• <table id="gigg0"></table>
  • west china medical publishers
    Keyword
    • Title
    • Author
    • Keyword
    • Abstract
    Advance search
    Advance search

    Search

    find Keyword "肋骨骨折" 33 results
    • 聚左旋乳酸可吸收肋骨釘治療重癥肋骨骨折患者的適應證探討

      摘要: 目的 探討聚左旋乳酸可吸收肋骨釘治療重癥肋骨骨折患者的適應證,總結其應用經驗。 方法 2005年6月至2008年8月,我科對46例(男31例,女15例;年齡15~61歲,平均年齡38歲)合并多根多段肋骨骨折、連枷胸、大出血和胸內外復合傷患者行開胸手術治療,根據骨折特點分類,用聚左旋乳酸可吸收肋骨釘固定骨折肋骨,同時處理相應的胸內外復合傷。 結果 圍術期死亡1例,術后第3 d死于突發腹腔大出血。44例患者術后胸壁穩定,自主呼吸,排痰良好。隨訪45例,隨訪時間6個月~3年,隨訪期間有39例胸壁穩定,胸部X線片示:固定處無透明帶,對位愈合良好;有4例患者出現可耐受的胸痛;7例患者有13處固定后肋骨移位,分別出現在gt;3 cm劈裂或斜形骨折、老年皮質較薄、多發性肋軟骨骨折和雙側肋骨骨折患者中。 結論 斷面相對較整齊有移位的橫形骨折、3cm以內較短的劈裂或斜形骨折、合并線性胸骨骨折是采用可吸收肋骨釘固定骨折肋骨首選的適應證;對粉碎性骨折和gt;3 cm較長的劈裂斜形骨折,不宜采用;軟骨部、老年骨皮質較薄骨折應慎重選用。

      Release date:2016-08-30 06:02 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • TiNi環抱式接骨器內固定治療多發性肋骨骨折

      目的 總結鈦鎳(TiNi)環抱式接骨器治療多發性肋骨骨折的臨床經驗,分析其臨床效果。 方法 2009年1月至2012年3月瀘州醫學院附屬中醫院收治115例多根多處肋骨骨折患者,采用隨機化模塊法將115例患者分為兩組,內固定組:60例,男38例,女22例;年齡16~78歲;平均肋骨骨折數6.36根,部位4.56處;合并血氣胸37例,28例伴有明顯反常呼吸運動和急性呼吸窘迫綜合征(ARDS);均采用鈦鎳(TiNi) 環抱式接骨器內固定,伴ARDS和呼吸功能不全者加用呼吸機輔助呼吸治療。對照組:55例,男42例,女13例;年齡17~79歲,平均肋骨骨折數6.23根,部位4.72處,伴血氣胸38例;用胸帶加厚棉墊加壓包扎外固定。術后觀察兩組患者的疼痛指數(VAS)、鎮痛藥用量、呼吸機帶機時間、肺部并發癥發生率和平均住院時間。 結果 所有患者均治愈出院,無圍術期死亡。入院后安靜時和強制咳嗽時各時間點兩組VAS差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。內固定組患者疼痛明顯減輕,鎮痛藥物(曲馬多)用量、鎮痛藥物使用時間、肺不張、肺部感染等并發癥發生率、呼吸機輔助呼吸時間和住院時間明顯少于或短于對照組(P<0.05)。 結論 對多根多處肋骨骨折,特別是伴反常呼吸、呼吸功能不全患者,行TiNi環抱式接骨器內固定肋骨斷端,臨床效果滿意,它是一種新型、實用、有效的肋骨固定方法。

      Release date:2016-08-30 05:47 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • Two Internal Fixation Methods for Multiple Rib Fractures: A Case Control Study

      目的探討可吸收肋骨釘與記憶合金接骨板內固定兩種方法治療多發性肋骨骨折的效果。 方法回顧性分析2009年1月至2014年1月在上海市第六人民醫院胸外科行手術內固定的胸部外傷致多根多處肋骨骨折患者321例的臨床資料,其中可吸收肋骨釘組70例,其中男62例、女8例,年齡(48.54±9.74)歲;記憶合金接骨板組251例,其中男187例、女64例,年齡(51.44±10.22)歲。分析兩組患者療效差異。 結果兩組患者術前疼痛評分(7.74±0.89 vs.7.66±0.92)、術后疼痛評分(3.80±0.79 vs.3.82±0.85),術后胸腔引流時間[(6.00±2.84)d vs.(5.68±2.98)d]差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05)。記憶合金接骨板組住院時間[(20.06±7.39)d vs.(17.77±7.68)d],及手術時間(101.29±30.67)min vs.(71.95±29.50)min]均短于可吸收肋骨釘組,且差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。術后3個月隨訪復查胸部X線,兩組患者骨折再移位差異無統計學意義。 結論可吸收肋骨釘與記憶合金接骨板均是治療多發性肋骨骨折較理想的術式,記憶合金接骨板手術操作更為簡單,可吸收肋骨釘手術無需在體內留置金屬內固定裝置,但固定強度較接骨板略差,應根據情況選擇合適的內固定方法。

      Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • Tunnel-type open reduction and internal fixation of rib fractures with titanium locking plate

      Objective To investigate the tunnel-type open reduction and internal fixation of rib fractures (ORIF) with titanium locking plate in traumatic rib fractures. Methods Clinical data of 10 patients with multiple rib fractures from June 2016 to January 2017 in the Sixth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University were analyzed. There were 6 males and 4 males with an average age of 38.5±9.0 years (range, 30–63 years). All patients underwent emergency treatment, chest CT and ultrasound examination before they admitted to the hospital. According to rib fractures and injuries, patients were given the tunnel-type ORIF of rib fractures with titanium locking plates, the chest tube and negative suction drainage. The patients were followed up over three months. Results All patients were cured. There was no complication during follow-up. No wound infection and death occurred. Postoperative three-month follow-up showed that chest pain was significantly relieved without pulmonary atelectasis and pleural effusion or other complications. Conclusion Tunnel-type internal fixation of rib fractures with titanium locking plates is effective, which can quickly restore the stability and integrity of the thorax. Surgical procedure is simple and can get fast postoperative recovery to improve the patient's quality of life.

      Release date:2017-12-04 10:31 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • Efficacy and Safety of Internal Rib Fixation for Multiple Rib Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

      ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of internal rib fixation for patients with multiple rib fractures. MethodsA total of 141 patients with multiple rib fractures who were admitted to Department of Thoracic Surgery of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University between January 2010 and January 2013 and whose chest trauma score (AIS-ISS) was 9-20 (16±2) were recruited in this study. Using the random number generator of SPSS, all the patients were randomly divided into an internal fixation group [69 patients including 41 males and 28 females with their age of 25-61 (37±4) years] who underwent internal rib fixation, and a control group [72 patients including 43 males and 29 females with their age of 24-63 (35±5) years] who received conservative therapy. Plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) patients' satisfaction degree with thoracic appearance,incidence of lung infection,pain-relieving efficacy,postoperative chest drainage duration and length of hospital stay were compared between the 2 groups. ResultsPlasma CRP levels of the internal fixation group were not statistically different from those of the control group in 1-3 days after injury (P>0.05) but were significantly lower than those of the control group in 4-12 days after injury (P<0.05). Patients' satisfaction degree with thoracic appearance (97.1% vs. 48.6%,P<0.05) and pain-relieving efficiency (91.3% vs. 68.1%,P<0.05) of the internal fixation group were significantly higher than those of the control group. Incidence of lung infection of the internal fixation group was significantly lower than that of the control group(11.6% vs. 37.5%,P<0.01). Postoperative chest drainage duration [(3±2) d vs. (7±4) d,P<0.05] and length of hospital stay [(9±4) d vs. (15±7) d,P<0.05] of the internal fixation group were significantly shorter than those of the control group. ConclusionsFor patients with multiple rib fractures and stable vital signs,internal fixation surgery is helpful to shorten length of hospital stay, relieve chest pain and improve thoracic appearance. It can also reduce lung inflammation and increase surgical safety so as to improve treatment outcomes of multiple rib fractures.

      Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • 連枷胸內固定手術方法的臨床應用比較

      摘要: 目的 比較4種對多根、多段肋骨骨折內骨的內固定方法,總結其治療經驗。 方法 2006年7月至2009年7月三峽大學仁和醫院收治75例多根、多段肋骨骨折患者,男51例,女24例;年齡17~74歲,平均年齡43.50歲。致傷原因為:交通傷44例,高處墜落傷21例,撞擊傷10例;采用鋼絲固定5例,鋼板固定12例,Judet固定架固定51例,人工合成樹脂骨內固定7例。 結果 75 例患者均采用內固定手術治療,術后胸廓恢復正常形態,縱隔擺動消失,疼痛和呼吸困難明顯改善;隨訪6個月~2年,復查胸部X線片示:鋼絲固定的患者中有2例發生2處固定移位,其余患者無再次移位,恢復良好。 結論 內固定手術治療是治療多根、多段肋骨骨折患者的有效方法,但各有利弊,應嚴格掌握手術適應證。

      Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • INTERNAL FIXATION TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE RIB FRACTURES WITH ABSORBABLE RIB-CONNECTINGPINS/

      Objective To study the indications, methods, and therapeutic effect of absorbable rib-connecting-pins fixation in the treatment of multi ple rib fractures. Methods Between March 2007 and September 2009, 40 patients with multiple rib fractures received internal fixation with absorbable rib-connecting-pins, including 8 one-side flail chest and 1 twoside flail chest. There were 32 males and 8 females with an average age of 39.8 years (range, 25-72 years). The injury was caused by traffic accident in 32 cases, fall ing from height in 6 cases, and blunt hitting in 2 cases. Preoperatively, imaging data of the chest X-ray or spiral CT three-dimensional (3D) examination showed that all patients had multiple ribs fractures and displacement. The number of fractured ribs was 4-10 (median, 6), and the fracture location ranged from the 2nd to the10th ribs. Of them, 28 cases were accompanied by hemathorax, pneumathorax or hemopneumothorax; 5 cases by thoracic organ injury; and 10 cases byother part trauma. The time from injury to hospital ization was less than 1 day in 26 cases, 1-3 days in 12 cases, and 3-6 days in 2 cases, and the time from hospital ization to operation was 3 hours to 3 days (mean, 1.2 days). Results The median fixation rib number was 5 (range, 3-8). The mean operative time, the time in bed, and hospital ization days were 32 minutes (range, 15-50 minutes), 4.5 days (range, 2-7 days), and 11.2 days (range, 5-18 days), respectively. All incisions healed by first intention. No pulmonary infection, pulmonary atelectasis, intrathoracic infection or other compl ications occurred. All cases were followedup 6-12 months (mean, 8 months). PaO2 [(86.6 ± 2.2) mmHg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)] and SpO2 (97.2% ± 0.6%) at 2 hours after operation were obviously improved when compared with preoperative ones [PaO2 (53.6 ± 4.7) mm Hg and SpO2 (86.2% ± 1.8%)], showing significant differences (t=2.971, P=0.005; t=2.426, P=0.020). The chest X-ray films or spiral CT 3D indicated that fracture of rib healed within 3-6 months (mean, 4.5 months) after operation. Conclusion Severe collapsed chest wall orflail chest caused by fracture of multiple ribs should be treated by absorbable rib-connecting-pins, which is a simple, firm, and effective method.

      Release date:2016-08-31 05:41 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • SU,s全胸腔鏡下肋骨骨折骨板骨釘胸腔內植入固定技術的臨床應用

      目的 探討全胸腔鏡下肋骨骨折骨板骨釘胸腔內植入固定技術的操作方法及適應證。 方法 2009年10月至2011年10月赤峰學院附屬醫院3例有移位的肋骨骨折患者,其中男2例、女1例,平均年齡36歲;采用SU , s全胸腔鏡下肋骨骨折骨板骨釘胸腔內植入固定技術進行手術,3例均有胸腔內活動性出血和胸內凝血塊,術中應用自主設計專利器械進行操作,針對如何控制肋間血管出血、游離顯露肋骨斷端、牽開骨折斷端、對位固定、腔鏡下肋骨板內植入等階段設計了全新的手術方法。 結果 采用胸腔鏡下內植入式鎳鈦記憶合金肋骨板胸腔內植入1例,固定肋骨1根,手術時間125 min;采用可吸收肋骨釘固定2例,1例固定2根肋骨,手術時間110 min;1例固定1根肋骨,手術時間90 min。 3例患者手術順利,恢復良好,無并發癥發生,痊愈出院,隨訪3個月骨折無移位。結論 SU , s全胸腔鏡下肋骨骨折骨板骨釘胸腔內植入固定技術從技術角度在部分選擇的患者中可行,但還不能取代在重癥復合胸外傷常規開胸手術,還需進一步改進。

      Release date:2016-08-30 05:46 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • 疼痛和動脈血二氧化碳分壓作為肋骨骨折患者手術指征的臨床分析

      目的 探討疼痛和動脈血二氧化碳分壓(PaCO2)作為胸外傷肋骨骨折手術指征的可行性,為肋骨內固定手術提供一條合理、可行的手術指征。 方法 選取2006年1月至2009年9月復旦大學附屬華山醫院南匯分院上海南匯中心醫院24例肋骨骨折3 d后主動疼痛評分gt;6分、伴或不伴有PaCO2gt;50 mm Hg患者,采取隨機抽簽法將24例患者分為兩組,手術固定組:12例,男8例,女4例;年齡 43.80±15.00歲;行爪形鋼板內固定手術;保守治療組:12例,男7例,女5例;年齡46.20±10.70歲;采取保守治療。術后1周、2周觀察疼痛評分、PaCO2和肺部感染發生率等。 結果 術后1周手術固定組疼痛評分小于保守治療組(1.25±0.97分vs. 6.17±1.03 分,Plt;0.05),PaCO2(44.00±5.00 mm Hg vs. 49.00±5.00 mm Hg,Plt;0.05)和肺炎發生率(8.33% vs. 50.00%,Plt;0.05)低于保守治療組。所有患者均得到隨訪,隨訪時間2周,術后2周手術固定組疼痛評分小于保守治療組(0.83±0.83分vs. 4.75±1.14分,Plt;0.05)。 結論 疼痛評分結合PaCO2作為肋骨內固定手術的手術指征具有可行性。

      Release date:2016-08-30 05:57 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • Effectiveness of conservative treatment and open reduction with internal fixation for the treatment of multiple rib fractures: a systematic review

      Objectives To systematically review the efficacy of conservative treatment and open reduction with internal fixation for multiple rib fractures. Methods We searched WanFang Data, CNKI, VIP, PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library and Web of Science from inception to December 2017 to collect studies on conservative treatment and open reduction with internal fixation for multiple rib fractures. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. Results A total of 16 studies were included, involving 1 374 patients, 723 patients in the surgical group and 651 patients in the conservative group. The meta-analysis showed that the length of stay in the ICU (MD=–3.41, 95%CI –4.92 to –2.43, P<0.000 01), total length of stay (MD=–7.60, 95 %CI–10.67 to–4.53,P<0.000 01), incidence of pulmonary arylene (RR=0.40, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.54,P<0.000 01), incidence of lung infections (RR=0.43, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.61,P<0.000 01), and incidence of chest wall malformation (RR=0.05, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.11,P<0. 0.000 01) in the surgical group were superior to the conservative group. Conclusions Compared with conservative treatment, open reduction with internal fixation can significantly improve the recovery time of patients with multiple rib fractures, reduce hospitalization time, the incidence of perioperative complications, and significantly enhance the prognosis of patients, which is more conducive to the rehabilitation of patients.

      Release date:2019-01-15 09:51 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    4 pages Previous 1 2 3 4 Next

    Format

    Content

  • <table id="gigg0"></table>
  • 松坂南