This paper is to discuss the research of heterogeneity in Meta-analysis, including the definition of the heterogeneity in Meta-analysis and classification it into clinical heterogeneity, methodological heterogeneity and statistical heterogeneity, the strategies for diminishing clinical heterogeneity and methodological heterogeneity, the five testing methods in statistical heterogeneity (Q statistic, I2 statistic, H statistic, Galbraith plot and L’Abbe plot) and the examples and applying conditions of the five testing methods, classification of meta-analysis into exploratory meta-analysis and analytic meta-analysis according if the meta-analysis has heterogeneity, and the strategies and the flowchart when existing the heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
ObjectiveTo systematically interpret the updated risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions version 2 (ROBINS-I V2) in 2024, summarizing its key improvements, operational procedures, and clinical application value. MethodsThrough literature review and case studies, the improvements of ROBINS-I V2 were compared with the 2016 version, including the expansion of bias domains, refinement of signaling questions, and optimization of decision flowcharts. A retrospective study in stomatology was used to demonstrate the practical application of the tool. ResultsThe ROBINS-I V2 tool has restructured the hierarchy and refined the definitions of bias domains, optimized the evaluation processes across seven risk-of-bias dimensions, and minimized subjective judgment errors through standardized decision flowcharts. ConclusionROBINS-I V2 significantly improves the rigor of bias assessment in non-randomized intervention studies through its scientific design and standardized workflow. It is recommended for evidence quality grading and decision-making support in clinical research.
目的 探討臨床護理差錯產生的原因及其預防措施，以提高護理質量。 方法 回顧性分析2011年7月－2012年6月臨床護理工作中發生的護理差錯案例，對其進行統計分析，并提出防范護理差錯的對策與措施。 結果 該期間醫院發生臨床護理差錯23例，其中醫囑執行不當或錯誤13例（占56.52%），違反操作常規4例（占17.39%），未嚴格執行查對制度3例（占13.04%）及業務技術水平不足3例（占13.04%），其發生的原因既有個人因素也有管理因素，個人因素主要為粗心大意、責任心不強、技術操作不當等；管理因素主要為護理人員數量不足、護理管理制度特別是對護理差錯的處理方式不夠科學及人文社會環境因素所致等。 結論 臨床護理差錯的發生是由多方面因素造成的，需采取相關對策綜合防制。
Objective To analyze the causes for day surgery cancellations before admission or on the same day of operation, and put forward targeted measures to improve the medical resource utilization and patient satisfaction. Methods The basic information and clinical data of patients who had been scheduled for surgery in the Day Surgery Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University between January 2018 and September 2021 were collected. The reasons for the surgery cancellations before admission or on the same day of operation were analyzed. Results From January 2018 to September 2021, a total of 45176 patients were successfully scheduled for day surgery, and 44300 patients completed surgery as planned. A total of 876 operations (1.94%) were cancelled after being scheduled, including 546 (1.21%) before admission and 330 (0.73%) on the surgery day. Ranked from high to low according to the cancellation rates, the top five departments were Department of Dermatology, Department of Vascular Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, and Department of Gastroenterology, with a cancellation rate of 3.38% (8/237), 2.90% (25/863), 2.85% (101/3548), 2.48% (171/6893), and 1.91% (260/13578), respectively. In the reasons for cancellations, patient factors accounted for 57.31% (502/876) and medical management factors accounted for 42.69% (374/876). Conclusions The cancellations of day surgery mainly occur before admission, and are mainly caused by patient factors. It is necessary to strengthen the preoperative education for day surgery patients, and enhance the communication and cooperation between surgery physicians, nurses and technicians, in order to reduce the operation cancellation rate and make reasonable and efficient use of medical resources.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of seven types of cognitive interventions for older adults with mild to moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD).MethodsWe searched The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM databases to collect randomized controlled trials on cognitive interventions for mild to moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD) from inception to January 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. STATA 14.0 software was then used to perform a meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 49 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The results of network meta-analysis revealed that each cognitive intervention had significantly improved the cognitive ability of AD patients. Specifically, nursing intervention (NI) (MD=3.01, 95%CI 1.70 to 4.50, P<0.005) was the most effective enhancer of cognitive ability, followed by music therapy (MT) (MD=2.60, 95%CI 0.96 to 4.30, P<0.001), physical exercise (PE) (MD=2.4, 95%CI 1.0 to 3.9, P<0.001), cognitive rehabilitation (CR) (MD=2.3, 95% CI 0.92 to 3.7, P=0.013), cognitive simulation (CS) (MD=1.7, 95%CI 1.2 to 2.3, P=0.037), computerized cognitive training (CCT) (MD=1.6, 95%CI 0.42 to 2.8, P<0.001), and pharmacological therapies (PT) (MD=1.5, 95%CI 0.24 to 2.8, P=0.041).ConclusionsThe seven types of cognitive interventions are helpful in improving the cognitive ability of Alzheimer's patients, and nursing intervention is the most effective cognitive intervention. Moreover, non-pharmacological therapies may be better than pharmacological therapies.
ObjectiveTo evaluate prehospital treatment strategies of rescuers and first-line hospitals for thoracic trauma victims after Lushan earthquake, and provide reference for making emergency response plans, staff training, and preparedness of material and human resources for future disasters. MethodsClinical data of 365 victims in Lushan '4.20' earthquake who received treatment in West China Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 63 victims had thoracic trauma, including 40 males (63.5%)and 23 females (36.5%)with their age of 49.08±19.10 years. There were 244 victims with orthopedic trauma, including 133 males (54.5%)and 111 females (45.4%)with their age of 41.59±22.74 years. Prehospital treatment methods (including specific treatment and general treatment)were compared between thoracic trauma victims and orthopedic trauma victims. ResultsAmong all the thoracic trauma victims, 51 victims required specific pre-hospital treatment, but only 10 (19.6%)victims actually received it. Among all the orthopedic trauma victims, 220 victims required specific prehospital treatment, but actually 162 (73.6%)victims received it. The percentages of thoracic and orthopedic victims who received specific prehospital treatment were statistically different (P < 0.01). There was no statistical difference in the percentage of victims who received general treatment between thoracic and orthopedic trauma victims (P > 0.05). ConclusionsThoracic trauma victims receive less specific prehospital treatment than orthopedic trauma victims from rescuers and first-line hospitals after Lushan earthquake. More specific prehospital treatment is needed for thoracic trauma victims in disaster rescue in the future.
Psychological problems are significant factors that contribute to the occurrence of postoperative complications, reduced quality of life, and prolonged hospital stays. Lung cancer patients who require surgery often experience high psychological stress related to both the disease and the treatment, making them more susceptible to depression and anxiety. Therefore, timely intervention to address these psychological issues is crucial for promoting postoperative recovery and improving patients' quality of life. This paper will review the current status, impact, and interventions for depression and anxiety-related psychological problems in lung cancer surgery patients.