摘要:目的:評價塞來昔布(Celecoxib)聯合希羅達(Xeloda)節拍化療(metronomic chemotherapy)治療老年晚期胃癌的客觀療效及毒副反應,探討老年晚期胃癌高緩解率、低毒性的治療方法。方法:45例患者隨機分為兩組。治療組23例,采用塞來昔布與希羅達節拍化療, Celecoxib 200 mg Bid, Xeloda 500 mg Bid,連續服藥,直至病情進展。4周為一周期,至少1周期后評定療效。對照組22例,采用FOLFOX4方案化療:LOHP 85 mg/m2 iv gtt 2h d1,CF 200 mg/m2 iv gtt 2h d1、d2,5FU 400 mg/m2 iv bolus d1、d2,5FU 600 mg/m2 civ 22h d1、d2。每2周重復,4周為1周期,至少1周期后評定療效。結果: 45例患者均獲得隨訪。治療組與對照組總有效率(RR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、生活質量改善率(QOL)分別為47.8%(11/23)、50.0%(11/22);91.3%(21/23)、63.6%(14/22);826%(19/23)、54.5%(12 /22)。 兩組患者中位疾病進展時間(mTTP)、中位生存期(MST)分別為9.5個月、5.5個月;13.5個月、9個月。治療組與對照組1年生存率分別為56.5％(13/23)、27.3％(6/22)。兩組總有效率差異無統計學意(Pgt;0.05),生活質量改善率、疾病控制率、1年生存率差異有統計學意義(Plt;0.05)。治療組毒副反應輕微。結論:塞來昔布聯合希羅達節拍化療治療老年晚期胃癌安全、有效,患者得到生存受益,依從性好,效價比高,值得臨床進一步研究。
ObjectiveTo explore the value of multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) in the judgment of N stage and lymph node metastasis of patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent surgery after transformation therapy.MethodsClinical data of 27 patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent surgery after transformation therapy, form July 2017 to July 2019 in Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University were analyzed retrospectively, and all of patients underwent SOX regimen transformation therapy. The MSCT enhanced scan was performed before operation, and the postoperative pathology was used as the gold standard. The preoperative N stage and lymph node metastasis groups were evaluated by MSCT enhanced scan and compared with the pathological results.Results Before the operation, MSCT was used to evaluate the lymph node metastasis of the patients with advanced gastric cancer after transformation therapy, and compared with the lymph nodes metastasis of the corresponding pathological results, the accuracy rates of lymph node groups in No.1, No.3, No.5, No.6, No.7, No.8, and No.16 were 77.78% (21/27), 81.48% (22/27), 85.19% (23/27), 88.89% (24/27), 85.19% (23/27), 74.07% (20/27), and 96.30% (26/27), respectively. Compared with pathological results, the total accuracy of N stage after transformation therapy that evaluated by MSCT was 62.96% (17/27), with the Kappa coefficient was 0.419 (P=0.003).ConclusionsMSCT has high accuracy and consistency for the N stage of advanced gastric cancer after transformation therapy. Besides, MSCT has a certain diagnostic rate for lymph node metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer in lymph node groups of No.1, No.3, No.5, No.6, No.7, No.8, and No.16.
目的:評價多西他賽(D)聯合拓撲替康(T)治療晚期胃癌的臨床療效和毒性反應。方法:用DT方案治療晚期胃痛患者47例。結果:可評價療效者47例,完全緩解(CR)4例,占8.5％:部分緩解(PR)28例,占59.6％:穩定(SD)11例．占23.4％:進展(PD)4例,占8.5％。總有效率:(CR+PR)為68.1％,臨床獲益率(CR+PR+SD)為91.5％。中位腫瘤進展期(TTP)8.4個月,中位生存期(MST)12.8個月。主要不良反應為骨髓抑制、白細胞減少、胃腸道反應、惡心嘔吐、腹瀉、口腔粘膜炎,無治療相關性死亡病例。結論:多西他賽聯合拓撲替康治療晚期胃癌臨床緩解率頗高,提高了生存質量,不良反應可耐受,患者治療依從性好,可以作為晚期胃癌一線治療方案。
Objectives To systematically review the efficacy and safety of docetaxel or epirubicin based regimens in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Methods We searched EMbase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data from inception to March 2017, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on docetaxel or epirubicin based regimens in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 12 RCTs involving 984 advanced gastric cancer patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that docetaxel based regimens were superior to epirubicin based regimens in ORR (RR=1.21, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.43, P=0.03), DCR (RR=1.13, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.26, P=0.03), 1-year survival rate (RR=1.26, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.56, P=0.04) and 2-year survival rate (RR=3.03, 95%CI 1.59 to 5.75, P=0.000 7), while there was no statistical difference between two groups in the incidence of grade Ⅲ to Ⅳ adverse events. The results of sensitivity analysis showed that docetaxel based regimens were superior to epirubicin based regimens in 2-year survival rate (RR=2.56, 95%CI 1.06 to 6.19, P=0.04), but there were no statistical differences in ORR (RR=1.13, 95%CI 0.88 to 1.45, P=0.34), DCR (RR=1.02, 95%CI 0.85 to 1.21, P=0.84) and 1-year survival rate (RR=1.29, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.80, P=0.14). The results of sensitivity analysis indicated that the overall outcomes might be affected by the risk bias of included studies. The comparision between docetaxel based regimens and epirubicin based regimens was consistent with the overall outcomes in the incidence of grade Ⅲ to Ⅳ adverse events. Conclusions Compared with epirubicin based regimens, docetaxel based regimens may have more clinical benefits for advanced gastric cancer patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel (DOC) combined with oxaliplatin (OXA) regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. MethodsSixty patients with advanced gastric cancer treated in our hospital from January 2008 to January 2011 were randomly divided into two groups. The treatment group (n=30) was given DOC combined with OXA regimen. Patients in this group were treated with DOC 75 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1; OXA 130 mg/m2, ivgtt, d4; with 21 days as a cycle. The control group (n=30) was given DCF regimen. Patients in the control group were treated with DOC 75 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1; cisplatin 75 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1; calcium folinate 200/m2, ivgtt, 2 h, d1-2; fluorouracil 400 mg/m2, bolus 10 minutes, fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 civ 22 h d1-2; also with 21 days as a cycle. All patients received two cycles of chemotherapy at least. The effective rate (complete remission+partial remission), adverse reactions, median survival time and quality of life were analyzed and compared between the two groups. ResultsThe effective rates in the treatment group and the control group were 60.0% and 46.7% respectively, showing a non-significant difference (P>0.05). The appetite increasing rate (70.0% vs 43.3%), the weight gain rate (60.0% vs 33.3%), and the Karnofsky score improvement rate (63.3% vs 30.0%) of the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The adverse reactions were fewer in the treatment group, and most of them were between grade Ⅰ and Ⅱ. The median time of disease progression (5.8 months vs 5.6 months) and the median survival period (11.8 months vs 9.2 months) of the treatment group were longer than those in the control group. ConclusionDOC combined with OXA regimen is effective in treating advanced gastric cancer. It can significantly improve the quality of life of the patients, and it has fewer adverse reactions. Meanwhile, the median survival period is prolonged. DOC combined with OXA regimen is worth to be applied in clinic.
Objective To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy for HER-2 positive patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods We searched ClinicalTrails.gov, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2016), CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data, VIP and major meeting proceeding databases (ASCO and ESMO) from inception to May 2016, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or non-RCTs about trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric cancer. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results Nine studies involving 1 034 HER-2 positive patients were included, of which three were RCTs and the other six were non-RCTs. Meta-analysis results indicated that the trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy group (the trial group) was superior to the chemotherapy alone group (the control group) in complete remission (OR=2.76, 95%CI 1.40 to 5.44,P=0.003), partial remission (OR=1.81, 95%CI 1.40 to 2.33,P<0.000 01), overall response rate (OR=2.09, 95%CI 1.63 to 2.68,P<0.000 01) and disease control rate (OR=2.20, 95%CI 1.63 to 2.98,P<0.000 1), while there was no statistical significances in stable disease (OR=0.87, 95%CI 0.66 to 1.14,P=0.31). In terms of safety, the incidence of diarrhea (OR=1.51, 95%CI 1.10 to 2.06,P=0.01) and erythra (OR=4.35, 95%CI 1.25 to 15.10,P=0.02) in the trial group were higher than the control group. However, other adverse reactions were no significant differences in two groups. Conclusion Compared with chemotherapy alone, trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of HER-2 positive patients with advanced gastric cancer can significantly improve response rate, but it may increase the incidence of diarrhea and erythra. Because of the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, the above conclusion needs to be verified by conducting more high quality studies.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of lentinan on immune function in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1969-2006), EMBASE (1984-2006), OVID (1969-2006), CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library) (Issue 4, 2006), the Chinese Biomedicine Database (1978-2006) and CNKI (1978-2006). We also handsearched relevant journals. Pharmaceutical companies were contacted to identify additional randomized controlled trials. We assessed the identified studies in order to include high quality studies. Results Ten studies (containing 786 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Six trials shown that lentinan+FAM had significant efficacy upon patients with advanced gastric cancer compared with FAM in overall response [Plt;0.01, RR1.70, 95%CI (1.39,2.09)]. In three trials, a significant effect of lentinan+FAM group compared with FAM group in quantity of CD3+ T, T4/T8, NK was found, but lower than FAM group in side- effect of digestive system [RR0.71, 95%CI (0.55,0.91)]. The other trail identified there were fewer side effects in lentinan+FAM group compared with FAM group, though did not discribe the overall response. In case the significant heterogeneity, meta-analysis could not be used for the other three trails included, since the components of chemotherapeutic agents (ATP+Co-A+Vc; DDP+ Epirubicin+5FU; 5FU+CF+VP16) were not the same. In the three trials, overall response was statistically significant better in the lentinan group than in the control group, and lentinan group could significantly increase the quantity of CD3+ T, T4/T8, NK compared with control group. Conclusions The present meta-analysis suggested that addition of lentinan to standard chemotherapy provided a significant advantage over chemotherapy alone in terms of efficacy for patients with advanced gastric cancer. However, most of trials included in the review were of low quality, therefore, it is of necessity to conduct multi-center randomized-controlled trials of high quality.
ObjectiveTo understand the latest research progress in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and explore the optimal treatment strategy. Method The latest literature on the treatment of AGC was retrieved and reviewed. Results For patients with AGC, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, palliative therapy, nutritional support, and traditional Chinese medicine therapy were currently adopted in clinic, the combination of them were used usually. Some patients obtained good therapeutic effects by new chemotherapy drugs and antibody conjugated drugs. In the era of first-line immunotherapy or targeted therapy, first-line immunotherapy alone, immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy, double immunotherapy, and immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenesis targeted drugs for AGC had represented some survival benefits. ConclusionsThe research, development, and widespread application of new anti-tumor drugs have continuously expanded the treatment methods for AGC. The development of tumor molecular biology provides an opportunity for the treatment of AGC, and the precise diagnosis and treatment pattern guided by molecular typing is gradually maturing. However, the treatment of AGC is still facing challenges. In the era of precision medicine, facing the higher heterogeneity of gastric cancer, the dilemma of precise treatment of drugs for AGC, and the research and development of new anti-tumor drugs, the optimal treatment mode of AGC still needs more clinical exploration. It is necessary to comprehensively consider various aspects such as the patient’s physical condition, previous treatment status, and drug accessibility.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effects of continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion chemotherapy (CHPPC) and intravenous chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer patients, and find better nursing methods. MethodsSixty advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy between June 2013 and June 2014 were divided into CHPPC group (group C, n=30) and intravenous chemotherapy group (group V, n=30). We recorded the nursing methods for both the two groups, patients' satisfaction to the nursing and treatment, peritoneal metastasis rate and quality of life during the chemotherapy. ResultsThe life quality in group V was lower than that in group C (P<0.05). The differences in patients' satisfaction rate, peritoneal metastasis rate, and one-year survival rate were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionFor patients with advanced gastric cancer requiring chemotherapy, in spite of higher cost and more complicated operations, CHPPC is superior in lower adverse events rate, better quality of life during chemotherapy and doesn't decrease patients' satisfaction to the nursing and treatment.