Objective To evaluate the applicability of Transcranial Doppler (TCD) monitoring in brain protection in the process of aortic dissection surgical procedure. Methods From Feburary 2007 to November 2007, six patients with type I aortic dissection underwent surgical procedure in Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University. All patients are male with their age ranged from 48 to 60 years. During the operation, right subclavian arterial cannulation technique was used to protect the brain, and TCD monitoring was adopted to guide cerebral perfusion. The function of nervous system after operation was observed, and the minimental state examination (MMSE) was used to assess the cognitive function of the patients. A twoyear followup was done to monitor patients’ aorta condition. Results The time of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was 136 to 350 minutes. The time of selected cerebral perfusion was 20 to 65 minutes. The lowest cerebral blood flow was 31% of basic level according to TCD monitoring. All patients were successfully treated without neurological complication and cognitive dysfunction when discharged from hospital. MMSE score was 28 to 30 points. During the twoyear followup after operation, all aortic false lumen were closed and there was no dissection recurrence. Conclusion Monitoring blood change with TCD monitoring technique is safe and effective in evaluating brain protection by selective cerebral perfusion in aortic dissection surgical procedure.
Abstract： Objective To evaluate the clinical safety and neurological outcomes of right axillary artery cannulation with a side graft compared with a direct approachin aortic arch replacement for patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection. Methods Between July 2008 and July 2010， 280 consecutive patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection underwent right axillary artery cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass （CPB） in total arch replacement and stented “elephant trunk” implantation in our hospital.These 280 patients were divided into two groups according to the method of axillary artery cannulation in operation:direct arterial cannulation was used in 215 patients（direct arterial cannulationgroup， DG group， mean age of 43.1±9.5 years）， while cannulation with a side graft was used in 65 patients（ indirect cannulation group， IG group， mean age of 44.7±8.3 years）. Clinical characteristics of both groups were similar except their axillary artery cannulation method. Patient outcomes were compared as to the prevalence of clinical complications， especially neurological deficits and postoperative morbidity. Results The overall hospital mortality was 3.6% （10/280）， 3.3% （7/215） in DG group and 4.6% （3/65） in IG group respectively.Right axillary artery cannulation was successfully performed in all cases without any occurrence of malperfusion. Postoperatively， 25 patients（8.9%）developed temporaryneurological deficits， 19 cases in DG group（8.8%）， and 6 cases in IG group （9.2%）， and all these patients were cured after treatment. The incidence of postoperative complications directly related to axillary artery cannulation was significantly lower in IG group than that in DG group（1 case vs. 19 cases， P=0.045）. There were no statistical differences in arterial perfusion peak flow， peak pressure，antegrade cerebral perfusion time， deep hypothermic circulatory arrest time， and CPB time between the two groups（P ＞ 0.05）. Conclusion Right axillary artery cannulation with a side graftcan significantly reduce the postoperative complications of axillary artery cannulation. It is a safe and effective method for patients undergoing surgery for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.
Objective To analyze the surgical effect of total aortic arch replacement and stented elephant trunk (Sun’s procedure) for acute or chronic Stanford type A aortic dissection, and to investigate the optimal surgical timing for Stanford type A aortic dissection involving aortic arch. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 327 patients with acute or chronic Stanford type A aortic dissection treated by Sun's procedure from June 2010 to June 2014 in Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether the time from onset to operation was longer than 2 weeks: an acute group with 229 patients (≤2 weeks, the average time of onset to operation 5.70±3.50 d) and a chronic group with 98 patients (>2 weeks, the average time of onset to operation 21.60±15.70 d). There were 186 males and 43 females with a mean age of 47.47±11.19 years in the acute group, and 76 males and 22 females with a mean age of 45.62±12.92 years in the chronic group. The patients discharged from hospital were followed up for one year. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in preoperative data. The rate of coronary artery bypass grafting, cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamping time, intraoperative and postoperative 24 h red blood cell intake were higher or more in the acute group than those in the chronic group (P<0.05). The in-hospital morality, ICU stay, mechanical ventilation time, the incidence of neurological dysfunction, low cardiac output syndrome, acute renal failure with continuous renal replacement therapy, hepatic insufficiency, poor wound healing were higher or more in the acute group than those in the chronic group (P<0.05). During one year follow-up, the survival rate of the acute and chronic groups was 97.0% and 97.6% respectively (P>0.05). No new complications were found in the two groups. The irreversible neurological dysfunction, paraplegia and renal failure showed no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion The short-term mortality and complications of acute Stanford A aortic dissection involving aortic arch treated by Sun’s procedure are significantly higher or more than those of chronic Stanford type A aortic dissection. The risk of surgical treatment in acute phase is high.
Objective To evaluate the importance of "one-stop" hybrid operating room in the individualized treatment of aortic pathology. Method We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 247 patients of aortic pathology who were operated in the hybrid operating room in our hospital from January 2013 through December 2014. There were 193 males and 54 females at age of 24-83(54±12) years. Results Thoracic or abdominal endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR/EVAR) was applied in 132 patients, including 122 simple patients and 10 complexes. Fenestrated TEVAR was applied in 61 patients. Hybrid operation was done in 54 patients. Perioperative death occurred in 9 patients (3.6%). Perioperative complication rate was 11.7% (29/247) . The patients were followed up for one year. During follow-up, five patients were dead. The one-year survival rate was 98.0% (242/247) . Conclusions "One-stop" individualized treatment of aortic pathology shows its advantage, yet long-term result still needs to be followed up.
Objective To evaluate the value of 16slice spiral computed tomography (SCT) and its threedimensional reconstruction in diagnosis of aortic dissection (AD). Methods Fortyfive cases with AD underwent 16slice SCT, performed with unenhanced, contrastenhanced scanning and threedimensional reconstructions. Emphasis was placed on the true and false lumen, intimal flap, the entry and reentry tear and the involvement of branches of AD. Eleven cases were confimed by operation. Results True and false lumen and intimal flap of AD could be shown in all 45 cases (100%), the entry and reentry tears were revealed in 44 cases (97.8%) and 33 cases (73.3%), respectively. The right common iliac arteries were most easily involved by AD, 21 cases (46.7%). The thrombi in false lumen were shown in 29 cases (64.4%). Compared with surgery, the location and size of initial entry sites of 11 cases were consistent with the former. Conclusion 16slice SCT can exactly and completely diagnose AD, and provide detailed imaging information for clinical therapy. It’s very important for the selection of treatment methods and the observation of curative effect of patients.
Objective To introduce the experience of treating 85 cases of stanford type B aortic dissection by endovascular implantment of stent-grafts，to provide more clinical evidence for endovascular repairment for stanford B type aortic dissections.Methods Imaging examination by computed tomography angiography （CTA） were done to obtain anatomical detail of dissection. Stent-grafts were implanted under the guide of DSA in all cases. The patients were followed-up for 3 months，6 months，12 months，and then annually by CTA examination to observe the complications and morphological changes of the aneurysm.Results The technical success rate was 95.3%（81/85），and the clinical success rate was 91.8%（78/85）. Eight patients died after operation in hospital，who were all in acute phase，and no patients of chronic phase died，there had statistic differences （P＜0.05）. The perioperative complications’ incidence of endovascular repair which happened in patients of acute phase was higher than that patients of chronic phase （38.2% vs.13.3%，P＜0.05）. Left subclavian artery were covered completely for 13 cases，and partially covered for 22 cases，there was no obvious cerebralvascular insufficiency. There were 41 patients of whom other tears which were not covered during operation exsited at abdominal aortic and one year following-up showed that at those section thromblization of false cavity was not clear. The rest of patients whose abdominal aortic didn’t exist tears hadn’t new tears appeared.Conclusions Regardless in the acute or chronic stage，endovascular therapy is an effective mathod of treating stanford type B dissection. However，implanting stent-grafts have a higher security in chronic period than doing that in acute period. If the right carotid artery，vertebra and Willis ring are smoothly，there is little need to set up a by-pass to left subclavian artery before endovascular repairment. For those patients that other uncovered tears exited，following-up should be a must，and further strategy should be studied and prepared in advance.
Objective To investigate the security and efficiency of endovascular repair for Stanford type B aortic dissection (AD) with severe complications. Methods Between January 2003 and December 2009, 60 patients having Stanford type B AD with severe compl ications were treated, including 39 males and 21 females with an average age of 43.7 years (range, 34-71 years). Severe compl ications included 27 cases of huge hemothorax, 1 case of paraplegia, 7 cases of acute renal failure,10 cases of cel iac trunk ischemia, 10 cases of superior mesenteric artery ischemia, and 5 cases of severe limb schemia. Emergency stent-graft deployment were appl ied in all patients, and 64 stent-grafts were successfully implanted. Results All patients survived and were followed up 3-86 months. Hemothorax disappeared after 28 days to 3 months of operation in all hemothorax patients; renal function returned normal after 1 to 9 days; l imb and visceral ischemia disappeared gradually after 1 to 14 days; and muscular strength of lower limb in the paraplegia patient began to recover after 4 hours of operation. The postoperative CT angiography showed enlarged true lumen and thrombosis in the false lumen. Conclusion Emergency endovascular repair is a safe and effective method to treat Stanford type B AD with severe complications.
Objective To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of modified total arch replacement by retrospectively analyzing the clinical outcome of surgical patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection (AAD). Methods From June 2015 to December 2016, 39 consecutive patients with AAD were recruited to this study. This modified technique was preformed under general anesthesia and a 30℃ hypothermia circulatory arrest (HCA) with continual bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion. Different surgical approaches were applied according to the aortic root condition: Bentall procedure (4 patients), David procedure (2 patients), aortic valve plasty and ascending aortic replacement (25 patients) and Cabrol procedure (8 patients). Concomitant procedures included mitral valve plasty (1 patient) and tricuspid valve plasty (1 patient). Results The average cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), aortic occlusion time (ACC), HCA and operation time was 218.5±42.2 min, 134.2±32.4 min, 4.9±2.3 min and 415.5±80.5 min respectively. Four patients required dialysis and 2 patients developed temporary neurological deficit. No permanent neurological deficit, postoperative paraplegia or in-hospital death occurred. Computed tomography examination was performed on all patients before discharge and 3 months after discharge. The follow-up result showed that 37 patients developed complete thrombosis in the false lumen and 2 patients developed partial thrombosis. Conclusion Modified total arch replacement is a safe and effective approach for AAD. It can greatly avoid postoperative complications and provide satisfactory short-term outcomes.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the short-and long-term results of hybrid procedures in the treatment for aortic arch lesions. MethodsFrom October 2002 to March 2011, 28 patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms or dissections involving the aortic arch were treated with hybrid endovascular treatment in our center. Twenty-two males and 6 females were in the series. The mean age of the patients was 68 years old. Of 28 patients, 15 were atherosclerotic thoracic aortic aneurysms and 13 were thoracic aortic dissection. Follow-up protocol consisted of computed tomography (CT) angiograms or ultrasound was performed in 3, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. The main goal was to evaluate the operative mortality, morbidity, and the longterm survival of these patients. ResultsHybrid procedures included 12 totalarch transpositions, 3 left common carotid artery (LCCA)left subclavian artery (LSA) bypass, 11 right common carotid artery (RCCA)LCCA-LSA bypass, 2 RCCA-LCCA bypass. The technical success rate was 92.9% (26/28). The complications occurred in 10 patients (35.7%). Operative mortality was 7.1% (2/28). The apoplexia rate was 7.1% (2/28). The time of followup was (36±3) months. The patency rates of 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year were 100%, 92.9% (26/28), and 85.7% (24/28), respectively. The survival rates of 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year were 89.3% (25/28), 71.4% (20/28), and 60.7% (17/28), respectively. ConclusionsThe short-and long-term results with hybrid procedures in the treatment for aortic arch diseases are satisfactory. Further reducing the complications is the key to increase the survival rate.