OBJECTIVE: To provide a new reconstructive method to treat refractory ulcers on the sole of the forefoot. METHODS: The reversed medial plantar flap with the medial plantar pedal artery and vein as pedicle was used to treat the refractory ulcers on the sole of the forefoot in 5 cases. The size of the flap was 3.5-5.0 cm x 4.0-5.5 cm. The deformities were corrected at the same time and the flaps were protected after operation. RESULTS: All flaps survived without complications. There was no recurrence after 6-month following-up. The patients could walk. CONCLUSION: The distal ends of medial plantar pedal artery and vein have plenty anastomoses with dorsal pedal artery and deep plantar arch. The reversed medial plantar flap has reliable blood supply by these anastomoses. The reversed medial plantar flap should be a choice in treating refractory ulcers on the sole of the forefoot.
Objective To investigate the operative procedure and the cl inical results of reverse lateral tarsal artery flap in treating forefoot skin and soft tissue defect. Methods From August 2007 to April 2009, 11 patients with forefoot skin and soft tissue defect were treated with reverse lateral tarsal artery flaps, including 7 males and 4 females aged from 16 to 60 years(36 years on average). Of 11 cases, defects were caused by crash in 5 cases, by grind contusion in 3 cases and the course disease was 4-12 hours; by tumor extended resection in 3 cases and the disease course was 3-12 months. There were 5 wounds on the dorsum of first metatarsophalangeal joint, 2 on the dorsum of the first toes, and 4 on the dorsum of distal part of metatarsal bones. The area of defect ranged from 4 cm × 2 cm to 6 cm × 5 cm. There were 6 cases of tendon exposure, 4 cases of tendon defect with bone exposure, and 1 case of tendon defect with open dislocation of metatarsophalangeal joint. The flap was designed with dorsal artery of foot as its pedicle. The plantar perforating branch was designed as its rotating point. And the flaps were transferred retrogradely to repair the forefoot wounds. The flap area ranged from 4.5 cm × 2.5 cm to 6.5 cm × 4.5 cm. The lateral dorsal nerve of foot was anastomosed with the nerve in wound area in 7 cases. Donor site was covered by full thickness skin graft. Results Partial necrosis occurred and was cured by dressing change, followed by skin graft in 2 cases. The flaps survived and primary heal ing was achieved in the other 9 cases. All the skin grafts of donor site survived and primary heal ing wasachieved after operation. All the patients were followed up for 6 months to 2 years, averaged 13 months. The texture and color of the flap were similar to skin at the recipient site. All patients returned to normal in walking and running and no ulceration occurred. The two point discrimination was 5-12 mm 6 months after operation in 7 patients who received nerve anastomosis, while only protective sensation recovered partly in the other 4 patients whose cutaneous nerve were not anastomosed. Conclusion Reverse lateral tarsal artery flap has the perfect shape and its blood vessel is constant. The blood pedicle is thick and long enough when transferred retrogradely. The flap is a good choice in the treatment of forefoot skin and soft tissue defect.
Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthroplasty versus arthrodesis for rheumatoid forefoot deformity. Methods The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the first MTP joint arthroplasty vs. arthrodesis for rheumatoid forefoot deformity published by February 2012 were searched in the databases such as CNKI, Ovid, MEDLINE, CBM, EMbase, WanFang Data, The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2012), and KJEBM. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and evaluated the methodological quality according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 4 RCTs were included. Among total 206 (269 feet) patients involved in, 98 (130 feet) were in the arthroplasty group, while the other 108 (139 feet) were in the arthrodesis group. The results of meta-analysis showed that the arthrodesis group was superior to the arthroplasty group in the footwear (MD=?0.88, 95%CI ?1.55 to ?0.22, P=0.01), and the alignment (MD=?5.04, 95%CI ?8.94 to ?1.14, Plt;0.000 01) with significant differences. But there were no significant differences between the two groups in patient satisfaction, metastatic lesions, pain, activity and weight-bearing of Hallux. Conclusion Based on the current studies, arthrodesis is superior to arthroplasty in treating rheumatoid forefoot deformity. For the quality restrictions and possible publication bias of the included studies, more double blind, high quality RCTs are required to further evaluate the effects.
Objective To evaluate the surgical treatment and effectiveness of rheumatoid forefoot reconstruction with arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint and arthroplasty of lesser metatarsal heads. Methods Between January 2007 and August 2009, 7 patients with rheumatoid forefoot were treated by reconstruction with arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint and arthroplasty of lesser metatarsal heads. They were all females with an average age of 62 years (range, 56-71 years) and with an average disease duration of 16 years (range, 5-30 years). All patients manifested hallux valgus, hammer toe or mallet toe of 2-5 toes, 5 feet complicated by subluxation of the second metatarsophalangeal joint. The improved American Orthopaedic Foot amp; Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 36.9 ± 6.4. The hallux valgus angle was (46 ± 5)°, and the intermetarsal angle was (12 ± 2)° by measuring the load bearing X-ray films preoperatively. Results All incisions healed by first intention after operation. The X-ray films showed bone fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint at 3-4 months after operation. Seven patients were followed up 2.9 years on average (range, 2-4 years), gait was improved and pain was rel ieved. The hallux valgus angle decreased to (17 ± 4)° and the intermetarsal angle was (11 ± 2)° at 3 months postoperatively, showing significant differences when compared with preoperative values (P lt; 0.05). The improved AOFAS score was 85.3 ± 5.1 at 2 years postoperatively, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative score (t=4.501, P=0.001). One patient had recurrent metatarsalgia at 4 years after operation. Conclusion Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint and arthroplasty of lesser metatarsal heads for rheumatoid forefoot reconstruction can correct hallux valgus, remodel the bearing surface of the forefoot, and rel ieve pain, so it can be considered as a procedure that provides improvement in the cl inical outcome.
The skin and soft tissue defects or ulceration of the wight-bearing part of the sole was difficult to repair with medial plantar island flap, but would be treated with retrograde island flap carrying plantar metatarsal arteries as pedicle. Ten flaps were applied in 9 patients. They had either indolent ulcer or skin defect secondary to excision of painful corn or callosities of the front part of the sole. The flaps were 3 cm to 5 cm long and 3 cm to 4 cm wide, and they all survived following retrograde transfer. The patients were followed up for 1 to 10 years. It was found that the patients could bear weight on the operated foot and could walk without pain or lameness. The flaps were resistant to abrasion from long-time walking. It was concluded that this kind of flap was best suitable to repair the ulcers and defects over the front part of the sole despite there were some minor shortcomings such as the size of the flaps available was small and the donor site required split skin graft for coverage.