Objective To evaluate efficacy of amiodarone in the prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods CBM (from January 1978 to August 2017), CNKI (from January 1987 to August 2017), VIP (from January 1989 to August 2017), Wanfang (from January 1998 to August 2017) and PubMed (from January 1989 to August 2017) databases were searched. The articles were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality of articles was assessed by improved Jadad scale. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. Results There were 19 articles meeting inclusion criteria including 2 817 patients and all were randomized controlled trial (RCT). There were 16 articles with high quality and 3 articles with low quality by improved Jadad scale. Compared with the placebo, amiodarone had a significant effect on reducing the incidence of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting (RR=0.37, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.50, P<0.000 01) and different administration models and time of amiodarone had effect on the atrial fibrillation after aterial bypass grafting (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with the placebo, amiodarone is effective in reducing the incidence of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting.
Objective To systematically review the effectiveness of amiodarone in treating repurfusion arrhythmia (RA) after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), so as to provide high quality evidence for formulating the rational thrombolytic therapy for AMI. Methods Randomized controlled trails (RCTs) on amiodarone in treating RA after thrombolytic therapy for AMI were electronically retrieved in PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2012), CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data from inception to January, 2013. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed quality. Then RevMan 5.1 software was used for meta-analysis. Results A total of 5 RCTs involving 440 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis suggested that, compared with the blank control, amiodarone reduced the incidence of RA after thrombolytic therapy in treating AMI (RR=0.60, 95%CI 0.48 to 0.74, Plt;0.000 01) and the incidence of ventricular fibrillation (RR=0.47, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.85, P=0.01). It neither affected the recanalization rate of occluded arteries after thrombolytic therapy (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.88 to 1.15, P=0.94) nor decreased the mortality after surgery (RR=0.33, 95%CI 0.10 to 1.09, P=0.07). Conclusion Current evidence indicated that, amiodarone can decrease the incidence of RA. Unfortunately, the mortality rate can’t be reduced by amiodarone. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion
目的:研究猝死患者在心肺復蘇過程中出現室性心率失常時胺碘酮的應用。方法:選心肺復蘇過程中出現的室性心律失常患者共107例,隨機分為治療組57例采用胺碘酮治療,對照組50例采用利多卡因治療,持續心電監護觀察其療效。結果:治療組、對照組有效率分別為93.1%、80.0%,有顯著性差異。結論:胺碘酮組的療效明顯高于利多卡因組,在治療心肺復蘇過程中室性心律失常應首選胺碘酮。
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the pharmacoeconomic value of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus amiodarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), and to provide reference for treatment scheme selection, drug selection and the formulation of drug policy. MethodsWe searched databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, CNKI and CBM from 2000 to 2014 to collect pharmacoeconomic studies on RFA versus Amiodarone for treating AF. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. The cost-effectiveness of RFA and Amiodarone for AF was compared according to the cost, effectiveness, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). ResultsA total of three studies were included. The results of pharmacoeconomic evaluation showed that the ICERs for each study were $7 976 to $29 068, ￡7 763 to ￡27 745, and $59 194, respectively. According to country-specific willingness to pay thresholds, the ICER of each included study was acceptable. ConclusionCompared to Amiodarone, RFA is a cost-effective therapy for AF.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation versus amiodarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation, so as to provide reference for the chosen of clinical treatment options. MethodsWe searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2014), CNKI, VIP and WanFang data from inception to October 2014 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing radiofrequency ablation versus amiodarone for atrial fibrillation. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 4 RCTs involving 511 atrial fibrillation patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:compared with amiodarone, radiofrequency ablation could reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence (RR=0.35, 95%CI 0.22 to 0.55, P<0.000 01). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR=0.97, 95%CI 0.17 to 5.61, P=0.97) between both groups. The incidence of adverse events in the radiofrequency ablation group was 7.7%, and was lower than 12.7% of the amiodarone group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that, compared with amiodarona, radiofrequency ablation is related to lower recurrence rate and higher efficacy, but there is no difference in the safety between the two interventions. However, due to the limited quality and quantity of included studies, higher quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Shen Song Yang Xin Capsule for cardiac arrhythmia. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched from the following electronic databases: WanFang, CNKI, CBM, VIP, PubMed, and The Cochrane Library. Quality assessment and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently. Disagreement was resolved through discussion. All data were analyzed by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Thirteen studies involving 1896 participants were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that compared with the control group, a) efficacy: Shen Song Yang Xin Capsule was superior to mexiletine (OR=2.96, 95%CI 1.79 to 4.87), and propafenone (OR=2.41, 95%CI 1.60 to 3.62), but was not superior to miodarone (OR=1.25, 95%CI 0.88 to 1.71); b) safety: Shen Song Yang Xin Capsule was superior to propafenone and miodarone in reducing the incidence of cardiac arrhythmia (OR=0.06, 95%CI 0.01 to 0.35; OR=0.05, 95%CI 0.02 to 0.17), but no significant difference was found between the two groups in incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions. Conclusion Based on the current studies, Shen Song Yang Xin Capsule is not inferior to the commonly-used anti-arrhythmic medicine at present. It has lower incidence of cardiac arrhythmia, and has no significant difference in the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions compared with western drugs. For the quality restrictions of the included studies, more double blind RCTs with high quality are required to further assess the effects.
Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of ibutilide versus amiodarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Methods An electronic search in databases including PubMed, Embase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP Database, and The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2011), published from January 1994 to January 2011,was conducted to include both English and Chinese randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about ibutilide versus amiodarone in treating atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Two reviewers independently screened the studies according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, extracted the data, assessed the methodological quality, and then performed Meta-analysis by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Eight RCTs involving 506 patients were finally included. The results of Meta-analysis showed: a) The total effective rate of alleviating atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in the ibutilide group was superior to that of the amiodarone group (OR=2.27, 95%CI 1.19 to 4.33, P=0.01); b) Four RCTs showed that ibutilide was similar to amiodarone for alleviating atrial fibrillation (OR=1.61, 95%CI 0.96 to 2.71, P=0.07), but the former was superior to the latter for alleviating atrial flutter (OR=8.97, 95%CI 4.51 to 17.84, Plt;0.000 01); c) Five RCTs showed that ibulitide took shorter time to alleviate atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter compared with amiodarone (WMD= –126.55 min, 95%CI –202.35 to –50.76, P=0.001); d) Four RCTs showed that the total adverse effect rates in the two groups had no significant difference (OR=1.13, 95%CI 0.37 to 3.43, P=0.83), but there were more cardiovascular side-effects in the ibutilide group (OR=2.36, 95%CI 1.40 to 4.01, P=0.001). Conclusion Compared with amiodarone, ibutilide has a higher total effective rate in cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, and it obviously takes shorter time to alleviate atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, but there is no significant difference in the cardioversion rate of atrial fibrillation between them. There is no significant difference in total side-effect rates between the two groups, but the cardiovascular adverse reaction in the ibutilide group is significantly higher than that of the amiodarone group. Because of the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, this conclusion has to be further proved by more high-quality RCTs.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of 5% dextrose intravenous infusion for phlebitis caused by amiodarone. MethodsA total of 136 patients treated in our hospital between June 2011 and March 2012 were randomly assigned into control group with 63 patients and intervention group with 73 patients. The control group was administrated 600 mg amiodarone with 15 drops/minute intravenous injection once daily, for 3 days, while for the intervention group patients, we added 5% dextrose solution infusion in the same channel at the same time. ResultsPhlebitis occurred in 22 patients (34.9%) in the control group, while the intervention group had only 11 (15.0%) (χ2=7.252,P=0.007). ConclusionInfusion of 5% dextrose solution can significantly reduce the occurrence of phlebitis caused by amiodarone.
摘要:目的:探討胺碘酮治療充血性心力衰竭(CHF)心房顫動伴快速心室率的臨床療效。方法: 將106例各種原因所致的房顫伴快速心室率的CHF患者按入院順序隨機分為治療組及對照組。兩組抗CHF基礎治療相同,治療組加用靜脈負荷量胺碘酮150 mg后,再以1 000μg/min靜脈點滴維持6小時,500 μg/min靜滴18小時。同時口服胺碘酮0.2,3次/d,1周;再0.2,2次/d,1周以后以0.2,1次/d 至觀察終點,隨診為12個月。 結果: 治療組53例使用胺碘酮治療可顯著增加抗心律失常有效性,改善左室射血分數,減少心力衰竭再住院率,42例患者轉復為室性心律。 結論: 靜脈及口服胺碘酮同時應用治療充血性心力衰竭房顫是有效和安全的。Abstract: Objective: To explore the effect and safety of amiodarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation with congestive heart failure. Methods:One hundred and six patients of AF with CHF caused by a variety of reasons were randomly divided into treatment group and control group according to hospitalized order.The two groups were treated with the same antiCHF therapy,the treatment group was treated with loaded intravenous amiodarone 150 mg;and then dripped to 1 000 μg/min for 6 hours, dripped to 500 μg/min for 18 hours. United with oral amiodarone by amiodarone tablets with 0.2 g,3 time/day a week,further 0.2 g,2 times/day a week,later 0.2 g,1 times/day to the end.The end of followup time was 12 months. Results:In treatment group,53 cases with amiodarone therapy can significantly increase the effectives of antiarrhythmic, improve the rate and heart failure rehospitalization.42/53 patients reversed to sinus rhythm. Conclusion:The results showed it is effective and safe united with intravenous amiodarone and oral amiodarone in treatment of atrial fibrillation with organic heart disease.
【摘要】 目的 報道1例靜脈滴注胺碘酮致肝腎功能不全患者。 方法 2010年10月收治1例擴張性心肌病患者，治療過程中使用胺碘酮注射液，導致嚴重的肝腎功能不全。系統查閱中國期刊全文數據庫及外文數據庫Pubmed、Embase建庫至2011年8月關于胺碘酮致肝腎功能不全的相關文獻，進行靜脈胺碘酮致肝腎功能不全的可能性評估，探索胺碘酮靜脈滴注致肝功能不全的的作用機制。 結果 根據查閱文獻結果分析，此患者靜脈注射胺碘酮致肝功不全的可能性高，Naranjo概率評分分別為7分。 結論 提出臨床醫師和臨床藥師應進行胺碘酮靜脈的藥學監護，高度的重視胺碘酮相關的不良反應，從而及時識別和防治胺碘酮所致肝腎功能不全，減少其不良預后。【Abstract】 Objective To report a case of hepatic and renal insufficiency induced by intravenous injection with amiodarone, and to evaluate the possibility of the adverse drug reaction. Methods A patient with dilated cardiomyopathy was admitted in October, 2010. During the procedure, the use of amiodarone hydrochloride injection made the patient suffer from liver and kidney dysfunction. We retrieved the literatures about liver and kidney toxicity of amiodarone from CNKI, Pubmed, and Embase (from the establishment of the databases to November 2011). We also ssessed the possibility of the adverse drug reaction, discussed the mechanism of amiodarone-induced hepatic insufficiency. Results According to the literature, There was a great possibility of hepatic insufficiency induced by amiodarone, and the total score of the Naranjo probability score was 7. Conclusion It is important to pay more attention to the pharmaceutical care of amidarone to timely recognize and effectively prevent or treat hepatic and renal insufficiency induced by intravenous injection with amiodarone.