ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of local endometrial mechanical stimulation in patients with recurrent embryo implantation failure in vitro fertilization.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect clinical controlled studies on the efficacy and safety of local endometrial mechanical stimulation in patients with recurrent embryo implantation failure from inception to March 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 10 studies, including 8 randomized controlled trials and 2 case-control studies, and involving 1 274 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: the clinical pregnancy rate of endometrial mechanical stimulation group was higher than that of control group (RR=1.40, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.89, P=0.03). However, no significant differences were found in implantation rate (RR=0.75, 95%CI 0.50 to 1.13, P=0.17), live births rate (RR=1.38, 95%CI 0.99 to 1.93, P=0.06), miscarriage rate (RR=0.83, 95%CI 0.55 to 1.24, P=0.36) and rate of multiple pregnancy (RR=0.90, 95%CI 0.61 to 1.35, P=0.63).ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that, for patients with repeated implantation failure, mechanical endometrial stimulation before re-transplantation may help to improve the clinical pregnancy rate of test-tube infants, however, it has no significant effects on implantation rate, live birth rate, abortion rate, multiple pregnancy rate and ectopic pregnancy rate. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed required to verify above conclusions.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty on forgotten joint score (FJS) in patients with knee osteoarthritis.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty on FJS in patients with knee osteoarthritis from inception to December 31st, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 2 RCTs and 11 cohort studies were included. The results of meta-analysis based on RCTs showed that: compared to posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty (PS-TKA), unicompartmental knee arthroplasty could improve FJS on 12-month (MD=9.23, 95%CI 0.53 to 17.93, P=0.04) after operation. The results of meta-analysis based on cohort studies showed that: compared to PS-TKA, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty could improve FJS on 6-week (MD=8.90, 95%CI 6.87 to 10.94, P<0.000 01), 6-month (MD=18.72, 95%CI 8.71 to 28.74, P=0.000 2), 1-year after operation (MD=13.41, 95%CI 8.87 to 17.95, P<0.000 01), and the last follow-up (MD=0.99, 95%CI 0.47 to 1.54, P=0.000 2).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that, comparing with PS-TKA, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in knee osteoarthritis shows advantage in the improvement of FJS. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) versus laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for patients with gastric cancer. Methods Databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI were searched to collect cohort studies about TLTG vs. LATG for gastric cancer from inception to February 28th 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of six cohort studies were included, of which 407 cases were in the TLTG group, and 315 cases were in the LATG group. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with LATG group, patients in TLTG group had shorter operation time (MD=–8.97, 95%CI –16.21 to –1.73, P=0.02), and initial postoperative feeding time (MD=–0.30, 95%CI –0.57 to –0.03, P=0.03). However, the anastomic time, bleeding volume, the number of dissected lymph nodes, proximal resection margin, initial flatus time, postoperative hospital stay, overall postoperative complications, anastomotic fistula, and anastomotic stenosis were similar between two groups (all P values>0.05)． Conclusions Compared with LATG, TLTG has shorter operation and recovery time for patients with gastric cancer. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of prophylactic antimicrobial use on preventing infections after arthroscopy.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect clinical studies on the efficacy of prophylactic antimicrobial use on preventing infections after arthroscopy from January 1990 to September 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies; then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 15.0 software.ResultsA total of 8 retrospective cohort studies and 1 randomized controlled trial involving 60 136 subjects were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that: there was no difference in the post-operational infection rate among patients with and without antimicrobial prophylaxis for arthroscopies (OR=0.51, 95%CI 0.25 to 1.04, P=0.06). For knee arthroscopies, the post-operational infection rate had no difference between patients with and without antimicrobial prophylaxis (OR=0.89, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.23, P=0.48). However, for shoulder arthroscopies, the post-operational infection rate in the antimicrobial prophylaxis group was significantly lower than that in the group without the antimicrobial prophylaxis(OR=0.18, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.37, P<0.000 01).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that there is no association between preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis and a decreased infection rate for knee arthroscopies. Antimicrobial prophylaxis appears to lead to fewer infections after shoulder arthroscopies. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the correlation between atrial fibrillation and prognosis of patients with ischemic stroke after intravenous thrombolysis. MethodsLiterature search was carried out in PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2014), CBM and WanFang Data up to April 2014 for the domestic and foreign cohort studies on atrial fibrillation and prognosis of patients with ischemic stroke after intravenous thrombolysis. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2. ResultsA total of 7 cohort studies were finally included involving 69 017 cases. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with patients without atrial fibrillation, atrial fibrillation reduced 3-month favourable nerve function of patients with atrial fibrillation (OR=0.85, 95%CI 0.73 to 0.98, P=0.03) but did not influence the risk of death after intravenous thrombolysis (OR=1.47, 95%CI 0.75 to 2.86, P=0.26); and increased the risks of intracranial haemorrhagic transformation (OR=1.36, 95%CI 1.26 to 1.47, P < 0.001) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after intravenous thrombolysis (OR=1.43, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.99, P=0.04). ConclusionFor patients with ischemic stroke, atrial fibrillation does not influence the risk of death, but it increases the risks of intracranial hemorrhage, and worsens 3-month favourable nerve function of after intravenous thrombolysis. For those patients, more assessment before intravenous thrombolysis and more monitoring after intravenous thrombolysis are necessary. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, the abovementioned conclusion still needs to be verified by conducting more high quality studies.
ObjectiveTo systematically review whether or not obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) increases the incidence of atrial fibrillation in coronary artery disease patients.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, SinoMed, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were searched for studies on the relationship between OSAHS and the incidence of atrial fibrillation in coronary artery disease patients from inception to July 2nd, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literatures, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsIn total, 11 cohort studies were included, involving 709 in exposed group and 975 in non-exposed group. The results of meta-analysis indicated that OSAHS was associated with the incidence of atrial fibrillation in coronary artery disease patients (RR=2.01, 95%CI 1.72 to 2.36, P<0.000 01). The subgroup analysis showed that OSAHS of PSG diagnosis increased the risk of the incidence of atrial fibrillation in coronary artery disease patients (RR=2.40, 95%CI 1.84 to 3.12, P<0.000 01); moderate and severe OSAHS of PSG diagnosis had higher risk of the incidence of atrial fibrillation in coronary artery disease patients (RR=3.73, 95%CI 2.51 to 5.53, P<0.000 01); high risk OSAHS of Berlin questionnaire assessment increased the incidence of atrial fibrillation in CAD patients (RR=1.56, 95%CI 1.27 to 1.92, P<0.000 1).ConclusionThe current evidence indicates that OSAHS is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation in coronary artery disease patients. Due to the limitation of quality and quantity of the included studies, more large-scale and fine quality research are needed to warrant the accuracy of conclusion above.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in left main coronary artery disease. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies on the efficacy and safety of IVUS and coronary angiography-guided PCI in left main coronary artery disease from inception to March, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies; then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 7 studies involving 7 777 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with PCI guided by coronary angiography, the incidence of cardiac death (OR=0.45, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.61, P<0.000 01), myocardial infarction (OR=0.67, 95%CI 0.53 to 0.84, P=0.004), major adverse cardiovascular events (OR=0.46, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.61, P<0.000 01), total deaths (OR=0.54, 95%CI 0.44 to 0.67, P<0.000 01), and in-stent thrombosis (OR=0.28, 95%CI 0.18 to 0.45, P<0.000 01) occurred in PCI guided by IVUS were lower. The differences were statistically significant. However, there were no statistical significance in the incidence of target revascularization in PCI (OR=0.80, 95%CI 0.40 to 1.61, P=0.54) and revascularization of target lesions (OR=0.68, 95%CI 0.36 to 1.27, P=0.23) between two groups.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the IVUS-guided PCI can decrease the incidence of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, MACEs, stent thrombosis, total death and has no effect on target lesion revascularization and target vessel revascularization. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the perinatal outcomes after laparoscopic myomectomy versus transabdominal myomectomy.MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, Elsevier, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were searched from inception to July 2017, to collect randomized controlled trials or cohort studies comparing the perinatal outcomes after laparoscopic myomectomy and transabdominal myomectomy. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of include studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsEight randomized controlled trials, twenty-one cohort studies involving 4357 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: the premature birth rate (OR=0.60, 95%CI 0.38 to 0.95, P=0.03) in the laparoscopic myomectomy was lower than that in the laparotomy group. However, the rate of uterine rupture during pregnancy (OR=3.19, 95%CI 1.29 to 7.89, P=0.01) in the laparoscopic myomectomy was higher than that in the laparotomy group. There were no significant differences between two groups in the myoma residual (OR=1.00, 95%CI 0.37 to 2.65, P=0.99), recurrence (OR=0.92, 95%CI 0.68 to 1.25, P=0.60), abortion (OR=0.90, 95%CI 0.63 to 1.28, P=0.56), ectopic pregnancy (OR=1.11, 95%CI 0.54 to 2.26, P=0.78), pregnancy rate (OR=1.06, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.27, P=0.52), cesarean (OR=0.82, 95%CI 0.57 to 1.19, P=0.31), and pregnancy complications (OR=0.84, 95%CI 0.45 to 1.59, P=0.60).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that there are no significant differences between two groups in the myoma residual, myoma recurrence, abortion, ectopic pregnancy, pregnancy rate, cesarean and pregnancy complications. While the rate of uterine rupture during pregnancy in the laparoscopic myomectomy is higher than that in the laparotomy group, the premature birth rate after operation in the laparoscopic myomectomy is lower and shorter than that in the laparotomy group. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the relationship between hypothyroidism and the risk of atrial fibrillation.MethodPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM, VIP and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect cohort and case-control studies on the association between hypothyroidism and atrial fibrillation from inception to November 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 5 cohort studies involving 574 268 subjects and 18 059 atrial fibrillation cases were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that hypothyroidism was not associated with atrial fibrillation (OR=1.10, 95%CI 0.75 to 1.61, P=0.62). From subgroup analysis, no relationship was identified in community population (OR=0.97, 95%CI 0.72 to 1.29, P=0.82) and cardiac surgery patients (OR=1.22, 95%CI 0.58 to 2.53, P=0.60).ConclusionsHypothyroidism does not increase the risk of atrial fibrillation. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of His-bundle pacing (HBP) and right ventricular pacing (RVP).MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMbase, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies on efficacy of HBP and RVP from inception to December, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 8 studies involving 1 130 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: HBP group was superior to RVP group in QRS duration (MD=–43.88, 95%CI –52.53 to –35.22, P<0.000 01), LVEF (MD=4.53, 95%CI 2.67 to 6.38, P<0.000 01), and NYHA (MD=–0.85, 95%CI –1.14 to –0.56, P<0.000 01). However, the operation time (MD=15.21, 95%CI 11.44 to 18.98, P<0.000 01) and fluoroscopy duration (MD=2.98, 95%CI 2.10 to 3.85, P<0.000 01) of HBP group were longer than that of RVP group.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that, compared with RVP, HBP is superior in maintaining of QRS duration, LVEF and NYHA; however, the operation time is longer. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusion.