【摘要】 目的 探討腰硬聯合麻醉復合丙泊酚恒速輸注清醒鎮靜的可行性、理想的藥物劑量、術中知曉情況以及麻醉質量和效果。 方法 收集2009年3-12月480例美國麻醉醫師協會（ASA）Ⅰ～Ⅲ級擬在腰硬聯合麻醉下行下腹部、會陰部、下肢手術的患者480例，隨機分為咪達唑侖組（M組）、丙泊酚Ⅰ組（PA組）、丙泊酚Ⅱ組（PB組）、丙泊酚Ⅲ組（PC組），每組各120例。四組患者均于腰2-3或腰3-4行腰硬聯合麻醉，蛛網膜下腔注入輕比重0.2 %布比卡因12～15 mg，麻醉平面確切后，M組予以咪達唑侖0.04~0.06 mg/kg，PA組先予以負荷量丙泊酚0.50 mg/kg再以2.00 mg/（kg?h）劑量持續泵注，PB組予以負荷量丙泊酚0.75 mg/kg再以3.00 mg/（kg?h）劑量持續泵注，PC組予以負荷量丙泊酚1.00 mg/kg再以3.75 mg/（kg?h）劑量持續泵注。觀察患者給藥前（T0）、給藥1（T1）、3（T2）、5（T3）、10（T4）、30（T5）、60 min（T6）各時點血流動力學平均動脈血壓（MAP）、心率（HR）的變化、腦電雙頻指數（BIS）值及鎮靜評分、術中所看到的圖片的回憶及不良反應。 結果 各組在給予鎮靜藥后MAP、HR均有所下降，但測量值的變化在正常范圍內；在T3時間點，各組BIS值及鎮靜/警醒OAA/S評分降低，與T0比較，差異有統計學意義（Plt;0.05）；與其他3組比較，在T4、T5、T6時點PC組BIS值與OAA/S評分降低，差異有統計學意義（Plt;0.05），PC組的鎮靜遺忘滿意率高于其他3組；各組間未見發生嚴重的舌后墜、呼吸暫停和血氧飽和度（SpO2）lt;90%。 結論 在下腹部、下肢手術中，應用腰硬聯合麻醉復合1.00 mg/kg負荷量的丙泊酚繼而以3.75 mg/（kg?h）劑量持續泵注，可取得良好的鎮靜效果，不良反應小。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the feasibility, ideal dose, intra-operative awareness as well as the quality and effectiveness of constant infusion of propofol under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) for conscious sedation. Methods A total of 480 patients at ASA grade Ⅰ-Ⅲ to be operated in the lower abdomen, perineum and lower limbs under CSEA from March to December 2009 were randomly divided into four groups: midazolam group (M group), propofol group Ⅰ (PA group), propofol group Ⅱ (PB group), and propofol group Ⅲ (PC group), with 120 patients in each group. All four groups of patients underwent CSEA at L2-3 or L3-4 and accepted pinal injection of 12-15 mg of 0.2% hypobaric bupivacaine. After the anesthetic plane was confirmed, patients in M group accepted 0.04-0.06 mg/kg of midazolam; patients in PA group accepted propofol at a loading dose of 0.50 mg/kg followed by continuous infusion at a dose of 2.00 mg/(kg?h); patients in PB group accepted propofol at a loading dose of 0.75 mg/kg followed by continuous infusion at a dose of 3.00 mg/(kg?h); patients in PC group accepted propofol at a loading dose of 1.00 mg/kg followed by continuous infusion at a dose of 3.75 mg/(kg?h). The change of hemodynamics including the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and the heart rate (HR), bispectral index (BIS) values, sedation scores, memory of pictures seen during operation and adverse effects before drug administration (T0), at minute 1 (T1), 3 (T2), 5 (T3), 10 (T4), 30 (T5) and 60 (T6) after drug administration were observed. Results MAP and HR decreased in all the four groups after administration of sedatives, but the changes of measured values were within normal ranges. BIS value and the Observer’s Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (OAA/S) scale decreased in all groups at T3, compared with those at T0 (Plt;0.05). Compared with the other 3 groups, BIS valueand OAA/S scale were significantly lower in PC group at T4, T5 and T6 (Plt;0.05), and the satisfaction rate of sedation and amnesia was much higher. No serious glossocoma, apnea and SpO2 below 90% was observed in all the four groups. Conclusion During the surgery of lower abdomen and lower limbs, application of CSEA combined with propofol at a loading dose of 1.00 mg/kg followed by continuous infusion at a dose of 3.75 mg/(kg?h) can achieve a good sedative effect, with little side effect.
Objective To explore effective substances and methods for prevention of peridural adhesion. Methods Laminectomy was performed on the 5th lumbar segment in 64 rabbits, which were equally divided into 4 groups. The duramater (12 mm×6 mm) was exposed. The exposed duramater was left uncovered in Group A; the exposed dura mater was covered with sodium hyaluronate jel (high molecular weight, 1 ml) in Group B; the lamina repair was performed with the autologous spinous process in Group C; the lamina repair was performed with the sodium hyaluronate jel filling and the autologous spinousprocess in Group D. The specimens were observed grossly and histologically at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks postoperatively. The computed imaging analysis on the epidural adhesion was also performed at 6 weeks postoperatively. Results ①The gross anatomical evaluation: Severe peridural adhesion was formed in Group A, less adhesion formed in Groups B and C, but no obvious adhesion formed in Group D. ②The area percentage of the epidural scar: The area percentage ofthe epidural scar was 15.89%±1.88% and 13.94%±1.89% in Groups C and D respectively, which were significantly lower than those in Groups A and B (22.66%±2.89% and 20.70%±2.82%,Plt;0.05). ③The density of epidural scar: Thedensity of the epidural scars were 42.03%±7.36% and 36.50%±9.08% in Groups B and D, which were significantly lower than those in Groups A and C (63.73%±6.06% and 52.11%±4.10%，Plt;0.05). Conclusion The high molecular weight sodium hyaluronate jel filling combined with the lamina repair using the autologous spinous process has the best preventive effect on the peridural adhesion after laminectomy.
目的:比較硬膜外阻滯復合全麻與單純全麻在胸科腫瘤手術中的臨床應用,在麻醉效果、血流動力學、術后蘇醒等方面的影響。方法:46例擇期胸科腫瘤手術患者(ASAⅠ～Ⅲ),隨機分成兩組,Ⅰ組應用硬膜外阻滯復合全麻并行PCEA,Ⅱ組應用單純全身麻醉。并對術中MAP、HR、SPO2、全麻藥用量,術后蘇醒程度,拔管時間及術后并發癥進行觀察。結果:Ⅰ組病例術中血流動力學平穩,圍拔管期心血管反應輕微,全麻藥用量少,蘇醒迅速徹底,術后并發癥少。Ⅱ組病例術中血流動力學波動大,圍拔管期心血管反應較強,蘇醒時間相對較長,術后并發癥較多。結論:硬膜外阻滯復合全麻能更有效抑制胸科腫瘤手術的應激反應,保持血流動力學平穩,促進術后呼吸功能的恢復。麻醉效果及安全性優于單純全麻。
In order to find an ideal biological material to prevent peridural adhesion following laminectomy, 30 rabbits were used as animal model, in each of which 2 defects with a size of 1 cm x 0.5 cm were made following laminectomy of L3, L5 spine. One of the defects was covered extradurally with chitosan, gelatin foam or PLA membrane respectively, while the other defect was exposed as control. All of these animals were sacrificed on the 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th and 10th week after operation, and the extradural fibrosis and adhesion of every animal were evaluated by gross observation and histological examinations. It was revealed that in the chitosan and PLA membrane groups, the extradural tissue was smooth without thickening and there was no fibrous proliferation or adhesion in the epidural cavity, and that in the chitosan group, the growth of fibroblast was restrained but the growth of the epithelial cells was promoted significantly, thus, wound healing was rapid. In the control group and gelatin foam group, obvious extradural fibrosis and adhesion were observed and the extradural space had almost disappeared. Therefore, it was concluded that the biodegradable PLA membrane and chitosan were both an ideal material in the prevention of postoperative epidural adhesion.
Objective To determine the ability of the polyactic acid glue (PLA-G) in preventing epidural adhesion after laminectomy. Methods Each of the 24 randomly selected rats was done laminectomyof L2 and L5. The PLA-G, which would change from liquid to solid when meets with serum, was used in the epidural site of L5 to become a half-solid membrane(the experimental group, EG). The PLA-G was not used in the same site of L2(the control group, CG) .The gross anatomical, histological, and microscopical evaluation were made 2，4，6，8，10 and 12 weeks after operation; electron microscope observation was also made on two rats 4 weeks after operation(both EG and CG). Results Obvious epidural space was observed between dura mater and scar tissue(ST), but no cells in the epidural space were observed inEG 2 weeks after operation. Corps of the red cells between dura mater and ST and proliferation of fibroblast cell(FB) were observed in CG 2 weeks after operation. Some remaining glue shiver in the epidural space with lightly increasing fibroblast and smooth dura mater were observed in EG 4 weeks after operation. However, fragile scar conglutinated with dura mater diffusely and more FB were observed in CG. From the 6th week to the 12th week, a potential interspace between scar and dura mater was observed and PLA glue was absorbed completely in EG. However, tougher scar, which was very difficult to dissect from dura mater and surrounding tissues, was observed. According to the fibroblast ultrastructure observation, bigger nucleus and more plentiful rough endoplasmic reticulum were observed in CG. Conclusion The PLA-G can effectively reduce the epidural scar and adhesion in animal experiment.
Objective To explore anesthetic quality of epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia applied for surgery of rectal cancer. Methods One hundred and seventy-eight patients who were diagnosed as rectal cancer and received operation in the Central Hospital of Bazhong City from June 2010 to June 2012 were included retrospectively. These patients were divided into two groups according to the type of anesthesia， and the patients who received general anesthesia only were defined as group A， the patients who received epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia were defined as group B. The anesthetic quality and anesthetic adverse reaction were observed in two groups. Results The differences of baseline characteristics in two groups were not significant （P＞0.05）. The difference of anesthetic quality in two groups was not significant （P＞0.05）. In terms of anesthetic adverse reaction， the incidence rate of hypertension， hypotension，tachycardia， or postoperative nausea and vomiting of the group B was significantly lower than those of the group A （P＜0.05）. The incidence rate of bradycardia， premature ventricular contractions， or time of gastrointestinal function recovery had no significant differences （P＞0.05）. There was no nerve dysfunction of lower limb in two groups. Conclusion Epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia applied for surgery of rectal cancer as compared with general anesthesia only not only has the same anesthetic quality， but also has obvious advantages in decreasing anesthetic adverse reaction.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the arthroscopic treatment effectiveness of popliteal cyst excision in combination with debridement of the knee under local anesthesia by comparing with continuous epidural anesthesia. MethodsBetween June 2002 and January 2013,145 patients with popliteal cyst underwent arthroscopic popliteal cyst excision in combination with debridement of the knee under local anesthesia (local anesthesia group).In addition,51 patients with popliteal cyst were treated with the same surgery under continuous epidural anesthesia between February 2000 and August 2005 served as control group.No significant difference was found in gender,age,side,disease duration,or cyst size between 2 groups (P>0.05).Then,anesthesia time,analgesia effect,anesthesia satisfaction,operation time,bleeding volume,and anesthesia complication were compared between 2 groups.The guidelines of Rauschning and Lindgren were used to assess the effectiveness,and recurrence rate was recorded. ResultsAll incisions healed primarily,no neurological or vascular injury was found.The patients were followed up 1 year and 1 month to 8 years (mean,3.7 years) in local anesthesia group,and 8 years to 13 years and 7 months (mean,10.8 years) in control group.Local anesthesia group had shorter anesthesia time,higher visual analogue scale (VAS) score,shorter operation time,and lower bleeding volume (P<0.05) than control group.Anesthesia satisfaction was reduced in local anesthesia group,but there was no significant difference (χ2=0.071,P=1.000).The anesthesia complication incidence of control group (15.7%,8/51) was significantly higher than that of local anesthesia group (0) (P=0.000).Recurrence was found in 12 patients of local anesthesia group (curative ratio 91.7%) and in 5 patients of control group (curative ratio 90.2%),showing no significant difference (χ2=0.111,P=0.774).According to the guidelines of Rauschning and Lindgren,there were 131 cases of grade 0,13 cases of grade I,and 1 case of grade Ⅱ in local anesthesia group,and 37 cases of grade 0,12 cases of grade I,and 2 cases of grade Ⅱ in control group; significant differences in grading were shown between at pre- and post-operation in 2 groups (Z=-10.683,P=0.000; Z=-6.385,P=0.000),and between 2 groups at post-operation (Z=-3.145,P=0.002). ConclusionCompared with under continuous epidural anesthesia,arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cyst excision under local anesthesia can obtain better results.Under local anesthesia,the condition of nerve and vessel can be timely and dynamically observed.Arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cyst excision in combination with debridement of the knee has the advantages of less trauma,lower recurrence rate,and satisfactory results.
【摘要】 目的 觀察不同劑量的舒芬太尼用于剖宮產術后硬膜外自控鎮痛的效果比較。 方法 將2009年4-11月60例硬膜外麻醉下行剖宮產手術術后的患者隨機分為三組，術后鎮痛液A組采用0.125%羅哌卡因復合0.3 μg/mL舒芬太尼；B組為0.125%羅哌卡因復合0.4 μg/mL舒芬太尼；C組0.125%羅哌卡因復合0.5 μg/mL舒芬太尼，觀察三組患者的術后鎮痛效果（視覺模擬法評分，即VAS評分）及不良反應。 結果 A組VAS評分高于B組和C組，B組VAS評分高于C組（Plt;0.05）。三組患者術后惡心嘔吐、運動阻滯、嗜睡及腸蠕動抑制等并發癥無統計學差異（Pgt;0.05）。 結論 0.125%羅哌卡因復合0.5 μg/mL舒芬太尼以4 mL/h持續輸注用于剖宮產術后患者自控硬膜外鎮痛術后疼痛VAS評分最小，患者鎮痛滿意度最高。【Abstract】 Objective To observe the effect of postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with three different doses of sufentanil combined with 0.125% ropivacaine after cesarean section. Methods Data was collected from April 2009 to November 2009. Sixty patients after cesarean section under continuous epidural anesthesia were randomly divided into three different groups.Group A was given sufentanil 0.3 μg/mL and 0.125% ropivacaine for PCEA, group B was given sufentanil 0.4 μg/mL and 0.125% ropivacaine, group C was given sufentanil 0.5 μg/mL and 0.125% ropivacaine. The analgesia effects were evaluated by the visual analogue scales (VAS). Side effects were also recorded. Results The VAS scores were significantly the highest in group A than that in group B and group C, the VAS scores in group B were higher than that in group C (Plt;0.05). The incidence of side effects, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting, lethargy, and pruritus, was not significant among the three groups (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion 0.5 μg/ mL sufentanil and 0.125% ropivacaine recommended for PCEA with background 4 mL/h is safe and effective for patients after cesarean section.