Objective To explore the indications for liver transplantation among patients with hepatolithiasis. Methods Data from 1431 consecutive patients with hepatolithiasis who underwent surgical treatment from January 2000 to December 2006 were retrospectively collected for analysis. Surgical procedures included T-tube insertion combined with intraoperative cholangioscopic removal of intrahepatic stones, hepatectomy, cholangiojejunostomy, and liver transplantation. Results Nine hundred and sixty-one patients who had a stone located in the left or right intrahepatic duct underwent hepatectomy or T-tube insertion combined with intraoperative cholangioscopic removal of intrahepatic stones. The rate of residual stones was 7.5% (72/961). Four hundred and seventy patients who had a stone located in the bilateral intrahepatic ducts underwent surgical procedures other than liver transplantation; the rate of residual stones was 21.7% (102/470). Only 15 patients with hepatolithiasis underwent liver transplantation; they all survived. According to the degree of biliary cirrhosis, recipients were divided into 2 groups: a group with biliary decompensated cirrhosis (n=7), or group with biliary compensated cirrhosis or noncirrhosis group (n=8). There were significant differences in operative times, transfusion volumes and blood losses between 2 groups (P＜0.05). In the first group, 6 of 7 patients experienced surgical complications, and in the second, 8 recipients recovered smoothly with no complications. Health status, disability and psychological wellness of all recipients (n=15) were significantly improved in 1 year after transplantation as compared with pretransplantation (P＜0.05). Conclusion Liver transplantation is a possible method to address hepatolithiasis and secondary decompensated biliary cirrhosis or difficult to remove, diffusely distributed intrahepatic duct stones unavailable by hepatectomy, cholangiojejunostomy, and choledochoscopy.
Objective To determine whether local delivery of c-myc shRNA could inhibit hyperplasia and lithogenic potentiality in a rat model of chronic proliferative cholangitis (CPC) via specific blockade of the c-myc expression. Methods The CPC animal model (CPC group) was established via retrograde insertion of a 5-0 nylon thread into the common bile duct through Vater’s papilla. Three kinds of c-myc shRNAs were then respectively injected in c-myc shRNA group, which were included shRNA-1, shRNA-2, and shRNA-3, respectively. Negative control group and sham operation group were established for comparison. Subsequently, histopathological changes of bile duct wall were observed by HE, Massion, and PAS/AB staining; c-myc protein was detected by immunohistochemistry method; 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) protein was tested by immumofluorescence method; c-myc, Mucin 3, and Procollagen Ⅰ mRNAs were detected by real time PCR; Ki-67 protein was determined by Western blot; Activity of β-glucuronidase was measured by modified Fisherman method. Results ①Compared with the CPC and negative control groups, biliary tract mucosa epithelium (HE staining), submucosal acid mucinous gland (mid-blue staining, PAS/AB staining), and degree of over-hyperplasia of collagen fiber in bile duct wall (blue staining, Massion staining) were weaker in the c-myc shRNA group. ②The expressions of c-myc mRNA, Mucin 3 mRNA, Procollagen Ⅰ mRNA, Ki-67 protein, and β-G activity in the c-myc shRNA group were lower than those of the CPC and negative control groups (Plt;0.05), but higher than those of the sham operation group (Plt;0.05). Conclusion c-myc shRNA treatment could effectively inhibit the hyperplastic behavior and lithogenic potential of CPC, which might help to prevent the biliary restenosis and stone recurrence.
Objective To investigate the recurrence of hepatolithiasis and reoperation and their relation to the location of intrahepatic stone. MethodsTwo hundred and twentysix patients of hepatolithiasis operated upon in the period of 1990-1995 were retrospectively analysed.ResultsAmong those patients, there were 101 patients (44.7%) had previous operation for the gallstones diseases including cholecystectomy for gallbladder stones (n=21, 20.8%), choledocholithotomy (n=72, 71.3%),liver segmentectomy (n=6， 5.9%), and choledochojejunostomy (n=2, 2.0%). The operative mortality was 5.0% for the reoperation group and none for the first time operation for hepatolithiasis.Conclusion Although the liver resection is an ideal surgical method to eradicate the diseased lesion and to minimize the malignant changes especially in primary hepatolithiasis (type I, or IE)， choledochojejunostomy is only recommended for the secondary type (type IE or IE) where possible. In the management of hepatolithiasis, the complete information of biliary tract is needed for the choice of surgical methods.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and effect of treatment of bile duct exploration though hepatic sections instead of spliting common bile duct, cured for hepatolithiasis with bile duct stones. MethodsClinical data of 122 cases of our hospital were retrospectively reviewed, these patients with left intrahepatic bile duct stone and common bile duct calculi. As control group, during the period from June 2007 to June 2010, in which 64 patients underwent left hepatic lobectomy, common bile duct exploration and T tube drainage. In observation group, 58 patients from June 2011 to December 2013, underwent left hepatic resection combined biliary duct exploration by the liver section stump bile duct. The operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative hospitalization time, and incidence of complications between the 2 groups were compared. ResultsCompared with the control group, the postoperative hospitalization time was shortened obviously in observation group patients(P < 0.05), there were no significant difference in operative time and bleeding during operation of 2 groups(P > 0.05), The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was significantly lower than the control group(P < 0.05). In 122 patients, 105 cases were followed-up(86.1%), the follow-up time was 2 years. Two groups of patients had no stone residual and recurrence. ConclusionsBile duct exploration by intraoperative liver section is an effective method to treat left hepatolithiasis, it can simplified procedures, shortening the postoperative hospitalization time, and effectively avoid complications caused by common bile duct incision and T tubedrainage.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo evaluate the advances in minimally invasive surgery treatment for hepatolithiasis. MethodsLiteratures about the advances in minimally invasive surgery treatment for hepatolithiasis were collected and reviewed. ResultsHepatectomy and bile duct exploration using laparoscopy can get better effect. Fibrocholedochoscopy play an important role in the course of operation and after operation for hepatolithiasis. ConclusionThe individualization treatment program should be used for hepatolithiasis. Association application of multipathway minimally invasive operation, such as laparoscopy, fibrocholedochoscopy and so on, can increase the cure rate of hepatolithiasis.
ObjectiveTo investigate the option of biliary drainage for surgical management of hepatolithias. MethodsThe clinical data of 146 patients with hepatolithiasis, who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from March 2006 to June 2014, was analyzed retrospectively.These patients were divided into biliary enteric drainage group and T tube drainage group according to the function of sphincter of Oddis.The intra-operative related data, postoperative complications, and long-term efficacy were compared between two groups. Results①The two groups were comparable in terms of gender, age, body weight, preoperative liver function, preoperative symp-toms and signs, preoperative biochemical index, calculus distribution, preoperative complications (P > 0.05).②There were no significant differences of the hepatolobectomy rate, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, times and time of hepatic portal occlusion, bile culture positive rate, hospital stay and hospitalization expenses between two groups (P > 0.05).But the operation time of the biliary enteric drainage group was significantly longer than that of the T tube drainage group (P < 0.001).③The total complications rate and specific complication rate were not signifi-cantly different between two groups (P > 0.05).④The stone instant clearance rate of the biliary enteric drainage group was significantly higher than that of the T tube drainage group (P=0.031).But the stone final clearance rate was not significantly different between two groups (P=0.841).⑤The postoperative quality of life was not significantly different between two groups (Excellent and good:P=0.560;Poor:P=0.560).The rates of stone residual, recurrence, mortality and canceration were not significantly different between two groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionThe biliary drainage for surgical management of hepatolithias is selected according to the function of sphincter of Oddi.Biliary enteric drainage and Roux-en-Y anastomosis are firstly selected for patients with the loss of function of sphincter of Oddi.
After analysising 15 patients with portal hypertension (PHT) in secondary biliary cirrhosis due to hepatolithiasis, the authors consider that the surgical procedure depends on indivedual’s specificity: majority of patients with PHT but no hemorrhage may be treated by removing the hepatobiliary stone, resolving the bile duct stricture and then reconstructing it as the first step. Whether or not to dispose of PHT depended on the postoperative condition. If the patient had previous hemorrhage and is accompanied by severe obstructive jaundice, splenectomy with shunt and simple biliary external drainage is the choice and removal of stone with biliary tract reconstruction will be performed in the second stage. Meanwhile, it is very important to monitor perioperative condition of the patient and treat the complications.
ObjectiveTo explore the value of laparoscopic choledocholithotomy on hepatolithiasis patients with previous bile duct surgery contraindicating hepatectomy. MethodsEighty-six hepatolithiasis patients contraindicating hepatectomy accepted laparoscopic choledocholithotomy during March 2009 and March 2013 in the department of general surgery, AVIC 363 hospital. Among them, 26 cases with previous bile duct surgery(PBS group) and 60 cases without (NPBS group), 15 cases with left intrahepatic bile duct stone, 52 cases with right intrahepatic bile duct stone, and 19 cases with bilateral intrahepatic bile duct stone. Perioperative materials were reviewed between two groups retrospectively. ResultsThe operation time of the PBS group and NPBS group was(161.4±31.5) min and(155.7±28.1) min respectively(P > 0.05). And the intraoperative blood loss of them was(69.2±50.7) mL and(44.1±27.4) mL respectively (P < 0.05). Postoperative complication incidence of PBS group was 53.8%, among them, ascites was found obviously much more in PBS group than that in NPBS group(P < 0.05). The general residual stone incidence of two groups was 15.1%, and the general stone clearance rate was 98.8%. The long term postoperative complication occurrence in PBS group was 23.1%, which was higher significantly than that in NPBS group(P<0.05). ConclusionLaparoscopic choledocholithotomy is a safe, effective thus feasible choice for hepatolithiasis patients with previous bile duct surgery, especially for those without hepatic atrophy, bilateral hepatic bile ducts stone with hepatic bile duct stricture and hepatic bile duct stone with coexisting biliary cirrhosis.
Objective To evaluate the value of the application of laparoscopic hepatectomy in hepatolithiasis. Methods The clinical data of 35 patients with hepatolithiasis performed with laparoscopic hepatectomy were analyed retrospectively. Operations included laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy， left hemihepatectomy， cholecystectomy， choledocholithotomy， choledochoscopy， and T-tube drainage. Results All operations of 35 patients were performed complete laparoscopically. The mean operative time was 205 minutes （150-370minutes）. The mean blood loss was 330mL（50-1 000mL）. Patients felt less pain without administration of painkillers after operation. Ambulation resumed on thefirst day and liquid diet resumed on the second day after operation. The average hospital stay was 12.7 days （4-15d）. There was no death. The excellent and good rate of operation was 71.4% and 25.7%， respectively. Conclusion Laparoscopic hepatetomy is an effect and minimally invasive alternative method for hepatolithiasis in slective patients.
ObjectiveTo observe the effects of oral Xiaoyan Lidan tablets(XYLDT) on the bile composition(total bile acids, cholesterol, phospholipids) in patients with intrahepatic duct stones after common bile duct exploration(CBDE) with T tube drainage, to explore its possible preventive effects on stone recurrence. MethodsForty consecutive patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones who underwent CBDE with T tube drainage were randomly divided into experi mental group and control group. XYLDT were administrated at day 4 after surgery in experimental group(n=20), while none of medication were given in control group(n=20). 2 mL of bile was collected through T tube in both groups at day 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, and 21 postoperatively. Total bile acids(TBA), cholesterol(CHO), and phospholipids(PLIP) in bile were measured, and TBA/CHO ratio and PLIP/CHO ratio were calculated respectively. The results were statistical analyzed. ResultsThe demographic data in both groups including age, gender, height, weight, preoperative concomitant diseases, operative time, postoperative complications, hospital stays, serum total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase(ALT), aspartate aminotransferase(AST), and amylase were not significantly different(P > 0.05). The measurements of TBA, CHO, PLIP, and the ratio of TBA/CHO and PLIP/CHO in bile were not significant on day 1, 2, and 3 after surgery in both groups(P > 0.05). In experimental group, the TBA, CHO, and PLIP on day 7, 14, and 21 after surgery were significantly increased compared with the control group(P < 0.05). The ratio of TBA/CHO on day 7, 14, and 21 was 2.17±0.29, 2.29±0.44, and 2.59±0.58, the ratio of PLIP/CHO was 2.03±0.68, 2.84±0.64, and 2.86±0.77, respectively, which were also significantly increased compared with the control group(P < 0.05). ConclusionsOral XYLDT can increase the secretion of TBA, CHO, and PLIP, elevate the TBA/CHO and PLIP/CHO ratio, and change the bile composition which may increase the dissolution of cholesterol in the bile. Presumably, oral XYLDT may have preventive effects in the recurrence of intrahepatic bile duct stones.