ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. MethodThe literatures about the research progress of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the advanced gastric cancer were reviewed. ResultsThe neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the advanced gastric cancer could significantly improve the R0 resection rate, improve the long-term survival rate, and reduce the risk of death.The course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer without distant metastasis generally was 6-9 weeks, and then according to the results of the curative effect evaluation to decide whether to undergo surgery treatment.Further the clinical research and improvement of chemotherapy sensitivity detection method were helpful to the unity of the standard of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. ConclusionsThe curative effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer is clear.But there is no uniform standard on such as indications, chemotherapy regimens, medication time, and curative effect evaluation index, and so on.It is still needed the further research of multicenter and large clinical trials.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of S-1 and oxaliplatin in the first-line chemotherapy of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods From March 2012 to April 2013, 57 patients in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University were enrolled in this study. Oxaliplatin was administered at 130 mg/m2 on day 1, while S-1 was administered orally (< 1.25 m2: 40 mg twice per day; 1.25-1.50 m2: 50 mg twice per day; > 1.50 m2: 60 mg twice per day) for 14 days. The response was evaluated every two chemotherapy cycles. Results The objective response rate was 52.6%, and the disease control rate was 84.2%. The median time to progression was 5.8 months, and the median survival time was 13.5 months. The major grade 3/4 hematological toxic effects were neutropenia (12.3%) and thrombocytope nia (12.3%), and the grade 3/4 non-hematological toxic effects were vomiting, fatigue and sensory neuropathy. The rate of clinical benefit response was 71.9% (41/57). Conclusion The regimen of oxaliplatin and S-1 shows precise efficacy and good tolerance against advanced gastric cancer, and it is worthy of promotion and application in the future.
Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy for distant gastric cancer. Methods All 18 patients with distant gastric cancer receiving laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy were analyzed. Results Laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy was performed successfully in all patients. The mean operation time was (291.33±19.61) min. The mean blood loss was (151.32±71.78) ml. The mean numbers of harvested lymph node were 14.57±3.11. The mean time of gastrointestinal function recovery was (3.46±0.93) d, the mean out of bed activity time was (1.75±0.45) d. All patients were followed up for 1-24 months, mean 11 months. No local recurrence, trocar implant or distant metastasis happened. Conclusion Laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy is a feasible and safe surgical procedure combined with minimal trauma and fast recovery.
ObjectiveTo investigate the risk factors of hepatoduodenal lymph node (HDLN) metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer and its effect on prognosis. MethodsClinical datas of patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent D2 radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and HDLN dissection between Jan 2011 and Nov 2013 in department of general surgery of Ankang Central Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent risk factors associated with HDLN metastasis. Survival curves were performed to compare the survival rate of patients with or without HDLN metastasis and of patients with HDLN metastasis or with other lymph node metastasis. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for the multivariate analysis of risk factors for death in advanced gastric cancer. ResultsThe incidence of HDLN metastasis was 10.7% in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that the middle or lower stomach cancer (OR=6.014, P=0.002) and stage T3 or T4 (OR=5.133, P=0.021) were independent risk factors for HDLN metastasis. The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 36.7% in patients with HDLN metastasis. It was lower in patients with HDLN metastasis compared with those without (P=0.002). Limited to node-positive patients, patients with HDLN metastasis demonstrated decreased 2-year OS rate compared with node-positive patients without HDLN metastasis (P=0.027). Cox proportional hazard analysis identified poorly differentiated or undifferentiated cancer, stage of T3 or T4, and HDLN metastasis were independent poor prognostic factors in the patients with advanced gastric cancer (P < 0.05). ConclusionsCancer located in the middle or lower stomach, and stage T3 or T4 were independent risk factors for HDLN metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer. HDLN metastasis demonstrated a poor prognosis.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the prognostic significance of serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and insulin-like growth factors-Ⅰ (IGF-Ⅰ) in advanced gastric cancer patients who were treated with oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX). MethodsNinety-six advanced gastric cancer patients who were treated with FOLFOX in our hospital between March 2007 to August 2010 were enrolled in this study. All of the patients were treated with oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 1, and leucovorin (20 mg/m2, about 10 min) on day 1 and day 2, followed by a 5-fluorouracil bolus (400 mg/m2) and 22 hours of continuous infusion of 600 mg/m2. Treatment was repeated in 2-week intervals, and patients received 4 chemotherapy cycle in total. The levels of serum VEGF and IGF-Ⅰ were measured using enzyme-linked immunoassays. The relationship between serum levels of VEGF/IGF-Ⅰ and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients, the relationship between serum levels of VEGF/IGF-Ⅰ and prognosis of patients, were analyzed. ResultsThe serum levels of VEGF and IGF-Ⅰ were (464.4±57.4) pg/mL and (33.5±7.3) ng/mL, respectively. The serum level of VEGF was related with surgical history, Lauren's classification, TNM staging before treatment, and pathological type (P < 0.05), and serum level of IGF-Ⅰ was related with TNM staging before treatment and number of transferred organs (P < 0.05). The serum levels of VEGF and IGF-Ⅰ in stable disease (SD) +progressive disease (PD) patiens were higher than those of complete response (CR) +partial response (PR) patients (P < 0.05). The results of Cox proportional hazard regression model showed that, effect of chemotherapy (HR=1.764, P=0.006), number of transferred organs (HR=1.662, P=0.015), serum level of VEGF (HR=1.834, P=0.012) and IGF-Ⅰ (HR=1.855, P=0.008), were all significantly related with time to progression (TTP); serum level of VEGF (HR=2.205, P=0.002) and IGF-Ⅰ (HR=1.931, P=0.004) were all significantly related with overall survival (OS). ConclusionLevels of serum VEGF and IGF-Ⅰ are independent prognostic factors in patients with advanced gastric cancer who were treated with FOLFOX chemotherapy.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of postoperative intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy (IHPC) for advanced gastric cancer, so as to provide references for clinical practice and study. Methods The following databases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang were searched on computer, and other searches were also performed to collect all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on postoperative IHPC versus intravenous chemotherapy alone (IC) for advanced gastric cancer. The quality of the included studies was assessed according to Cochrane Handbook 5.1 for Systematic Review, and Meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 18 RCTs involving 2299 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that: a) Efficacy evaluation: There were significant differences between the IHPC group and the IC group in 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate, 3- and 5-year recurrence rate, and 3- and 5-year distant metastasis rate; the OR value and 95%CI were 1.88 (1.49, 2.39), 2.45 (1.64, 3.67), 2.29 (1.92, 2.73), 2.17 (1.70, 2.76), 0.39 (0.29, 0.52), 0.54 (0.40, 0.72), 0.55 (0.38, 0.78), 0.58 (0.42, 0.81), respectively; b) Safety evaluation: There were significant differences between the IHPC group and the IC group in the incidence of abdominal pain, abdominal distension, nausea and vomiting; the OR value and 95%CI were 2.20 (1.58, 3.07), 7.00 (2.67, 18.36), 0.65 (0.45, 0.95), respectively. But there were no significant differences between the IHPC group and the IC group in the incidence of alopecia, ileus, bone marrow inhibition, and hepatic lesion. Conclusion Compared with IC, postoperative IHPC+IC can improve survival rate and reduce the recurrence and distant metastasis rate; additionally, it is safe and feasible, so it is recommended that the detailed condition of patients should be taken into consideration when the postoperative IHPC+IC therapy is applied to clinic.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationship between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene C677T polymorphism and efficacy of fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). MethodsComputer retrieval in China Journal Full-text Database, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database, Wanfang database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Database (from their establishment to May 28, 2013) was performed to include case-control studies on MTHFR gene C677T polymorphism and sensitivity to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Statistical analysis was done by using RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsSeven case-control studies with 775 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that among MTHFR C677T genotypes, for TT vs. CC, OR=4.63, 95%CI (1.23, 17.4); and for CC+CT vs. TT, OR=0.21, 95%CI (0.06, 0.78). Subgroup analysis of Asian group showed that for TT vs. CC, OR=32.99, 95%CI (11.40,95.42); and for CC+CT vs. TT, OR=0.04, 95%CI (0.02, 0.10). Sensitivity analysis performed according to different detection methods showed that for TT vs. CC, OR=6.03, 95%CI (1.53, 23.72); and for CC+CT vs.TT, OR=0.17, 95%CI (0.04, 0.68). ConclusionPolymorphism of MTHFR C677T gene may be associated with sensitivity to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in patients with AGC.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of preoperative regional-arterial chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. MethodThe literatures about the research progress of preoperative regional-arterial chemotherapy in the advanced gastric cancer were reviewed. ResultsThe preoperative regional-arterial chemotherapy in the advanced gastric cancer could decrease the tumour stage, improve the R0 resection rate and the long-term survival rate, effectively improve the drug concentrations of tumor and portal vein, and not only kill or damage cancer cells directly, but also prevent the metastasis of liver and lymph nodes effectively, and reduce the side effects, cause the nuclear pyknosis and fracture of cancer cells in a short time. The course of preoperative regional-arterial chemotherapy in the advanced gastric cancer generally was 4-9 weeks, and then whether the surgery treatment was decided to undergo according to the results of the curative effect evaluation. ConclusionsThe preoperative regional-arterial chemotherapy in the advanced gastric cancer has more advantages than intravenous chemotherapy, further research of multicenter and large clinical trials, would inaugurate a wider application prospects.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the therapeutic effect and adverse reaction of paclitaxel liposome combined with continuous infusion of large-dose 5-fluorouracil(5-fu) in treatment for advance gastric cancer(AGC). MethodsFrom May 2009 to August 2012, 63 consecutive patients with AGC in this hospital were enrolled in this study. All the patients were given chemotherapy including paclitaxel liposome and continuous infusion of large-dose(2.5 g/m2) 5-fu. The efficacy and toxicity of this regimen were observed. ResultsThere was no patient who could not tolerate adverse reaction related to such regimen. Five cases achieved complete response and 31 cases achieved partial response, the overall response rate was 57.1%(36/63). Hematologic toxicity included gradeⅢ/Ⅳleucopenia 8 cases(12.7%) and neutropenia 10 cases(15.9%), while there was no occurrence of gradeⅢ/Ⅳanemia or thrombopenia. Non-hematologic toxicity was fairly mild. ConclusionsPaclitaxel liposome is safe, well tolerated, highly targeted, and has long duration of effect. Paclitaxel liposome combined with continuous infusion of large-dose 5-fu is safe and effective in treatment for patients with AGC.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel (DOC) combined with oxaliplatin (OXA) regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. MethodsSixty patients with advanced gastric cancer treated in our hospital from January 2008 to January 2011 were randomly divided into two groups. The treatment group (n=30) was given DOC combined with OXA regimen. Patients in this group were treated with DOC 75 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1; OXA 130 mg/m2, ivgtt, d4; with 21 days as a cycle. The control group (n=30) was given DCF regimen. Patients in the control group were treated with DOC 75 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1; cisplatin 75 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1; calcium folinate 200/m2, ivgtt, 2 h, d1-2; fluorouracil 400 mg/m2, bolus 10 minutes, fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 civ 22 h d1-2; also with 21 days as a cycle. All patients received two cycles of chemotherapy at least. The effective rate (complete remission+partial remission), adverse reactions, median survival time and quality of life were analyzed and compared between the two groups. ResultsThe effective rates in the treatment group and the control group were 60.0% and 46.7% respectively, showing a non-significant difference (P>0.05). The appetite increasing rate (70.0% vs 43.3%), the weight gain rate (60.0% vs 33.3%), and the Karnofsky score improvement rate (63.3% vs 30.0%) of the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The adverse reactions were fewer in the treatment group, and most of them were between grade Ⅰ and Ⅱ. The median time of disease progression (5.8 months vs 5.6 months) and the median survival period (11.8 months vs 9.2 months) of the treatment group were longer than those in the control group. ConclusionDOC combined with OXA regimen is effective in treating advanced gastric cancer. It can significantly improve the quality of life of the patients, and it has fewer adverse reactions. Meanwhile, the median survival period is prolonged. DOC combined with OXA regimen is worth to be applied in clinic.