目的 探討慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重（AECOPD）合并肺栓塞（PE）的臨床特點。 方法 回顧性分析2009年1月－2012年6月38例AECOPD合并PE患者（栓塞組）的臨床資料，并與42例單純AECOPD（對照組）臨床資料進行對比。 結果 栓塞PE組不對稱性下肢水腫發生率明顯高于對照組（P＜0.05），另外肺動脈高壓、D-二聚體及修改的Geneva評分與對照組比較存在一定差異，且差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。 結論 AECOPD合并PE的臨床表現并不特異，當AECOPD出現不對稱性水腫、D-二聚體升高、肺動脈高壓及修改的Geneva評分升高等表現不能解釋原因時，要考慮PE的可能，并盡快選擇CT肺動脈成像或肺動脈造影以明確診斷。
Objective To investigate the prognostic value of troponin I ( cTNI) , brain natriuretic peptide ( BNP) and D-dimer in acute pulmonary embolism ( APE) .Methods The plasma levels of cTNI, BNP, and D-dimer were measured in 98 consecutive patients with APE at the time of admission. The relationship between these parameters and mortality were evaluated. Results APE was diagnosed in 98 consecutive patients during January 2009 to December 2010, in which 49 were males and 49 were females. 14 ( 14. 3% ) patients died at the end of follow-up. The patients with positive cTNI tests had more rapid heart rates, higher rate of syncope, cardiogenic shock and mortality than the patients with normal serumcTNI. However the age and blood pressure were lower in the patients with abnormal serum cTNI ( P lt; 0. 05) . A receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis identified BNP≥226. 5 ng/L was the best cut-off value ( AUC 0. 829, 95% CI 0. 715-0. 942) with the negative predictive value of 97. 1% for death. The mortality of the patients whose serum D-dimer level ranging from 500 to 2499 ng/mL, 2500 to 4999 ng/mL, and ≥5000 ng/mL was 7. 8% , 12% , and 41. 2% , respectively ( P = 0. 009) . Upon multivariate analysis, cardiogenic shock ( OR=2. 931, 95% CI 0. 828-12. 521, P =0.000) , cTNI≥0. 3 ng/mL ( OR=1. 441, 95% CI 0. 712-4. 098, P = 0. 0043) , BNP gt; 226. 5 ng/L ( OR = 1. 750, 95% CI 0. 690-6. 452, P = 0. 011) and D-dimer≥5000 ng/mL( OR = 1. 275, 95% CI 0. 762-2. 801, P = 0. 034) were independent predictors of death. Conclusions Combined monitoring of cTNI, BNP or D-dimer levels is helpful for prognosis prediction and treatment decision for APE patients.
Objective To summarize the probability of pulmonary embolism （PE） induced by lower extremity deep venous thrombosis （DVT） and investigate the role of vena cava filter （VCF） in preventing from PE. Methods The clinical data of 1 058 patients with lower extremity DVT from January 2005 to January 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Results The PE rate was 3.21% （34/1 058） and the death rate was 1.42% （15/1 058） in 1 058 patients with lower extremity DVT. The VCF was implanted in 171 of 1 058 patients. The VCFs of 151 patients were implanted from femoral vein， 20 patients were implanted from jugular vein. The PE rates were 3.61% （32/887） and 1.17% （2/171） and the death rates were 1.69% （15/887） and 0 （0/171） in patients without VCF and with VCF， respectively. Both of them occurred in the first ten days. PE could keep as long as 35 d. The PE rate and death rate in the patients without VCF were significantly higher than those in the patients with VCF （P＜0.01）. The PE rates and death rates in both lower extremities DVT were higher than those in patients with the right and left ones （P＜0.05）， which in the right lower extremity were higher than those in the left one （P＜0.05）. The PE rate and death rate in the patients with lower extremity DVT combined with vena cava thrombosis were significantly higher than those in the patients with central type （P＜0.05）， which in the central type were significantly higher than those in the peripheral type （P＜0.05）， there were no significant differences between peripheral type and mixed pattern. The follow-up time was from 1 month to 7 years with （39±19） months， the patency rate of VCF was 98.7%. There were no filter migration， declination， and failure of expansion. Conclusions VCF can prevent from PE effectively， but the indications must be controlled.
Objective To analyze the clinical features of patients with acute pulmonary embolism ( APE) with normal blood pressure and right ventricular dysfunction. Methods 130 hospitalized patients with normotensive APE between January 2009 and January 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography to determine if they were complicated with RVD. The clinical features, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment were analyzed and compared between the normotensive APE patients with or without RVD. Results 41 normotensive APE patients with RVD were as RVD group, and other 89 patients without RVD were as non-RVD group. The incidences of syncope ( 34.1% vs. 7.8% ) , tachycardia( 41.4% vs. 21.3% ) , P2 hyperthyroidism( 46.3% vs. 25.8% ) , jugular vein filling ( 12.1% vs. 1.1% ) , and cyanosis ( 26.8% vs. 8.9% ) were all significantly higher in the RVD group than those in the non-RVD group ( P lt; 0.05) . Computed tomography pulmonary angiography ( CTPA) revealed that the incidences of thromboembolism involving proximal pulmonary artery ( 58. 3% vs. 8. 3% ) and thromboembolism involving lobar pulmonary ( 77.8% vs.51.2% ) were also higher in the RVD group ( P lt; 0.001, P = 0.025 ) . In the RVD group, the patients were assigned to received thrombolysis plus anticoagulation therapy, or anticoagulation therapy alone. The clinical indicators ( heart rate, PaCO2 , AaDO2 , SPAP, TRPG) were all statistically improved after thrombolysis or anticoagulation treatment ( P lt;0.001) . But compared with the patients who underwent anticoagulation therapy alone, the cost of treatment and the incidence of minor bleeding were significantly higher, and the levels of AaDO2 , SPAP and TRPG were statistically lower in the patients with thrombolysis plus anticoagulation therapy. Conclusions For APE patients with central pulmonary embolism demonstrated by CTPA, syncope, and tachycardia, transthoracic echocardiograph should be performed as early as possible to confirm RVD diagnosis. For normotensive APE patients with RVD, anticoagulant treatment can achieve higher efficacy of costeffectiveness ratio.
Objective To investigate the risk factors, clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of venous thrombosis (and pulmonary embolism) in patients with idiopathic hypereosinophilia (IHE) so as to provide a theoretical basis for clinical prevention of venous thrombosis and improve prognosis.Methods Thirty-nine patients with IHE admitted to West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2010 to January 2022 were collected in this retrospective case-control study to explore the risk factors of venous thrombosis (including pulmonary embolism) and thrombosis recurrence after treatment. Results There were 17 (43.5%) patients combined with venous thrombosis of 39 patients with IHE. In the patients with vascular involvement, pulmonary embolism was the initial expression of IHE accounted for 29% (5/17). patients of IHE with pulmonary embolism were younger [44 (24.5 - 51.0) vs. 56 (46.3 - 67.8) year, P=0.035] and had higher peak absolute eosinophil counts [11.7 (7.2 - 26.5)×109/L vs. 3.8 (2.9 - 6.7)×109/L, P=0.020] than those without pulmonary embolism. After a mean follow-up of 13 months (2 - 21 months), thrombosis recurred in 35.3% (6/17) of patients. Persistent increasing in eosinophils (>0.5×109/L) was an independent risk factor for thrombus recurrence (odds ratio 13.33, 95% confidential interval 1.069 - 166.374). Conclusions Thrombosis is a common vascular impaired complication in IHE , and increased eosinophilia is a risk factor for thrombosis and thrombus recurrence after therapy. Controlling and monitoring the eosinophilic cell levels in patients with IHE may avoid severe comorbidities.
Objective To compare the efficacy of reteplase and ateplase in the treatment of acute massive pulmonary thromboembolism ( PTE) in emergency. Methods From January 2005 to December 2009,42 patients with acute massive PTE were treated by intravenous thrombolysis with reteplase or ateplase. The thrombolysis efficacy, bleeding incidence and mortality were measured. Results In the reteplase group, the emergency thrombolysis effective rate was 88. 9% among 18 patients. Mild bleeding occurred in 3 patients,moderate bleeding in 1 patient, and 2 cases died in hospital. In the ateplase group, the emergency thrombolysis effective rate was 75% among 24 patients. Mild bleeding occurred in 3 patients, moderate bleeding in 2 patients, and 3 cases died in hospital. The thrombolysis effective rate, bleeding incidence and mortality had no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion Both the reteplase and ateplase thrombolysis therapy are safe and effective in the treatment of acute massive PTE, but reteplase thrombolysis therapy is more convenient in emergency.