ObjectiveTo investigate the status of quality of life and influencing factors among newly diagnosed epilepsy patients with co-morbid anxiety and depression. MethodsA total of 180 newly diagnosed epilepsy patients from June 2022 to December 2022 in a district of Shanghai were selected as the study subjects. The Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31 (QOLIE-31), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-24), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), and Epilepsy Self-Management Scale (ESMS) were used to assess patients' quality of life, depression levels, anxiety levels, and self-management abilities, respectively. Patients were divided into the co-morbid depression group (HAMA≥14 and HAMD>17) and the control group (HAMA<14 and HAMD≤17), and their general characteristics and scale scores were compared. Spearman correlation, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression analysis were used to identify influencing factors of quality of life in epilepsy patients with co-morbid depression. ResultsCompared to the control group, the anxiety comorbid with depression group of older adults had a higher proportion, higher unemployment rate, lower personal and family annual income in the past year, higher frequency of epileptic seizures, and lower medication adherence (P<0.05). The correlational analysis revealed a negative correlation between the quality of life abilities of epilepsy patients with comorbid anxiety and depression and the severity of anxiety and depression. (r=?0.589, ?0.620, P<0.05). The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that the frequency of seizures in the past year (β=?1.379, P<0.05), severity of anxiety (β=?0.279, P<0.05), and severity of depression (β=?0.361, P<0.05) have an impact on the ability to quality of life in epilepsy patients with co-morbid anxiety and depression. These factors account for 44.1% of the total variability in quality of life (R2=0.4411, P<0.05). ConclusionThe frequency of seizures in the past year, as well as the severity of anxiety and depression, are important factors that influence the ability to quality of life in epilepsy patients with comorbid anxiety and depression. For these patients, it is crucial to take into account these factors and provide appropriate support and interventions.
Objective To explore the current situation and influencing factors of self-management behavior in patients with primary glaucoma, so as to provide a theoretical basis for formulating intervention strategies to improve patients’ self-management ability. Methods Using convenient sampling method, 400 patients with primary glaucoma visiting the Outpatient Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University between September 2019 and March 2020 were selected. Their current situation of self-management behavior was investigated by self-management behavior questionnaire, and the influencing factors of self-management behavior were analyzed. Results A total of 381 valid questionnaires were recovered. The total score of self-management behavior of patients with primary glaucoma was 51.11±6.22, and the mean scores of life debugging dimension, functional health care dimension, and medical management dimension were 2.66±0.67, 3.02±0.81, and 3.13±0.60, respectively. The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that age [40-59 vs. <40 years old: unstandardized partial regression coefficient (b)=–2.830, 95% confidence interval (CI) (–4.813, –0.847), P=0.005; ≥60 vs. <40 years old: b=–2.660, 95%CI (–4.820, –0.498), P=0.016], occupation [in-service vs. farmers: b=2.639, 95%CI (0.303, 4.976), P=0.027; unemployed or retired vs. farmers: b=2.913, 95%CI (0.995, 4.831), P=0.003], smoking [smoking vs. non-smoking: b=–3.135, 95%CI (–5.196, –1.075), P=0.003], disease type [primary open-angle glaucoma vs. primary angle-closure glaucoma: b=–2.119, 95%CI (–3.317, –0.921), P=0.001], number of follow-up visits [≤2 vs. >2: b=–1.071, 95%CI (–2.118, –0.024), P=0.045], whether fixed doctor follow-up [unfixed vs. fixed: b=–2.619, 95%CI (–3.632, –1.605), P<0.001] were correlated with the total score of self-management behavior of patients with primary glaucoma. Conclusions The self-management behavior of patients with primary glaucoma is in the middle level. The main factors affecting the self-management behavior level of primary glaucoma patients include age, occupation, smoking, disease type, follow-up times, and fixed doctor’s follow-up. Ophthalmologists should pay attention to the current situation and influencing factors of self-management behavior and take feasible intervention measures to improve the self-management behavior of patients with primary glaucoma.
ObjectiveThis article aims to comprehensively retrieve and summarize the best evidence for the self-management of epilepsy in adolescents, so as to provide a reference for clinical medical staff and relevant decision makers. MethodsWe systematically searched Cochrane, Global Guidelines Collaboration (GIN), Scottish Interhospital Guidelines Network (SIGN), Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), NICE, RANO (Nurses' Association of Ontario, Canada), UpToDate, BMJ, Medical Maitong, PubMed, International League Against Epilepsy, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database and other databases and websites. All kinds of literature related to the self-management of epilepsy in adolescents were collected from the establishment of the database to April 18, 2023, including clinical decision-making, clinical guidelines,. Evidence summary, expert consensus, systematic review, etc. Four researchers were invited to evaluate the quality of the retrieved guidelines, and two researchers independently screened and evaluated the quality of the remaining literature. According to the opinions of professionals, data extraction and analysis were performed on the literature that met the inclusion criteria. ResultsA total of 9 articles were included, including 3 clinical guidelines, 3 expert consensus and 3 systematic reviews. We summarized the evidence in the literature in the following 8 aspects: Self-management initiation timing, monitoring management, psychological management, innovative self-management mode, information and support, medication management, daily life management and follow-up management. We identified 34 best pieces of evidence. ConclusionsThis article provides health care providers with the best evidence for the self-management of adolescents with epilepsy, guiding them to provide self-management education and counseling for adolescents with epilepsy through evidence-based methods, helping them to improve self-management ability, reduce seizures, reduce health services and healthcare costs, and improve quality of life.
ObjectiveTo investigate the level and influencing factors of self-management behaviors among maintenance hemodialysis patients.MethodsPatients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis were recruited from 4 tertiary hospitals in Chengdu from October 2016 to October 2017. Convenient sampling method was used to select patients. The instruments used in the study included General Information Questionnaire, Hemodialysis Self-management Instrument, Hemodialysis-related Knowledge Questionnaire, Herth Hope Index, Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale, and Chronic Illness Resources Survey.ResultsA total of 360 patients were investigated, and 343 patients were finally included. The mean score of self-management behavior was 54.87±9.65. The results of multiple linear stepwise regression showed that gender, age, ethnic, monthly family income, chronic illness resources, knowledge and internal health locus of control were the significant influencing factors of self-management behaviors (P<0.05).ConclusionThe self-management behavior among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis can be promoted by improving the level of knowledge and internal health locus of control, and making effective use of chronic illness resources.
Objective To systematically assess the effectiveness of self-management during adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. Methods Through formulating the inclusion and exclusion criteria and the search strategy, such databases as The Cochrane Library, PubMed (1966 to 2010), OVID, ELSEVIER, CINAHL, EMbase, CNKI (1980 to 2010), WanFang Data, VIP (1989 to 2010) and CBM (1978 to 2010) were searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about postoperative self-management in breast cancer. Two reviewers evaluated the quality of the included studies, extracted and crosschecked the data; the Review Manager 5.0 software was used to perform the test for heterogeneity, and the cumulative effect was calculated with either fixed or random effects models. Results Among the included ten studies in English, three revealed that the program of self-management had no impact on the overall life quality of patients, three revealed that it could enhance the self-care ability of patients (P=0.004), three revealed that it could not reduce the anxiety level of patients, and two revealed that it had certain influence on the depression level of patients. Conclusion The program of self-management can enhance the patients’ self-care ability, but its influence on patients’ overall life quality as well as the level of anxiety and depression is still undefined.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of follow-up continuous nursing intervention on the self-management ability and medication compliance of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. MethodsBetween June and December 2013, 157 maintenance hemodialysis patients were randomly divided into control group (n=76) and study group (n=81). The control group was given conventional nursing, while the study group received continuous nursing intervention program as well as conventional nursing. Six months later, the self-management ability and medication compliance of the patients were assessed by using self-made Patient Self-management Scale and Morisky Medication Compliance Scale. ResultsSix months later, self-management ability in patients of the study group was significantly better than that in the control group (P<0.05). Medication compliance rate in the study group reached a highest of 45.7%, while it was only 18.4% in the control group, and the difference between the two groups was significant (χ2=13.283, P<0.001). ConclusionFollow-up continuous nursing intervention can obviously improve maintenance hemodialysis patients' ability of self management and compliance behavior, so as to improve the quality of life of these patients.
Objective To investigate the general situation of self-management behavior of patients with cirrhosis, and analyze its influencing factors. Method From January to June 2015, the in-patients with liver cirrhosis were recruited from Gastroenterology Ward of a comprehensive hospital in Chengdu city by convenience sampling method, and a series of questionnaires were used in the research, including self-management behavior scale, social support scale (SSRS), quality of life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) and sociodemographic characteristics. Results One hundred and sixty-eight patients were enrolled. The self-management behavior of patients with cirrhosis scored an average of 50.4±11.3, which was in the medium level. Self management behavior was positively and significantly correlated with social support (r=0.488, P<0.001) and the overall quality of life (r=0.554, P<0.001). Multiple linear regression indicated that the gender and course of the disease were two influencing factors. Moreover, female experienced better self-management behavior than men (t=27.090, P<0.001); and the longer the course of the disease was, the better the self-management behavior could be found (t=34.057, P<0.001). Conclusion We should strengthen the health education of self-management in patients with cirrhosis, and make full use of the patients’ social support system, so as to improve the patients’ self-management behavior as well as the treatment of diseases and their quality of life.
Objective To discuss the application value in increasing the frequency of monitoring and ensuring the safety of anticoagulation therapy in patient self-monitoring (PST) and self-management (PSM) of portable coagulometer. Method This non-randomized prospective controlled study was conducted in 100 patients receiving oral warfarin anticoagulation therapy after heart valve replacement and met the inclusion criteria in our hospital between March 2013 and April 2014 year. All the patients were divided into three groups including an outpatient follow-up group(outpatient group), a self-monitoring group and a self-management group. Meanwhile, the patients in the outpatient group visited professional institutions, performed international normalized ratio (INR) testing with central lab and adjusted the dosage of orally administered warfarin by the doctors. And the other two groups performed INR testing with CoaguChek XS portable coagulometer by themselves, and the patients in the self-management group performed management by themselves. The follow-up time was 6 months. The dates of time in therapeutic range (TTR), fraction of time in therapeutic range (FTTR) and anticoagulation complications in the three groups were analyzed and compared. Results There was no significant difference in the INR results obtained from the follow-up time among the three groups (P=0.845) . TTR value of INR of the outpatient group, the self-monitoring group, and the self-management group was 45.9% (4368.0 days/9517.0 days), 61.2% (6057.0 days/9897.0 days), and 65.4% (2833.8 days/4333.0 days), respectively with a statistical difference among the three groups (P<0.001) . FTTR value of INR obtained from the outpatient group, the self-monitoring group, and the self-management group was 48.3% (99 times/205 times), 60.7% (164 times/270 times), and 64.9% (100 times/154 times) respectively. There was a statistical difference in the FTTR between the outpatient group and the self-monitoring group (P=0.007) , and also between the outpatient group and the self-monitoring group (P=0.002) . But there was no statistical difference between the self-monitoring group and the self-management group (P=0.392) . There were not any major bleeding and thrombosis complications in all study. And there was no statistical difference in the total complications, thrombosis, and bleeding complications rates between the outpatient group and the self-monitoring group, and also between the outpatient group and the self-management group (P>0.05) . Conclusions The patients receiving oral anticoagulation after heart valve replacement or their care providers were able to perform PST and PSM. The use of portable coagulometer for self-monitoring and self-management can increase the frequency of anticoagulation monitoring and achieve better INR target value control. PST and PSM could achieve higher quality of anticoagulation management and life and without increasing the risk of oral anticoagulation than the traditional monitoring method. The monitoring frequency of once a month is reasonable for the patients receiving oral anticoagulation more than half a year after heart valve replacement.