Objective To explore the application value of infrared thermography in the design and harvesting of ultrathin anterolateral thigh perforator flaps. Methods Between June 2024 and December 2024, 9 cases of ultrathin anterolateral thigh perforator flaps were designed and harvested with the assistance of infrared thermography. There were 7 males and 2 females, aged 21-61 years (mean, 39.8 years). The body mass index ranged from 19.49 to 26.45 kg/m2 (mean, 23.85 kg/m2). Causes of injury included 5 cases of traffic accident injuries and 4 cases of machine crush injuries. There were 3 cases of leg wounds, 2 cases of foot wounds, and 4 cases of hand wounds. After debridement, the size of wound ranged from 7 cm×4 cm to 13 cm×11 cm. The time from admission to flap repair surgery was 5-12 days (mean, 7 days). Preoperatively, perforator localization was performed using a traditional Doppler flow detector and infrared thermography, respectively. The results were compared with the actual intraoperative locations; a discrepancy ≤10 mm was considered as consistent localization (positive), and the positive predictive value was calculated. All 9 cases were repaired with ultrathin anterolateral thigh perforator flaps designed and harvested based on thermographic images. The size of flap ranged from 8 cm×5 cm to 14 cm×8 cm, with a thickness of 3-6 mm (mean, 5.2 mm). One donor site was repaired with a full-thickness skin graft, and the others were sutured directly. Postoperatively, anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant, and anti-vascular spasm treatments were administered, and follow-up was conducted. ResultsThe Doppler flow detector identified 22 perforating vessels within the set range, among which 16 were confirmed as superficial fascia layer perforators intraoperatively, with a positive predictive value of 72.7%. The infrared thermograph detected 23 superficial fascia layer perforating vessels, and 21 were verified intraoperatively, with a positive predictive value of 91.3%. There was no significant difference between the two methods [OR (95%CI)=3.93 (0.70, 22.15), P=0.100]. The perforator localization time of the infrared thermograph was (5.1±1.3) minutes, which was significantly shorter than that of the Doppler flow detector [(10.1±2.6) minutes; MD (95%CI)=–5.00 (–7.08, –2.91), P<0.001]. Postoperatively, 1 case of distal flap necrosis healed after dressing change; all other flaps survived successfully. The skin grafts at donor site survived, and all incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 3-6 months (mean, 4.7 months). No pain or other discomfort occurred at the donor or recipient sites. All patients with foot wounds could walk with shoes, and no secondary flap revision was required. Flaps in 3 hand wound cases, 2 foot wound cases, and 3 leg wound cases recovered light touch and pressure sensation, but not pain or temperature sensation; the remaining 2 cases had no sensory recovery.ConclusionPreoperative localization using infrared thermography for repairing ultrathin anterolateral thigh perforator flaps can help evaluate the blood supply status of perforators, reduce complications, and improve surgical safety and flap survival rate.
ObjectiveTo explore the application value of infrared thermography (IRT) technique assisted peroneal artery perforator flap in repairing oral and maxillofacial defects. MethodsThe clinical data of 20 patients with oral and maxillofacial malignant tumors treated with peroneal artery perforator flap between October 2020 and December 2021 were retrospectively analysed. There were 13 males and 7 females, with an average age of 56.5 years (range, 32-76 years). There were 8 cases of tongue cancer, 5 cases of parotid gland cancer, 4 cases of buccal cancer, and 3 cases of mandibular gingival cancer; and 12 cases of squamous cell carcinoma, 3 cases of adenoid cystic carcinoma, and 5 cases of mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) and IRT technique were performed before operation to locate the peroneal artery perforator and assist in the design of the flap. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CDU and IRT technique were compared with the actual exploration during operation. The accuracy of CDU and IRT technique in detecting the number of peroneal artery perforator and the most viable perforating points was compared. The patients were followed up regularly to observe the recovery of donor and recipient sites, the occurrence of complications, and the recurrence and metastasis of tumors. Results The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of peroneal artery perforators detected by IRT technique before operation were 72.22%, 50.00%, 92.86%, and 16.67% respectively, which were higher than those by CDU (64.17%, 33.33%, 84.62%, and 14.29% respectively). Forty-five peroneal artery perforators were found by CDU before operation, and 35 were confirmed during operation, with an accuracy rate of 77.8%; 43 “hot spots” were found by IRT technique, and 32 peroneal artery perforators were confirmed within the “hot spots” range during operation, with an accuracy rate of 74.4%; there was no significant difference between the two methods (χ2=0.096, P=0.757). The accuracy rates of the most viable perforating points found by CDU and IRT technique were 80.95% (17/21) and 94.74% (18/19), respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (χ2=0.115, P=0.734). The localization errors of CDU and IRT technique were (5.12±2.10) and (4.23±1.87) mm, respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (t=1.416, P=0.165). All the perforator flaps survived, and the incisions of donor and recipient sites healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 5-18 months, with an average of 11 months. The skin flap was soft and had good blood supply, and the lower limb scar was concealed and the lower limb had good function. No lower limb swelling, pain, numbness, ankle instability, or other complications occurred, and no tumor recurrence and metastasis were found during the follow-up. Conclusion Compared with the CDU, using the IRT technique to assist the preoperative peroneal artery perforator flap design to repair the oral and maxillofacial defects has a high clinical application value.
Objective To evaluate the application value of infrared thermography in breast reconstruction, cosmetic surgery, and limb reconstruction. Methods A retrospective analysis of clinical data from 67 patients undergoing breast reconstruction and cosmetic procedures and 30 patients undergoing limb reconstruction between February 2022 and June 2025. The patients undergoing breast reconstruction and cosmetic surgery were all female, aged 25-60 years with a median age of 48 years. Procedures included breast reconstructions in 48 cases, breast reductions in 8, nipple reconstructions in 5, revision breast reconstructions in 2, revision nipple reconstruction in 1, and labia minora reductions in 3. Among the patients undergoing limb reconstruction, 18 were males and 12 were females, aged 29-62 years with a mean age of 43 years. Procedures included skin flap transplants for wound repair in 10 cases, fracture internal fixation in 17, and limb lengthening reconstructions in 3. An infrared thermography device was applied intraoperatively and within 48 hours postoperatively to monitor flap and distal limb temperature and vascular perfusion. Results Intra- and post-operative infrared thermography assessment indicated 2 positive cases (2.1%, 2/97), comprising 1 false positive. Among the 95 negative cases (97.9%, 95/97), 1 false negative was recorded. After operation, 1 case of immediate breast reconstruction exhibited localized vascular compromise at the edge of the local flap, though infrared detection showed no abnormally low skin temperature. The wound healed with delayed healing following dressing changes. One case of latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap exhibited persistent infrared hypothermia during transfer. However, the flap demonstrated active dermal hemorrhage and a positive pinch test. Continuous monitoring revealed a subsequent rise in flap temperature, confirming adequate perfusion. The flap survived, with primary wound closure achieved. The postoperative infrared thermal imaging monitoring of the surgical site indicated adequate blood supply with no local ischemic necrosis in other patients. All patients were followed up. The patients undergoing breast reconstruction were followed up 1-30 months, with a median follow-up time of 15 months. The reconstructed breasts and nipples demonstrated good survival. The patients undergoing labia minora reduction were followed 3, 8, and 13 months, respectively. The surgical sites exhibited favorable appearance and blood supply. The patients undergoing limb reconstruction were followed 1-12 months (mean, 7 months). Transplanted flaps showed good survival, and patients with fractures or limb lengthening achieved favorable limb recovery. Conclusion Infrared thermography offers a convenient, non-invasive, and objective supplementary indicator for breast and limb reconstruction. This technology can be used intra- and post-operatively to assess blood supply, thereby aiding surgical decision-making and reducing the risk of postoperative complications. However, attention should be paid to the potential for false positives and false negatives.