• <table id="gigg0"></table>
  • west china medical publishers
    Keyword
    • Title
    • Author
    • Keyword
    • Abstract
    Advance search
    Advance search

    Search

    find Keyword "正中小切口" 4 results
    • Minimally Invasive versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery: A Case Control Study

      ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical experience of aortic valve replacement surgery with minimally invasive procedure. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 72 patients underwent isolated aortic valve replacement in our hospital between January 2011 and August 2013. The patients undergoing minimally invasive procedure were as a minimally invasive group(30 patients with 18 males and 12 females at age of 60.2±13.4 years). The patients undergoings conventional procedure were as a control group(42 patients with 27 males and 15 females at age of 61.3±14.5 years). The outcomes of the two groups were compared. ResultsThere was no death and severe complication in both groups. Postoperative echocardiography showed no paravalvular leakage, no valve dysfunction in both groups. There were no significant statistically differences between the two groups in cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic crossclamping time, ventilation time, postoperative left ventricle ejection fraction, the length of ICU stay and hospital stay (P>0.05). Blood transfusion ratio, blood transfusion volume and blood loss volume were lower in the minimally invasive group than those in the control group (P<0.05). The length of incision, chest closure time, operative duration were shorter in the minimally invasive group than those in the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionUpper median sternotomy is a safe and feasible procedure for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery. Compared with conventional aortic valve replacement, its advantages include less surgical trauma, stable sternum, rapid recovery, less blood loss and blood transfusion, and cosmetic outcomes.

      Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • Analysis of 85 infants of minimal median sternotomy for cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass

      目的 探討胸部正中小切口在嬰幼兒先天性心臟病手術治療中的可行性及效果。 方法 將我院 2016 年 5 月至 2016 年 10 月 170 例行手術治療的常見先天性心臟病嬰幼兒患者分為兩組:常規組,85 例,男42例、女43例,年齡(6.9±2.1)個月,采用常規胸部正中切口;小切口組,85 例采用胸部正中小切口,男43例、女42例,年齡(6.4±1.8)個月。小切口手術切口于平第 3 肋間切開,止于劍突起始處上 0.5 cm,剛好放入小胸骨撐開器為好。 結果 兩組患兒體外循環時間差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。小切口組手術時間略長(P<0.05)。兩組預后沒有差別,但是小切口組傷口長度顯著縮短[(7.8±0.8) cmvs. (4.0±0.5)cm,P<0.05]。 結論 正中小切口基本具有胸骨正中切口的優點,可顯露心臟各部位,滿足絕大部分心臟探查和手術操作需要,必要時仍可向上延長切口使心內操作不受限制等優點,故認為正中小切口在嬰幼兒心臟手術中具有良好的安全性和美觀性。

      Release date:2017-09-26 03:48 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • 胸骨正中小切口在心臟直視手術中的應用

      目的 介紹胸骨正中小切口在心臟手術中的應用效果. 方法 風濕性心瓣膜病或先天性心臟病患者40例,分別在常規體外循環或常溫心臟不停跳下行心內直視術.做胸骨下端正中小切口,長5~9cm,保留胸骨柄的連續性. 結果 手術均順利進行,術后無嚴重并發癥發生,循環穩定,恢復快,瘢痕隱蔽.心臟不停跳手術患者,術后輔助呼吸和使用正性肌力藥物的時間明顯縮短. 結論 胸骨正中小切口可以安全的應用于多種常規和心臟不停跳心內直視手術,適應范圍廣、創傷小、手術效果好和美容效果佳.

      Release date:2016-08-30 06:31 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • 胸骨正中小切口行主動脈瓣置換術

      目的 總結32例經胸骨正中小切口置換主動脈瓣的臨床經驗。 方法 采用胸骨正中上段小切口,切口下緣在第3肋間中點水平,上方在第2肋間上緣處與正中線成70°夾角斜向左側,切口長度約8~9cm,沿肌層表面向中線和胸骨柄上緣潛行分離,鋸開部分胸骨至第3肋間中點,并在此處橫斷兩側胸骨。主動脈瓣置換術采用間斷縫合法。 結果 本組無死亡。與同期81例常規正中切口置換主動脈瓣者比較,升主動脈阻斷時間、術后呼吸機輔助時間無差異;而心包引流量明顯減少,術后住院時間明顯縮短(P<0.05)。 結論 經胸骨正中小切口置換主動脈瓣安全、創傷小、療效好。

      Release date:2016-08-30 06:33 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    1 pages Previous 1 Next

    Format

    Content

  • <table id="gigg0"></table>
  • 松坂南