ObjectiveTo investigate the application effect of wire reduction technique guided by minimally invasive wire introducer in the treatment of difficult-reducing intertrochanteric fractures.MethodsBetween April 2016 and April 2018, 30 patients with intertrochanteric fractures who had difficulty in closed reduction under the traction bed were treated. There were 17 males and 13 females, aged from 60 to 93 years (mean, 72 years). The causes of injury included falls in 22 cases and traffic accidents in 8 cases. The fractures were classified according to AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification: 12 cases of type A1, 12 cases of type A2, and 6 cases of type A3. Intramedullary nail incision and self-made minimally invasive wire introducer were used to assist reduction of intertrochanteric fracture, and then intramedullary nail internal fixation was performed.ResultsThe operation time was 30-70 minutes, with an average of 45 minutes. The intraoperative blood loss was 100-210 mL, with an average of 160 mL. One case died of cerebrovascular accident at 3 months after operation; the remaining 29 cases were followed up 6-18 months, with an average of 8.3 months. Postoperative DR reexamination showed that all patients had a good reduction in the fracture end, no retraction, fracture displacement, hip valgus deformity, and other serious complications occurred. The fracture was completely healed and the healing time was 3-8 months, with an average of 6 months. At 3 months after operation, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 1-3, with an averge of 1.7. According to Harris functional score of hip joint, 26 cases were excellent and 3 cases were good.ConclusionFor the difficult-reducing intertrochanteric fractures, minimally invasive wire introducer is used to insert steel wire into the incision of head and neck nail for assisted reduction, which can achieve satisfactory reduction results and improve the effectiveness of intertrochanteric fracture.
Objective To analyse the factors of complications aftertreatment of intertrochanteric fractures with Gamma nail. Methods From January 1998 to May 2004, 50 patients were treated with Gamma nail, including 18 males and 32 females and ageing from 47 to 82 years. The locations were the left side in 16 cases andthe right in 34 cases. According to Evans classification, there were 4 cases oftype Ⅰ, 2 cases of type Ⅱ, 23 cases of type Ⅲ, 10 cases of type Ⅳ and 11 cases of type Ⅴ. Results Fifty patients were followed up 429 months. Accordingto the Harris criterion for evaluation, the results were excellent and good in 35 cases, showing sthenic weight loading walking and normal range of motion of the hip joint. The postoperative complications appeared in 15 cases: 5 cases of coxa vara or coxa valga, 3 cases of rotation deformity of lower limb, 2 cases oftension screwprotrusions and lower shorten, 1 case of failure of internal fixation, 1 case of femoral fracture, 2 cases of coxalgia and 1 case of pain in knee joint and stiff knee joint. Conclusion The reason of complications was various, mainly lies in insufficient comprehension and analysis of the types of fractures, unfamiliarity with the characteristics and usage of the instruments and neglected rehabi litation instruction, inappropriate functional training and too early weight loading after operation.
Objective To investigate the appl ication of anti-rotation screw after dynamic hi p screw (DHS) in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture. Methods Between April 2006 and January 2010, 22 cases of intertrochanteric fractures underwent DHS fixation operation with an anti-rotation screw, including 15 males and 7 females with an average ageof 66.3 years (range, 54-83 years). Fractures were caused by sl ipping in 16 cases, traffic accident in 5 cases, and fall ing from height in 1 case. All cases showed closed fractures, including 13 cases in the left and 9 cases in the right. Eighteen cases were simple intertrochanteric fracture, 4 cases were intertrochanteric fractures compl icated with Colles fractures. According to Evans classification standard, there were 14 cases of type I, 6 cases of type II, 1 case of type III, and 1 case of type IV. The time from wound to operation was 3-7 days (mean, 4.5 days). Results The operation time ranged from 51-95 minutes (mean, 72 minutes). The intraoperative blood loss was 150-350 mL (mean, 270 mL). The hospital ization days were 12-35 days (mean, 16.8 days). Primary heal ing was observed in all cases. All cases were followed up 6-17 months (mean, 14 months). Union of fracture was observed at 12-16 weeks (mean, 13.6 weeks); no fracture or internal fixation loosening occurred. According to HUANG Gongyi’s standard of efficacy assessment, the results were excellent in 19 cases and good in 3 cases. Conclusion Appl ication of an anti-rotation screw can help to improve the strength of the DHS for the internal fixation of intertrochanteric fracture, especially the anti-rotation abil ity, which does not increase the operation time obviously.
Objective To summarize the new research progress in distal interlocking screws of cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Methods Relevant domestic and foreign literature was extensively reviewed to summarize the static/dynamic types of distal interlocking screw holes, biomechanical studies, clinical studies and application principles, effects on toggling in the cavity, and related complications of distal interlocking screws.ResultsThe mode of the distal interlocking screw holes can be divided into static and dynamic. Distal interlocking screws play the role of anti-rotation, maintaining femur length, resisting compression stress, increasing torque stiffness, resisting varus stress, etc. The number of the screws directly affects the toggling of the main nail in the cavity. At present, regardless of whether long or short nails are used, distal interlocking screws are routinely inserted in clinical practice. However, using distal interlocking screws can significantly increase the duration of anesthesia and operation, increase fluoroscopy exposure time, surgical blood loss, and incision length. There is a trend of trying not to use distal interlocking screws in recent years. No significant difference is found in some studies between the effectiveness of dynamic and static interlocking for AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 31-A1/2 fractures. At present, the selection of the number and mode of distal interlocking screws is still controversial. When inserting distal interlocking screws, orthopedists should endeavor to minimize the occurrence of complications concerning miss shot, vascular injuries, local stress stimulation, and peri-implant fractures. Conclusion Distal interlocking screws are mainly used to prevent rotation. For stable fractures with intact lateral walls, long cephalomedullary nails can be used without distal interlocking screws. For any type of intertrochanteric fractures, distal interlocking screws are required when using short cephalomedullary nails for fixation. Different interlocking modes, the number of interlocking screws, and the application prospects of absorbable interlocking screws may be future research directions.
Objective To study the effectiveness of anterolateral C-shaped approach in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur in elderly patient by comparing with traditional anterolateral approach. Methods Between April 2010 and November 2011, 66 patients with intertrochanteric fracture of the femur were analyzed retrospectively. Of 66 patients, 37 underwent improved anterolateral C-shaped approach combined with fixation of dynamic hip screw (DHS) (improved group), and 29 underwent traditional anterolateral approach combined with fixation of DHS (conventional group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, side, disease duration, fracture type, and complication between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and hospitalization time were recorded; and X-ray films were taken to observe the fracture healing. The hip function was evaluated according to self-established criterion. Results The operation was successfully completed in all patients, and primary healing of incision was achieved. All patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 17.8 months). Bone union was achieved in both groups; the fracture healing time was 3-6 months (mean, 4.8 months). No loosening or breaking of internal fixation was observed during follow-up period. The operation time and postoperative drainage volume of improved group were significantly less than those of conventional group (P lt; 0.05); no significant difference was found in intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization days between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). According to self-established criterion, improved group was significantly better than conventional group in recovery of hip joint motion and function at 6 and 12 months after operation (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Anterolateral C-shaped approach combined with DHS could minimize muscle injury and scar formation, which is beneficial to surgical exposure and early postoperative rehabilitation.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical effect of applying the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) to the perioperative management of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures.MethodsThe clinical data of 64 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures admitted to West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2016 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 32 patients admitted from January to December in 2017 were in ERAS group, and 32 patients admitted from January to December 2016 were in control group. The control group used conventional orthopedic perioperative management measures, and the ERAS group combined the ERAS concept on the basis of conventional treatment measures for perioperative management. The incidence of perioperative complications, Visual Analogue Scale score, modified Barthel Index score, inpatient satisfaction and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere was no significant difference in age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, combined disease, modified Barthel Index or Visual Analogue Scale score at admission, or time from injury to surgery between the two groups (P>0.05). The total incidence of perioperative complications (12.5% vs. 37.5%) and length of hospital stay [(8.09±2.33) vs. (10.41±3.63) d] in the ERAS group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The Visual Analogue Scale scores of the two groups of patients before operation, on the first day and the third day after operation were lower than those at admission (P<0.05). The comparison between the two groups at each time point showed that the Visual Analogue Scale scores of patients in the ERAS group were lower than those in the control group before operation, on the first day and the third day after operation, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The modified Barthel Index scores of the two groups of patients on the third day, and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after operation showed a rising trend with time. The modified Barthel Index scores of the ERAS group were better than those of the control group on the third day, and 1 month and 3 months after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups 6 months after operation (P>0.05). The hospitalization satisfaction score of the ERAS group was 95.56±5.12, which was higher than that of the control group (92.84±5.62), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionsThe implementation of ERAS perioperative management for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures may reduce the incidence of perioperative complications, relieve patient pain, promote the short-term recovery of activities of daily living of patients, improve the inpatient satisfaction and shorten the length of hospital stay.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of Othofix pertrochanteric fixator for fixation of intertrochanteric fracture. MethodA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data from 36 cases of intertrochanteric fracture treated with Othofix pertrochanteric fixator (OPF group) and 47 cases treated with Gamma nail (Gamma group) between October 2012 and March 2015. There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, side, AO fracture classification, combined medical disease, and injury to operation time between 2 groups (P>0.05) . The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time, fracture union time, and complication rate were recorded and compared between 2 groups. Hip function was evaluated with Sanders post-trauma criteria. ResultsThe operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospitalization time of the OPF group were significantly less than those of the Gamma group (P<0.05) . All the cases were followed up 6-12 months (mean, 8.8 months) in 2 groups. Healing of incision by first intention was obtained. Bone union was achieved in 2 groups, and the fracture union time of the OPF group was significantly shorter than that of the Gamma group (t=14.780, P=0.000) . There was no deep wound or pin track infection in 2 groups. Superficial skin reactions developed around the screw and the pins in 14 cases (38.9%) of the OPF group, but no incision infection in the Gamma group, showing significant difference (χ2=22.010, P=0.001) . Mild varus of the hip and pin cutting-out occurred in 3 cases (8.3%) and 2 cases (5.6%) of the OPF group, and in 4 cases (8.5%) and 3 cases (6.4%) of Gamma group, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.001, P=0.960; χ2=0.025, P=0.830) . According to Sanders post-trauma criteria, the results were excellent in 16 cases, good in 15 cases, fair in 3 cases, and poor in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 86.1% in the OPF group; the results were excellent in 22 cases, good in 20 cases, fair in 4 cases, and poor in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 89.4% in the Gamma group; and there was no significant difference (χ2=0.200, P=0.610) . ConclusionsThe Othofix pertrochanteric fixator has good effectiveness in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture, which has the advantages of simple operation, less operation time, little bleeding, and early functional recovery.
Objective To compare the inter-observer agreement, consistency with the gold standard, and accuracy of the 2007 and 2018 versions of the AO/OTA classification in femoral intertrochanteric fractures, and to identify easily confused fracture types. Methods X-ray images of patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures at Daping Hospital, Army Medical University between 2017 and 2021 were retrospectively collected. Three senior orthopedic trauma surgeons independently classified the fractures using both the 2007 and 2018 AO/OTA versions. A committee of five experts established the gold standard. Kappa coefficients were used to evaluate inter-observer agreement and consistency with the gold standard, while a confusion matrix was used to analyze accuracy and confusion points. Results A total of 236 patients were included. Regarding inter-observer agreement, the 2007 version was superior to the 2018 version at the subtype level [Kappa value: (0.473-0.739) vs. (0.322-0.658)], with no significant difference at the subgroup level [Kappa value: (0.234-0.453) vs. (0.204-0.442)]. Regarding consistency with the gold standard, the 2018 version was slightly better than the 2007 version [Kappa value: (0.332-0.629) vs. (0.269-0.581)] at the subgroup level. In terms of accuracy, the 2007 version showed higher accuracy at the subtype level (72.50% vs. 70.11%), whereas the 2018 version demonstrated better accuracy at the subgroup level (59.04% vs. 51.99%). The most easily confused subtypes in both versions were A1 and A2. At the subgroup level, A2.2 was the most easily confused type in both versions. Conclusions There is inconsistency in the application of both classification versions by surgeons. The 2007 version demonstrates slightly better inter-observer agreement at the subtype level, while the 2018 version shows better accuracy at the subgroup level. The A2.2 subgroup is a major point of confusion, suggesting that clinical attention should be focused on this type or that auxiliary tools may be needed to improve accuracy.
Objective To compare the effectiveness between improved anterolateral approach and lateral approach in the treatment of senile intertrochanteric fracture. Methods The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed, from 61 patients with senile intertrochanteric fracture treated between February 2008 and February 2010. Of 61 patients, 34 patients underwent improved anterolateral approach combined with fixation of dynamic hip screw (improved group), and 27 patients underwent conventional lateral approach combined with fixation of dynamic hip screw (conventional group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, Evans classification, comorbidities, disease duration, or Harris hip scores between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results The operation was successfully completed in all patients. The operation time, blood loss, perspective frequency during operation, drainage volume, hospitalization days, and out-of-bed time in the improved group were significantly less than those in the conventional group (P lt; 0.05). All patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 18.7 months). Bone union was achieved in both groups; the fracture healing time was (11.64 ± 1.28) weeks in the improved group and was (12.29 ± 1.12) weeks in the conventional group, showing no significant difference (t=2.15, P=0.15). Harris hip scores at 3, 6, and 12 months were significantly better than preoperative scores in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05), and significant differences were found among different time points after operation in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05), between 2 groups after operation (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of incision infection, limb shortening, coax vara, internal fixation loosening, main screw cutting-out from femoral head between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05), but the incidence of total complications in the improved group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Compared with conventional lateral approach, improved anterolateral approach has the advantages of sufficient exposure, reducing muscle damage and surgical risk in treating intertrochanteric fracture. Operating treatment of improved anterolateral approach combined with early rehabilitation after surgery can recover hip joint function as quickly as possible.
Objective To explore the way and therapeutic effect of one stage total hi p replacement (THR) intreating ischemic necrosis of femoral head combined with intertrochanteric fracture. Methods From July 1997 to September 2005, one stage THR was performed in 18 cases (11 left and 7 right) of ischemic necrosis of femoral head combined with fresh intertrochanteric fracture, including 13 males and 5 females, with an age range of 32-60 years. There were 11 primary cases, 2 cases of ankylosing spondyl itis, 2 cases of rheumatic arthritis, 2 cases of congenital acetabular dysplasia and 1 case of femoral neck fracture fixed using cannulated cancellous screws postoperatively in all cases of ischemic necrosis of femoral head. They suffered from ischemic necrosis of femoral head for 8 years (4-23 years). According to Evan’s intertrochanteric fracture classification, there were 4 cases of type II, 6 cases of type III, 5 cases of type IV and 3 cases of type V. According to the Ficat ischemic necrosis of femoral head classification, there were 5 cases of type III, and 13 cases of type IV. The disease course was 2-12 hours. The average value of Harris evaluation was 35.2 preoperatively. The prosthesis of biology was used. Results All wounds healed by first intention. One case suffered deep venous thrombosis 3 days postoperatively and recovered completely after treatment. No infection of urinary system and lung as well as no bedsore occurred postoperatively. The X-ray films showed that the fracture ends healed and that prosthesis had good form attitude and position after 4 months of operation. All cases were followed up for 2 years. They could walk and take care of themselves after 6 months. The average value of Harris evaluation was 94.7 points postoperatively (P lt; 0.05). The results were excellent in 15 cases, good in 2 cases, fair in 1 case according to Harris evaluation standard of THR; the excellent and good rate was 94.4%. Conclusion One stage THR for treating ischemic necrosis of femoral head combined with intertrochanteric fracture can avoid secondary operation. It could resume the ideal function of the hip joint.