• <table id="gigg0"></table>
  • west china medical publishers
    Keyword
    • Title
    • Author
    • Keyword
    • Abstract
    Advance search
    Advance search

    Search

    find Keyword "微型接骨板" 3 results
    • 微型接骨板橋式支撐固定治療骰骨壓縮骨折

      目的 總結應用微型接骨板橋式支撐固定治療骰骨壓縮骨折的臨床療效。 方法 2007 年7 月-2009 年11 月,采用指掌骨微型接骨板橋式支撐固定治療骰骨壓縮骨折15 例15 足。男13 例,女2 例;年齡22 ~ 48 歲,平均35 歲。致傷原因:扭傷3 例,交通事故傷2 例,高處墜落傷3 例,重物壓傷7 例。合并第4、5 跗跖關節脫位6 例。于傷后2 ~ 10 d,平均3.7 d 行手術切開復位內固定治療。 結果 術后切口均Ⅰ期愈合。X 線片檢查示骨折于術后8 ~ 12周愈合。15 例均獲隨訪,隨訪時間6 ~ 34 個月,平均19.2 個月。3 例術后8 ~ 12 周開始負重功能鍛煉,4 ~ 6 周后X 線片復查示螺釘于釘帽與釘體連接處斷裂,未作處理,于術后4.5 ~ 6.0 個月取出內固定。術后4 例持續步行后出現足背外側脹痛。術后4.5 ~ 6.0 個月取出內固定,內固定取出后4 ~ 6 周根據美國骨科協會足踝外科分會標準評價足功能,獲優11 例,良4 例,優良率100%。 結論 指掌骨微型接骨板橋式支撐固定在不進一步損傷關節面的同時既可恢復足外側柱長度,又可固定骨折及跗跖關節脫位,是治療骰骨壓縮骨折的良好方法之一。

      Release date:2016-09-01 09:03 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • 單純第一跖骨基底部閉合性粉碎骨折脫位的治療

      目的總結手術治療單純第1跖骨基底部閉合性粉碎骨折脫位的方法及療效。 方法2009年2月-2013年10月,采用切開復位微型接骨板跨關節橋式支撐內固定治療9例(9足)單純第1跖骨基底部閉合性粉碎骨折脫位。男7例,女2例;年齡22~65歲,平均38.5歲。致傷原因:高處墜落傷6例,扭傷3例。根據Myerson跗跖關節骨折脫位分型,均為B1型。其中3例骨折端骨質壓縮。受傷至手術時間2~4 d,平均2.7 d。 結果術后切口均Ⅰ期愈合。患者均獲隨訪,隨訪時間1年1個月~3年,平均1年8個月。骨折均愈合,愈合時間10~12周,平均10.8周。術后5例固定接骨板靠近關節側的螺釘斷裂,未作特殊處理;9例均于術后6個月~2年取出內固定物。末次隨訪時,按照美國矯形足踝協會(AOFAS)標準評分為80~95分,平均88.4分。 結論微型接骨板跨關節橋式支撐內固定具有手術操作簡便、固定牢固、減少關節面損傷、斷釘易取出等優點,是治療第1跖骨基底部閉合性粉碎骨折脫位理想方法之一。

      Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
    • TREATMENT OF DISPLACED RADIAL HEAD FRACTURES WITH INTERNAL FIXATION

      Objective?To analyse the procedure and effectiveness of internal fixation in treatment of displaced radial head fractures.?Methods?Between August 2005 and May 2009, 35 patients with displaced radial head fractures underwent open reduction and internal fixation with SmartNail? and/or AO mini-plates. There were 28 males and 7 females with an average age of 28.4 years (range, 17-48 years). The injury mechanism included traffic accident in 16 patients, falling in 13, and falling from height in 6. According to Mason classification, 21 fractures were rated as type II, 9 as type III, and 5 as type IV. All fracturs were closed fractures. Six cases complicated by radial neck fractures, 1 case by olecranon fracture, 3 by posterior dislocations of the elbow, 1 by posterior dislocation of the elbow and coronoid process fracture, and 3 by medial collateral ligament injuries. The time from injury to operation was 3 to 7 days.?Results?Except 1 patient whose incision healed by second intention, healing of incision by first intention was achieved in the other patients. All patients were followed up 12-25 months with an average of 17 months. The average fracture healing time was 10.2 weeks (range, 8-16 weeks). At last follow-up, the average flexion and extension of the elbow was 119° (range, 95-145°). The average arc of forearm rotation was 126° (range, 90-175°). According to elbow functional evaluation criteria by Broberg and Morrey, the results were excellent in 18 cases, good in 13, and fair in 4; the excellent and good rate was 88.6%.?Conclusion?In treatment of displaced radial head fractures, open reduction and internal fixation can be performed with SmartNail? and/or AO mini-plates based on different fracture types and the short-term effectiveness is satisfactory.

      Release date:2016-08-31 05:45 Export PDF Favorites Scan
    1 pages Previous 1 Next

    Format

    Content

  • <table id="gigg0"></table>
  • 松坂南