ObjectiveTo systematically review the postoperative complications between robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) and laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LAS) in children with hirschsprung's disease (HSCR). MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect non-randomized controlled studies related to the objective from inception to May 10, 2025. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using RevMan 5.4 software. ResultsA total of 7 studies involving 901 children were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the RAS group had a lower incidence of postoperative enterocolitis than the LAS group (OR=0.64, 95%CI 0.42 to 0.98, P=0.04) and a higher rate of complication-free outcomes (OR=2.16, 95%CI 1.26 to 3.72, P<0.01). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in intraoperative duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative anastomotic complications, fecal soiling, adhesive intestinal obstruction, wound infection, incisional hernia, perianal infection, or urinary retention (P>0.05). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that RAS significantly reduces the risk of postoperative enterocolitis and improves the rate of complication-free outcomes in children with HSCR but offers no advantages in intraoperative indicators or other complications. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.