ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of repairing or reconstructing defects of the forefoot. MethodsBetween February 2006 and February 2013, 57 patients with defects of the forefoot were treated. There were 41 males and 16 females with an average age of 38.9 years (range, 19-68 years). The disease causes included motor vehicles crush injury in 28 cases, crashing injury in 17 cases, and machine extrusion injury in 12 cases. The left side was involved in 25 cases and the right side in 32 cases, with a mean disease duration of 4.7 hours (range, 0.5-75.0 hours). Defect located at the 1st metatarsus in 9 cases, at the 5th metatarsus in 8 cases, at the 1st and the 2nd metatarsus in 16 cases, at the 4th and 5th metatarsus in 11 cases, at multiple metatarsus and the forefoot in 13 cases. The bone defect ranged from 2.5 cm×1.9 cm×1.4 cm to 13.3 cm×11.2 cm×2.7 cm. The soft tissue defect ranged from 12.4 cm×6.3 cm to 27.2 cm×18.7 cm. The iliac bone or vascularized iliac bone or vascularized fibula bone was used to rebuild the arch of the foot, and free flap was used to repair defects of the forefoot. The donor site was sutured directly or covered with skin graft. ResultsVenous crisis and partial necrosis occurred in 3 and 2 flaps respectively, which healed after symptomatic treatment. The other flaps and grafted skins survived, and wounds healed primarily. Fifty-one cases were followed up 1.5-2.5 years (mean, 2.1 years). The appearance was excellent and the feeling of the flap recovered at different levels. The two-point discrimination was 8.4-19.8 mm (mean, 13.7 mm) at 1.5 years after operation. According to upper extremity functional evaluation standard by hand surgery branch of Chinese Medical Association, sensation recovered to S2 in 6 cases, to S3 in 18 cases, and to S4 in 27 cases. The patients began to walk with weight loading at 2-6 months after operation (mean, 3.9 months). The bone healing time was 3-6 months (mean, 4.2 months). Based on American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) standards, the results were excellent in 19 cases, good in 24 cases, fair in 7 case, and poor in 1 case, and the excellent and good rate was 84.3%. ConclusionIt is a good solution to treat defects of the forefoot to use iliac bone or vascularized iliac bone or vascularized fibula bone for rebuilding the arch of the foot and use free flap for repairing defect.
Objective To investigate the operative procedures and cl inical outcomes of the modified superficial peroneal neuro-fasciocutaneous flap in repairing soft tissue defect of forefoot. Methods From May 2006 to May 2009, 5 male patients (aged 40-63 years) with soft tissue defect of forefoot were treated with the modified superficial peroneal eurofasciocutaneous flap. Tendons and bones were exposed in all cases. Defect was caused by object crash (4 cases) and traffic accident (1 case). The sizes of soft tissue defects of forefoot were 4 cm × 2 cm-8 cm × 4 cm. Rotating point of the modified superficial peroneal neuro-fasciocutaneous flap pedicled with the peripheral vessels network of ankle joint was at the level of tibiotalar joint. The flaps ranging from 5 cm × 4 cm to 10 cm × 6 cm were adopted to repair soft tissue defects of forefoot. The donor sites were either sutured directly or covered with intermediate spl it thickness skin grafts. Results All flaps survived and all wounds healed by first intention. Skin graft at donor site survived completely in all cases. All patients were followed up 6-18 months (mean 11 months). The appearance, texture, and function of the flap were satisfactory. There was a protective sensibil ity in all flaps without abrasion or ulceration, and the two-point discrimination of the flaps was 10-13 mm. The walking pattern was normal. No obvious discomfort was observed at the skin-graft donor sites. Conclusion With rel iable blood supply, no sacrifice of vascular trunks, favorable texture, and thickness, the modified superficial peroneal neuro-fasciocutaneous flap pedicled with the peripheral vessels network of ankle joint is useful to repair skin soft tissue defect of the forefoot.
Objective To compare the difference in forefoot width between minimally invasive extra-articular osteotomy via small incision and traditional Chevron osteotomy in the treatment of hallux valgus. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 45 patients with hallux valgus between April 2019 and July 2022. Among them, 22 cases underwent minimally invasive extra-articular osteotomy via small incision (minimally invasive group), and 23 cases underwent traditional Chevron osteotomy (traditional group). There was no significant difference in the baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05), including gender, age, affected side, Mann classification of hallux valgus, disease duration, and preoperative intermetatarsal angle (IMA), hallux valgus angle (HVA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), bony forefoot width, soft tissue forefoot width, osteophyte width, and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. The osteotomy healing time and the occurrence of complications in the two groups were recorded. The differences between pre- and post-operation (changes) in various imaging indicators and AOFAS scores in the two groups were calculated. And the bony forefoot width and soft tissue forefoot width at 1, 6, and 12 months after operation were also recorded and compared between the two groups. Results One case of skin injury occurred during operation in the minimally invasive group, while 3 cases of poor wound healing occurred after operation in the traditional group. None of the patients experienced infections, nerve injuries, or other complications. All patients were followed up 12-31 months (mean, 22.5 months). The osteotomy healed in the two groups and no significant difference in healing time between the two groups was found (P>0.05). The IMA, HVA, DMAA, osteophyte width, and AOFAS score at 12 months after operation significantly improved compared to those before operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the changes of IMA, HVA, and osteophyte width (P>0.05). However, the differences in the changes of AOFAS score and DMAA were significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in bony and soft tissue forefoot widths at different time points after operation (P>0.05). However, there were significant differences in the two groups between the pre- and post-operation (P<0.05). Conclusion The minimally invasive extra-articular osteotomy via small incision for hallux valgus, despite not removing the medial osteophyte of the first metatarsal, can still effectively improve the forefoot width and osteophyte width. While correcting the IMA and HVA, it can more effectively restore the DMAA, resulting in better AOFAS scores.
Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthroplasty versus arthrodesis for rheumatoid forefoot deformity. Methods The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the first MTP joint arthroplasty vs. arthrodesis for rheumatoid forefoot deformity published by February 2012 were searched in the databases such as CNKI, Ovid, MEDLINE, CBM, EMbase, WanFang Data, The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2012), and KJEBM. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and evaluated the methodological quality according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 4 RCTs were included. Among total 206 (269 feet) patients involved in, 98 (130 feet) were in the arthroplasty group, while the other 108 (139 feet) were in the arthrodesis group. The results of meta-analysis showed that the arthrodesis group was superior to the arthroplasty group in the footwear (MD=?0.88, 95%CI ?1.55 to ?0.22, P=0.01), and the alignment (MD=?5.04, 95%CI ?8.94 to ?1.14, Plt;0.000 01) with significant differences. But there were no significant differences between the two groups in patient satisfaction, metastatic lesions, pain, activity and weight-bearing of Hallux. Conclusion Based on the current studies, arthrodesis is superior to arthroplasty in treating rheumatoid forefoot deformity. For the quality restrictions and possible publication bias of the included studies, more double blind, high quality RCTs are required to further evaluate the effects.
The skin and soft tissue defects or ulceration of the wight-bearing part of the sole was difficult to repair with medial plantar island flap, but would be treated with retrograde island flap carrying plantar metatarsal arteries as pedicle. Ten flaps were applied in 9 patients. They had either indolent ulcer or skin defect secondary to excision of painful corn or callosities of the front part of the sole. The flaps were 3 cm to 5 cm long and 3 cm to 4 cm wide, and they all survived following retrograde transfer. The patients were followed up for 1 to 10 years. It was found that the patients could bear weight on the operated foot and could walk without pain or lameness. The flaps were resistant to abrasion from long-time walking. It was concluded that this kind of flap was best suitable to repair the ulcers and defects over the front part of the sole despite there were some minor shortcomings such as the size of the flaps available was small and the donor site required split skin graft for coverage.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a new reconstructive method to treat refractory ulcers on the sole of the forefoot. METHODS: The reversed medial plantar flap with the medial plantar pedal artery and vein as pedicle was used to treat the refractory ulcers on the sole of the forefoot in 5 cases. The size of the flap was 3.5-5.0 cm x 4.0-5.5 cm. The deformities were corrected at the same time and the flaps were protected after operation. RESULTS: All flaps survived without complications. There was no recurrence after 6-month following-up. The patients could walk. CONCLUSION: The distal ends of medial plantar pedal artery and vein have plenty anastomoses with dorsal pedal artery and deep plantar arch. The reversed medial plantar flap has reliable blood supply by these anastomoses. The reversed medial plantar flap should be a choice in treating refractory ulcers on the sole of the forefoot.