【摘要】 目的 探討肝炎后肝硬化自發性細菌性腹膜炎（spontaneous bacterial peritonitis，SBP）的診療情況及頭孢哌酮舒巴坦聯合左旋氧氟沙星對SBP的治療效果。 方法 對2004年1月-2009年12月收治的54例肝炎后肝硬化SBP患者，應用頭孢哌酮舒巴坦聯合左旋氧氟沙星給與治療，并觀察分析治療效果。 結果 肝炎后肝硬化SBP的臨床表現以發熱，腹痛為主，具有典型腹膜刺激征的不足半數。外周血白細胞升高者不多見，腹腔積液中白細胞計數、PMN計數和細菌培養是自發性細菌性腹膜炎的重要診斷指標。 結論 肝炎后肝硬化合并SBP的臨床表現不典型。致病菌以G-桿菌為主。在早期診斷、綜合治療的基礎上，頭孢哌酮舒巴坦聯合左旋氧氟沙星對自發性細菌性腹膜炎的治療效果顯著。【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the diagnosis and treatment of post-hepatitis cirrhosis complicated with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) cases and the efficacy of cefoperazone and sulbactam combined with levofloxacin in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with SBP. Methods From January 2004 to December 2009, the clinical data from 54 cases of SBP after cirrhosis were analyzed. The patients underwent the treatment of cefoperazone sulbactam combined with levofloxacin. The therapeutic effect was observed. Results The main clinical manifestations were fever and abdominal pain, and about half of the patients had the typical peritoneal irritation. Only a few patients had elevated peripheral white blood cells (WBC). The WBC count, abdominal effusion polymorphonuclearcyte count and bacteria cultivation were the indexes of diagnosis of SBP. Conclusion The clinical features of post-hepatitis cirrhosis complicated with SBP are not typical. The main pathogenic bacteria is G- bacilli. In the early diagnosis and treatment, cefoperazone sulbactam combined with levofloxacin is effective.
Objective To explore the condition and quality of domestic clinical therapeutic studies on integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine for posthepatitic cirrhosis in recent 30 years. Methods Jadad scale was used to score 121 literatures selected from January 1980 to January 2010 in periodicals of domestic authoritative resources databases, such as CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, and CBM. Systematic reviews were conducted to 39 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) literatures of treating posthepatitic cirrhosis with integrated traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine scored two or more points. Results In 30 years, the main problems existing in domestic posthepatitic cirrhosis clinical research of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine were as follows: the design of clinical RCTs was not strict enough; there was deficiency in the use of blind method; the standardized and uniformed research standard were insufficiency; the sample content was low without specific estimation methods; there was lack of analyses in compliance with cases falling off or without follow-up; and the report of adverse reaction and the quality of life research was neglected. Conclusion Posthepatitic cirrhosis therapy of integrated traditional Chinese and western medical is of “personalized” and “diversified” characteristics. Its therapeutic effects are significantly better than those of pure western medicine and worthy to be popularized in the clinic. However, the quality and level of its clinical scientific research methods still need further improvement.