 180.240 ml/h). After rightsided maze procedure was finished, aorta was crossclamped and cold crystalloid or blood cardioplegia were delivered for myocardial protection. Left atrial incision was performed through the interatrial groove or interatrial septum. The ablation lines were created to encircle the orifices of the left and right pulmonary veins respectively. The ablation lines were also performed from the left encircling line to the posterior mitral valve annulus and to the orifice of left atrial appendage respectively. An ablation line was used to connect the circumferential line of left and right pulmonary veins. The left atrial appendage was tied and concomitant operations were performed. Amiodarone was given to the patients after operation and regular follow-up was done. Results There were four perioperative deaths including 2 cases of multiple organ failure, 1 case of mechanic valve obstruction and 1 sudden death. Follow-up was done to 115 patients for 1.5-7.0 years (4.8±2.6 years) with three cases lost. During the followup period, four patients died, including 3 sudden deaths and 1 case of prosthetic obstruction. Eightyseven patients (78.4%, 87/111) recovered to sinus rhythm; 22 patients still had AF; 1 patient had atrial flutter; and 1 patient required a permanent pacemaker one year after the operation. Diameter of left atrium after operation (0.5-7.0 years) was decreased compared with that before operation（44.90±7.50 mm vs. 54.30±10.80 mm，t＝10.641，P＝0.000）. Conclution Radiofrequency modified maze procedure for AF in patients with mitral valve disease is relatively safe. But heart rhythm instability, tachyarrhythmia and recurrent AF are not rare for those patients. Therefore, the surgical indication of AF should be individualized.
Objective To evaluate postoperative quality of life （QOL） of patients aged over 65 after mitral valvereplacement （MVR）. Methods Ninety patients aged over 65 undergoing MVR by the same surgical group in Departmentof Cardiovascular Surgery of Anzhen Hospital were prospectively enrolled in this study. There were 62 male and 28 femalepatients with their age of 65-76 （68.6±6.8） years. There were 55 patients with hypertension，38 patients with type 2 diabetes，and all the patients had persistent atrial fibrillation. Nottingham Healthy Profile （NHP，Part I） and Duke Activity StatuIndex （DASI） were used to evaluate preoperative and postoperative QOL. According to the choice of prosthetic heart valves they received，all the patients were divided into two groups with 45 patients in each group: biological valve group and mechanical valve group. All the patients received MVR via the interatrial groove approach under general anesthesia and cardiopulmonary bypass. Mechanical valve replacement was performed using continuous suture without preserving the posterior leaflet of the mitral valve. Biological valve replacement was performed using interrupted suture and some of the posteriorleaflet of the mitral valve was routinely preserved. Patients in both groups underwent intraoperative bilateral pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial appendage ablation using a bipolar radiofrequency ablation device. The left atrial appendage was not excised or ligated. Results Postoperative QOL of all the patients was significantly better than preoperative QOL. There was no statistical difference in NHP and DASI at the 6th month after discharge between the 2 groups. But from the 1st year after discharge，QOL of the biological valve group was significantly better than that of the mechanical valve group. At the 3rd year after discharge，NHP and DASI of the mechanical valve group was not statistically different from those at the 1st year after discharge，but NHP and DASI of the biological valve group was significantly better than those at the 1st year after discharge. Conclusions QOL of elderly patients are significantly improved after MVR. Patients who receive biologicalvalve replacement may acquire better long-term QOL than patients who receive mechanical valve replacement.