Search

安全護理在腫瘤化療中的應用

目的:探討安全護理在腫瘤化療中應用的效果。方法:將安全護理運用于我科200名化療患者,以患者和護士的安全程度來評價安全護理的應用效果。結果:安全護理應用于腫瘤化療,既能促進患者的身心安全又能保證護士的職業安全。結論:在腫瘤化療中應合理應用安全護理,以保證患者和護士的安全。

同種異體腎移植術后并發乳糜漏護理一例

較大腎上腺腫瘤后腹腔鏡術圍手術期的護理

摘要:目的: 探討直徑＞6.0cm的腎上腺腫瘤患者經后腹腔鏡手術圍手術期的護理策略。 方法 :對我院近5年收治的27例腎上腺腫瘤(直徑＞6.0cm)患者經后腹腔鏡手術圍手術期間實施同步護理,并將護理措施進行回顧性總結。 結果 :24例患者通過后腹腔鏡術順利切除腫瘤,術中術后未出現并發癥,痊愈出院,3例患者中轉為開放手術。 結論 :做好直徑＞6.0cm的腎上腺腫瘤患者經后腹腔鏡手術術前術后的護理配合,對促進傷口愈合,防止并發癥發生起到佷重要的作用。

老年患者腎移植術后難愈傷口護理一例

供體腎錯構瘤剔除后再移植護理二例

Prospective Cohort Study on Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Renal Transplantation or Hemodialysis

ObjectiveTo compare the quality of life in the early stage of treatment in patients who accepted renal transplantation with those who still were undergoing long-term hemodialysis. MethodsPatients undergoing long-term hemodialysis in December 2011 and adult patients who planned to accept renal transplantation within 6 months were chosen to be our study subjects. The Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) was used for the study. After 6 months of following up, they were assessed with the same questionnaire again. Those hemodialysis patients who accepted renal transplantation within this period were divided into the intervention group. The quality of life between the two groups was compared then. ResultsA total of 124 end-stage renal failure patients were involved in our study, in which 79 patients successfully accepted renal transplantation (intervention group) and the other 45 patients who still underwent hemodialysis (control group). No other complications were observed during this period. There was no significant difference in life quality between the two groups before treatment (P>0.05). Six months after the treatment, SF-36 total score and each of the 8 dimension scores for the intervention group were all significantly higher than those for the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionRenal transplantation recipients have a totally better life quality than those who depend on hemodialysis.