【Abstract】 Objective To compare the accuracy of color-doppler ultrasonography, mammography and near-infrared light scanning for diagnosing breast diseases. Methods The diagnostic accuracy of the above three imaging methods were analyzed and compared with each other on the basis of the postoperative pathological results. ResultsFive hundreds and sixty-five cases (breast cancer: 274 cases, benign diseases: 291 cases) were examined. The sensitivity of color-doppler ultrasonography, mammography and near-infrared light scanning for diagnosing breast cancer were 83.7%(200/239), 84.2%(64/76) and 76.9%(100/130), respectively. The specificity were 88.6%(226/255), 93.2%(69/74) and 82.6%(114/138), and the accuracy were 86.2%(426/494), 88.7%(133/150) and 79.9%(214/268), respectively. Color-doppler ultrasonography and mammography were superior to near-infrared light in the item of accuracy (P<0.05), especially for lesions of breast cancers that were less than 2 cm. The false negative rate of near-infrared light was higher (48.8%, 21/43)than those of the other methods in detecting breast cancer at early stage. The sensitivity for detecting intraductal papilloma and inflammation of breast using color-doppler ultrasonography were 58.8%(10/17) and 69.2%(18/26), respectively, which were higher than that of near-infrared light scanning 〔0 and 23.5%(4/17), P<0.05 and P<0.01〕. The sensitivity and the accuracy of near-infrared light without physical examination reduced significantly, in which the sensitivity reduced from 76.9%(100/130) to 56.9%(74/130), P<0.01, and the accuracy reduced from 79.9%(214/298) to 61.9%(166/268), P<0.01. Conclusion Color-doppler ultrasonography and mammography are accurate imaging methods for diagnosing breast diseases.
目的 分析彩色多普勒超聲對肝硬化患者門靜脈血流改變的評價作用。 方法 選擇2010年1月-2011年4月收治的50例肝硬化患者作為觀察組,其中代償期患者27例,失代償期患者23例;同時設置健康對照組50名,比較兩組的門靜脈內徑(Dpv)、門靜脈平均血流速度(Vpv)、門靜脈血流量(Qpv)。 結果 觀察組患者的Dpv增寬,Vpv減慢,Qpv減少,與對照組比較,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05);且失代償期患者的改變更為明顯,與代償期患者間差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。 結論 彩色多普勒超聲檢查門靜脈血流改變可以對肝硬化患者進行初步確診。
Objective To analyze features of color Doppler ultrasonography in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Method The ultrasound images of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (51 cases) and gastrointestinal cancers (59 cases) confirmed by operation and pathology were compared and analyzed. Results The gastric stromal tumor mainly occurred at the bottom of the stomach and the body of the stomach (17 cases), the intestinal stromal tumor mainly occurred at the small intestine (24 cases). The gastric cancer mainly occurred at the gastric antrum (18 cases), the intestinal cancer all occurred at the colon (20 cases) and rectum (12 cases). Compared with the gastrointestinal cancers, the gastrointestinal cavity was not surrounded by tumor, the peripheral boundary was clear, the morphology was more regular, the internal echo was uneven, and there was no peripheral lymph node metastasis in the gastrointestinal stromal tumors, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the degree of blood flow and tumor diameter between the gastrointestinal stromal tumors and the gastrointestinal cancers (P>0.05), but the blood flow of the intestinal stromal tumor was significantly more abundant as compared with the intestinal cancer (P<0.05). Conclusion Color Doppler ultrasonography, as a simple and rapid method, has a certain diagnostic value for differentiation of gastrointestinal stromal tumors and gastrointestinal cancers.